New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
i think the fact that after booting from the same OS install that worked before it wasnt working, this might not be useful. at this point im not really concerned about ever using the box in production again as the VMs were spun back up on other servers/work redirection to another provider
the only reason im still invested in this is that its genuinely interesting and might help someone down the line if the cause is identified
Hey OP, just checking in – has this issue been resolved yet?
Also, are you open to trying a routing solution (not bridge ) like PVE SDN? I might be able to help out with that if you're interested!
I'll check out your PM
Provider:
Hoping tomorrow comes with a fix
Maybe that's why Hetzner for all Ryzens use Intel NIC (iNIC)..
Perhaps today
inspired by BilohRulesUpdate™
i didnt spot the rule:
my bad yall ill post next when there's an update
Can’t wait to find out.
I’m a principal network architect for a nationwide ISP during the day.
DM’d you - if nobody has figured it out yet I’d love a chance to do so for free to share the knowledge back here.
no updates till now? april is ending shortly...
every time i ask its "tomorrow" and "shortly" so doesnt seem so
Final update
From provider:
Now running Mellanox MT28800 ConnectX-5 100G and it works.
@Falzo post your TRC20 address
Appreciated! you can send USDT here: TBXjLTEQu5Waqh52bvtUdvV36fJAoDvvzD
Ed: and btw, I think pinning the problem on the nic and fw is rather bs. But that's just me... easier to blame some weird hw constellation than admittung some config error somewhere.
LooooooL. Still Royale?
Faulty silicon in nics and faulty drivers are pretty common to any experienced server administrator. You sound amateurish with that comment.
Yeah, it is so common that they needed two months to figure it out, despite having switched all hardware weeks ago already...
If it is amateurish to have doubts in such explanations, you can call me that 🤷🏻♂️
Agree with Falzo here. Totally disappointed by this situation's handling of the provider... hope they heavily compensated the OP.
bounty still ongoing ?
Switching out the hardware for the same would be how to confirm it's firmware issue...
Go and read up on how long it takes Intel to find and then provide solutions for bugs in i225 and i226 chipsets. Years? Yep. Or in docsis 3.0 modems (puma).
You'd rather it be a made up non-existent config issue than physically bad hardware? I have no idea why. It was the attitude that it was a misconfigured software issue that caused the solution to take two months, so that's the wrong conclusion.
my bad homie i was getting my shit rocked by jeffrey bezos this week
https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/6e017c03f85bad4a64dd3b20601e45d7edf3a1ba72e36603c9ca3468a9b161e0
what would yall even consider appropriate compensation?
At least the server cost x downtime period.
eg. if server is $100 and was down for 3months, $300.
we got a month free + didn't pay for the downtime period
well received and thanks for coming through - much appreciated! gonna donate to some campaigns to put it to good use.
If you dont have any active clients, that could work. Else, I would see the downtime as a "bad work" done to your potential earnings.
Finally Falzo got paid.
I do have some Google Ads campaigns that could use them for sure. Thanks!
need new pants soap? I'll buy, you'll pick up ;-) ;-)