Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Netcup doing their promotions again - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Netcup doing their promotions again

2»

Comments

  • vitobottavitobotta Member

    @sanvit said:

    @hyperblast said:
    need a yabs for this please: VPS 1000 G11 SE NUE MAR25

    This is for the VPS 1000 G11 iv SE NUE JAN25, but should be the same spec-wise.

    root@nue-8gb:~# curl -Ls yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Tue Mar 25 05:37:29 PM CET 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 1996.250 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 7.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 503.8 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-56-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : netcup GmbH
ASN        : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host       : NETCUP-GMBH
Location   : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 39.50 MB/s    (9.8k) | 366.69 MB/s   (5.7k)
Write      | 39.57 MB/s    (9.8k) | 368.62 MB/s   (5.7k)
Total      | 79.07 MB/s   (19.7k) | 735.32 MB/s  (11.4k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.17 GB/s     (4.2k) | 3.00 GB/s     (2.9k)
Write      | 2.29 GB/s     (4.4k) | 3.20 GB/s     (3.1k)
Total      | 4.47 GB/s     (8.7k) | 6.21 GB/s     (6.0k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.61 Gbits/sec  | 2.17 Gbits/sec  | 21.2 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.73 Gbits/sec  | 2.21 Gbits/sec  | 28.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 841 Mbits/sec   | 1.54 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 395 Mbits/sec   | 156 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.31 Gbits/sec  | 1.98 Gbits/sec  | 94.4 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.10 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 200 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 832                           
Multi Core      | 2685                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11205806

YABS completed in 12 min 51 sec

    Seems like mine are a bit better. I wonder how many people are running yabs on these nodes...

  • sanvitsanvit Member

    @vitobotta said:

    @sanvit said:

    @hyperblast said:
    need a yabs for this please: VPS 1000 G11 SE NUE MAR25

    This is for the VPS 1000 G11 iv SE NUE JAN25, but should be the same spec-wise.

    root@nue-8gb:~# curl -Ls yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Tue Mar 25 05:37:29 PM CET 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 1996.250 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 7.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 503.8 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-56-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : netcup GmbH
ASN        : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host       : NETCUP-GMBH
Location   : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 39.50 MB/s    (9.8k) | 366.69 MB/s   (5.7k)
Write      | 39.57 MB/s    (9.8k) | 368.62 MB/s   (5.7k)
Total      | 79.07 MB/s   (19.7k) | 735.32 MB/s  (11.4k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.17 GB/s     (4.2k) | 3.00 GB/s     (2.9k)
Write      | 2.29 GB/s     (4.4k) | 3.20 GB/s     (3.1k)
Total      | 4.47 GB/s     (8.7k) | 6.21 GB/s     (6.0k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.61 Gbits/sec  | 2.17 Gbits/sec  | 21.2 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.73 Gbits/sec  | 2.21 Gbits/sec  | 28.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 841 Mbits/sec   | 1.54 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 395 Mbits/sec   | 156 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.31 Gbits/sec  | 1.98 Gbits/sec  | 94.4 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.10 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 200 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 832                           
Multi Core      | 2685                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11205806

YABS completed in 12 min 51 sec

    Seems like mine are a bit better. I wonder how many people are running yabs on these nodes...

    These are one of the older ones (got it on January) so maybe the node itself is full (assuming netcup fills each node before moving on to the next). Considering this is their VPS lineup and not the RS, I can live with the CPU performance, but the random IO could improve (the machin itself was idling until now though lol)

  • dav848dav848 Member

    @sreekanth850 said:
    disappointed with flash sale. No root servers.

    what is different root server and normal?

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

  • braunibrauni Member

    @sh97 said:
    Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    i dont think so

    Thanked by 1sh97
  • Protocol903Protocol903 Member

    @sh97 said: Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    No. FAQ states they have it disabled cuz of security reasons. whatever that means.

    Thanked by 1sh97
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @shaikhmanal said:

    @sh97 said: Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    No. FAQ states they have it disabled cuz of security reasons. whatever that means.

    it means because of sicherheitsrisiken aka security reasons. :)

  • raza19raza19 Veteran
    edited March 26

    @hyperblast said:

    @shaikhmanal said:

    @sh97 said: Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    No. FAQ states they have it disabled cuz of security reasons. whatever that means.

    it means because of sicherheitsrisiken aka security reasons. :)

    They took a fortnight to reply to my question regarding the same but apart from that netcup is just pure luv :)

    Antwort vom Support
Reply from Support
Markus Von Baligand commented:

Hello,
thank you for your Request.

In our experience, nested virtualization via the SVM flag can lead to technical problems at processor level.
 As the servers we rent out are fully virtualized, such problems affect all customers on the same node equally.
 For this reason, as well as for security reasons, we can no longer offer you the activation of the SVM flag for any of our products.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
netcup Team
    Thanked by 1hobofl
  • sanvitsanvit Member

    @raza19 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @shaikhmanal said:

    @sh97 said: Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    No. FAQ states they have it disabled cuz of security reasons. whatever that means.

    it means because of sicherheitsrisiken aka security reasons. :)

    They took a fortnight to reply to my question regarding the same but apart from that netcup is just pure luv :)

    > Antwort vom Support
> Reply from Support
> Markus Von Baligand commented:
> 
> Hello,
> thank you for your Request.
> 
> In our experience, nested virtualization via the SVM flag can lead to technical problems at processor level.
>  As the servers we rent out are fully virtualized, such problems affect all customers on the same node equally.
>  For this reason, as well as for security reasons, we can no longer offer you the activation of the SVM flag for any of our products.
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> netcup Team
>

    I remember reading something about their custom kernel and live migration not chugging along with nested virt on their forum. But that was also just a speculation.

    Thanked by 1raza19
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @raza19 said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @shaikhmanal said:

    @sh97 said: Is it possible to get nested virt on netcup VMs?

    No. FAQ states they have it disabled cuz of security reasons. whatever that means.

    it means because of sicherheitsrisiken aka security reasons. :)

    They took a fortnight to reply to my question regarding the same but apart from that netcup is just pure luv :)

    > Antwort vom Support
> Reply from Support
> Markus Von Baligand commented:
> 
> Hello,
> thank you for your Request.
> 
> In our experience, nested virtualization via the SVM flag can lead to technical problems at processor level.
>  As the servers we rent out are fully virtualized, such problems affect all customers on the same node equally.
>  For this reason, as well as for security reasons, we can no longer offer you the activation of the SVM flag for any of our products.
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> netcup Team
>

    in the end, it's germanangst! (c) (r)

    Thanked by 1raza19
  • coolmanxcoolmanx Member

    thanks for your info

  • n1njaxn1njax Member

    @dav848 said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    disappointed with flash sale. No root servers.

    what is different root server and normal?

    With rootservers you get dedicated cores

Sign In or Register to comment.