Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Interest for virtual servers with 10Gbps bandwidth in Sweden?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Interest for virtual servers with 10Gbps bandwidth in Sweden?

deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
edited May 2015 in General

Hi,

Would there be any interest for virtual servers in Sweden with up to 10Gbps burst bandwidth (can use such speeds for a short period of time)?

By default, virtual machines will include 1-2TB bandwidth (in/out) depending on configuration. HDD/SSD disk IO will be limiting factor for downloading files but for uploads, there should be no issues.

Price may not be within LEB due to nature of the speed :)
Transit carries are RETN and Tele2.

Obviously, you will need to keep within your data transfer limit and not use it constantly. I will not be allowing seedboxes or torrents right now.

Looking glass: http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/


Speedtest file: http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test

http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test




IPv4 and IPv6 supported and hosted on virtual machine with 10Gbps. Do not abuse please or we will be forced to rate limit.



Please do speedtests and post results :)

Regards,

Port speed
  1. Would you be interested?28 votes
    1. Yes
      32.14%
    2. No
      17.86%
    3. There is no point in offering 10Gbps shared for virtual machines!
      50.00%

Comments

  • ItsChrisGItsChrisG Member
    edited May 2015

    Speedtest maxes out at 11MB/s for me... are you sure its on 10G port?

    You also need to provide a much bigger test file for 10G testing - 1G minimum.

  • Did a few tests, not including everything on here, as i'm currently on my phone.

    1Gbit in NL -> testfile = 29.2M/s
    1Gbit in NL -> EDIS SE = 35.8M/s
    1Gbit in NL -> HostHatch SE = 28.4M/s
    
    10Gbit in Seattle -> testfile = 3.82M/s
    10Gbit in Seattle -> EDIS SE = 8.20M/s
    10Gbit in Seattle -> HostHatch SE = 7.92M/s
    
    1Gbit in NY -> testfile =11.6M/s
    1Gbit in NY -> EDIS SE = 16.2M/s
    1Gbit in NY -> Hosthatch SE = 19.9M/s
    

    As far as i know Edis and Hosthatch are on 1Gbit.

    With the substantial differences on here, between a 10Gbit port, and 1Gbit port. I honestly am hoping that the bandwidth in Sweden at the least is a lot better.

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep

    @ItsChrisG said:
    Speedtest maxes out at 11MB/s for me... are you sure its on 10G port?

    You also need to provide a much bigger test file for 10G testing - 1G minimum.

    Hi.

    Testing from Estonia (Elion) produces over 200Mbps.


    It is on 10G port. I will prepare 1G test file shortly.

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2015

    @AutoSnipe said:

    EDIS/Hosthatch are using Portlane, and we are on a different network in Sweden. (mix of Tele2/RETN).

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2015

    @ItsChrisG said:

    We have 10G port.
    From hypervisor:

  • I'm completely aware of this, but seems that it cannot get over ~200mbit.
    Therefore i'm saying that i hope that it is better in Sweden then it is outside of sweden.

    Although if you have a look at the link below, which is what you provided as a test file for this provider earlier this month, you can see a massive difference.

    image

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran
    edited May 2015

    Price may not be within LEB due to nature of the speed :)

    I wouldn't pay extra if I only have 1-2TB to burn in a virtual machine, since then the 10 gbps aren't really useful.

    Bursting to high speeds can be useful in some cases, but I can't think of many in a shared environment where I can't abuse the I/O and even PPS could be a problem.

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • pr0n

  • J1021J1021 Member

    I see very little use for servers connected at 10Gb/s with xTB transfer quotas.

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • ahmiqahmiq Member

    1) From Online.net (France)

    root@fr:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    --2015-05-23 16:04:20--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)... 2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16, 46.227.67.243
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16|:80... failed: Permission denied.
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 100000000 (95M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[======================================>] 100,000,000 12.1M/s   in 8.5s
    
    2015-05-23 16:04:29 (11.2 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [100000000/100000000]
    

    2) RamNode NL

    root@nl:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    --2015-05-23 10:04:12--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)... 46.227.67.243, 2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 100000000 (95M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[======================================>] 100,000,000 21.2M/s   in 4.8s
    
    2015-05-23 10:04:17 (20.0 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [100000000/100000000]
    

    3) CatalystHost , Dallas US

    root@us:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    --2015-05-23 10:06:01--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)... 2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16, 46.227.67.243
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16|:80... failed: Permission denied.
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 100000000 (95M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[======================================>] 100,000,000 13.5M/s   in 9.0s
    
    2015-05-23 10:06:11 (10.6 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [100000000/100000000]
    
    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • FlamesRunnerFlamesRunner Member
    edited May 2015

    Doesn't 10G mean if someone bothered to DDOS/DOS any VPS on the node at a rate of perhaps 20GBPS and 40mpps, the network and bandwidth for the node would clog?
    What would happen to your 10G port?
    Anyways, if you're offering speeds this high, chances are someone will use the VPS to send attacks - the more bandwidth, the more power.

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    # wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test -6
    --2015-05-23 17:24:13--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)... 2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16|:80... failed: Permission denied.
    Retrying.
    
    --2015-05-23 17:24:14--  (try: 2)  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/100MB.test
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16|:80... failed: Permission denied.
    Retrying.
    
    ^C

    @deployvm gj on the IPv6 "deployment" there.

  • fitvpnfitvpn Member

    1Gbps enough,10Gbps useless, cannot get more than 1Gbps/100Mbps in reality.
    Only if inside Sweden

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2015

    @rm_ said:

    I've fixed the IPv6 issue. It was due to IPTables. NIC driver also adjusted to VirtIO instead of Intel.

    `[root@test ~]#  wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.tele2.net/100MB.zip
    --2015-05-23 21:42:26--  http://speedtest.tele2.net/100MB.zip
    Resolving speedtest.tele2.net... 2a00:800:1010::1, 90.130.70.73
    Connecting to speedtest.tele2.net|2a00:800:1010::1|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/zip]
    Saving to: â/dev/nullâ
    
    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600  237M/s   in 0.4s
    

    Thanks for your input and tests everyone!

    1GB file added: http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test

  • 4n0nx4n0nx Member

    Don't understand how you expect us to run a 10 gbit/s test (1250 MByte/s) with a 100MByte file.

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep

    @4n0nx said:
    Don't understand how you expect us to run a 10 gbit/s test (1250 MByte/s) with a 100MByte file.

    True.

    Please find the 1GB test file.

    http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test

    Thanked by 14n0nx
  • Sweden Gigabit, Portlane:
    
    root@sweden:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test
    --2015-05-23 22:27:48--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com... 46.227.67.243, 2a03:8600:0:122:1:0:2b40:bf16
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 1073741824 (1.0G) [text/plain]
    Saving to: â/dev/nullâ
    
    100%[==========================>] 1,073,741,824 74.4M/s   in 14s
    
    2015-05-23 22:28:02 (74.1 MB/s) - â/dev/nullâ saved [1073741824/1073741824]
    
    root@sweden:~# traceroute 46.227.67.243
    traceroute to 46.227.67.243 (46.227.67.243), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  1-210-73-178.static.edis.at (178.73.210.1)  187.447 ms  187.416 ms  187.597 ms
     2  te-8-4.sto5.se.portlane.net (80.67.4.176)  0.642 ms  0.643 ms  0.703 ms
     3  be1-518-80g.cr1.sto1.se.portlane.net (80.67.4.184)  1.095 ms  1.158 ms  1.143 ms
     4  te-1-4-sthix.kst1.se.obenetwork.net (192.121.80.201)  1.414 ms  1.555 ms  1.640 ms
     5  46-227-67-243.static.obenetwork.net (46.227.67.243)  1.186 ms  1.167 ms  1.168 ms
    
    NL Gigabit, NForce
    
    root@nl:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test -4
    --2015-05-23 22:30:35--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)... 46.227.67.243
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com (lg-se.xhostfire.com)|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 1073741824 (1.0G) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==========================>] 1,073,741,824 46.3M/s   in 23s
    
    2015-05-23 22:30:59 (44.6 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [1073741824/1073741824]
    
    root@nl:~# traceroute 46.227.67.243
    traceroute to 46.227.67.243 (46.227.67.243), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  172.16.8.1 (172.16.8.1)  0.235 ms  0.214 ms  0.201 ms
     2  0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0)  11.691 ms  11.687 ms  11.716 ms
     3  5.104.137.29 (5.104.137.29)  1.522 ms  1.515 ms  7.221 ms
     4  ams-ix.retn.net (80.249.209.216)  1.805 ms  1.786 ms  1.856 ms
     5  ae1-4.RT.TC1.STO.SE.retn.net (87.245.233.181)  23.269 ms et030-4.RT.TC1.STO.SE.retn.net (87.245.232.113)  23.439 ms  23.419 ms
     6  GW-ObeNetwork.retn.net (87.245.249.11)  23.766 ms  23.700 ms  23.684 ms
     7  46-227-67-243.static.obenetwork.net (46.227.67.243)  23.451 ms  23.348 ms  23.546 ms
    
    Ashburn, VA 10Gbit Internap Link:
    
    root@Ashburn:~# wget -O /dev/null http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test -4
    --2015-05-23 22:37:14--  http://lg-se.xhostfire.com/1GB.test
    Resolving lg-se.xhostfire.com... 46.227.67.243
    Connecting to lg-se.xhostfire.com|46.227.67.243|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 1073741824 (1.0G) [text/plain]
    Saving to: â/dev/nullâ
    
    100%[==========================>] 1,073,741,824 17.9M/s   in 59s
    
    2015-05-23 22:38:14 (17.2 MB/s) - â/dev/nullâ saved [1073741824/1073741824]
    
    root@Ashburn:~# traceroute 46.227.67.243
    traceroute to 46.227.67.243 (46.227.67.243), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0)  0.430 ms  0.431 ms  0.508 ms
     2  border (0.0.0.0)  0.423 ms  0.443 ms  0.460 ms
     3  core2.te5-1-bbnet1.wdc002.pnap.net (216.52.127.8)  0.792 ms core2.te5-2-bbnet2.wdc002.pnap.net (216.52.127.72)  0.775 ms  0.811 ms
     4  0.te4-4.tsr3.iad1.us.voxel.net (173.231.161.73)  0.387 ms  0.379 ms  0.360 ms
     5  173.231.160.81 (173.231.160.81)  0.418 ms  0.397 ms 173.231.160.89 (173.231.160.89)  0.383 ms
     6  * * *
     7  et030-4.RT.TC1.STO.SE.retn.net (87.245.232.113)  104.073 ms  106.988 ms  101.786 ms
     8  GW-ObeNetwork.retn.net (87.245.249.11)  103.155 ms  103.242 ms  103.330 ms
     9  46-227-67-243.static.obenetwork.net (46.227.67.243)  97.976 ms  100.153 ms  97.934 ms
    
    

    Can't max from your source in any location I test. Are you actually paying for a 10Gbit commit or just a 10Gbit link? It looks like you may not get more than 70-80M/sec from anywhere but inside the same network.

    Cheers!

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2015

    @TheLinuxBug said:

    We do not have any agreements for a 10Gbit commit as it is unnecessary. We have only a 10Gbit link that allows bursts (full usage for some periods) limited by data traffic per TB.

    This will be useful because for want fast speeds for specific purposes but not utilise a great amount of it.

    I believe multi-threaded downloads may help.

Sign In or Register to comment.