Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Which provider do you actually use? - Page 5
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Which provider do you actually use?

1235»

Comments

  • Rimu for Production, Chicago for VNC/VPN, and either a 256MB or 512MB from either BurstNet, BuyVM, SD or Prometeus now and then for testing.

  • 1x OneAsiaHost 128MB OVZ for SG-based VPN (assuming I can get the damn thing to work, which is proving more difficult than I expected)
    1x BuyVM 128MB OVZ for US-based VPN
    1x BuyVM 256MB OVZ for private ownCloud
    1x BuyVM 256 KVM for unlicensed anime fan-subs
    1x BuyVM 250GB KVM storage VPS for off-site backups
    1x CloudShards custom plan for family ownCloud
    1x httpZoom 128MB OVZ for UK-based VPN
    1x Hudson Valley Host custom plan which I have no use for, but I keep because it's less than £1 a month :-/
    1x KimSufi mKS for messing about with RDP (probably being cancelled)
    1x StormVZ 64MB OVZ for iDevice VPN
    1x TinyVZ 128MB OVZ for general messing about/testing
    1x XenVZ 96MB OVZ for a WordPress blog and a bunch of small static websites

  • Ramnode & Hostigation for production.
    MiniVPS for personal sites.
    VirtIO for testing.

  • 1x BuyVM 128MB for US VPN
    1x RamNode 512mb for VNC
    1x Ramnode 256mb for hosting sites
    1x BudgetVM 512mb for gaming servers
    3x Edis.at 128mb KVMs
    1x amazon EC2 micro for a mumble server

  • I have a 32MB (RAM upgraded) box from ipxcore.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @juandm said: I have a 32MB (RAM upgraded)

    Upgraded from what ? 16 ? :o

  • @Maounique said: Upgraded from what ? 16 ? :o

    No, it is no longer 32MB, it has more.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    I've got a non leb at GeekStorage for production. Then a bhost iron and cloudshards 256mb plan.

    No problems anywhere.

  • DamianDamian Member
    edited December 2012

    Currently:
    2x Semoweb
    1x Urpad (going away soon)
    2x Buyvm
    2x RansomIT
    2x Hostigation
    2x SecureDragon
    1x Bhost
    1x Prometeus
    2x Errantweb
    1x IPXcore
    1x CatalystHost
    1x Ramnode
    1x Ramhost
    1x Cloud3k
    2x StormVZ
    2x Crowncloud

    Formerly:
    Qualityservers
    Virtualsrv
    BGSA
    VPS6
    Alienlayer
    Quickpacket
    Hostpolar
    VMStorm
    EaseVPS
    Allsimple
    Vooservers
    Hostitek
    RethinkVPS
    BlueVM

  • @Damian could always replace your URPAD with a 24khost!

  • @Damian and your IPXcore with one from Fusioned :P

  • FutureHosting, Knownhost, Steadfast & HostEurope for Production,
    Ramnode for Backups and Testing,
    Prometeus for Testing

  • Woo... and the crowd goes wild!

    @Damian said: EaseVPS

  • JacobJacob Member
    edited December 2012

    I also seen VPS6, Allsimple, Vooservers under formerly.

    Problem?

    @Jack said: Didn't you see that bit ^

  • DamianDamian Member
    edited December 2012

    @Jacob said: I also seen VPS6, Allsimple, Vooservers under formerly.

    Out of my 'formerly' list, the only providers that didn't have quality issues were Allsimple and VMStorm. They're only 'formerly' because I standardized all of our managed external-vendor nodes and standarized on OpenVZ, and Allsimple is Xen and VMStorm is VMware. They had great service otherwise.

  • I am VPS free for almost a year now. All dedis baby.

  • @24khost said: @Damian could always replace your URPAD with a 24khost!

    $21/year 1GM Ram?

  • Thanks for some of the mentions here for Cloud Shards.

  • I have always wondered about the popularity of one of the top providers mentioned here. Quote from their terms of service:

    4) Content (Public & Private)

    4,1) Any data, material, or content hosted will be considered `public`, regardless of any actual access restrictions placed by the client.

    For my needs, this term completely disqualifies them from consideration.

    How do others make use of a server with that kind of restriction? I cannot think of a single use case where everything on the server could be considered public.

Sign In or Register to comment.