Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Unlimited bandwidth VPSes? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Unlimited bandwidth VPSes?

2»

Comments

  • @rm_ said:
    and I find it funny how you all try to pretend it doesn't exist.

    OVH offer:

    1. Under $3 a month - more than $3

    2. At least 100 Mbits - ~ matching

    3. At least 30 TB of usable bandwidth (100 Mbits) - cannot do 30TB with this VPS

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    qhoster said: OVH offer:

    more than $3

    cannot do 30TB with this VPS

    So your point is that it's ~3.3 USD, not 3 USD, and that you can't do 30 TB, but maybe can do 25-28 TB; and those highly important details make the OP's request totally unrealistic. Mkay.

    Traffic said: Your telepathy skills never cease to amaze me.

    Yeah I see no other explanation how otherwise for example some "pnshostings" thinks he can peddle his 512 MB of RAM OpenVZ crap for $6.80 here. Or those other sarcastic comments which try to present the OP as some kind of an insane person asking for the moon from the sky.

    Thanked by 14n0nx
  • To make 30TB (if you really need it) you need 150 200MBit port. We are using OVH servers and we know their abilities.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    qhoster said: To make 30TB (if you really need it) you need 150 200MBit port. We are using OVH servers and we know their abilities.

    Such knowledge, wow. Very "qhoster", much competent.

     eth0                                                                     18:56 
      ^      t                                                                      
      |  rt rt rt rt  t     t          rt rt     t                                  
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt  t rt rt rt rt rt rt                               
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    rt rt rt  t  t  t          
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt       
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    
      |  rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt    
     -+---------------------------------------------------------------------------> 
      |  19 20 21 22 23 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18    
                                                                                    
     h  rx (KiB)   tx (KiB)      h  rx (KiB)   tx (KiB)      h  rx (KiB)   tx (KiB) 
    19   44162939   45445628    03   36390967   37408894    11   35879017   36509051
    20   44459356   46355161    04   39713265   40789967    12   34017302   34753575
    21   42253587   43623839    05   44291068   45804783    13   34697728   35425437
    22   41906174   43008963    06   41785693   42939874    14   31776279   32465600
    23   41166788   42240150    07   38609205   39747052    15   31930716   32701121
    00   40283205   41274270    08   41204618   42262046    16   32096975   32837972
    01   41439339   42387322    09   37829359   38575097    17   30537840   31325290
    02   37633180   38687385    10   30410733   31148020    18   26208155   26930389
    
    Months:
        ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
          Aug '15     26.12 TiB |   27.04 TiB |   53.16 TiB |  177.41 Mbit/s
          Jul '15      7.02 TiB |    7.42 TiB |   14.45 TiB |   46.33 Mbit/s
        ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
    
    Days:
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
          08/30/15    654.92 GiB |  671.36 GiB |    1.30 TiB |  163.23 Mbit/s
          08/29/15    975.44 GiB |    0.98 TiB |    1.93 TiB |  192.20 Mbit/s
          08/28/15    985.94 GiB |    1.00 TiB |    1.96 TiB |  195.24 Mbit/s
          08/27/15    973.02 GiB |    0.99 TiB |    1.94 TiB |  192.85 Mbit/s
          08/26/15    984.06 GiB |    1.00 TiB |    1.96 TiB |  195.12 Mbit/s
          08/25/15    971.85 GiB |    0.98 TiB |    1.93 TiB |  192.14 Mbit/s
          08/24/15      0.98 TiB |    1.03 TiB |    2.01 TiB |  200.27 Mbit/s
          08/23/15    999.30 GiB |    1.01 TiB |    1.99 TiB |  197.53 Mbit/s
          08/22/15    982.52 GiB |    0.99 TiB |    1.95 TiB |  194.17 Mbit/s
          08/21/15      0.99 TiB |    1.04 TiB |    2.03 TiB |  201.58 Mbit/s
          08/20/15      0.99 TiB |    1.04 TiB |    2.02 TiB |  201.09 Mbit/s
          08/19/15    979.19 GiB |    1.00 TiB |    1.96 TiB |  194.45 Mbit/s
          08/18/15    984.96 GiB |    1.00 TiB |    1.96 TiB |  194.96 Mbit/s
          08/17/15    981.01 GiB |    0.99 TiB |    1.95 TiB |  194.04 Mbit/s
          08/16/15    970.47 GiB |    0.98 TiB |    1.93 TiB |  191.68 Mbit/s
          08/15/15    941.91 GiB |  980.24 GiB |    1.88 TiB |  186.62 Mbit/s
          08/14/15    936.68 GiB |  973.25 GiB |    1.87 TiB |  185.44 Mbit/s
          08/13/15    837.49 GiB |  867.14 GiB |    1.66 TiB |  165.50 Mbit/s
          08/12/15    737.96 GiB |  755.38 GiB |    1.46 TiB |  144.99 Mbit/s
          08/11/15    720.84 GiB |  738.77 GiB |    1.43 TiB |  141.71 Mbit/s
          08/10/15    765.08 GiB |  783.65 GiB |    1.51 TiB |  150.37 Mbit/s
          08/09/15    757.45 GiB |  773.93 GiB |    1.50 TiB |  148.68 Mbit/s
          08/08/15    753.39 GiB |  769.76 GiB |    1.49 TiB |  147.88 Mbit/s
          08/07/15    793.42 GiB |  811.04 GiB |    1.57 TiB |  155.78 Mbit/s
          08/06/15    736.94 GiB |  755.50 GiB |    1.46 TiB |  144.90 Mbit/s
          08/05/15    618.37 GiB |  634.27 GiB |    1.22 TiB |  121.62 Mbit/s
          08/04/15    811.35 GiB |  838.63 GiB |    1.61 TiB |  160.20 Mbit/s
          08/03/15    979.02 GiB |    1.00 TiB |    1.95 TiB |  194.23 Mbit/s
          08/02/15    961.33 GiB |  996.77 GiB |    1.91 TiB |  190.11 Mbit/s
          08/01/15    916.56 GiB |  945.40 GiB |    1.82 TiB |  180.78 Mbit/s
         ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------

    From a VPS-SSD I had back in August.

  • @rm_ wow I did not think one could get so close to full 100/100 24/7 usage

    awesome o.O

  • @rm_ said:
    From a VPS-SSD I had back in August.

    The OVH service is saying 100Mbit cap you post 200.27 Mbit/s

    So again to use 27TB you need 150Mbit+ :)

  • qhoster said: The OVH service is saying 100Mbit cap you post 200.27 Mbit/s

    So again to use 27TB you need 150Mbit+ :)

    Because it is 100 mbit/s duplex, as in upload + download. 100 mbit/s over a month (not duplex) are ~30TB, 100 mbit/s duplex are 60TB over a month.

    Thanked by 1rm_
  • May be this is some torrent service to utilize the 100Mbit 50/50 100% of the time ...

  • qhoster said: May be this is some torrent service to utilize the 100Mbit 50/50 100% of the time ...

    Or any sort of [reverse] proxy/vpn/relay (Tor..)

  • Fliphost had something like that.

  • It is great there is an OVH to provide such a cheap service. For the rest of the providers including the cheap Hetzner the traffic/price rates are not even close.

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member
    edited September 2015

    qhoster said: cannot do 30TB with this VPS

    4n0nx said: @rm_ wow I did not think one could get so close to full 100/100 24/7 usage

    You can use 100mbit both ways at the same time!

    All with 0.36 load and Tor

    Thanked by 34n0nx rm_ berkay
  • linuxthefish said: All with 0.36 load and Tor

    All that was just Tor?

  • Traffic said: All that was just Tor?

  • Seems OVH released the speeds as now you can reach 1GBit from the dedicated servers:

    [root@ovzhost20 ~]# wget http://lg-fr.qhoster.com/100MB.test
    --2015-09-25 23:33:30-- http://lg-fr.qhoster.com/100MB.test
    Resolving lg-fr.qhoster.com... 178.32.160.70
    Connecting to lg-fr.qhoster.com|178.32.160.70|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: “100MB.test”

    100%[==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 100,000,000 103M/s in 0.9s

    2015-09-25 23:33:31 (103 MB/s) - “100MB.test” saved [100000000/100000000]

    [root@ovzhost20 ~]#

  • qhoster said: Seems OVH released the speeds as now you can reach 1GBit from the dedicated servers:

    this has always been the case, it's the upload that is capped

  • rm_ said: So your point is that it's ~3.3 USD, not 3 USD, and that you can't do 30 TB, but maybe can do 25-28 TB; and those highly important details make the OP's request totally unrealistic. Mkay.

    Yes, but, (1) while 30c USD is not much in absolute terms, it is a full 10% higher than OPs budget. And (2) it's not like there are a plethora of providers that can match online.net to make up OP's desired "list".

  • @TarZZ92 said:

    No the test is download from our OVH FR looking glass. In terms : upload.

  • singsing said: Yes, but, (1) while 30c USD is not much in absolute terms, it is a full 10% higher than OPs budget. And (2) it's not like there are a plethora of providers that can match online.net to make up OP's desired "list".

    OP wanted $3 for 30TB. OVH gives 60TB for 3€. I would prefer the latter...

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited September 2015

    4n0nx said: OP wanted $3 for 30TB. OVH gives 60TB for 3€. I would prefer the latter...

    The way the OP has put it:

    NumaPlay said: At least 30 TB of usable bandwidth (100 Mbits)

    I really think they just meant a normal 100 Mbit full duplex connection, and mentioned 30 TB just for clarity (the amount you can transfer in one direction, e.g. upload), i.e. the VPS-SSD won't be "2x better" but just matching what they asked.

    Thanked by 14n0nx
  • WilliamWilliam Member
    edited September 2015

    qhoster said: No the test is download from our OVH FR looking glass. In terms : upload.

    Internal and traffic over selected internet exchanges (French peers + DECIX and AMSIX) always was full Gbit if currently not saturated by higher level customers (happens nearly never).

  • qhoster said: No the test is download from our OVH FR looking glass. In terms : upload.

    but you are doing an internal test (one ovh server to another) ?

  • TarZZ92 said: but you are doing an internal test (one ovh server to another) ?

    At 106MB/s and TCP the distance cannot be higher than a few to 10-15 ms - Test is likely France, but at least EU.

  • qhosterqhoster Member
    edited September 2015

    No the test was from NL, and ping seems under 10ms yes:

    [root@ovzhost20 ~]# ping lg-fr.qhoster.com
    PING lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=7.21 ms
    64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=7.22 ms
    64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=7.31 ms
    64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=7.20 ms

  • You need to contact the hoster directly, it all depends on the bandwidth overages.

  • ddosprotection said: You need to contact the hoster directly, it all depends on the bandwidth overages.

    Yeah.. even if they write "unlimited everything for anything you want", once you contact them and say "ok but can I run Tor(rent) and use 60/120/600TB a month?" they say no. -.-

    So... is there anything equally cheap to online.net and OVH? (where you can actually use the bandwidth 24/7 to the fullest extent for anything you want, not just advertised and excluding a lot of applications)

Sign In or Register to comment.