SSD VPS in FRANKFURT, LOS ANGELES & NEW JERSEY || VirtFusion || 1x IPv4 + /64 IPv6

EthernetServers

Hello,

### SPECIAL OFFER: Reply to this topic with your order number and we'll double your bandwidth! ###

Ethernet Servers has been in business since July 2014.

Our instantly deployed VPS plans are KVM powered, with VirtFusion, 1 IPv4 and a /64 IPv6.

Accepted payment methods: PayPal, Alipay, Credit/Debit Card, and many cryptocurrencies.

Los Angeles | CPU: 2x AMD EPYC 7301 | Test IP: 64.31.6.238 | YABS
New Jersey | CPU: 2x AMD EPYC 7402 | Test IP: 64.31.14.238 | YABS
Frankfurt | CPU: 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6142 | Test IP: 208.115.231.237 | YABS

---

SSD Space	RAM	CPU Core(s)	Bandwidth	1 Month	36 Months
55 GB	1 GB	1	2 TB @ 10 Gbps	$3/mo	$2.25/mo
80 GB	2 GB	1	4 TB @ 10 Gbps	$6/mo	$4.50/mo
160 GB	4 GB	2	6 TB @ 10 Gbps	-	$9/mo

---

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.

Thank you

noloudelou

Finally kvm! Have been using their ovz vps for almost two years, real stable

zywe

Nice. Any plans for a config with more RAM/CPU and less disk?

EthernetServers

@noloudelou said:
Finally kvm! Have been using their ovz vps for almost two years, real stable

Glad to hear it! Thank you for your kind words!

COLBYLICIOUS

Where is the mandatory YABS??? Also please provide nws.sh test!

niehua

Order Number: 9837861533

EthernetServers

@zywe said:
Nice. Any plans for a config with more RAM/CPU and less disk?

I can make a double core promo happen for LET users Simply comment your order number here and I'll get that sorted out for you! This applies to everyone else too - both new and existing orders.

hkt

Hope to launch cheaper VPS with lower configurations

ferdor

Happy to see KVM and /64 prefix!

Can I get the double bandwidth please? Order number 2125509142

Fyzzp0o0

But your 64.31.xx.xx cannot be used by customers, so what is your Los Angeles IP?

Fyzzp0o0

NO

Fyzzp0o0

1

Fyzzp0o0

1

EthernetServers

@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Fyzzp0o0

@EthernetServers said:
@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Because you made me feel cheated

EthernetServers

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:
@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Because you made me feel cheated

There's no "cheating" going on here. I explained exactly how test IPs work already.

In any case, a full refund has been issued per your agreement in the ticket

I wish you all the best of luck with your future hosts.

Have a great day!

Edit: For those who may be reading this, it seems the OP decided to edit their posts to remove their rather ridiculous argument, which says all there is to say

Fyzzp0o0

@EthernetServers said:

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:
@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Because you made me feel cheated

There's no "cheating" going on here. I explained exactly how test IPs work already.

In any case, a full refund has been issued per your agreement in the ticket

I wish you all the best of luck with your future hosts.

Have a great day!

Edit: For those who may be reading this, it seems the OP decided to edit their posts to remove their rather ridiculous argument, which says all there is to say

I don't think this is the so-called "industry standard". As a consumer, I only see that the IP you assign is very different from your test IP, so I can't accept this.

If you like the two pictures I just took, I can send them to you again.

EthernetServers

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:
@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Because you made me feel cheated

There's no "cheating" going on here. I explained exactly how test IPs work already.

In any case, a full refund has been issued per your agreement in the ticket

I wish you all the best of luck with your future hosts.

Have a great day!

Edit: For those who may be reading this, it seems the OP decided to edit their posts to remove their rather ridiculous argument, which says all there is to say

I don't think this is the so-called "industry standard". As a consumer, I only see that the IP you assign is very different from your test IP, so I can't accept this.

If you like the two pictures I just took, I can send them to you again.

We can agree to disagree what test IPs are - that's not a problem. I don't think there's anything productive to be achieved by spamming our LET thread any further. If you have any further questions, feel free to DM me

Fyzzp0o0

@EthernetServers said: We can agree to disagree what test IPs are - that's not a problem.

No, don't be so self-righteous, we didn't reach an agreement

I don't want to reply to your message anymore, stop it

I withdrew the pictures I sent just because I don't want your IP to be exposed in the forum and attacked, that's all.

ferdor

Can I get the double bandwidth please? Order number 2125509142

EthernetServers

@niehua said:
Order Number: 9837861533

Your bandwidth has been doubled thank you for your business!

josephcz

Nice deal, can you provide BGP session support?

yoursunny

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:

@Fyzzp0o0 said:

@EthernetServers said:
@Fyzzp0o0 the IP quoted in our post is a test IP, allowing customers to test the routing and latency. It's not the IP you will get when you place an order.

This is an industry-standard practice. If you look at other ads here on LET with a test IP, and ask for that particular IP, you won't be given that exact IP - and it's also unlikely you will get an IP in that exact range.

In any case, we are communicating via ticket so I'm not sure why there is a need to post these messages here, especially when I offered to provide you with a full refund, which you have not replied back to as of yet.

Because you made me feel cheated

There's no "cheating" going on here. I explained exactly how test IPs work already.

In any case, a full refund has been issued per your agreement in the ticket

I wish you all the best of luck with your future hosts.

Have a great day!

Edit: For those who may be reading this, it seems the OP decided to edit their posts to remove their rather ridiculous argument, which says all there is to say

I don't think this is the so-called "industry standard". As a consumer, I only see that the IP you assign is very different from your test IP, so I can't accept this.

If you like the two pictures I just took, I can send them to you again.

How different?
If test IP and assigned IP are announced from same ASN and have comparable latency, it should be acceptable.

ferdor

@yoursunny said:
If test IP and assigned IP are announced from same ASN and have comparable latency, it should be acceptable.

I think the test address for LA is good. Here's a ping to it from my vps (with a very different IP but who cares):

# ping 64.31.6.238
PING 64.31.6.238 (64.31.6.238) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.720 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=0.785 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=0.492 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=0.781 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=0.593 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=0.484 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=7 ttl=60 time=0.830 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=0.882 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=0.552 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=0.795 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=0.778 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=0.906 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=13 ttl=60 time=0.908 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=14 ttl=60 time=0.782 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=15 ttl=60 time=0.472 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=16 ttl=60 time=0.606 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=17 ttl=60 time=0.609 ms
64 bytes from 64.31.6.238: icmp_seq=18 ttl=60 time=0.539 ms
^C
--- 64.31.6.238 ping statistics ---
18 packets transmitted, 18 received, 0% packet loss, time 17207ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.472/0.695/0.908/0.147 ms

EthernetServers

@hkt said:
Hope to launch cheaper VPS with lower configurations

Resource management for our new KVM offering (after years of being an OpenVZ shop) has been a learning curve. For example, take our first KVM offer - the disk space allocation has been increased since then - for no added cost.

I have some thoughts for future LET offers, so I'd say keep an eye out for our future LET threads. Any changes will be available to everyone - both new and existing customers - also at no extra cost

There are, however, no immediate plans for anything cheaper, but never say never.

EthernetServers

@ferdor said:
Happy to see KVM and /64 prefix!

Can I get the double bandwidth please? Order number 2125509142

This is now complete Thanks for your business!

jairuo

double bandwidth please? Order Number: 7906268638

cold

wait, is IPv6 working again ?

sugarman

Is UDP allowed?

EthernetServers

@josephcz said:
Nice deal, can you provide BGP session support?

Unfortunately this isn't something we offer.

EthernetServers

@jairuo said: double bandwidth please? Order Number: 7906268638

All set!