Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › EaseVPS Benchmark - ServerBear
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

EaseVPS Benchmark - ServerBear

DestroyeRCoDestroyeRCo Member
edited August 2012 in General 
System Specs
RAM 2048 MB
HDD 61 GB
CPU Model    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
CPU Cores   4
CPU Speed   3192 MHz
CPU Cache   8192 KB
UnixBench
UnixBench (w/ all processors)   3165.6
UnixBench (w/ one processor)    1492.7
Raw UnixBench Output

#    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com


1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation  1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: servercore: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.el5.028stab099.3 -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 15:56:00 MSK 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.9 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   22:23:54 up  4:42,  0 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.33, 1.60; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 29 2012 22:23:54 - 22:52:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       35965458.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3929.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4977.4 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        757709.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          209282.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1848977.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1460922.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 397638.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              15579.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6596.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2062.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1209214.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   35965458.4   3081.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3929.5    714.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4977.4   1157.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     757709.4   1913.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     209282.3   1264.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1848977.3   3187.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1460922.7   1174.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     397638.7    994.1
Process Creation                                126.0      15579.6   1236.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6596.8   1555.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2062.5   3437.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1209214.1    806.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1492.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 29 2012 22:52:01 - 23:20:32
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      125282535.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    15018.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              16214.0 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        525646.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          139917.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1465365.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             5228353.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                1311249.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              52603.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  19982.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2659.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4033424.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  125282535.0  10735.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      15018.0   2730.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      16214.0   3770.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     525646.7   1327.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     139917.1    845.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1465365.7   2526.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5228353.4   4202.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1311249.8   3278.1
Process Creation                                126.0      52603.1   4174.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      19982.3   4712.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2659.9   4433.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4033424.2   2688.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3165.6

Comments

  • DestroyeRCoDestroyeRCo Member
    edited August 2012 
    I/O Pings
ioping -c 10
request=1 time=75.3 ms
request=2 time=14.2 ms
request=3 time=6.7 ms
request=4 time=71.6 ms
request=5 time=30.0 ms
request=6 time=26.0 ms
request=7 time=16.0 ms
request=8 time=20.3 ms
request=9 time=14.2 ms
request=10 time=10.4 ms

10 requests completed in 9295.2 ms, 35 iops, 0.1 mb/s
I/O Seek Test (No Cache)
ioping -RD
207 iops, 0.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/4.8/128.2/6.8 ms
I/O Reads - Sequential
ioping -RL
90 iops, 22.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 8.9/11.1/149.6/9.0 ms
I/O Reads - Cached
ioping -RC
179893 iops, 702.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.0/0.0 ms
DD
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
18.6129 s, 57.7 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
18.0796 s, 59.4 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
25.703 s, 41.8 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
50.4471 s, 21.3 MB/s
FIO
Read IOPS   75.0
Read Bandwidth  1.2 MB/second
Write IOPS  48.0
Write Bandwidth 792 KB/second
Processses  4
Raw FIO Output
FIO random reads:
randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
...
randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 4 processes
randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)

randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3431: Wed Aug 29 20:39:39 2012
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=307730 B/s, iops=75 , runt=3490070msec
  cpu          : usr=0.02%, sys=0.07%, ctx=140559, majf=0, minf=88
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3432: Wed Aug 29 20:39:39 2012
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=308846 B/s, iops=75 , runt=3477450msec
  cpu          : usr=0.02%, sys=0.07%, ctx=136788, majf=0, minf=91
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3433: Wed Aug 29 20:39:39 2012
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=308175 B/s, iops=75 , runt=3485027msec
  cpu          : usr=0.02%, sys=0.07%, ctx=138100, majf=0, minf=91
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3434: Wed Aug 29 20:39:39 2012
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=308842 B/s, iops=75 , runt=3477498msec
  cpu          : usr=0.02%, sys=0.07%, ctx=137019, majf=0, minf=90
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=4096.2MB, aggrb=1202KB/s, minb=300KB/s, maxb=301KB/s, mint=3477450msec, maxt=3490070msec
Done

FIO random writes:
randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
...
randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 4 processes

randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3464: Wed Aug 29 22:10:03 2012
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=198021 B/s, iops=48 , runt=5423659msec
  cpu          : usr=0.01%, sys=0.05%, ctx=140431, majf=0, minf=24
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3465: Wed Aug 29 22:10:03 2012
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=198321 B/s, iops=48 , runt=5415444msec
  cpu          : usr=0.01%, sys=0.05%, ctx=138236, majf=0, minf=27
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3466: Wed Aug 29 22:10:03 2012
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=198380 B/s, iops=48 , runt=5413837msec
  cpu          : usr=0.01%, sys=0.05%, ctx=138549, majf=0, minf=27
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3467: Wed Aug 29 22:10:03 2012
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=198029 B/s, iops=48 , runt=5423439msec
  cpu          : usr=0.01%, sys=0.05%, ctx=140189, majf=0, minf=26
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=4096.2MB, aggrb=773KB/s, minb=193KB/s, maxb=193KB/s, mint=5413837msec, maxt=5423659msec
Done
  • DestroyeRCoDestroyeRCo Member
    edited August 2012 
    Download Speed (100MB File)
Location    Rate
Cachefly     10.5 MB/s
Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA     6.65 MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX, USA  8.35 MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP    4.21 MB/s
Linode, London, UK   2.98 MB/s
OVH, Paris, France   170 KB/s
SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands  9.99 MB/s
Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany  8.61 MB/s
iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia  4.52 MB/s
Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA   9.90 MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore     4.29 MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA  9.48 MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA     10.2 MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA   10.9 MB/s
Traceroute
Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  199.19.108.241 (199.19.108.241)  0.032 ms  0.010 ms  0.008 ms
 2  xe-1-0-3.ar1.atl1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.135.29)  7.758 ms  7.758 ms  7.759 ms
 3  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  6.295 ms  6.301 ms  6.302 ms
Ping
PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=6.13 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=6.24 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=6.33 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=6.41 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=6.31 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=6.08 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=61 time=6.39 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=61 time=6.52 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=61 time=6.37 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=61 time=6.35 ms

--- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.088/6.318/6.528/0.160 ms
  • TaylorTaylor Member

    For compassion hear is my one for UK for the same spec

    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/10/Uce34eGzUvfcTaGt

  • InglarInglar Member
    edited August 2012

    You may use < pre > < /pre > tags for better view /without spaces inside tags/ :)

    Just try it and you will like ;)

  • DestroyeRCoDestroyeRCo Member

    @Jack said: Is this there Jax location?

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • tinyraytinyray Member

    score and grade in fact mean nothing,

  • JacobJacob Member

    Benchmark looks decent, but @taylor has better IO.

  • serverbearserverbear Member
    edited August 2012

    @DestroyeRCo Thanks for the benchmark, it normally formats better if you post it from the online report. The txt file is more so you can see if there's any errors.

    I am making a nice "copy for LET" button that'll grab everything & put it in your clipboard to post.

    The UK nodes seem to have better Disk IO.

    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • JacobJacob Member

    New Disks! :D Most of them <3000 Hours.

    @serverbear said: The UK nodes seem to have better Disk IO.

Sign In or Register to comment.