Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DeluxHost W-1 (+2 extra vCores) Ryzen 9 9950X 12 EUR/year

135

Comments

  • networknetwork Member
    edited May 31

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @network said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

    Yeah its heavily dependent on provider, but for 12 EUR/Yr renewal this is to be expected. You can't have everything I guess.

  • @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

  • HayzeeHayzee Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    Thanked by 1FentyFold
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited May 31

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Thanked by 1buggedout
  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Simply.. Personal preference. GB4 runs faster and more smoothly and look.. It wouldn't even run even if I wanted to.. Been stuck for the last 20 minutes. If GeekBench scores matters so much, you shouldn't even be using VPS. Get a Dedicated Server or Bare Metal. I have nothing to hide, no reasons to hide either.

    IPv4 Network Information:

    ISP : Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
    ASN : AS214677 Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
    Host : DELUXHOST
    Location : Kerkrade, Limburg (LI)
    Country : Netherlands

    Running GB6 benchmark test... cue elevator music

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited May 31

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/search?q=9950x

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

  • buggedoutbuggedout Member

    @network said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

    This GB4 score is utterly low for a 9950x and multicore score of just 9% higher makes me further skeptical while OP keeps on talking about it being 3 vCores. I think its a vm with either hyper threading disabled or severely over sold or an older low power intel processor. But its a 9950x with claimed high performance suitable for adults who know how to use a true vm rather then we noobs who only used windows server and a tiny file explorer window. OP should sell it in highendtalk, we are not fit for it....

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member
    edited May 31

    @buggedout said:

    @network said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

    This GB4 score is utterly low for a 9950x and multicore score of just 9% higher makes me further skeptical while OP keeps on talking about it being 3 vCores. I think its a vm with either hyper threading disabled or severely over sold or an older low power intel processor. But its a 9950x with claimed high performance suitable for adults who know how to use a true vm rather then we noobs who only used windows server and a tiny file explorer window. OP should sell it in highendtalk, we are not fit for it....

    Did you forget what the moderator @angstrom warned you about?
    "People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything"

    I have no control over what the provider does to throttle CPU performance, This server transfer is true and accurate, 3 vCores as stated. That's all I have to say. Just don't forget the warning yeah :)

  • buggedoutbuggedout Member
    edited May 31

    @FentyFold said:

    @buggedout said:

    @network said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

    This GB4 score is utterly low for a 9950x and multicore score of just 9% higher makes me further skeptical while OP keeps on talking about it being 3 vCores. I think its a vm with either hyper threading disabled or severely over sold or an older low power intel processor. But its a 9950x with claimed high performance suitable for adults who know how to use a true vm rather then we noobs who only used windows server and a tiny file explorer window. OP should sell it in highendtalk, we are not fit for it....

    Did you forget what the moderator @angstrom warned you about?
    "People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything"

    I have no control over what the provider does to throttle CPU performance, This server transfer is true and accurate, 3 vCores as stated. That's all I have to say. Just don't forget the warning yeah :)

    I forgot sorry, feel free to report me !!

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @buggedout said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @buggedout said:

    @network said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    This is GB4, others above posted GB6. I can't find data for GB4 scores for 9950x but this seems very low - my Genoa VPS from another vendor scores 6200+ single core with GB4.

    This GB4 score is utterly low for a 9950x and multicore score of just 9% higher makes me further skeptical while OP keeps on talking about it being 3 vCores. I think its a vm with either hyper threading disabled or severely over sold or an older low power intel processor. But its a 9950x with claimed high performance suitable for adults who know how to use a true vm rather then we noobs who only used windows server and a tiny file explorer window. OP should sell it in highendtalk, we are not fit for it....

    Did you forget what the moderator @angstrom warned you about?
    "People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything"

    I have no control over what the provider does to throttle CPU performance, This server transfer is true and accurate, 3 vCores as stated. That's all I have to say. Just don't forget the warning yeah :)

    I forgot sorry, feel free to report me !!

    Wish granted.

    Thanked by 1buggedout
  • @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

    I do not have any issues with you posting GB4 score.

    Issue comes when you compared GB4 SCORE with GB6 Score and stated this:

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing

    This becomes misleading.

    Thanked by 1buggedout
  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

    I do not have any issues with you posting GB4 score.

    Issue comes when you compared GB4 SCORE with GB6 Score and stated this:

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing

    This becomes misleading.

    I welcome you to invite any of them to post their GeekBench 4 scores, If Mine is lower, I will retract the statement.

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited May 31

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

    I do not have any issues with you posting GB4 score.

    Issue comes when you compared GB4 SCORE with GB6 Score and stated this:

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing

    This becomes misleading.

    I welcome you to invite any of them to post their GeekBench 4 scores, If Mine is lower, I will retract the statement.

    You're welcome

    ## Basic System Information
    
    | Field       | Value                              |
    |-------------|------------------------------------|                                   
    | Processor   | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor|
    | CPU cores   | 2 @ 4291.916 MHz                   |
    | AES-NI      | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | VM-x/AMD-V  | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | RAM         | 2.9 GiB                            |
    | Swap        | 0.0 KiB                            |                                     
    | Disk        | 31.5 GiB                           |                                     
    | Distro      | Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)       |
    | Kernel      | 6.12.38+deb13-amd64                |
    | VM Type     | KVM                                |
    | IPv4/IPv6   | ✔ Online / ✔ Online                |
    
    ## IPv6 Network Information                                                              
    | Field    | Value              |                                                    
    |----------|--------------------|
    | ISP      | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | ASN      | AS18450 WebNX, Inc.|
    | Host     | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | Location | Ogden, Utah (UT)   |
    | Country  | United States      |                                                        
    ## Geekbench Results                                                 
    
    
    Version Single Core Multi Core Full Results
    GB4 9384 16167 View
    GB5 2114 3700 View
    GB6 3003 5310 View
    Thanked by 1buggedout
  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @rpqu said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

    I do not have any issues with you posting GB4 score.

    Issue comes when you compared GB4 SCORE with GB6 Score and stated this:

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing

    This becomes misleading.

    I welcome you to invite any of them to post their GeekBench 4 scores, If Mine is lower, I will retract the statement.

    You're welcome

    ## Basic System Information
    
    | Field       | Value                              |
    |-------------|------------------------------------|                                   
    | Processor   | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor|
    | CPU cores   | 2 @ 4291.916 MHz                   |
    | AES-NI      | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | VM-x/AMD-V  | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | RAM         | 2.9 GiB                            |
    | Swap        | 0.0 KiB                            |                                     
    | Disk        | 31.5 GiB                           |                                     
    | Distro      | Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)       |
    | Kernel      | 6.12.38+deb13-amd64                |
    | VM Type     | KVM                                |
    | IPv4/IPv6   | ✔ Online / ✔ Online                |
    
    ## IPv6 Network Information                                                              
    | Field    | Value              |                                                    
    |----------|--------------------|
    | ISP      | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | ASN      | AS18450 WebNX, Inc.|
    | Host     | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | Location | Ogden, Utah (UT)   |
    | Country  | United States      |                                                        
    ## Geekbench Results                                                 
    
    

    | Version | Single Core | Multi Core | Full Results | |---------|-------------|------------|--------------|
    | GB4 | 9384 | 16167 | View |
    | GB5 | 2114 | 3700 | View |
    | GB6 | 3003 | 5310 | View |

    It is obvious, That is not from DeluxHost provider.

  • rpqurpqu Member

    @FentyFold said:

    @rpqu said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:
    @network

    According to the website scores.
    Single Core: 2713
    Multi Core: 2944

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing.

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core |
    Multi Core |
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19657509

    YABS completed in 12 min 10 sec

    Just a reminder to others.

    OP is posting GB4 score.

    Others posted GB6 score.

    I am not sure why OP went for GB4 instead of GB6 considering the fact that others posted GB6.

    Might be due to ram limitation? Ik ive had it flunk out a few times when trying to get a gb6 on a low ram vps

    That would have been ok HAD conclusion wasn't drawn.

    "Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing"

    Now you are calling something good posting GB4 score while comparing that with GB6 posted by others....

    Well get them to run GB4 then, We'll compare the scores purely on GB4 no problem. You clearly wanted to find issues with me knowing 1GB was insufficient to run GB6..

    I do not have any issues with you posting GB4 score.

    Issue comes when you compared GB4 SCORE with GB6 Score and stated this:

    Based on the scores being higher than several users posted above, I think the VPS is in a not-too-clustered/overloaded node which is a good thing

    This becomes misleading.

    I welcome you to invite any of them to post their GeekBench 4 scores, If Mine is lower, I will retract the statement.

    You're welcome

    ## Basic System Information
    
    | Field       | Value                              |
    |-------------|------------------------------------|                                   
    | Processor   | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor|
    | CPU cores   | 2 @ 4291.916 MHz                   |
    | AES-NI      | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | VM-x/AMD-V  | ✔ Enabled                          |
    | RAM         | 2.9 GiB                            |
    | Swap        | 0.0 KiB                            |                                     
    | Disk        | 31.5 GiB                           |                                     
    | Distro      | Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)       |
    | Kernel      | 6.12.38+deb13-amd64                |
    | VM Type     | KVM                                |
    | IPv4/IPv6   | ✔ Online / ✔ Online                |
    
    ## IPv6 Network Information                                                              
    | Field    | Value              |                                                    
    |----------|--------------------|
    | ISP      | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | ASN      | AS18450 WebNX, Inc.|
    | Host     | WebNX, Inc.        |                                                        
    | Location | Ogden, Utah (UT)   |
    | Country  | United States      |                                                        
    ## Geekbench Results                                                 
    
    

    | Version | Single Core | Multi Core | Full Results | |---------|-------------|------------|--------------|
    | GB4 | 9384 | 16167 | View |
    | GB5 | 2114 | 3700 | View |
    | GB6 | 3003 | 5310 | View |

    It is obvious, That is not from DeluxHost provider.

    Whoops, thought it's free for all, my bad

  • zedzed Member
    edited May 31

    @angstrom said:
    People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything -- seriously

    @FentyFold (= the OP), if you find that a comment is inappropriate, please flag it, saying why, but don't reply to the comment in the thread, which only serves to give rise to a more heated exchange

    (This new order starts now)

    This is problematic.

    The snarky comments are obviously unneeded (though I'd argue the op invited it), but telling us we're not allowed to call bullshit on claims in transfer threads immediately makes it an avenue for cheating people.

    The op is already making good on this new ruling by claiming to report people for comments disputing/disproving his claims.

    See https://lowendtalk.com/post/quote/217667/Comment_4802821 for example.

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @zed said:

    @angstrom said:
    People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything -- seriously

    @FentyFold (= the OP), if you find that a comment is inappropriate, please flag it, saying why, but don't reply to the comment in the thread, which only serves to give rise to a more heated exchange

    (This new order starts now)

    This is problematic.

    The snarky comments are obviously unneeded (though I'd argue the op invited it), but telling us we're not allowed to call bullshit on claims in transfer threads immediately makes it an avenue for cheating people.

    The op is already making good on this new ruling by claiming to report people for comments disputing/disproving his claims.

    See https://lowendtalk.com/post/quote/217667/Comment_4802821 for example.

    Another one who got butthurt I guess. Are you challenging the authority of a moderator? Calling my statement "bullshit" because you don't like or disagree with me? Nice try and attempt to spin it in your favour. I can only say you tried, like many others.

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @zed said:

    @angstrom said:
    People, if you're not interested in the OP's service transfer, then move on and don't post anything -- seriously

    @FentyFold (= the OP), if you find that a comment is inappropriate, please flag it, saying why, but don't reply to the comment in the thread, which only serves to give rise to a more heated exchange

    (This new order starts now)

    This is problematic.

    The snarky comments are obviously unneeded (though I'd argue the op invited it), but telling us we're not allowed to call bullshit on claims in transfer threads immediately makes it an avenue for cheating people.

    The op is already making good on this new ruling by claiming to report people for comments disputing/disproving his claims.

    See https://lowendtalk.com/post/quote/217667/Comment_4802821 for example.

    Why don't you understand simple terms? If you have no reasons to be here, Not interested? You should not be commenting. Don't hijack or harass my thread by leaving unsolicited remarks.

  • JabJabJabJab Member

    You guys already proved that this VPS is shit in terms of CPU despite OP claiming otherwise. As fully expected with DeluxHost and the price. Also expect some network hiccups for that price.

    Please stop bumping this thread so the actual "important" message for potential "I am too lazy to research" buyers won't be lost in millions of rage-posts.

    Thanked by 1meowwcc
  • edited May 31

    @FentyFold said:
    Did you forget what the moderator @angstrom warned you about?

    Go fucking report me you fucking retard spasmo.

    Are you challenging the authority of a moderator?

    No, i'm certainly not challenging @angstrom. I like him and i won't be angry if i get some kind of punishment for this but if sir garbage peddler over there is flame baiting i'm going to bite.

  • @JabJab said:
    You guys already proved that this VPS is shit in terms of CPU despite OP claiming otherwise. As fully expected with DeluxHost and the price. Also expect some network hiccups for that price.

    Please stop bumping this thread so the actual "important" message for potential "I am too lazy to research" buyers won't be lost in millions of rage-posts.

    Have to disagree here when the OP starts to mislead people and needs to be called out. Comparing across GB4 to GB6 and then manipulating the result to own benefit is something that has been criticized in the past.

    You may call those people lazy researcher but it will be a victim blaming instead of calling out the intentional ill intention.

    Thanked by 1meowwcc
  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @JabJab said:
    You guys already proved that this VPS is shit in terms of CPU despite OP claiming otherwise. As fully expected with DeluxHost and the price. Also expect some network hiccups for that price.

    Please stop bumping this thread so the actual "important" message for potential "I am too lazy to research" buyers won't be lost in millions of rage-posts.

    Have to disagree here when the OP starts to mislead people and needs to be called out. Comparing across GB4 to GB6 and then manipulating the result to own benefit is something that has been criticized in the past.

    You may call those people lazy researcher but it will be a victim blaming instead of calling out the intentional ill intention.

    If anything, that was unintentional. I've already invited you and the rest to post GB4 scores with the same specs from DeluxHost. I will gladly retract the statement if my score is indeed lower, You guys are the one trying to flip the narrative acting as though I'm the villian. I'm a man of my word. Post the GB4 we'll have a head to head comparison. If mine is lower, I will retract my statement. So what am I trying to hide? You tell me.

    Can I accuse you the same? You knew 1 GB RAM wasn't enough for GB6 and you spun it in your favour. Do you like the accusation now even though it may or may not have been your intention to begin with.

  • networknetwork Member

    @FentyFold said: Can I accuse you the same? You knew 1 GB RAM wasn't enough for GB6 and you spun it in your favour. Do you like the accusation now even though it may or may not have been your intention to begin with.

    @rpqu posted GB6 benchmarks for DeluxHost above running on 1GB RAM:

  • @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    The raw power of 3 9950x core with 1 GB RAM and 10 GB storage would be useless in my opinion. You'll hit RAM or storage limit much quicker than any of the cores reaching even a steady 50% usage.

    I'm able to run it perfectly with buffer, even with 1 GB of RAM, on Ubuntu 24 for my workload. :)
    No idea why you guys be hating on DeluxHost or maybe you're just an inexperienced VPS user their support and system have been treating me well and reliably over the last 6-7 months especially at the renewal price Im paying. :#

    This is where comprehension fail occurs when someone doesn't read carefully and falls in to confirmatory bias.

    I am a user of deluxe host storage server and pretty happy with it. Moreover no where I wrote anything about quality of deluxehost.

    What I wrote was, for cpu intensive apps, there are more probability of OOM kills or storage full error and hence 3 vcpu 9950x may not be used even to their 50% efficency.

    Next time, please read, understand and then reply.

    As a mere storage server user, I think you should keep your opinions to yourself given that you clearly don't know what linux ubuntu is capable of or how efficient it is. The most you have experienced is Windows Server and your tiny file explorer window :D Let the adults and professional who uses true VPS and linux conduct their businesses.

    .... Stated by someone who bought 3x3v 9950x 1 gb ram 10 GB storage from deluxehost of all the providers out there.

    For 6 months, asking for $30 each.... For these servers?

    You are just getting rid off it to cope your loss by cheating some other person.

    Stop bashing DeluxHost already just because your moma didn't shower you with love when you were younger :o for your info, All W plans are still sold out and out of stock, People are still asking for restock from DeluxHost. How are these VPS servers unwanted? I think you're the unwanted child B)

    u a tool and u know these servers are dead, if they paid 100x themselves u wouldnt be begging for $10 a server an a dead deal you can get anywhere.

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited May 31

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @JabJab said:
    You guys already proved that this VPS is shit in terms of CPU despite OP claiming otherwise. As fully expected with DeluxHost and the price. Also expect some network hiccups for that price.

    Please stop bumping this thread so the actual "important" message for potential "I am too lazy to research" buyers won't be lost in millions of rage-posts.

    Have to disagree here when the OP starts to mislead people and needs to be called out. Comparing across GB4 to GB6 and then manipulating the result to own benefit is something that has been criticized in the past.

    You may call those people lazy researcher but it will be a victim blaming instead of calling out the intentional ill intention.

    If anything, that was unintentional. I've already invited you and the rest to post GB4 scores with the same specs from DeluxHost. I will gladly retract the statement if my score is indeed lower, You guys are the one trying to flip the narrative acting as though I'm the villian. I'm a man of my word. Post the GB4 we'll have a head to head comparison. If mine is lower, I will retract my statement. So what am I trying to hide? You tell me.

    Can I accuse you the same? You knew 1 GB RAM wasn't enough for GB6 and you spun it in your favour. Do you like the accusation now even though it may or may not have been your intention to begin with.

    GB4 score was already provided by rpqu. Unless deluxehost use some custom variant of 9950x, it should be in the range across providers. right?

    When let's say top end is 9000+ then for low end providers, 4500+ may be considered as okish score. but if it is even half of that, then certainly that is an anomaly and probably heavily oversold.

  • @FentyFold said:

    @zed said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @zed said:

    @FentyFold said: I think you should keep your opinions to yourself

    be careful being a twat or you might attract ex-deluxhost users to comment on your thread.

    If you or the others had bad experience with deluxhost, leave. If you have nothing good to say, leave.

    ok.

    these things are probably barely worth the 12 bucks a year delux charges for them knowing how massively oversold they run their systems.

    the idea of paying 25 bucks for just 6 months is hilarious.

    Clearly not something your 1 brain cell could comprehend. The value in the $25 USD is.. You get +2 extra vCores permanently. A W-5 plan (3 vCores) costs 52 EUR/Yr in renewal. For the same processing power. Your 1 brain cell couldn't see the value in it obviously.

    And you brain doesn’t comprehend the only additional resource is somthing thyey are known to oversel, has high steal and therefore not extra.

    It’s KVM where the extra RAM that’s guaranteed. it’s not worth /2 of a plan it isn’t just because you claim it’s got the same “processing power” you was not dropped as a baby you was volley kicked.

  • FentyFoldFentyFold Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    @FentyFold said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @JabJab said:
    You guys already proved that this VPS is shit in terms of CPU despite OP claiming otherwise. As fully expected with DeluxHost and the price. Also expect some network hiccups for that price.

    Please stop bumping this thread so the actual "important" message for potential "I am too lazy to research" buyers won't be lost in millions of rage-posts.

    Have to disagree here when the OP starts to mislead people and needs to be called out. Comparing across GB4 to GB6 and then manipulating the result to own benefit is something that has been criticized in the past.

    You may call those people lazy researcher but it will be a victim blaming instead of calling out the intentional ill intention.

    If anything, that was unintentional. I've already invited you and the rest to post GB4 scores with the same specs from DeluxHost. I will gladly retract the statement if my score is indeed lower, You guys are the one trying to flip the narrative acting as though I'm the villian. I'm a man of my word. Post the GB4 we'll have a head to head comparison. If mine is lower, I will retract my statement. So what am I trying to hide? You tell me.

    Can I accuse you the same? You knew 1 GB RAM wasn't enough for GB6 and you spun it in your favour. Do you like the accusation now even though it may or may not have been your intention to begin with.

    GB4 score was already provided by rpqu. Unless deluxehost use some custom variant of 9950x, it should be in the range across providers. right?

    When let's say top end is 9000+ then for low end providers, 4500+ may be considered as okish score. but if it is even half of that, then certainly that is an anomaly and probably heavily oversold.

    First of all, We are talking about DeluxHost VPS only. With 3vCore same CPU model, and 1 GB RAM. What's the point of comparing with another provider that isn't budget option? Might as well you bring in a Bare Metal running Ryzen 9 9950X then u post and tell me the single and multi score. Compare apple with apple and from the same vendor.

Sign In or Register to comment.