Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Netcup Nano VS IONOS VPS S - Netcup just sucks
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Netcup Nano VS IONOS VPS S - Netcup just sucks

MarkEYuiMarkEYui Member
edited May 26 in Reviews

IONOS


# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-04-20                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mon May 26 09:09:25 UTC 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 28 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 1996.249 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 77.4 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-60-generic
VM Type    : MICROSOFT
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : IONOS SE
ASN        : AS8560 IONOS SE
Host       : Strato GmbH
Location   : Berlin, State of Berlin (BE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 80.05 MB/s   (20.0k) | 496.47 MB/s   (7.7k)
Write      | 80.26 MB/s   (20.0k) | 499.08 MB/s   (7.7k)
Total      | 160.31 MB/s  (40.0k) | 995.56 MB/s  (15.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 474.42 MB/s    (926) | 469.91 MB/s    (458)
Write      | 499.63 MB/s    (975) | 501.21 MB/s    (489)
Total      | 974.05 MB/s   (1.9k) | 971.12 MB/s    (947)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 2.84 Gbits/sec  | 20.2 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 3.57 Gbits/sec  | 15.4 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 115 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 976 Mbits/sec   | 670 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 965 Mbits/sec   | 761 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.69 Gbits/sec  | 1.72 Gbits/sec  | 94.5 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 678 Mbits/sec   | 705 Mbits/sec   | 229 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 2.99 Gbits/sec  | 19.8 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 796 Mbits/sec   | 14.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 140 Mbits/sec   | 118 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 893 Mbits/sec   | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | --             
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 937 Mbits/sec   | 157 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 347 Mbits/sec   | 90.5 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 686 Mbits/sec   | 760 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1371                          
Multi Core      | 2278                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12143484

YABS completed in 14 min 54 sec
root@ubuntu:~#

Netcup


# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-04-20                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mo 26. Mai 10:42:48 CEST 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2294.590 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 58.9 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-60-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : netcup GmbH
ASN        : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host       : NETCUP-GMBH
Location   : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 70.59 MB/s   (17.6k) | 990.83 MB/s  (15.4k)
Write      | 70.78 MB/s   (17.6k) | 996.04 MB/s  (15.5k)
Total      | 141.37 MB/s  (35.3k) | 1.98 GB/s    (31.0k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.50 GB/s     (2.9k) | 1.71 GB/s     (1.6k)
Write      | 1.58 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.83 GB/s     (1.7k)
Total      | 3.08 GB/s     (6.0k) | 3.54 GB/s     (3.4k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 748 Mbits/sec   | 28.3 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 903 Mbits/sec   | 16.9 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 694 Mbits/sec   | 91.7 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 854 Mbits/sec   | 520 Mbits/sec   | 151 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 954 Mbits/sec   | 187 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 638 Mbits/sec   | 97.3 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 893 Mbits/sec   | 390 Mbits/sec   | 201 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 770 Mbits/sec   | 28.4 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 895 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.00 Gbits/sec  | 798 Mbits/sec   | 91.7 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 945 Mbits/sec   | 624 Mbits/sec   | --             
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 941 Mbits/sec   | 180 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 994 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 97.2 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 914 Mbits/sec   | 365 Mbits/sec   | 201 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 368                           
Multi Core      | 594                           
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12143338

YABS completed in 27 min 25 sec

Are these Netcup Mikro, Tiny etc really that bad?

Comments

  • RubbenRubben Member
    edited May 26

    It's not that bad, you just have way high expectations for a service that costs ~20 EUR / year without any special dealz.

    Besides the CPU performance, everything seems fine. And even CPU is fine as long as your application feels usable. They also have great uptime and are not some random summerhost that can disappear any second.

    Netcup has several other great offers with more performance, just be prepared to open your wallet a bit more.

    Thanked by 2jsg PineappleM
  • MarkEYuiMarkEYui Member

    Yeah sure, its really low-end - thats also what I expected.
    IONOS and Netcup Mini-VPS are alsmost the same price. IONOS is even cheaper.

    What do you guys think, which VPS is better for using as a Wireguard Tunnel?

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @Rubben said: be prepared to open your wallet a bit more

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • RubbenRubben Member
    edited May 26

    @MarkEYui said:
    Yeah sure, its really low-end - thats also what I expected.
    IONOS and Netcup Mini-VPS are alsmost the same price. IONOS is even cheaper.

    What do you guys think, which VPS is better for using as a Wireguard Tunnel?

    Ionos, same price, but better CPU. RAM and storage doesn't matter in your case.

  • cybertechcybertech Member

    the piko i had was better cpu score than that.

    Thanked by 2MarkEYui nghialele
  • MarkEYuiMarkEYui Member

    @cybertech said:
    the piko i had was better cpu score than that.

    Yeah thats also what I think. My last Nano was better.

Sign In or Register to comment.