New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Safest .32 OpenVZ Kernel?
I've really started to hate OpenVZ, one of my servers has been on 2.6.32-042stab053.5, but constantly experiences the vzquota's soft locks. I upgraded to the 055 but that just panics at boot.
I have another one that is on 2.6.32-042stab049.6, and surprisingly it has had little issue apart from a lockup every month or so.
Is it best to downgrade to 049 from 053?
As I say, I am really starting to hate OpenVZ. I require the .32, does anyone have a suggested version that actually has some stability.
Comments
049 had tons of issues, we had it crash ~8 times over the period of us being in buffalo on a single node.
.32 is simply unstable and what might be stable for a few users is going to blow up for others. There are a few hosts on here that claim .32 is 100% stable, but that's only 'for now'. They just recently patched a major crash issue that can happen to anyone.
Francisco
I don't see why anyone even attempted to use the .32 kernel. It's too new. I won't use it for at least a year for the same reason I won't migrate to CentOS 6 for at least a year.
Because the vSwap feature is pretty amazing.
I can assure you stability is much more awesome :P Is this for VM clients or for your MC stuff?
Francisco
The 49 is running a custom PiePanel setup (so Minecraft), and seems run it fairly well. Although has a lock up about once a month.
The 53 is running Solus. Lets not get started with the SolusVM I LOVE EATING DATABASES bug. But is now locking up once a day.
You've checked the smart on your drives right?
I will take a look.
Sounds like a fun bug.
Oh it is. Its really entertaining to fix.
SMART is fine.
In the meanwhile, the linux kernel is at his version 3.3 =/
I had a kernel guy go through the RHEL 2.6.32 kernel and he said it was far closer to 2.6.39 than 2.6.32 since redhat backports so much code.
Francisco