Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Rent to own servers in India? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Rent to own servers in India?

2»

Comments

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @wych said:
    That from DC or upstream?

    DC in banglore.

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member
    edited November 2014

    This is a server we have ( running hyper-v ) 202.65.142.170 colo'ed with pioneer elabs ( ctrls )
    in hyderabad.

  • iBotiBot Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    You think so ? , bandwidth is shit load costly we possily cant even run a C.S server without a ddos protection let alone a CS server need a min of 600 GB bandwidth up + down ( sometimes even more )

    Are you freaking kidding me? CS Server needs 600GB? Get your facts straight. I am running multiple L4D2 & CSGO Servers of ranks 40s-100s at gametracker and considering them alone, they barely hit 300GB.

    Secondly you are listing consumer price, you might want to check the retail prices and also look for different ISPs, like ACT or similar DTH service. They offer better pricing and peerings (TATA). Uptime is quite amazing as well.

    Thanked by 1Mark_R
  • wychwych Member
    edited November 2014

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    This is a server we have ( running hyper-v ) [redacted] colo'ed with pioneer elabs ( ctrls )
    in hyderabad.

    Why post the IP in public?

    And those are retail not trade pricing more than likely.

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @wych said:

    Its where I host one of the game servers so didnt bother.

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @iBot said:
    Secondly you are listing consumer price, you might want to check the retail prices and also look for different ISPs, like ACT or similar DTH service. They offer better pricing and peerings (TATA). Uptime is quite amazing as well.

    ACT is the best and cheapest thought they are new ,

    ( 600gb ) I mentioned because of the http server which people host to update files CSGO hits more and in India apart from ACT rest of them meter uploads too..... not only downloads so that sucks literally.

  • DewlanceVPSDewlanceVPS Member, Patron Provider

    If you think Indians will purchase your server then first research market requirement before starting any new idea without research.




    If you can ship to other country at less price then you will get a many clients from Asian country.

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @DewlanceVPS said:
    If you think Indians will purchase your server then first research market requirement before starting any new idea without research.




    If you can ship to other country at less price then you will get a many clients from Asian country.

    Sounds good. This post is for research purposes only :)

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @wych said:
    Honestly for me to consider I would want something a little higer spec'd.

    Who much would you be wanting for RTO on the updated first post cloudbells

    How about the following:

    CPU model : AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor

    RAM - 8 GB

    HDD - 500 GB SATA

    RTO Term - 12 months

    Price of Transport - as per Fedex(Global)

    Colo after RTO period- $75

    Service - Default unmanaged. 4 hour response time.

    Customize - Limited to RAM and Harddisk

  • wychwych Member

    @cloudbells said:

    Slightly more appealing ;)

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    IMHO no one will transfer from India when they could get the same hardware ( or better ) at around spending 200 extra. The only point of investing in this is its in India. The point of not investing in it is colo / buy pricing will F*** you up because Indian DC are hard to maintain costs are ridiculous ( being an Indian I know pretty well ) so suggest only people with that extra itch in the pocket consider this offer.

    Thank you for your feedback. If given a choice would you go for it?

    BTW I have a higher CPU in stock - AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @cfgguy said:
    I think you should go for it. Indian customer base is huge and you dont need overseas customers to make it a success. $75 is nothing if you can host game servers or voice servers or may be vpn.

    Thank you. We are working towards it :)

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    which dc ?

    In house datacenter in New Delhi, India.

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @wych said:
    Slightly more appealing ;)

    Thank you. Would you be willing to shed $90-$130 for this machine in RTO? Not requesting an order just taking honest feedbacks :)

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @cfgguy said:
    IPv6

    We are getting in a week too. :)

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @cloudbells said:
    In house datacenter in New Delhi, India.

    Name of the DC....

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @cloudbells said:

    Depending on your colo price I'd rather buy hardware and send it to you for colo since I can visit delhi anytime day / night.

  • wychwych Member
    edited November 2014

    @cloudbells said:
    Thank you. Would you be willing to shed $90-$130 for this machine in RTO? Not requesting an order just taking honest feedbacks :)

    If you could RAID1/5 it then I would consider it (again not consent to an order but as near as possible).

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    Name of the DC....

    Cheeky...

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member
    edited November 2014

    @wych said:
    Cheeky...

    lol , I doubt he's gonna do a raid

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    lol , I doubt he's gonna do a raid

    why exactly would we not be able to do that especially when we are doing a feedback post on what client are looking for?
    Why so pessimist?

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @cloudbells said:
    Why so pessimist?

    Answer my question about your DC name lol , Do you have a test ip ?

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    I don't like the idea of RTO, how about you keep your old PC's! Without the RTO it would be great.

  • wychwych Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    I doubt he's gonna do a raid

    If you don't ask you don't get ;)

  • cloudbellscloudbells Member

    @VPSRAIDSolutions said:
    Answer my question about your DC name lol , Do you have a test ip ?

    Name of DC - CloudBells. It is still under construction but live. Test IP is in my signature(103.240.164.1)

  • cfgguycfgguy Member, Host Rep
    edited November 2014

    Pinging 103.240.164.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=250
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=250

    From Gurgaon

  • wychwych Member
    edited November 2014

    @cloudbells said:
    Test IP is in my signature(103.240.164.1)

    Not bad but irratic...

    Pinging 103.240.164.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=239
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=239
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=239
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=239
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=239
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=289ms TTL=237
    Reply from 103.240.164.1: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=237

    Ping statistics for 103.240.164.1: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 160ms, Maximum = 289ms, Average = 194ms

    Vanillas code tag sucks.

Sign In or Register to comment.