Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

1Gb Ram, 2GB Vswap, 7$/mo+ 1 free month* NinjaHawk LET Special!
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

1Gb Ram, 2GB Vswap, 7$/mo+ 1 free month* NinjaHawk LET Special!

TazTaz Member
edited August 2012 in Offers

This is a limited offer for LET community only.

65% Recurring Discount for our OVZ-Chunin Plan.

This is a limited promo, Once Stock is gone, We can not guarantee when stock will become available again.

So what do you get?

1GB Guaranteed Ram

2GB Vswap
50GB Raid-10 Storage
1000GB Monthly Transfer (100Mbps Shared Port)
1 IPV4 Address

7$/mo No discount code needed. Use this Direct Order Link

Discounted Upgrades are available.

Accepted payment method's

Paypal, Google Wallet, Credit/Debit / Prepaid Cards, Payza (formerly alertpay)(Upon request).

7days Money back Guaranty (Not all the LEB Provider offer this, or do they?)

But you said Free month?

This is where LEB loyalty comes handy.

Yes there is a free month promo. If you are switching from your old provider, you will get your second month on us.
All you have to do is when you get your second months invoice, log a support ticket to our billing department, provide a copy of your last invoice from your old provider , PM ME OVER Here with your ticket number (this is to ensure that only LEB members get this discount, not some one from google) and we will apply the credit.
Can this get any better? :)

ETC Informations:

Test Ip:

Server Location: Dallas, Texas. CoreExcange DC.
SolusuVm control panel,
All your Favorite Linux Distro available.

Node info: Xeon e3 1230 v1 or V2 (Random selection sorry), Raid-10.

upto 32GB DDR3 ECC Ram

--2012-07-18 21:34:03--
Connecting to||:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: â100mb.testâ

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 10.6M/s in 9.3s

2012-07-18 21:34:12 (10.7 MB/s) - â100mb.testâ

Little known fact: We have been in business since 2008 (

Thanked by 2jcaleb stevenph


  • finally your business appear~

  • this is an excellent offer

  • TazTaz Member
    edited August 2012

    @VMVPS We have posted multiple offers before. Both here, WHT and other forum.

    @stevenph Thank you :)

  • Nice offer, the only problem is that I don't need a high memory VPS D:

  • TazTaz Member

    @TheHackBox oneday, someday, soon!

  • Benchmark of the box:

    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz


    Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 11 2012 08:53:32 - 09:21:41
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables      114021428.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                    15665.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              16936.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1038073.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          279432.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3411394.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             6372248.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 580721.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              50575.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  29795.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3350.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        6874801.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  114021428.4   9770.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      15665.9   2848.3
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      16936.0   3938.6
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1038073.3   2621.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     279432.4   1688.4
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3411394.7   5881.7
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    6372248.4   5122.4
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     580721.1   1451.8
    Process Creation                                126.0      50575.4   4013.9
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      29795.0   7027.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3350.0   5583.3
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    6874801.8   4583.2
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3969.7


    ioping -c 10
    request=1 time=2.0 ms
    request=2 time=0.3 ms
    request=3 time=0.3 ms
    request=4 time=0.3 ms
    request=5 time=0.3 ms
    request=6 time=0.3 ms
    request=7 time=2.6 ms
    request=8 time=0.3 ms
    request=9 time=0.3 ms
    request=10 time=0.2 ms
    10 requests completed in 9008.1 ms, 1458 iops, 5.7 mb/s
    ioping -RD
    633 iops, 2.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/1.6/25.8/3.0 ms


    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    4.86889 s, 221 MB/s
    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    5.34618 s, 201 MB/s


    Cachefly    11.0 MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA     9.58 MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, TX, USA  11.2 MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP    6.96 MB/s
    Linode, London, UK   2.45 MB/s
    OVH, Paris, France   3.74 MB/s
    SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands  4.81 MB/s
    Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany  4.76 MB/s
    iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia  996 KB/s
    Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA   3.41 MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore     2.45 MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA  10.1 MB/s
    Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA     3.78 MB/s
    Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA   10.3 MB/s


    Traceroute ( traceroute to (, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1 (  0.023 ms  0.007 ms  0.006 ms
     2 (  1.098 ms  1.104 ms  1.116 ms
     3 (  1.092 ms  1.078 ms  1.075 ms
  • TazTaz Member

    @serverbear thank you for posting those benchmarks :).

  • Probably one of the shortest hops to Cachefly I've seen :P

  • flyfly Member

    not really sure how a traceroute to cachefly means anything. as long as it doesn't utterly suck, it doesn't show anything.

  • @fly I use it to see where they colo (so I can make sure the benchmark is run from the right host) we're building something that'll do that part better though.

  • @Taz_NinjaHawk - an excellent deal

    so far excellent service
    i will post a more detailed review soon

    '•.¸(¯'•.¸(¯`'•GREAT DEAL•'´¯)¸.•'´¯)¸.•'´¯)

  • TazTaz Member

    @serverbear Thank you :)
    @stevenph Thank you :).

    Thanked by 1stevenph
Sign In or Register to comment.