New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
I agree, but unfortunately we live in a world where people do click through warnings.
And when the port you're trying to bind to is in the ephemeral range (and isn't set to reserved), sshd may not start even if there's no attacker in the equation at all. That alone is a reason not to use TCP/34221.
Besides that, the only other issues are unlikely and contrived:
I agree that the primary purpose of making low ports privileged is no longer relevant as we no longer run things on massive shared servers with HTTP on port 80 and a bunch of untrusted users with personal sites on domain/~username/ and shell accounts, but that doesn't mean that binding SSH to port 34221 is smart or doesn't have security issues.