Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


VPS in Iran
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

VPS in Iran

jure12jure12 Member

Hi,

Does anyone know where I can buy a VPS located in Iran. Anywhere in Iran.
The price doesn't matter. What matters is that it has an SSD disk.

Comments

  • bdlbdl Member

    Only WMD disk available.

    Thanked by 2fly056 dedotatedwam
  • cu_ollycu_olly Member
    edited June 16

    What's your use case? If you're aiming for low latency to Iranians, you're going to be paying an eyewatering amount because you'll need TIC, only TIC, and nothing but TIC.

  • gbzret4dgbzret4d Member

    Exservers

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy
    Thanked by 1admax
  • d2411d2411 Member

    Just read that they are blocking those providers due to the conflict?

  • ClanlyClanly Member

    :D

  • MarkEYuiMarkEYui Member

    As long as they are not powered by nuclear energy you should have no problems

    Thanked by 2farsighter tentor
  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member

    FYI, my VPS from itpiran is down and the support does not reply.

    Their panel works, but not the host node.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • zGatozGato Member

    @ValdikSS said:
    FYI, my VPS from itpiran is down and the support does not reply.

    Their panel works, but not the host node.

    https://radar.cloudflare.com/ir

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member
    edited June 20

    @zGato I'm aware of the shutdown as well. It quite possibly (and most likely) due to censorship, but their (billing) panel still works.

  • zGatozGato Member

    @ValdikSS said:
    @zGato I'm aware of the shutdown as well. It quite possibly (and most likely) due to censorship, but their (billing) panel still works.

    Is their billing's IP in Iran?

  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member

    @zGato said: Is their billing's IP in Iran?

    It's behind Cloudflare.

    https://client.itpiran.net/

  • I read that Iran government deliberately slowed down the internet to discourage people from posting videos. But the speed is still fine for ssh

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited June 20

    @farsighter said:
    I read that Iran government deliberately slowed down the internet to discourage people from posting videos. But the speed is still fine for ssh

    It's not really slowed down, but outright blocked. Outgoing connections from Iranian VPSs (or standard ISP) are blocked, but some incoming connections from X ranges are accepted (and thus you make a tunnel). It's actually quite stable but unpredictable since this seems to be some whitelist they have.

    There is a specific DC in Tehran that incoming traffic is not whitelisted, but outgoing is still blocked

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited June 20

    @ValdikSS said:

    @zGato said: Is their billing's IP in Iran?

    It's behind Cloudflare.

    https://client.itpiran.net/

    This is probably hosted in one of their Hetzner boxes or their other locations outside of Iran. It's timing out cause it's trying to connect to their cluster most likely (alpha-cloud.itpiran.net)

    Either node is down or its network is down, since not even whitelisted ranges can ping it.

    Thanked by 2oloke dav848
  • minitorminitor Member
    edited June 21

    I saw that you were talking about this @zGato @ValdikSS . Just so you know a few days after my post about internet status in Iran it got worse, most data centers in Iran got full intranet and didn't had incoming and outgoing access to foreign IPs (even google.com), only a small count of ip ranges were able to access outside, but 2 data centers (AminIDC and Tebyan) were able to access outside easily, although they dropped some connections once in a few hours but after all this was fine. About other DCes after 1 day seemed that it got a little better, connection to google.com got available again but and other data centers seemed to open outgoing access to foreign IPs but not incoming, so people who ran vpn started to run ping tunnels and 6TO4 tunnels and that worked well. Until now tunnels have the issue of dropping connections once in a few hours but as it doesn't get fully disconnected it's fine. But about Valdik Iran server , I think you will not be able to connect to it until they disable the firewall, who knows

  • d2411d2411 Member

    Interesting.
    So some DCs are able to establish an outgoing connection but incoming traffic will be dropped ?
    So people are running VPN Tunnels to an outgoing connection ?
    I’ve tried to reach some Hosts but the only AS which is partly available is irancell.
    Even the Speedtest server in Teheran is still
    Working.

  • minitorminitor Member
    edited June 21

    @d2411 said:
    Interesting.
    So some DCs are able to establish an outgoing connection but incoming traffic will be dropped ?
    So people are running VPN Tunnels to an outgoing connection ?
    I’ve tried to reach some Hosts but the only AS which is partly available is irancell.
    Even the Speedtest server in Teheran is still
    Working.

    Yes exactly. And as you said Irancell server was available, I don't know why but seems they're getting back to normal, even TCI servers on check-host.net got online again

  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member

    @ValdikSS said: Their panel works, but not the host node.

    Apparently the host's panel does not work due to large TLS ClientHello with ML-KEM (Kyber) cipher, and disabling Kyber support allowed me to log into the panel and access the VPS over KVM.

    TCP is generally totally blocked, but ICMP is not. I managed to set up a tunnel.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member

    Used Tor Relays as a source of fairly diverse IP ranges, scanned them by connecting, sending TLS ClientHello and waiting for a reply (as the block allows connection and sending the handshake, but filters the reply).

    Here are working Relays, hence IP ranges, so far:

    31.57.224.200:443 951041ACCE3BA0C2D98421AAC6B43E4A04A25F8F
    102.130.115.59:443 1FA9AD3AB62B0C7D54AFBB4679ED084300324D50
    102.130.113.42:9001 066FE3C4E07A18EA53B2828F753D3788D58D771D
    102.130.113.30:9001 A4B2F2A51F73D408530FA6C8AF63A7FAFFDAA0FC
    102.130.119.48:9001 A578594EC6F2D9E96799C548DFC089DAB3C2FB9D
    102.68.86.91:9001 9F593EBE1619195ABA174FBBB45B02A52604A4C5
    102.130.117.25:443 9A0AAF2E43BE3744CD1D6CD532C861F5A568F7A9
    102.130.113.9:9001 8AA3E8CD23AA9AC8103BAF0ACFF4D12443C5A1F8
    102.130.117.167:443 2ACD6E9FF8726CC04375D5871498D07B36748158
    102.130.113.29:9001 316D6ABCEA52268E617BB992D0F9909425770BC4
    102.130.127.117:443 26B466A5152B058DB26878731AE453D22A8F4B21
    
    Thanked by 3oloke hafijpt4 tentor
  • olokeoloke Member
    edited June 21

    @ValdikSS said:
    Used Tor Relays as a source of fairly diverse IP ranges, scanned them by connecting, sending TLS ClientHello and waiting for a reply (as the block allows connection and sending the handshake, but filters the reply).

    Here are working Relays, hence IP ranges, so far:

    31.57.224.200:443 951041ACCE3BA0C2D98421AAC6B43E4A04A25F8F
    102.130.115.59:443 1FA9AD3AB62B0C7D54AFBB4679ED084300324D50
    102.130.113.42:9001 066FE3C4E07A18EA53B2828F753D3788D58D771D
    102.130.113.30:9001 A4B2F2A51F73D408530FA6C8AF63A7FAFFDAA0FC
    102.130.119.48:9001 A578594EC6F2D9E96799C548DFC089DAB3C2FB9D
    102.68.86.91:9001 9F593EBE1619195ABA174FBBB45B02A52604A4C5
    102.130.117.25:443 9A0AAF2E43BE3744CD1D6CD532C861F5A568F7A9
    102.130.113.9:9001 8AA3E8CD23AA9AC8103BAF0ACFF4D12443C5A1F8
    102.130.117.167:443 2ACD6E9FF8726CC04375D5871498D07B36748158
    102.130.113.29:9001 316D6ABCEA52268E617BB992D0F9909425770BC4
    102.130.127.117:443 26B466A5152B058DB26878731AE453D22A8F4B21
    
    102.68.86.91:9001 9F593EBE1619195ABA174FBBB45B02A52604A4C5
    

    This one is mine btw. So proud of him :3

    Thank you for your research. If you need access to this for testing IP, contact me in DMs.

    @ValdikSS said:

    @ValdikSS said: Their panel works, but not the host node.

    Apparently the host's panel does not work due to large TLS ClientHello with ML-KEM (Kyber) cipher

    Is ML-KEM enabled in TLS by default? I thought it's still a draft.

  • ValdikSSValdikSS Member
    edited June 21

    @oloke said: Is ML-KEM enabled in TLS by default?

    It is, in all browsers. I spotted that the panel opens with curl by accident, and started to investigate why. Guess it's part of the censorship.

    @oloke said: This one is mine btw. So proud of him :3

    That's awesome :D

    Technical discussion is in https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/484

    Here's my sshguard logs for anyone to help as well:

    105.72.172.250
    117.72.83.96
    118.193.61.63
    118.69.174.86
    123.253.22.53
    139.19.117.197
    14.103.118.107
    14.29.181.34
    147.0.206.46
    164.90.200.165
    183.134.88.239
    185.93.89.118
    186.96.145.241
    187.107.88.97
    193.151.149.140
    20.224.22.162
    208.69.84.112
    213.212.36.174
    38.96.255.247
    49.232.180.153
    50.84.211.204
    79.175.176.177
    85.16.0.158
    
    Thanked by 1oloke
  • MAXKO_HostingMAXKO_Hosting Member, Host Rep, LIR

    @ValdikSS said:
    Used Tor Relays as a source of fairly diverse IP ranges, scanned them by connecting, sending TLS ClientHello and waiting for a reply (as the block allows connection and sending the handshake, but filters the reply).

    Here are working Relays, hence IP ranges, so far:

    31.57.224.200:443 951041ACCE3BA0C2D98421AAC6B43E4A04A25F8F
    102.130.115.59:443 1FA9AD3AB62B0C7D54AFBB4679ED084300324D50
    102.130.113.42:9001 066FE3C4E07A18EA53B2828F753D3788D58D771D
    102.130.113.30:9001 A4B2F2A51F73D408530FA6C8AF63A7FAFFDAA0FC
    102.130.119.48:9001 A578594EC6F2D9E96799C548DFC089DAB3C2FB9D
    102.68.86.91:9001 9F593EBE1619195ABA174FBBB45B02A52604A4C5
    102.130.117.25:443 9A0AAF2E43BE3744CD1D6CD532C861F5A568F7A9
    102.130.113.9:9001 8AA3E8CD23AA9AC8103BAF0ACFF4D12443C5A1F8
    102.130.117.167:443 2ACD6E9FF8726CC04375D5871498D07B36748158
    102.130.113.29:9001 316D6ABCEA52268E617BB992D0F9909425770BC4
    102.130.127.117:443 26B466A5152B058DB26878731AE453D22A8F4B21
    

    Looks like most of the working relays are from South Africa. So our exit TOR relays should still work? B)

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • olokeoloke Member

    @MAXKO_Hosting said:

    @ValdikSS said:
    Used Tor Relays as a source of fairly diverse IP ranges, scanned them by connecting, sending TLS ClientHello and waiting for a reply (as the block allows connection and sending the handshake, but filters the reply).

    Here are working Relays, hence IP ranges, so far:

    31.57.224.200:443 951041ACCE3BA0C2D98421AAC6B43E4A04A25F8F
    102.130.115.59:443 1FA9AD3AB62B0C7D54AFBB4679ED084300324D50
    102.130.113.42:9001 066FE3C4E07A18EA53B2828F753D3788D58D771D
    102.130.113.30:9001 A4B2F2A51F73D408530FA6C8AF63A7FAFFDAA0FC
    102.130.119.48:9001 A578594EC6F2D9E96799C548DFC089DAB3C2FB9D
    102.68.86.91:9001 9F593EBE1619195ABA174FBBB45B02A52604A4C5
    102.130.117.25:443 9A0AAF2E43BE3744CD1D6CD532C861F5A568F7A9
    102.130.113.9:9001 8AA3E8CD23AA9AC8103BAF0ACFF4D12443C5A1F8
    102.130.117.167:443 2ACD6E9FF8726CC04375D5871498D07B36748158
    102.130.113.29:9001 316D6ABCEA52268E617BB992D0F9909425770BC4
    102.130.127.117:443 26B466A5152B058DB26878731AE453D22A8F4B21
    

    Looks like most of the working relays are from South Africa. So our exit TOR relays should still work? B)

    31.57.224.200:443 951041ACCE3BA0C2D98421AAC6B43E4A04A25F8F
    

    Is from @zGato in Singapore. We already knew it was working.

    All the other ones (including mine) are from Host Africa. It looks like they didn't block HostAfrica IP range properly.

    It's worth trying yours @MAXKO_Hosting but I doubt they will work.

  • zGatozGato Member

    @MAXKO_Hosting based on my tests, 102.211.56.0/24 is at least not whitelisted. You have a /22, so there's a small chance (but I highly doubt) that other /24s are whitelisted. Whitelisted ranges are only from previously used ones that got whitelisted for X/Y reasons and if your /22 is fresh from AFRINIC then there's 0 chance.

    Thanked by 1oloke
Sign In or Register to comment.