New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
OVH offer:
Under $3 a month - more than $3
At least 100 Mbits - ~ matching
At least 30 TB of usable bandwidth (100 Mbits) - cannot do 30TB with this VPS
So your point is that it's ~3.3 USD, not 3 USD, and that you can't do 30 TB, but maybe can do 25-28 TB; and those highly important details make the OP's request totally unrealistic. Mkay.
Yeah I see no other explanation how otherwise for example some "pnshostings" thinks he can peddle his 512 MB of RAM OpenVZ crap for $6.80 here. Or those other sarcastic comments which try to present the OP as some kind of an insane person asking for the moon from the sky.
To make 30TB (if you really need it) you need 150 200MBit port. We are using OVH servers and we know their abilities.
Such knowledge, wow. Very "qhoster", much competent.
From a VPS-SSD I had back in August.
@rm_ wow I did not think one could get so close to full 100/100 24/7 usage
awesome o.O
The OVH service is saying 100Mbit cap you post 200.27 Mbit/s
So again to use 27TB you need 150Mbit+
Because it is 100 mbit/s duplex, as in upload + download. 100 mbit/s over a month (not duplex) are ~30TB, 100 mbit/s duplex are 60TB over a month.
May be this is some torrent service to utilize the 100Mbit 50/50 100% of the time ...
Or any sort of [reverse] proxy/vpn/relay (Tor..)
Fliphost had something like that.
It is great there is an OVH to provide such a cheap service. For the rest of the providers including the cheap Hetzner the traffic/price rates are not even close.
You can use 100mbit both ways at the same time!
All with 0.36 load and Tor
All that was just Tor?
Seems OVH released the speeds as now you can reach 1GBit from the dedicated servers:
[root@ovzhost20 ~]# wget http://lg-fr.qhoster.com/100MB.test
--2015-09-25 23:33:30-- http://lg-fr.qhoster.com/100MB.test
Resolving lg-fr.qhoster.com... 178.32.160.70
Connecting to lg-fr.qhoster.com|178.32.160.70|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100MB.test”
100%[==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 100,000,000 103M/s in 0.9s
2015-09-25 23:33:31 (103 MB/s) - “100MB.test” saved [100000000/100000000]
[root@ovzhost20 ~]#
this has always been the case, it's the upload that is capped
Yes, but, (1) while 30c USD is not much in absolute terms, it is a full 10% higher than OPs budget. And (2) it's not like there are a plethora of providers that can match online.net to make up OP's desired "list".
No the test is download from our OVH FR looking glass. In terms : upload.
OP wanted $3 for 30TB. OVH gives 60TB for 3€. I would prefer the latter...
The way the OP has put it:
I really think they just meant a normal 100 Mbit full duplex connection, and mentioned 30 TB just for clarity (the amount you can transfer in one direction, e.g. upload), i.e. the VPS-SSD won't be "2x better" but just matching what they asked.
Internal and traffic over selected internet exchanges (French peers + DECIX and AMSIX) always was full Gbit if currently not saturated by higher level customers (happens nearly never).
but you are doing an internal test (one ovh server to another) ?
At 106MB/s and TCP the distance cannot be higher than a few to 10-15 ms - Test is likely France, but at least EU.
No the test was from NL, and ping seems under 10ms yes:
[root@ovzhost20 ~]# ping lg-fr.qhoster.com
PING lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=7.21 ms
64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=7.22 ms
64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=7.31 ms
64 bytes from lg-fr.qhoster.com (178.32.160.70): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=7.20 ms
You need to contact the hoster directly, it all depends on the bandwidth overages.
Yeah.. even if they write "unlimited everything for anything you want", once you contact them and say "ok but can I run Tor(rent) and use 60/120/600TB a month?" they say no. -.-
So... is there anything equally cheap to online.net and OVH? (where you can actually use the bandwidth 24/7 to the fullest extent for anything you want, not just advertised and excluding a lot of applications)