servaRICA – New KVM VPS Launch: Chimera Hybrid, Slim & FAT Slices – Blazing Disk Speed

FlamesRunner · June 2025

Very happy with the Chimera VPS so far, can hit full gigabit speeds to my home connection:

an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -c x.x.x.x -p5201
Connecting to host x.x.x.x, port 5201
[  5] local x.x.x.x port 59146 connected to x.x.x.x port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd          RTT
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   104 MBytes   876 Mbits/sec    3   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   116 MBytes   971 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   115 MBytes   962 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   115 MBytes   965 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   114 MBytes   960 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   115 MBytes   969 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   115 MBytes   965 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   115 MBytes   961 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.11 GBytes   957 Mbits/sec    3             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  1.11 GBytes   952 Mbits/sec                  receiver

Quick YABS:

root@nfs-backup:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-04-20                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Jun 21 04:10:46 UTC 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 2 days, 56 hours, 0 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5118 CPU @ 2.30GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 2.0 GiB
Disk       : 2.0 TiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-60-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Rica Web Services
ASN        : AS26832 Rica Web Services
Host       : Rica Web Services
Location   : Montreal, Quebec (QC)
Country    : Canada

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 249.09 MB/s  (62.2k) | 893.48 MB/s  (13.9k)
Write      | 249.75 MB/s  (62.4k) | 898.18 MB/s  (14.0k)
Total      | 498.84 MB/s (124.7k) | 1.79 GB/s    (27.9k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 966.81 MB/s   (1.8k) | 981.41 MB/s    (958)
Write      | 1.01 GB/s     (1.9k) | 1.04 GB/s     (1.0k)
Total      | 1.98 GB/s     (3.8k) | 2.02 GB/s     (1.9k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 330 Mbits/sec   | 587 Mbits/sec   | 77.8 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 281 Mbits/sec   | 871 Mbits/sec   | 80.4 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 102 Mbits/sec   | 865 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 206 Mbits/sec   | 811 Mbits/sec   | 237 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 376 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 75.2 ms        
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 971 Mbits/sec   | 9.68 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 216 Mbits/sec   | 885 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 909                           
Multi Core      | 1687                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12531841

YABS completed in 13 min 13 sec

artxs · June 2025

@FlamesRunner said:
Very happy with the Chimera VPS so far, can hit full gigabit speeds to my home connection:

try running iperf client from your home connection and see what speeds you get because you'll most likely going through cogent instead of beanfield.

NJa64F · June 2025

@artxs said: iperf client from your home connection

would just adding the -R switch to iperf3 do the same thing ?

iperf3 -c x.x.x.x -R

but my home connections upload speed is much lower than download

artxs · June 2025

@jperkins said:

@artxs said: iperf client from your home connection

would just adding the -R switch to iperf3 do the same thing ?

iperf3 -c x.x.x.x -R

but my home connections upload speed is much lower than download

-R tests download speed. since you omit -R when running from vps you're testing upload speed. So use -R when running from your home connection because you want to test the same direction (speed from vps to your home). the x.x.x.x would be your vps ip instead.

FlamesRunner · June 2025

@artxs

In the interest of completeness, here are three iperf3 runs, once with my client uploading and twice downloading for a total two each including my first post:

x.x.x.x - home IP
y.y.y.y. - VPS IP

an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201
Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host y.y.y.y is sending
[  5] local x.x.x.x port 54766 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Rwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  19.3 MBytes   162 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  7.05 MBytes  59.1 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  7.00 MBytes  58.8 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  4.41 MBytes  36.9 Mbits/sec  2.56 MBytes                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  6.18 MBytes  51.9 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  8.70 MBytes  73.0 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  5.87 MBytes  49.3 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  5.16 MBytes  43.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  3.24 MBytes  27.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  5.62 MBytes  47.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec  76.5 MBytes  64.1 Mbits/sec  210             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  72.5 MBytes  60.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201
Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host y.y.y.y is sending
[  5] local x.x.x.x port 54275 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Rwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  56.0 MBytes   470 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  27.9 MBytes   234 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  22.0 MBytes   185 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  27.2 MBytes   228 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  32.6 MBytes   274 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  38.3 MBytes   322 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  43.5 MBytes   365 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  49.2 MBytes   413 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  53.9 MBytes   453 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  59.9 MBytes   502 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   415 MBytes   348 Mbits/sec  382             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   411 MBytes   344 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -c y.y.y.y -p 5201 
Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
[  5] local x.x.x.x port 54383 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd          RTT
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   111 MBytes   934 Mbits/sec    2   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   116 MBytes   974 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   115 MBytes   966 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   116 MBytes   973 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   117 MBytes   979 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   116 MBytes   973 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   115 MBytes   966 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   115 MBytes   967 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.13 GBytes   967 Mbits/sec    2             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.03  sec  1.13 GBytes   963 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

This is on a multi-gig connection; the limiting factor on my end is the 2.5 Gbps switch and indeed the VPS' 1 Gbps limit.

It seems that the VPS has an uncongested line when it comes to the server's download speeds, but the server's upload speeds are much more inconsistent.

Fortunately, my use case relies much more on fast upload to the server as compared to fast download (NAS backups; hopefully the need to retrieve data does not occur often!), so it's okay for now, but the download speeds are pretty abysmal at times to my home connection.

zhongyang · June 2025

Is there a YABS test for KVM Slim Slice？

Motion3549 · June 2025

@FlamesRunner said:
@artxs

In the interest of completeness, here are three iperf3 runs, once with my client uploading and twice downloading for a total two each including my first post:

x.x.x.x - home IP
y.y.y.y. - VPS IP

> an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201
> Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
> Reverse mode, remote host y.y.y.y is sending
> [  5] local x.x.x.x port 54766 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Rwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  19.3 MBytes   162 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  7.05 MBytes  59.1 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  7.00 MBytes  58.8 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  4.41 MBytes  36.9 Mbits/sec  2.56 MBytes                  
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  6.18 MBytes  51.9 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  8.70 MBytes  73.0 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  5.87 MBytes  49.3 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  5.16 MBytes  43.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  3.24 MBytes  27.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  5.62 MBytes  47.2 Mbits/sec  2.57 MBytes                  
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
> [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec  76.5 MBytes  64.1 Mbits/sec  210             sender
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  72.5 MBytes  60.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver
> 
> iperf Done.
> 
> an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201
> Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
> Reverse mode, remote host y.y.y.y is sending
> [  5] local x.x.x.x port 54275 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Rwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  56.0 MBytes   470 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  27.9 MBytes   234 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  22.0 MBytes   185 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  27.2 MBytes   228 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  32.6 MBytes   274 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  38.3 MBytes   322 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  43.5 MBytes   365 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  49.2 MBytes   413 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  53.9 MBytes   453 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  59.9 MBytes   502 Mbits/sec  3.09 MBytes                  
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
> [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   415 MBytes   348 Mbits/sec  382             sender
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   411 MBytes   344 Mbits/sec                  receiver
> 
> iperf Done.
> 
> an@an-Mac-mini:~$ iperf3-darwin -c y.y.y.y -p 5201 
> Connecting to host y.y.y.y, port 5201
> [  5] local x.x.x.x port 54383 connected to y.y.y.y port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd          RTT
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   111 MBytes   934 Mbits/sec    2   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   116 MBytes   974 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   115 MBytes   966 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   116 MBytes   973 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   117 MBytes   979 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   116 MBytes   973 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   115 MBytes   966 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   115 MBytes   967 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   35ms     
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   115 MBytes   968 Mbits/sec    0   8.00 MBytes   34ms     
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.13 GBytes   967 Mbits/sec    2             sender
> [  5]   0.00-10.03  sec  1.13 GBytes   963 Mbits/sec                  receiver
> 
> iperf Done.
>

This is on a multi-gig connection; the limiting factor on my end is the 2.5 Gbps switch and indeed the VPS' 1 Gbps limit.

It seems that the VPS has an uncongested line when it comes to the server's download speeds, but the server's upload speeds are much more inconsistent.

Fortunately, my use case relies much more on fast upload to the server as compared to fast download (NAS backups; hopefully the need to retrieve data does not occur often!), so it's okay for now, but the download speeds are pretty abysmal at times to my home connection.

NJa64F · June 2025

@FlamesRunner said: iperf3-darwin -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201

there ya go. my only other iperf3 suggestion is to run some parallel connections with -P. Some VPS limit the per connection speed.

iperf3 -R -c y.y.y.y -p 5201 -P4

prolly everyone who recently bought a storage vps from Servarica is xferring a boatload of data. Things could settle down after a bit and improve even more.

FlamesRunner · June 2025

@Motion3549 said:
Do you have other vps to compare ?

I compared it to an Oracle Cloud box with access to a 4 Gbps link, looks like there's something snagging the speed on the client download from the server part; full speed on uploading to the server. When testing between the Oracle Cloud box and Servarica, it's full speed uploading from the OC box and around 800 Mbps the other way around.

Not 100% sure what's happening - not really an expert in this sort of thing.

Motion3549 · June 2025

@FlamesRunner said:

@Motion3549 said:
Do you have other vps to compare ?

I compared it to an Oracle Cloud box with access to a 4 Gbps link, looks like there's something snagging the speed on the client download from the server part; full speed on uploading to the server. When testing between the Oracle Cloud box and Servarica, it's full speed uploading from the OC box and around 800 Mbps the other way around.

Not 100% sure what's happening - not really an expert in this sort of thing.

Thanks for testing, at least we have a comparison to confirm.

louiejordan · June 2025

nice, I like this~

dricesne · June 2025

just making sure, the late delivery means the billing is from the delivery not order?

artxs · June 2025

@FlamesRunner said:
It seems that the VPS has an uncongested line when it comes to the server's download speeds, but the server's upload speeds are much more inconsistent.

You get full 1gps speed when the client is running from the vps (egress), so the congested line is only when you connect to the vps (ingress), which is using cogent instead of beanfield. This is what I experienced with my dedicated server there as well. I find that yabs/speedtest running on the server isn't a reliable indicator of network performance since providers often have different upstreams for ingress/egress.

NJa64F · June 2025

@artxs said: You get full 1gps speed when the client is running from the vps (egress), so the congested line is only when you connect to the vps (ingress), which is using cogent instead of beanfield

wait, so it like the packets drop breadcrumbs on the way out so they can trace the same way back gotta admit my understanding is very limited . so I found this
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/return-traffic/td-p/495284

RealChaika · June 2025

servaRICA's network is a bit curious, they don't have RPKI/valid ROAs for any of their announcements, not even IPv6:
https://bgp.tools/as/26832#prefixes
I noticed too one of the cheap VPS's I got is in a range single homed to Cogent, 149.5.244.0/22
https://bgp.tools/prefix/149.5.244.0/22#connectivity, not also upstreamed by Beanfield like most of their other IPs. A Cost saving measure? hmm

servarica_hani · June 2025

@dricesne said:
just making sure, the late delivery means the billing is from the delivery not order?

yes , the next billing date is 1 month after the delivery date

servarica_hani · June 2025

@artxs said:

@FlamesRunner said:
It seems that the VPS has an uncongested line when it comes to the server's download speeds, but the server's upload speeds are much more inconsistent.

You get full 1gps speed when the client is running from the vps (egress), so the congested line is only when you connect to the vps (ingress), which is using cogent instead of beanfield. This is what I experienced with my dedicated server there as well. I find that yabs/speedtest running on the server isn't a reliable indicator of network performance since providers often have different upstreams for ingress/egress.

We use both uplinks for upload and download
But this is BGP so the packets will take shortest path
on upload from server it seems beanfield presented the shortest path , on download cogent presented the shortest path

in some cases when there is issue with one uplink we choose where the outgoing packets from our network goes but we cannot control which path incoming packet will take

cogent is everywhere and peering in alot of places which make them alot of times the shortest path

servarica_hani · June 2025

@jperkins said:

@artxs said: You get full 1gps speed when the client is running from the vps (egress), so the congested line is only when you connect to the vps (ingress), which is using cogent instead of beanfield

wait, so it like the packets drop breadcrumbs on the way out so they can trace the same way back gotta admit my understanding is very limited . so I found this
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/return-traffic/td-p/495284

this is BGP protocol and in BGP there is no relation between both directions
in same tcp session you can have packets on same direction change path if the cost changed mid session

bdl · June 2025

Delivery within 24 hours for a $5/mth service - thankyou @servarica_hani

jgo24 · June 2025

@servarica_hani
Got the server
KVM Slim Slice 2
order #1523649347
Please double my bandwidth

jackpops · June 2025

@jgo24 said:
@servarica_hani
Got the server
KVM Slim Slice 2
order #1523649347
Please double my bandwidth

Hey guys, when did they have a doubling of bandwidth event?

fuqet · June 2025

@jackpops said:

@jgo24 said:
@servarica_hani
Got the server
KVM Slim Slice 2
order #1523649347
Please double my bandwidth

Hey guys, when did they have a doubling of bandwidth event?

They did not have doubling bandwidth event..

Vasto · June 2025

I ordered a kvm slim slice 16 which will arrive on the 27th. I seem impatient but if I may ask, is there a definite time when the order will arrive?

webmaster32 · June 2025

@Vasto said:
I ordered a kvm slim slice 16 which will arrive on the 27th. I seem impatient but if I may ask, is there a definite time when the order will arrive?

me too. bought a KVM FAT Slice 2 on June 22nd. still waiting for the delivery

thodinh · June 2025

@Vasto said:
I ordered a kvm slim slice 16 which will arrive on the 27th. I seem impatient but if I may ask, is there a definite time when the order will arrive?

Me too, my recently order in 25th, but it seems they are preparing for a lot of orders. Earlier, I placed an order and it was delivered in under 24 hours.

Proxecure · June 2025

If i order KVM Slim Slice 4 now, snd later i want to upgrade to kvm slim sluce 8 , then upgrade is possible without data loss?

hanli29 · June 2025

Those waiting days, to deliver the servers are conded?

webmaster32 · June 2025

opened a ticket and they said the new arrival date will be july 1st. canceled and got a refund

Proxecure · June 2025

@webmaster32 said:
opened a ticket and they said the new arrival date will be july 1st. canceled and got a refund

7th july

hanli29 · June 2025

Chimera Hybrid Plan 1

https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/yabs/servarica_-2c-4gb-20250630-3961b1

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

servaRICA – New KVM VPS Launch: Chimera Hybrid, Slim & FAT Slices – Blazing Disk Speed

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

servaRICA – New KVM VPS Launch: Chimera Hybrid, Slim & FAT Slices – Blazing Disk Speed

Comments