New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
1000 VPS per node!
and nope, that is not a joke, it is a "serious" business plan:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1371679
I think I have seen this guy's name associated with several deadpoolers before, can't remember where though. Anyone knows?
Comments
https://vpsboard.com/topic/4219-i-want-to-provide-1-per-year-vpss/
(Check my hilarious comment at the bottom!)
And this one:
https://vpsboard.com/topic/4219-i-want-to-provide-1-per-year-vpss/#entry61595
I got to say he reminds me of the guy who goes around and begging for VPS from everyone...citing anything between death of relative to flood in his family...you really need some courage to do that...
Or may be those are the same people and he just want a free VPS? LOL
Mtwiscool has "started", if not millions of projects before. Don't recall seeing anything finished.
Have to give it to him, he got a lot of ideas.
I've heard from a successful company's sales dept that they're happy to put 1000 VPSs on a node...
Depends on the node...
i am 99% sure it is a troll. seriously though look at his spellings
He's not trolling, just plain stupid...
Help him serverian, your nodes are probably the only ones that come close :P
Impossible, Your server will crash or hard disk will be give-up and die.
Is there any way in the real world that could handle 1000 vps's in a single node, whatever the specs on that node? I am really curious what is the average amount of boxes that some (crappy?) providers here try to fit in a single node...
Depends on the process count people run. I doubt the kernel would handle 30K processes (~30 processes per VPS). Technically, you can slab a very big node into smaller nodes (KVM, Xen) and run OpenVZ inside them and that'd be possible.
I don't know. I was told I could have a /24 on a 128mb VPS earlier today.
It has to be extremely oversold: memory, bandwidth, cpu, abusers... Not only ip's! I doubt that, e.g., even LES nodes are handling so many boxes in a single machine and they don't have the ipv4 issue as they don't offer that.
A certain green hosting company.
Possible, yes. Will it be operating? And, as of your knowledge, are here providers that pus the limit so far? What is the average limit of boxes in a single node that some providers they do overselling a lot their services, pushing?
First he wont get so much IPv4.
I don't know. Seems GVH might be seeding his idea: https://vpsboard.com/topic/4219-i-want-to-provide-1-per-year-vpss/?p=61619
As I said, it depends on the process count since that would be the only limiting factor for openvz on a very big node. But there shouldn't be any problem putting say 1000 production ready* KVM VPS on a very big node*.
[*] 1/2GB memory, 2/4 vCPU
[*] 240 threads (8 x Xeon E7-8895 v2), a few TBs of memory, 36/48 x SSD, with dual 10Gbps uplink.
You could get a /24 on a 128MB VPS with us if you have proper justification for it. And I don't think such as justification exists for a /24 to be allocated on a 128MB VPS.
I got a /18 just fine...
ARIN only charges $500/mo for a block + some other fancy feeds. We don't pay nearly $100/mo for our direct allocations.
VPN technically is valid.
Good point. Why not just ask ColoCrossing to SWIP a /24 to him for justification? That's all ARIN wants to see; that you're using your current allocations that almost total up to the allocation you request from them...
His math isn't even right though, how is he going to get 32000GB usable RAM on a 32GB system? Even forgetting about the RAM usage of the host node. I am not saying he has an otherwise solid business plan, but even the bits you can see where he was going for like the splitting up of resources is fundamentally flawed.
Oh wow...
So basically, he'll get a dedi with one IPv4 (or none), then get the free HE.net IPv6 tunneled address, and give everyone a single port for SSH via NAT?
Sounds like a business plan to me. //
Didnt think a /24 was enough for justification unless you're multi-homed. Thought you were looking for a /20 in use before you can get an allocation otherwise.
It's probably closer to copying LowEndSpirit/i-83 etc - 1/2 shared IPv4, 5 dedi IPv6, 20 dedi ports on IPv4.
This is possible, and is one of the reasons I refuse to touch OpenVZ. It's a scummy oversold cestpool. You can easily create 1,000 VMs (OpenVZ) on the CentOS image (the one that comes on the Wiki) and only be using about 70-90GB of RAM.
If you had KSM on the host machine enabled and churning through the blocks as you powered the VMs on, you could easily shrink that 70GB usage down to 5GB [ KSM links/merges all identical memory pages. ]
already been done
just at 50-60c/m and there isn't 1000 VM's on those boxes...
Obviously you can oversell but by the fact he's chosen 1k VPS on 32GB RAM with 32GB/VPS says to me he was trying to imply it'd be dedicated RAM and that he'd properly planned and allocated resources.
Unless you have auto boot right.