vpsdime vs wable - 6 gb ram vps

arpanjot

guys anyone having both vps? benchmarks would be nice.Also 6 gb for that price means its not guaranteed and is definitely oversold.In terms of overselling,which provider handles overselling efficiently?

vimalware

Wable has made their (0)verselling policy pretty clear

https://www.facebook.com/1407513069510726/photos/a.1412950622300304.1073741829.1407513069510726/1461043264157706/

Their user beancounter and inode allocations are directly proportional to the resources you choose at container creation time. I checked

FredQc

Wable NY:

[root@wny ~]# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null | bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
Number of cores : 5
CPU frequency :  2800.152 MHz
Total amount of ram : 6144 MB
Total amount of swap : 1024 MB
System uptime :   41 days, 21:10,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 1.76MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.64MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 22.4MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.85MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 12.9MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 50.8MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.85MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 24.5MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 25.5MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 96.5MB/s 
I/O speed :  461 MB/s


Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 13 2014 20:05:33 - 20:33:44
5 CPUs in system; running 5 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      156484036.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    17016.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              17728.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        485599.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          130410.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1544737.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             4892070.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 889020.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              30405.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  19764.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2860.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4380022.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  156484036.3  13409.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      17016.3   3093.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      17728.0   4122.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     485599.8   1226.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     130410.7    788.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1544737.8   2663.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4892070.5   3932.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     889020.7   2222.6
Process Creation                                126.0      30405.2   2413.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      19764.5   4661.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2860.3   4767.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4380022.2   2920.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3031.5

HostUs Atlanta:

[root@atl ~]#  wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null | bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5640  @ 2.27GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency :  1595.703 MHz
Total amount of ram : 6144 MB
Total amount of swap : 6144 MB
System uptime :   10 days, 14:53,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 60.5MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 73.5MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 82.0MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.20MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 18.6MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 24.8MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.83MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 27.2MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 24.8MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 83.3MB/s 
I/O speed :  281 MB/s


Benchmark Run: Mon Sep 22 2014 16:55:28 - 17:23:47
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       76951468.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    10453.3 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              11020.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        478493.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          131190.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1328195.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3682592.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 588084.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              20116.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  11080.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1487.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3555867.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   76951468.0   6594.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10453.3   1900.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      11020.6   2562.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     478493.1   1208.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     131190.7    792.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1328195.4   2290.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3682592.7   2960.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     588084.2   1470.2
Process Creation                                126.0      20116.1   1596.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      11080.8   2613.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1487.0   2478.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3555867.8   2370.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2103.8

Maounique

I think that request was more along the lines wabble vs vpsdime.
And, yeah, Incero does have a way to make interesting ToS/AUPs. There are some things you do not find somewhere else, or are so rare nobody ever met a host like that before.
Their right, as they say, feel free to go elsewhere, if you dont like it.

ffquest

Both are good. There is something for your information. If a system is overloaded it will be throttled in wable, but suspended in vpsdime.