Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Community Poll: Should We Remain a Provider on LET?

DasaboDasabo 🚩 Patron Provider Tag Suspended

Dear LET Community,

Following the recent events and the discussions surrounding our company, we would like to directly ask the community for honest feedback regarding our presence on LET as a provider.

We understand the concerns raised and we fully respect the opinions of this community. For this reason, we would like to open this poll and ask you a simple question:

Do you believe we should remain on LET as a provider, or would you prefer that we voluntarily step away from the platform?

If the majority of the community no longer wishes for us to remain here, I will formally open a ticket requesting the removal of our Patron Provider tag.

We kindly ask everyone to keep the discussion civil, constructive, and respectful.

Poll responses and feedback will be considered until May 15, 2026 at 09:00 AM Rome Time (CEST).

Thank you to everyone who takes the time to respond honestly.

Should we continue as a Patron Provider on LET?
  1. Should we continue as a Patron Provider on LET?171 votes
    1. YES
      21.05%
    2. NO
      78.95%
«134

Comments

This discussion has been closed.