New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
CloudShards 1GB SSD Cached 45GB 600GB OpenVZ Benchmark
ErawanArifNugroho
Member
It seems a while after I submitted my last benchmark. This time, let's test our new provider, CloudShards
OpenVZ 1024MB 2 CPU 1024MB RAM / 1024MB VSwap 45GB RAID10 HDD 600GB Bandwidth @ 1gigabit 1 IPv4
CPU Info
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.292 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 7000.58 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.292 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 7000.58 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
Memory Info
# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 1048576 kB MemFree: 1025752 kB Cached: 13040 kB Active: 18480 kB Inactive: 668 kB Active(anon): 5796 kB Inactive(anon): 312 kB Active(file): 12684 kB Inactive(file): 356 kB Unevictable: 0 kB Mlocked: 0 kB SwapTotal: 1048576 kB SwapFree: 1048576 kB Dirty: 0 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 6108 kB Shmem: 2624 kB Slab: 3636 kB SReclaimable: 1472 kB SUnreclaim: 2164 kB
Freevps.sh
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3500.292 MHz Total amount of ram : 1024 MB Total amount of swap : 1024 MB System uptime : 21:46, Download speed from CacheFly: 24.9MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 10.4MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 7.39MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.34MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 9.31MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.83MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 10.7MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 14.8MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 58.1MB/s I/O speed : 554 MB/s
Download test
# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin --2012-11-08 03:46:16-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.bin' 100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 19.6M/s in 5.2s 2012-11-08 03:46:21 (19.3 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]
Comments
Inodes
Disk Space
DD Test
IOPING
traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net
traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 198.12.80.130 (198.12.80.130) 0.025 ms 0.007 ms 0.006 ms
2 198.12.69.73 (198.12.69.73) 0.469 ms 0.859 ms 1.142 ms
3 buf-b1-link.telia.net (213.248.96.41) 0.164 ms 0.220 ms 0.215 ms
4 nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.246.37) 9.474 ms 9.478 ms 9.472 ms
5 nyk-b5-link.telia.net (213.155.135.19) 37.660 ms 37.670 ms 37.663 ms
6 globalcrossing-ic-126892-nyk-b5.c.telia.net (213.248.94.82) 9.094 ms 15.450 ms 15.554 ms
7 xe-3-0-4.ar1.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.229) 14.904 ms 13.782 ms 13.778 ms
8 vlan-75.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.129) 11.991 ms 12.002 ms 13.123 ms
9 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 10.312 ms 10.064 ms 10.296 ms
Ping test to Cachefly
For some reason, I can't get the benchmark results in the Serverbear website, so I just post it here :
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/11/08/DbdRzibgIxOUOzf7
Unixbench
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/sb-bench/UnixBench-5.1.3' locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory sh: 3dinfo: command not found # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Process Creation 1 2 3 2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: ny: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab062.2 -- #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 18:28:35 MSK 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 04:04:42 up 22:07, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Nov 08 2012 04:04:42 - 04:32:47 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23710618.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3470.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5924.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 793107.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 208972.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2251979.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1211855.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 214447.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 18912.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9932.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1440.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 919249.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23710618.7 2031.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3470.5 631.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 5924.0 1377.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 793107.3 2002.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 208972.1 1262.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2251979.5 3882.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1211855.0 974.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 214447.8 536.1 Process Creation 126.0 18912.8 1501.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9932.8 2342.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1440.6 2401.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 919249.3 612.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1378.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Nov 08 2012 04:32:47 - 05:00:53 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47370225.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6940.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 12525.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1408328.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 365204.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3925095.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2417173.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 300675.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 32906.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13716.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1355.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1751756.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47370225.4 4059.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6940.3 1261.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 12525.2 2912.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1408328.1 3556.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 365204.3 2206.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3925095.8 6767.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2417173.9 1943.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 300675.1 751.7 Process Creation 126.0 32906.3 2611.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13716.5 3235.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1355.5 2259.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1751756.0 1167.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2331.5http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/11/08/DbdRzibgIxOUOzf7
Looking pretty nice, how full is this node @concerto49?
Also when you say you can't get the results is something broken?
About 1/2 full. We weren't planning to submit these to ServerBear though. These are a bit lower spec specials. Our official plans have higher IO than this, especially random IO. We'd like to submit that.
@ErawanArifNugroho
Thanks for the great review! It's these plans here: http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/5609/openvz-256mb-3.25mo-512mb-5.75mo-ny-cloud-shards
Maybe we aren't listed? I did send an email in regards to it
Edit:
If anyone's interested, our upcoming Texas nodes look like (where we run our shared hosting right now):
Download speed from CacheFly: 94.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 13.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 95.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.67MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 10.1MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 10.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.79MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.66MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 27.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.4MB/s
@serverbear I can get the benchmark.txt but can't view the online page in the website
I like red borders.
@SimpleNode
Aye that's a bug, will be fixed in a few hours. Sorry about that.
The benchmark is fixed now @ErawanArifNugroho
[email protected]
@concerto49 Incero?
This benchmark was from Colocrossing, Buffalo. As to the download results of Texas, no - @ Internap. We've got A+B redundant power supplies + network there. 100% network + 100% power on the servers.
Feel free to compare it to Incero
- it's in a different building too.
Sounds like ionity
Seems very similar