Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Need some ping results to an IP
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Need some ping results to an IP

DrukpaDrukpa Member

Having some problems with my server, and can't figure out where the problem is. When I ping from my home connection, it results in a lot of packet loss, but when I ping from some VPS from UK, no packet loss results.

When I ping an IP in the same city (Dallas, Texas) as my server, no packet loss results, from both my home connection as well as the VPS. So, can't really blame my home ISP as well.

Would really appreciate if you guys (preferably from ASIA) could do a test on the IP (72.9.144.30) and paste the results.

Thanks.

Comments

  • Is this happening all the time or occasionally? Maybe a routing issue?

  • @MarcusLVPSHosting said:
    Is this happening all the time or occasionally? Maybe a routing issue?

    I sense an offer coming.

    Thanked by 1ATHK
  • DrukpaDrukpa Member

    Been happening continuously since last week. I am trying to rule out my home ISP, since I do not want to unnecessarily bother my host unless its really their problem.

    @MarcusLVPSHosting said:
    Is this happening all the time or occasionally? Maybe a routing issue?

  • Use just-ping.com

  • C:\Users\Administrator>ping 72.9.144.30

    正在 Ping 72.9.144.30 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 72.9.144.30 的回复: 字节=32 时间=356ms TTL=49
    来自 72.9.144.30 的回复: 字节=32 时间=418ms TTL=49
    来自 72.9.144.30 的回复: 字节=32 时间=357ms TTL=49
    来自 72.9.144.30 的回复: 字节=32 时间=419ms TTL=49

    I am from Asia, so don't mind these Chinese characters

    Thanked by 1Drukpa
  • wychwych Member

    What severian said.

  • DrukpaDrukpa Member

    Tried this site, once you test an IP, I think the result gets stored in cache. Not very accurate.

    @serverian said:
    Use just-ping.com

  • ryanswjryanswj Member
    edited July 2014

    Pinging 72.9.144.30 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=228ms TTL=42
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=42
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=42
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=214ms TTL=42

    Ping statistics for 72.9.144.30:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 214ms, Maximum = 228ms, Average = 219ms

    ===============================

    Tracing route to tailormadeservers.com [72.9.144.30]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms router.asus.com [10.20.16.1]
    2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms bb42-60-135-254.singnet.com.sg [42.60.135.254]
    3 4 ms 5 ms 5 ms 202.166.123.170
    4 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 202.166.123.169
    5 3 ms 3 ms 4 ms 202.166.121.182
    6 3 ms 4 ms 4 ms ae6-0.singha.singnet.com.sg [202.166.120.186]
    7 8 ms 19 ms 8 ms ae3-0.pepsi.singnet.com.sg [202.166.126.125]
    8 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms 203.208.191.113
    9 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 203.208.149.126
    10 171 ms 185 ms 171 ms 203.208.182.122
    11 198 ms 182 ms 195 ms 203.208.172.242
    12 178 ms 190 ms 175 ms ge-11-2-0.mpr2.pao1.us.above.net [64.125.12.205]
    13 189 ms 172 ms 171 ms ae7.cr2.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.25.137]
    14 196 ms 191 ms 194 ms ae1.cr2.lax112.us.above.net [64.125.31.234]
    15 232 ms 233 ms 235 ms ae3.cr2.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.21.85]
    16 228 ms 268 ms 229 ms ae2.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.21.61]
    17 221 ms 241 ms 225 ms ae7.er2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.20.234]
    18 232 ms 232 ms 236 ms 64.124.196.226.t00876-01.above.net [64.124.196.226]
    19 221 ms 238 ms 238 ms 206.123.64.45
    20 280 ms 230 ms 235 ms 72.249.128.110
    21 244 ms 260 ms 234 ms tailormadeservers.com [72.9.144.30]

    Trace complete.

    (woah! many many hops)

    Thanked by 1Drukpa
  • DrukpaDrukpa Member

    Not a network guru, but I have a feeling there's issues with above.net's routes.

    From the traceroute screenshot can someone please help me know where the most likely problem is at?

  • autoclickautoclick Member
    edited July 2014

    From Jakarta-Indonesia :

    Pinging 72.9.144.30 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=229ms TTL=48
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=229ms TTL=48
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=48
    Reply from 72.9.144.30: bytes=32 time=229ms TTL=48

    Ping statistics for 72.9.144.30:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 229ms, Maximum = 230ms, Average = 229ms

    Thanked by 1Drukpa
  • Not from Asia, but..

    $ ping 72.9.144.30 -c 30 | tail -n 3
    --- 72.9.144.30 ping statistics ---
    30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29017ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 177.136/321.412/754.601/125.186 ms

    Everything seems fine from here (Sweden).

    Never mind the min/max times, my AP is acting up. Can't be arsed to restart it again.

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep
    PING 72.9.144.30 (72.9.144.30): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=57.924 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=55.337 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=55.132 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=57.095 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=57.114 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=56.796 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=56.922 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=60.859 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=66.420 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=56.924 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=57.688 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=56.525 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=58.969 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=62.197 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=59.099 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=60.729 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=61.492 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=58.792 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=18 ttl=50 time=64.332 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=56.626 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=58.163 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=56.432 ms
    64 bytes from 72.9.144.30: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=54.590 ms
    ^C
    --- 72.9.144.30 ping statistics ---
    23 packets transmitted, 23 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 54.590/58.529/66.420/2.887 ms
    

    Nothing Lost Here in Canada.

  • From Kazakhstan

  • Fine from NL:

    will@nl:~$ ping 72.9.144.30 -c 30 | tail -n 3
    --- 72.9.144.30 ping statistics ---
    30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29035ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.518/128.415/132.190/1.499 ms
    
  • StarryStarry Member, Host Rep

    Ping statistics for 72.9.144.30:
    Packets: Sent = 337, Received = 337, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 212ms, Maximum = 363ms, Average = 220ms

    From Canton telecom

Sign In or Register to comment.