Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AnycastIP's new PoP - Sofia, BG

2»

Comments

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    @OpaqueRegistrant said: It would be interesting to see if there's a provider who would agree to it.

    Welcome to meet ps.kz and hosting.ua, at least some time ago both had no issues to spoof whatever you wanted from colo and dedis (not VPS).

  • gbshousegbshouse Member, Patron Provider

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @gbshouse said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    I wonder if you issue a pseudo-LOA so that some server providers might allow the anycast address as a source address, instead of considering it as spoofing. Is that a thing that exists in the world? If that's a thing, return packets could bypass rage4.

    Nope, it's just wrong >:)

    It would be interesting to see if there's a provider who would agree to it. Some places do their load balancing that way within a DC - they just have the server directly reply from the IP of the load balancer. But of course the politics of that are different.

    The best legit option to achieve such a thing is to use your own subnet with AnycastIP. This way the other providers can route egress directly as you have full control over the subnet.

  • @gbshouse said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @gbshouse said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    I wonder if you issue a pseudo-LOA so that some server providers might allow the anycast address as a source address, instead of considering it as spoofing. Is that a thing that exists in the world? If that's a thing, return packets could bypass rage4.

    Nope, it's just wrong >:)

    It would be interesting to see if there's a provider who would agree to it. Some places do their load balancing that way within a DC - they just have the server directly reply from the IP of the load balancer. But of course the politics of that are different.

    The best legit option to achieve such a thing is to use your own subnet with AnycastIP. This way the other providers can route egress directly as you have full control over the subnet.

    Not sure I get it. Routing is based on destination only. Source is only relevant for antispoofing

  • gbshousegbshouse Member, Patron Provider

    @OpaqueRegistrant if you own the subnet you can work with your providers and asked them to allow outgoing traffic without spoofing, just providing them with LoA etc. In the same time you can use the subnet with us. Side note - we do provide ECMP everywhere so you can balance the load between multiple nodes in the same location

Sign In or Register to comment.