New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
100% integrated whmcs
We use Virtualizor and all service management is done from our whmcs/dashboard.
Nothing like having your own panel
Everything can be easily linked using the API
You should've added a poll but I think that it doesn't matter much unless you offer hourly billing and API access.
gotcha, do you not offer the enduser panel for security purposes?
Yes, for security reasons, and it's also somewhat annoying for customers to have to access multiple panels to manage their service.
WHMCS offers all the options linked to Virtualizor, and it works well for us. Perhaps others prefer them separately, but it's worked well for us since we started.
WHMCS panel with intergrated user Panel to manage there services
The separate end user panel sometimes has more options/settings so I prefer that.
Don’t trust this man he uses Virtualizor
We are already testing virtfusion in a private environment
I like separate panels.
WHMCS only for billing and support. End panel to manage VPS.
tracking, ya our main concern was security. We had removed it but then lots of customers wanted it back. So just curious what others thought.
I prefer Enduser.
thank you, just the look? Or better control?
sir this is a wendys
Better control I believe, I've always preferred being able to access a VPS panel on another instance rather than through WHMCS
I prefer IN n Out
personally I like VirtFusion, only panel* that doesn't feel a decade out of date
*of the ones _I_ tried
thats fine, i dont mind where you take me out to
that's cool, if a provider did not offer end user panel would that stop you from getting a server from them?
Enduser always
Honestly no, it wouldn't stop me.
I've used layer7 in the past and the VPS control panel is built into their WHMCS which is something I'm not a fan of but I care more about their services so that didn't conflict my decision to use them.
Tbh if the services are good, in my opinion the way the panel is implemented doesn't matter. It's more about if people take the comfort seriously or not of having a separate instance for the control panel.
try ours
Why not proxmox as endpanel?
awesome.
yours? you have your own?
Stallion 😘
Francisco
ok but @DediRock did not ask you what women call me for my size, but rather the general control panel preference
Hahaha.
In Whmcs is decent, I’ve liked it for the crane products. It works fine so long as you aren’t intending to resell the vms and want users to have some sort of access.
Francisco
Can I get a $3/yr Cloudzy AI VM?
The AI says:
Francisco