Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

IP Volume

This discussion was created from comments split from: Who is IP Volume Inc?.

Comments

  • mpppmppp Member

    @DennisdeWit said:
    The Dutch newspaper wrote a longread about IPVolume/Ecatel/Novogara/ReBa Communications.

    https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2021/04/02/the-cesspool-of-the-internet-is-to-be-found-in-a-village-in-north-holland-a4038369

    For people being stuck behind a paywall, here's the full article https://archive.is/XV56j

    I suppose their abuse email is never checked. How come they are not blocked upstream?

    There should be some clearer procedures outlined somewhere to report abuse ignoring hosts against their upstream providers - where it hurts the most. Since they signed a contract with them that most likely stipulates that abuse has to be handled properly?

    After all ISPs that ignore abuse requests risk losing their "safe harbor" status and can be sued for millions ( in the US at least ). So even if a host is juridically not situated in the US, their upstream providers most likely are?

  • kaitkait Member

    @mppp This is from Jan 2022... no one cares about it anymore I assume.

  • mpppmppp Member
    edited August 2025

    @kait said:
    @mppp This is from Jan 2022... no one cares about it anymore I assume.

    The article is from 2022. The wikipedia article is crazy long for a hoster with edits in 2024. Media and authorities are interested them. And the hoster is still around actively ignoring abuse reports.

    So I'm not sure if I'd call that "no one cares about it anymore".

  • kaitkait Member

    @mppp said:

    @kait said:
    @mppp This is from Jan 2022... no one cares about it anymore I assume.

    The article is from 2022. The wikipedia article is crazy long for a hoster with edits in 2024. Media and authorities are interested them. And the hoster is still around actively ignoring abuse reports.

    So I'm not sure if I'd call that "no one cares about it anymore".

    I am more talking about this discussion.. Don't necro <3

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • VoidVoid Member

    Fuckin necro

  • kaitkait Member

    @Void said:
    Fuckin necro

    c=g ;)

  • mpppmppp Member

    Top google result for "IP Volume abuse", timeless.

  • kaitkait Member

    @mppp said:
    Top google result for "IP Volume abuse", timeless.

    Don't give a fuck, don't negro a discussion. Start a new one if you have new information. Everyone who needs to know about IP Volume knows about IP Volume. We all hope the feds raids their ass but don't negro a disccusion.

  • mpppmppp Member
    edited August 2025

    I am actually interested in why people don't kill them ( and similar ISPs ) by approaching their upstream providers, but thanks for your valuable input.

    Also learned a lot from this thread, so there's that.

  • kaitkait Member

    @mppp said:
    I am actually interested in why people don't kill them ( and similar ISPs ) by approaching their upstream providers, but thanks for your valuable input.

    Then go approach their upstreams.

  • mpppmppp Member

    Yeah I should have maybe asked @packetnext as he seems to know way more about this

    So again, my bad for the necro. Landed here from google and was genuine interest

  • kaitkait Member

    @mppp said:
    Yeah I should have maybe asked @packetnext as he seems to know way more about this

    So again, my bad for the necro. Landed here from google and was genuine interest

    No worries man, IP Volume just needs to opkankeren.

  • Let’s think about some things…

    • Why aren’t the NRC posting any follow-up’s?
    • Maybe someone should ask the Editorial Team to write a follow-up, and see what was the outcome? No one went to prison. No hardware confiscated. Nothing shut down.
    • Why hasn’t there been any legal action taken since 2020?

    So, what can we actually verify? What are the verifiable facts that we are aware of?

    In 2020, Dutch Criminal Authorities conducted a Full Criminal Investigation into the activities of IP Volume, Inc.

    The outcome of the said investigation? No evidence was found, no servers were confiscated. No evidence of being involved in any cyber crime related activities or CSAM.

    It is 2025… five years later: no court case, no charges, no convictions, and most notably — no arrests!

    That alone should speak volumes (no pun intended, even though the Internet is a series of tubes!)

    Now, let’s be fully transparent here, if something was going on, something serious. The plug would be pulled. Same as it was on CyberBunker, GLOBE, etc.

    Dutch police don’t joke around when there is in fact a criminal organization, and when there is evidence of any wrongdoing.

    They will do their jobs, honorably, and punish those that have committed acts punishable by criminal law.

    They will never hesitate because the world is a real and a serious place with real consequences, businesses that run properly, even after being investigated, and no wrongdoing is found, they will either continue to operate as-is, or will await court proceedings (and go bankrupt) but, most certainly not whilst operating the business conglomerate if they are a criminal organization.

    Everything would have simply been emptied, and done and over with.

    Meanwhile, several large security-focused organizations (including governmental bodies) rely on their services, and, if, there was something wrong with the business you are slandering, would they still continue to use their services?

    Would their supervising governmental bodies allow them to do so, if there were any court proceedings against them?

    One of the most famous ridiculous accusations is trying to link the said business conglomerate to what was referred to as the “RBN” (Russian Business Network), which wasn’t even a business, it was a “network”, it was a group of people — a “partnerka”, and they used datacenters out of Russia and the United States.

    Yet, one of these most serious and slanderous lies will never be removed from the forum, or from the Wiki… even though we are talking about a business that is nearly 25 years old and still standing strong. 💪

    What about the rest? Their transit providers, oversold network, eBay hardware… having to be desperate enough to accept any clients…

    Do you see that business conglomerate posting any advertisements? Needing clients?

    Are they strapped for cash, or are they running a legitimate business and minding their own business and NOT spending their time on hatred and jealousy?!

    Maybe the NRC Editorial Team should publish a Part 3 titled: “How A Controversial Dutch Datacenter Turned Out To Be Cleaner Than Its Most Famous Critics”.

    Speaking of NRC, and their Editorial Team… maybe it’s time to correct that those IP’s, from an Israeli company (Netstyle, and not IP Volume), are used by NordVPN… that “legitimate” company with advertisements on television channels.

    Love,
    VERA

    Thanked by 1eKo
Sign In or Register to comment.