Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


OS choices for decicated servers? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

OS choices for decicated servers?

2»

Comments

  • I'd rather just connect a spider KVM for those who want to manually install something exotic and be done with it :) Hopefully you don't need to reinstall a freebsd server too often.

  • jaakkajaakka Member
    edited November 2012

    FreeBSD once setup, mostly just runs.
    I have succeeded to build a lower memory footprint than with any *nix derivates and is pretty much bulletproof.

    I awarded a 50 000$ bonus to anyone thatll break it. No luck so far.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    So you are going to offer some dedicated servers? :P

  • @jaakka said: I awarded a 50 000$ bonus to anyone thatll break it. No luck so far.

    Does hitting it with unlimited amounts of UDP traffic count as breaking it? :p

  • @rds100 said: maybe

    @rds100 Better the kimsufi prices? :p

  • @Taylor better, yes. As in higher. The OVH prices are just funny :)

  • pubcrawlerpubcrawler Banned
    edited November 2012

    Wish someone would offer low-low end dedicated servers. I would gladly take an ARM based board with a SATA connected drive :)

    Nice thread suddenly with a bunch of us declaring our ages to be nearly middle ages :)

  • @rds100 You shouldn't even consider CentOS 5 as a possible choice, it's just to old. It's like installing a 5 year old entertainment system in a brand new car.

  • jaakkajaakka Member
    edited November 2012

    @jaakka said: I awarded a 50 000$ bonus to anyone thatll break it. No luck so far.

    Does hitting it with unlimited amounts of UDP traffic count as breaking it? :p

    No, you would have to have some proof from the filesystem.

  • @marcm said: @rds100 You shouldn't even consider CentOS 5 as a possible choice, it's just to old. It's like installing a 5 year old entertainment system in a brand new car.

    They claim it will be supported until Mar 31st, 2017, and some software (like cPanel) still recommends it i think?

  • @jaakka i will find someone who will break it for 50k :) He will even bring it to me, home for that price :) Just tell me the IP ;-)

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    CentOS5 is a must and I am pretty srue it will be supported for the following couple of years as well. I am still using it in my older nodes as well.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited November 2012

    @jaakka said: @jaakka said: I awarded a 50 000$ bonus to anyone thatll break it. No luck so far.

    Does hitting it with unlimited amounts of UDP traffic count as breaking it? :p

    No, you would have to have some proof from the filesystem.

    Got no idea what you are talking about, cause I am too lazy to scroll up. However for 50k I will go to the datacenter with a shotgun :)

    Damn, thought you wanted to hack someone, my mistake ;d

  • Pretty good starting list. I have Ubuntu on mine.

  • @rds100 said: They claim it will be supported until Mar 31st, 2017, and some software (like cPanel) still recommends it i think?

    It's true what you are saying in regards to support, but from my discussions with various folks from cPanel as well as fellow providers everyone recommends that you use CentOS 6. The thing is that it runs on an ancient Linux kernel and comes with ancient tools an libraries. Manually upgrading those is a bad idea. Your performance will also suffer if you use CentOS 5 on modern hardware. Of course, if you really want to use it over CentOS 6 then go ahead :)

  • @Alex_LiquidHost said: CentOS5 is a must and I am pretty srue it will be supported for the following couple of years as well. I am still using it in my older nodes as well.

    Why is CentOS 5 a must?

  • Im sure some of you would. Its a cluster for OC.

    http://www.olympic-casino.ee/about_the_company/too_olympic_casinos_en

    apply for a job then

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    @marcm said: Why is CentOS 5 a must?

    Cause there are people still looking for it ;)

  • @Alex_LiquidHost said: Cause there are people still looking for it ;)

    We provide templates for Xen and KVM with CentOS 5 as well, but I wouldn't ever deploy it on a dedicated server or virtualization node. Of course that's my personal preference and I was just making a recommendation to @rds100.

  • rds100rds100 Member
    edited November 2012

    I am too divided about CentOS 5, but it's because it doesn't support the discard mount option, so can't pass TRIM to a SSD. Which would be bad. Still i think it is quite popular among some people. We will see.

    Oh, by the way debian 6 doesn't support it either, unless you install a kernel from backports

  • @rds100 You can always get kernel 3.0 for CentOS 5 from El Repo if you really want CentOS 5, but soon you will find yourself upgrading this and that and hacking away.

  • I'll more likely use CentOS 6 or Ubuntu 12.04 in your list, but oh yes, I use ArchLinux on some of my LEBes.

  • I think it's InceptionHosting that is currently offering Debian 7, which was excellent for testing some sortware cofigurations. I'm not sure how useful it'll be on a dedicated server that you probably don't want to be reinstalling.

    Just something to think about.

  • Ubuntu 12.10

  • slackware and zenwalk :D

Sign In or Register to comment.