Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Ramnode 128MB CVZ (vs) Crissic OVZ512 For Storage
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Ramnode 128MB CVZ (vs) Crissic OVZ512 For Storage

simonindiasimonindia Member
in General

Ramnode 128MB CVZ
128MB RAM
64MB vSwap
1 CPU core
80GB HDD space
SSD-cached
500GB traffic
1Gbps uplink
1x IPv4
16x IPv6
$15/year

Crissic OVZ512
512MB RAM
512MB vSwap
3 vCPU cores
100GB HDD space
2TB transfer
1x IPv4
16x IPv6
OpenVZ/SolusVM
$13/year

Ramnode 128MB CVZ (vs) Crissic OVZ512
  1. Ramnode 128MB CVZ (vs) Crissic OVZ512 for OWNCLOUD and OFFSITE BACKUP65 votes
    1. Take Ramnode 128MB CVZ
      55.38%
    2. Take Crissic OVZ512
      35.38%
    3. I will suggest great deal under for a 15/year
        9.23%
«1

Comments

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    Ramnode is a more established company and probably more financially stable so I would go with that.

    Thanked by 3simonindia dosai Nick_A
  • vijaivijai Member

    You can't install owncloud in ramnode 128mb plan. Go with crissic 512mb one. If you don't want owncloud and have some other simple php file uploader / rsync / dropboxsync / hubicsync in mind, go with ramnode. They are too good.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • iSkyiSky Member

    Ramnode for sure, crissic is very strictly

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • earlearl Member
    edited April 2015

    Ramnode for sure.. I have both plans you mentioned..

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • victorqdvictorqd Member

    Ramnode. Its SSD cached & its 128 mb ram works better than Crissic's 512mb.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @MarkTurner said:
    Ramnode is a more established company and probably more financially stable so I would go with that.

    I to have that thinking but in Crissic 512 ram 2Tb transfer that y its hard to make a choise

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @vijai said:
    You can't install owncloud in ramnode 128mb plan. Go with crissic 512mb one. If you don't want owncloud and have some other simple php file uploader / rsync / dropboxsync / hubicsync in mind, go with ramnode. They are too good.

    Exactly thats whats makes me hard to decide

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @iSky said:
    Ramnode for sure, crissic is very strictly

    have u got VPS with Crissic pls post some bechmarks i don't have any exp with both companys

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @earl said:
    Ramnode for sure.. I have both plans you mentioned..

    hi can u pls post some bench marks thanks

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @victorqd said:
    Ramnode. Its SSD cached & its 128 mb ram works better than Crissic's 512mb.

    But i got to run one wordpress site with a MySQL and owncloud u think i can fit in

  • Master_BoMaster_Bo Member

    Note that ownCloud is extremely heavy application, even with its core modules only (talking of both 7 and 8 major versions). Unless you really need its functionality in full, install only server-side sync/storage software of your choice and feel happy.

    Talking of providers, I have positive experience with both.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    ramnode is great, but in this comparison crissic offers more ram, space and traffic for less money. I'd go with crissic therefore, if locations fit the needs...

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @Master_Bo said:
    Note that ownCloud is extremely heavy application, even with its core modules only (talking of both 7 and 8 major versions). Unless you really need its functionality in full, install only server-side sync/storage software of your choice and feel happy.

    Talking of providers, I have positive experience with both.

    i can't go wrong with both providers thanks @Master_Bo

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @Falzo said:
    ramnode is great, but in this comparison crissic offers more ram, space and traffic for less money. I'd go with crissic therefore, if locations fit the needs...

    thanks @Falzo ur correct Ramnode with high reputation Crissic with great offer Drives me crazy

  • earlearl Member
    edited April 2015

    simonindia said: hi can u pls post some bench marks thanks

    Gladly

    Ramnode - Atlanta

    This is actually their older plan that's not available any longer.. but I'll leave it here anyways.

    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency :  3299.986 MHz
Total amount of ram : 128 MB
Total amount of swap : 128 MB
System uptime :   13 days, 2:50,
Download speed from CacheFly: 61.1MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 25.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 74.9MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.77MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 10.0MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 13.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 37.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 49.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 28.2MB/s
I/O speed :  1.0 GB/s

    This is the current plan with the E5 and 80 GB HD

    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency :  2600.034 MHz
Total amount of ram : 128 MB
Total amount of swap : 128 MB
System uptime :   29 days, 6:22,
Download speed from CacheFly: 65.3MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 54.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 71.0MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.73MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 6.65MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 35.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 14.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 18.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 45.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 29.1MB/s
I/O speed :  319 MB/s

    Crissic Jacksonville

    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
Number of cores : 3
CPU frequency :  2659.777 MHz
Total amount of ram : 512 MB
Total amount of swap : 512 MB
System uptime :   7 days, 4:40,
Download speed from CacheFly: 54.1MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 19.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 61.9MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.52MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.63MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 6.53MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.64MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 23.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 27.9MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 64.2MB/s
I/O speed :  30.9 MB/s

    I bought the Crissic based on everyone's raved reviews.. but somewhat disappointed as some days the I/O can be as low as 9MB/s.. Fine for a backup server.

    Update:

    Sorry I've been posting all the wrong info there.. edited now. been a long day!!

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • nexmarknexmark Member

    @earl said:
    I bought the Crissic based on everyone's raved review.. but some what disappointed as some days the I/O can be as low as 9MB/s.. Fine for a backup server.

    9MB/s for Pure SSD?

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • mpkossenmpkossen Member

    @Falzo said:
    ramnode is great, but in this comparison crissic offers more ram, space and traffic for less money. I'd go with crissic therefore, if locations fit the needs...

    That could also be a bad thing, because why is it cheaper with more resources?

    Not trying to throw mud here, but if one of the two were unpopular providers many would call the cheaper plan unsustainable.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • earlearl Member

    nexmark said: 9MB/s for Pure SSD?

    The Crissic is plain HD no SSD.. At least I think

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • nexmarknexmark Member

    @earl said:

    My mistake, was looking at their website.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • blackblack Member

    vijai said: You can't install owncloud in ramnode 128mb plan.

    Huh? Mine works fine. Using about ~20 MB of ram on idle.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • earlearl Member

    @nexmark said:
    My mistake, was looking at their website.

    No worries..

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited April 2015

    I had this plan in crissics florida location for nearly a year, just for the storage and some development purposes, decent performance, can't remember any issues... I've only given it up, because I don't need it anymore an already have to much VPSs, but would go with it again, if needed ;-)

    I have a 256MB/120G plan from ramnode too, so as said they are very great too and offer europe location...

    one have probably to make his own choice or just get both deals and gluster one to another ;-)

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @earl said:
    I bought the Crissic based on everyone's raved review.. but somewhat disappointed as some days the I/O can be as low as 9MB/s.. Fine for a backup server.

    Thanks man i think Crissic bench mark is posted as same as ramnode i will take ur word for the Crissic Thanks

  • niknar1900niknar1900 Member

    I'm currently using the Crissic offer as a samba share for my photography and for my website. I chose Jacksonville, Florida for the location since I'm in Florida as well. I like it so far.

    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz
    Number of cores : 3
    CPU frequency : 2659.928 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 512 MB
    Total amount of swap : 512 MB
    System uptime : 9 days, 4:07,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 24.5MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 17.2MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 30.2MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.71MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.09MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 3.35MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.57MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 6.04MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 26.1MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 53.8MB/s
    I/O speed : 46.0 MB/s

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • earlearl Member

    @simonindia said:
    Thanks man i think Crissic bench mark is posted as same as ramnode i will take ur word for the Crissic Thanks

    Sorry, I just updated it..

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • victorqdvictorqd Member
    edited April 2015

    @simonindia said:

    nope ! I once installed wordpress on LAMP/LNMP/lowendscript - Crissic (512mb ram) and mysql still crashed all the time. Ram usage was too high all the time. I don't know why , but i have same thing (rather 4 wp blogs) running on ipsystem 512 mb plan & it runs flawless.

    Thanked by 1simonindia
  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @niknar1900 said:
    I'm currently using the Crissic offer as a samba share for my photography and for my website. I chose Jacksonville, Florida for the location since I'm in Florida as well. I like it so far.

    **Thanks for the Benchmark man **that kind of IO is more than want i have expected but is the **support **good

  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    @earl said:
    Sorry I've been posting all the wrong info there.. edited now. been a long day!!

    thanks @earl thanks for putting your time to make me right choice

    Thanked by 1earl
  • simonindiasimonindia Member

    Guys i think u all have seen the polls final results show both are best and every one gave your valuable feed back and discussion My sincere gratitude to You all

    I am planning to take both First Crissic offer then Next Ramnode offer

  • goodonegoodone Member

    I have this ramnode... :O which I no longer use. Still left 6 month.

Sign In or Register to comment.