Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

VPs.tc seems dubious provider but it's a good experience for me

Very good Turkish hosting company, servers performance are very satisfying for the priced you paying
I'm a new costumer but their costumer support seems to reply fast and they are friendly speaking perfect English .
Ignore the bad reviews that they are dodgy ,you get their company details in the invoice you receive .

Thanked by 2oloke forest

Comments

  • No network is flaky I couldn't acces my server for multiple hours by SSH web console ping ticket response is not very good

  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    I have a VPS with them for over 5 months now.

    The VPS is very cheap for the specs and location but I would not use it for anything serious or production ready.
    Their site is incomplete, just barely customized template so I don't think they even have a ToS.
    I don't know who runs the company. When it deadpools, I'm not even sure who to blame.

    From the emails, they seem to be pretty transparent with planned work and maintenance.

    • On 7th May they sent me a customer experience survey to fill for $5 credit.

    • On 9th May they had a serious outage and data loss incident in their CEPH cluster. I think the downtime was around 2 days and I had to rebuild the VM after. If i stored any important data there, it would probably be lost.
      They gave me a compensation of 10 usd for the incident.
      (I made 15 usd in credits while spending 12 usd on their yearly plan, stonks)

    • On 18th of June they sent an email about their future roadmap along with a picture of their rack.

    • On 25th of June IP ranges were changed which they also notified prior.

    The VPS restarts rather frequently in recent months (a few times a week).
    Currently I have 4 day uptime.

    There are some experiences of LET users who were dissatisfied with them. You may want to read it.
    As for performance, I don't use this IDLEr too much for heavy workloads, but the CPU seems to be rather slow.
    Here's YABS:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jul  7 08:03:15 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 4 days, 6 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2194.500 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    ASN        : AS44382 Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    Host       : DC HOST Inc
    Location   : Istanbul, Istanbul (34)
    Country    : Türkiye
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 45.23 MB/s   (11.3k) | 262.83 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Write      | 45.30 MB/s   (11.3k) | 264.21 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Total      | 90.53 MB/s   (22.6k) | 527.05 MB/s   (8.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 345.37 MB/s    (674) | 307.46 MB/s    (300)
    Write      | 363.72 MB/s    (710) | 327.94 MB/s    (320)
    Total      | 709.09 MB/s   (1.3k) | 635.40 MB/s    (620)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 287 Mbits/sec   | 62.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 810 Mbits/sec   | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 50.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 177 Mbits/sec   | 98.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 712 Mbits/sec   | 491 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 544 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 190 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 608 Mbits/sec   | 175 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 340                           
    Multi Core      | 378                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12754688
    
    YABS completed in 37 min 58 sec
    

    For the Turkey location, I would trust @tarisu much more with hosting serious stuff.

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Daverno said:
    Very good Turkish hosting company, servers performance are very satisfying for the priced you paying
    I'm a new costumer but their costumer support seems to reply fast and they are friendly speaking perfect English .
    Ignore the bad reviews that they are dodgy ,you get their company details in the invoice you receive .

    Congrats on your first post since December 2018 (wow!)

    So you're simply a satisfied customer of VPS.TC -- otherwise no connection?

  • tarisutarisu Member, Host Rep

    @oloke said:
    I have a VPS with them for over 5 months now.

    The VPS is very cheap for the specs and location but I would not use it for anything serious or production ready.
    Their site is incomplete, just barely customized template so I don't think they even have a ToS.
    I don't know who runs the company. When it deadpools, I'm not even sure who to blame.

    From the emails, they seem to be pretty transparent with planned work and maintenance.

    • On 7th May they sent me a customer experience survey to fill for $5 credit.

    • On 9th May they had a serious outage and data loss incident in their CEPH cluster. I think the downtime was around 2 days and I had to rebuild the VM after. If i stored any important data there, it would probably be lost.
      They gave me a compensation of 10 usd for the incident.
      (I made 15 usd in credits while spending 12 usd on their yearly plan, stonks)

    • On 18th of June they sent an email about their future roadmap along with a picture of their rack.

    • On 25th of June IP ranges were changed which they also notified prior.

    The VPS restarts rather frequently in recent months (a few times a week).
    Currently I have 4 day uptime.

    There are some experiences of LET users who were dissatisfied with them. You may want to read it.
    As for performance, I don't use this IDLEr too much for heavy workloads, but the CPU seems to be rather slow.
    Here's YABS:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jul  7 08:03:15 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 4 days, 6 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2194.500 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    ASN        : AS44382 Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    Host       : DC HOST Inc
    Location   : Istanbul, Istanbul (34)
    Country    : Türkiye
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 45.23 MB/s   (11.3k) | 262.83 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Write      | 45.30 MB/s   (11.3k) | 264.21 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Total      | 90.53 MB/s   (22.6k) | 527.05 MB/s   (8.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 345.37 MB/s    (674) | 307.46 MB/s    (300)
    Write      | 363.72 MB/s    (710) | 327.94 MB/s    (320)
    Total      | 709.09 MB/s   (1.3k) | 635.40 MB/s    (620)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 287 Mbits/sec   | 62.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 810 Mbits/sec   | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 50.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 177 Mbits/sec   | 98.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 712 Mbits/sec   | 491 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 544 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 190 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 608 Mbits/sec   | 175 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 340                           
    Multi Core      | 378                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12754688
    
    YABS completed in 37 min 58 sec
    

    For the Turkey location, I would trust @tarisu much more with hosting serious stuff.

    Thanks for the mention!

    We are happy to be one of trusted Turkish providers. :blush:

    Thanked by 3cainyxues mandala oloke
  • RubbenRubben Member

    @angstrom said:

    @Daverno said:
    Very good Turkish hosting company, servers performance are very satisfying for the priced you paying
    I'm a new costumer but their costumer support seems to reply fast and they are friendly speaking perfect English .
    Ignore the bad reviews that they are dodgy ,you get their company details in the invoice you receive .

    Congrats on your first post since December 2018 (wow!)

    So you're simply a satisfied customer of VPS.TC -- otherwise no connection?

    ur so sassy, i like you, please dont go bald

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Rubben said:

    @angstrom said:

    @Daverno said:
    Very good Turkish hosting company, servers performance are very satisfying for the priced you paying
    I'm a new costumer but their costumer support seems to reply fast and they are friendly speaking perfect English .
    Ignore the bad reviews that they are dodgy ,you get their company details in the invoice you receive .

    Congrats on your first post since December 2018 (wow!)

    So you're simply a satisfied customer of VPS.TC -- otherwise no connection?

    ur so sassy, i like you, please dont go bald

    Being a mod at LET is a factor that favors hair loss, unfortunately! :#

    I hope that the OP (= @Daverno ) returns to clarify why they suddenly felt moved to post after 6.5 years of slumber

    Thanked by 2oloke Frameworks
  • Thank you for sharing your 'verrry' important views with the shittiest community.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/152574/shittiest-community

    Thanked by 1borkedascii
  • @tarisu said:

    @oloke said:
    I have a VPS with them for over 5 months now.

    The VPS is very cheap for the specs and location but I would not use it for anything serious or production ready.
    Their site is incomplete, just barely customized template so I don't think they even have a ToS.
    I don't know who runs the company. When it deadpools, I'm not even sure who to blame.

    From the emails, they seem to be pretty transparent with planned work and maintenance.

    • On 7th May they sent me a customer experience survey to fill for $5 credit.

    • On 9th May they had a serious outage and data loss incident in their CEPH cluster. I think the downtime was around 2 days and I had to rebuild the VM after. If i stored any important data there, it would probably be lost.
      They gave me a compensation of 10 usd for the incident.
      (I made 15 usd in credits while spending 12 usd on their yearly plan, stonks)

    • On 18th of June they sent an email about their future roadmap along with a picture of their rack.

    • On 25th of June IP ranges were changed which they also notified prior.

    The VPS restarts rather frequently in recent months (a few times a week).
    Currently I have 4 day uptime.

    There are some experiences of LET users who were dissatisfied with them. You may want to read it.
    As for performance, I don't use this IDLEr too much for heavy workloads, but the CPU seems to be rather slow.
    Here's YABS:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jul  7 08:03:15 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 4 days, 6 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2194.500 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    ASN        : AS44382 Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    Host       : DC HOST Inc
    Location   : Istanbul, Istanbul (34)
    Country    : Türkiye
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 45.23 MB/s   (11.3k) | 262.83 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Write      | 45.30 MB/s   (11.3k) | 264.21 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Total      | 90.53 MB/s   (22.6k) | 527.05 MB/s   (8.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 345.37 MB/s    (674) | 307.46 MB/s    (300)
    Write      | 363.72 MB/s    (710) | 327.94 MB/s    (320)
    Total      | 709.09 MB/s   (1.3k) | 635.40 MB/s    (620)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 287 Mbits/sec   | 62.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 810 Mbits/sec   | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 50.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 177 Mbits/sec   | 98.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 712 Mbits/sec   | 491 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 544 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 190 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 608 Mbits/sec   | 175 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 340                           
    Multi Core      | 378                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12754688
    
    YABS completed in 37 min 58 sec
    

    For the Turkey location, I would trust @tarisu much more with hosting serious stuff.

    Thanks for the mention!

    We are happy to be one of trusted Turkish providers. :blush:

    Are there any current promotions? <3

  • M66BM66B Veteran

    @OnePrice said:

    @tarisu said:

    @oloke said:
    I have a VPS with them for over 5 months now.

    The VPS is very cheap for the specs and location but I would not use it for anything serious or production ready.
    Their site is incomplete, just barely customized template so I don't think they even have a ToS.
    I don't know who runs the company. When it deadpools, I'm not even sure who to blame.

    From the emails, they seem to be pretty transparent with planned work and maintenance.

    • On 7th May they sent me a customer experience survey to fill for $5 credit.

    • On 9th May they had a serious outage and data loss incident in their CEPH cluster. I think the downtime was around 2 days and I had to rebuild the VM after. If i stored any important data there, it would probably be lost.
      They gave me a compensation of 10 usd for the incident.
      (I made 15 usd in credits while spending 12 usd on their yearly plan, stonks)

    • On 18th of June they sent an email about their future roadmap along with a picture of their rack.

    • On 25th of June IP ranges were changed which they also notified prior.

    The VPS restarts rather frequently in recent months (a few times a week).
    Currently I have 4 day uptime.

    There are some experiences of LET users who were dissatisfied with them. You may want to read it.
    As for performance, I don't use this IDLEr too much for heavy workloads, but the CPU seems to be rather slow.
    Here's YABS:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jul  7 08:03:15 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 4 days, 6 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2194.500 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    ASN        : AS44382 Fiba Cloud Operation Company, LLC
    Host       : DC HOST Inc
    Location   : Istanbul, Istanbul (34)
    Country    : Türkiye
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 45.23 MB/s   (11.3k) | 262.83 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Write      | 45.30 MB/s   (11.3k) | 264.21 MB/s   (4.1k)
    Total      | 90.53 MB/s   (22.6k) | 527.05 MB/s   (8.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 345.37 MB/s    (674) | 307.46 MB/s    (300)
    Write      | 363.72 MB/s    (710) | 327.94 MB/s    (320)
    Total      | 709.09 MB/s   (1.3k) | 635.40 MB/s    (620)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 287 Mbits/sec   | 62.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 810 Mbits/sec   | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 50.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 177 Mbits/sec   | 98.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 712 Mbits/sec   | 491 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 544 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 190 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 124 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 608 Mbits/sec   | 175 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 340                           
    Multi Core      | 378                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12754688
    
    YABS completed in 37 min 58 sec
    

    For the Turkey location, I would trust @tarisu much more with hosting serious stuff.

    Thanks for the mention!

    We are happy to be one of trusted Turkish providers. :blush:

    Are there any current promotions? <3

    There is a double downtime deal.

    Thanked by 1jnd
  • sobrinosobrino Member
    edited June 7

    I'll share my honest experience with their services.

    Most of the time, their services work and remain available. However, there are occasions when their entire infrastructure goes down. For example, on June 7, 2026, everything was offline except for their main website. During that outage, the client portal was unavailable as well, making it impossible to create a support ticket.

    Their social media links are fake, and both of the physical addresses they provide are false. I haven't tested their phone number, but based on everything else, I assume it's fake too. It also appears that all of their services, including the client portal, are hosted on a single server. When that server fails, everything goes down with it.

    What is even more concerning is how they handle these incidents. They provide no announcements, no status updates, no apologies, and no compensation for the downtime their customers experience.

    Another issue is their Turkey VPS network performance. They advertise 25 Gbps bandwidth, but in my experience it rarely exceeds 1 Gbps and is often significantly lower.

    Their pricing is undoubtedly attractive, but when it comes to stability, support, and accountability, my experience has been disappointing. If your project is important, long-term, or customer-facing, I would strongly recommend looking elsewhere.

    On the other hand, if you're looking for an extremely low-cost solution for a short-term project lasting a month or two, you may find some value in their services.

    My recommendation is simple: never pay for more than one month in advance. Given their anonymity and the lack of reliable ways to contact them during major outages, there is a real risk of losing access to your money, your data, and potentially your business operations if they were to disappear without notice.

  • LeviLevi Member

    @sobrino said:
    I'll share my honest experience with their services.

    Most of the time, their services work and remain available. However, there are occasions when their entire infrastructure goes down. For example, on June 7, 2026, everything was offline except for their main website. During that outage, the client portal was unavailable as well, making it impossible to create a support ticket.

    Their social media links are fake, and both of the physical addresses they provide are false. I haven't tested their phone number, but based on everything else, I assume it's fake too. It also appears that all of their services, including the client portal, are hosted on a single server. When that server fails, everything goes down with it.

    What is even more concerning is how they handle these incidents. They provide no announcements, no status updates, no apologies, and no compensation for the downtime their customers experience.

    Another issue is their Turkey VPS network performance. They advertise 25 Gbps bandwidth, but in my experience it rarely exceeds 1 Gbps and is often significantly lower.

    Their pricing is undoubtedly attractive, but when it comes to stability, support, and accountability, my experience has been disappointing. If your project is important, long-term, or customer-facing, I would strongly recommend looking elsewhere.

    On the other hand, if you're looking for an extremely low-cost solution for a short-term project lasting a month or two, you may find some value in their services.

    My recommendation is simple: never pay for more than one month in advance. Given their anonymity and the lack of reliable ways to contact them during major outages, there is a real risk of losing access to your money, your data, and potentially your business operations if they were to disappear without notice.

    Turklers are well known for scams, lies and false adverts. If you are not local - stay away from low end turkler services.

  • forestforest Member
    edited June 7

    They're decent but have very high CPU steal and oversell RAM on the node I'm on, so they do aggressive memory ballooning. The solution is to blacklist the driver, since memory ballooning requires guest support:

    echo "blacklist virtio_balloon" > /etc/modprobe.d/stop-stealing-ram.conf
    

    I agree that they are not good for production.

  • buzzyLETbuzzyLET Member

    @forest said:
    They're decent but have very high CPU steal and oversell RAM on the node I'm on, so they do aggressive memory ballooning. The solution is to blacklist the driver, since memory ballooning requires guest support:

    echo "blacklist virtio_balloon" > /etc/modprobe.d/stop-stealing-ram.conf
    

    I agree that they are not good for production.

    do you have one of your tor relays on here? I can't even load the TOS..

  • forestforest Member

    @buzzyLET said:

    @forest said:
    They're decent but have very high CPU steal and oversell RAM on the node I'm on, so they do aggressive memory ballooning. The solution is to blacklist the driver, since memory ballooning requires guest support:

    echo "blacklist virtio_balloon" > /etc/modprobe.d/stop-stealing-ram.conf
    

    I agree that they are not good for production.

    do you have one of your tor relays on here? I can't even load the TOS..

    Yes, I have forest31 there now, although it's currently down (I'll investigate in a few hours).

Sign In or Register to comment.