Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Transfer - AMD Genoa 9554 - Advinservers.
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Transfer - AMD Genoa 9554 - Advinservers.

Hello,

I currently have a Excellent Server for Transfer from Advinservers,

KVM Premium XS
AMD Genoa 9554 (2 vCores)
0 dedicated, 2 burstable cores
4GB DDR5 ECC Memory
40GB NVMe SSD Storage
5TB Bandwidth (10 Gbit)
Located in Nuremberg, DE
Recurring Price - $24/year

Next Due date - November 21st, 2025

Asking Price - $25 (Excl of Paypal fee - if opted) + Transfer Fee ( If advin requires )

Preferred Payment - UPI / PAYPAL ( FRIENDS & FAMILY )

Prime Reason for Transfer, am just a Hobbyist. So, no uses currently since I grabbed a Rarecloud & Silvercreek Flash VPS-es

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2025-01-01

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Thu Jan 2 03:34:44 PM UTC 2025

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 5 days, 12 hours, 30 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor
CPU cores : 2 @ 3099.996 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 36.3 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Kernel : 6.8.0-41-generic
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:

ISP : Advin Services LLC
ASN : AS206216 Advin Services LLC
Host : Advin Services LLC
Location : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
Country : Germany

Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 4k block size...

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda2):

Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
Read 171.65 MB/s (42.9k) 1.11 GB/s (17.4k)
Write 172.11 MB/s (43.0k) 1.12 GB/s (17.5k)
Total 343.76 MB/s (85.9k) 2.23 GB/s (34.9k)
Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
------ --- ---- ---- ----
Read 1.46 GB/s (2.8k) 1.35 GB/s (1.3k)
Write 1.54 GB/s (3.0k) 1.44 GB/s (1.4k)
Total 3.00 GB/s (5.8k) 2.79 GB/s (2.7k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
Clouvider London, UK (10G) 5.07 Gbits/sec 2.11 Gbits/sec 19.1 ms
Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 6.94 Gbits/sec 4.45 Gbits/sec 12.6 ms
Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.62 Gbits/sec 7.23 Mbits/sec 95.8 ms
Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 52.2 Mbits/sec 1.42 Gbits/sec 161 ms
Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 1.15 Gbits/sec 1.38 Gbits/sec 157 ms
Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 1.55 Gbits/sec 1.35 Gbits/sec 86.8 ms
Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 612 Mbits/sec 906 Mbits/sec 213 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1479
Multi Core | 2228

Comments

  • This is beast

  • @barbaros said:
    This is beast

    Definitely Man

  • MMMMMMMMMMMM Member

    $7

  • Keep it yourself

    Thanked by 1MMMMMM
  • Does @Advin support server transfers?

  • @barbaros said:
    Does @Advin support server transfers?

    Will check and Pm you

  • FritzFritz Veteran

    No IPv6?

  • @Fritz said:
    No IPv6?

    Available on request ( I believe)

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Why post transfer threads when unsure if the providers allow transfers or not.

    Waste of time for everyone involved if provider says no at the end or something else goes weong

    Thanked by 3admax itachikonoha gks
  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider
    edited January 5

    @Deepak_leb said:

    @barbaros said:
    Does @Advin support server transfers?

    Will check and Pm you

    Transfer fee is $5 USD
    https://docs.advinservers.com/policies/termsofservice

    Thanked by 2barbaros admax
  • @plumberg said:
    Why post transfer threads when unsure if the providers allow transfers or not.

    Waste of time for everyone involved if provider says no at the end or something else goes weong

    Alright

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @advinservers said:

    @Deepak_leb said:

    @barbaros said:
    Does @Advin support server transfers?

    Will check and Pm you

    Transfer fee is $5 USD
    https://docs.advinservers.com/policies/termsofservice

    Looking through your ToS, the IP cleaning fee seems to be displayed inconsistently.

    1. Email sending section: "If we believe that you are intentionally sending email spam, we reserve the right to charge a $25 USD IP cleaning fee."
    2. Abuse section: "We may charge a fee, such as a $5 IP cleaning fee, if your service was caught email spamming or committing malicious acts intentionally."

    You may or may not want to change this so that a valued customar can't misunderstand it.

    Thanked by 1gks
  • I have no need for IP, and will buy is they allow windows OS

  • just a Hobbyist and charge more then recurring amount after use 1.5 month

    • 1.5 months of use
    • Excluding fees of paypal.
    • excluding of transfer fee.

    And base price is more than recurring.....

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited January 5
    Email sending section: "If we believe that you are 
    intentionally sending email spam, we reserve the 
    right to charge a $25 USD IP cleaning fee."
    

    conversely, does this mean that I always receive a clean (reddit does not block the ip) and localized ip from advin? @advinservers

  • @hyperblast said:

    Email sending section: "If we believe that you are 
    intentionally sending email spam, we reserve the 
    right to charge a $25 USD IP cleaning fee."
    

    conversely, does this mean that I always receive a clean (reddit does not block the ip) and localized ip from advin? @advinservers

    No it means you will get an IP that is not blacklisted in SPAM databases.

    Reddit blocking your IP is irrelevant as they block all DC IPs nonetheless.

  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider

    @Rubben said:

    @advinservers said:

    @Deepak_leb said:

    @barbaros said:
    Does @Advin support server transfers?

    Will check and Pm you

    Transfer fee is $5 USD
    https://docs.advinservers.com/policies/termsofservice

    Looking through your ToS, the IP cleaning fee seems to be displayed inconsistently.

    1. Email sending section: "If we believe that you are intentionally sending email spam, we reserve the right to charge a $25 USD IP cleaning fee."
    2. Abuse section: "We may charge a fee, such as a $5 IP cleaning fee, if your service was caught email spamming or committing malicious acts intentionally."

    You may or may not want to change this so that a valued customar can't misunderstand it.

    We'll get that fixed :)

  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider
    edited January 5

    @hyperblast said:

    Email sending section: "If we believe that you are 
    intentionally sending email spam, we reserve the 
    right to charge a $25 USD IP cleaning fee."
    

    conversely, does this mean that I always receive a clean (reddit does not block the ip) and localized ip from advin? @advinservers

    No, it does not guarantee anything.

    This is more reserved for brute forcing, running botnets, and sending email spam (something along these lines). Abuse can still happen, and most of the abuse incidents we see are from hacked servers which are excluded from this policy.

    In addition, we do not monitor blocks on third-party sites like Reddit. Getting banned on websites like Reddit are not our problem and impossible to monitor anyways.

  • ralfralf Member

    @itachikonoha said:

    • 1.5 months of use
    • Excluding fees of paypal.
    • excluding of transfer fee.

    And base price is more than recurring.....

    All of which is permitted by the forum rules.

    The rules are designed this way, because even if a service was ending next week, somebody still might want to have it as a transfer because it will still work out cheaper than any current offering.

    Thanked by 1Deepak_leb
  • zGatozGato Member

    Hosted under Hetzner and tunneled to Frankfurt, ...

    Be aware, latency is way worse than getting directly from a Hetzner reseller or a Frankfurt provider.

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider

    @zGato said:
    Hosted under Hetzner and tunneled to Frankfurt, ...

    Be aware, latency is way worse than getting directly from a Hetzner reseller or a Frankfurt provider.

    We colocate with Hetzner in Nuremberg and have a fiber connection to Interxion Frankfurt. In addition, we also have Cogent locally in Nuremberg.

    We do not use Hetzner transit at all, nor do we resell their servers. We own all of our hardware.

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited January 5

    @advinservers said:

    @zGato said:
    Hosted under Hetzner and tunneled to Frankfurt, ...

    Be aware, latency is way worse than getting directly from a Hetzner reseller or a Frankfurt provider.

    We colocate with Hetzner in Nuremberg and have a fiber connection to Interxion Frankfurt. In addition, we also have Cogent locally in Nuremberg.

    We do not use Hetzner transit at all, nor do we resell their servers. We own all of our hardware.

    My point is not whether you own all hardware and bla bla bla, but about your network being tunneled to Frankfurt, which of course, adds quite a bit of latency (roughly 5-7ms) to everywhere, and is not optimal for some scenarios.
    Proper Frankfurt

    Your network

  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider
    edited January 5

    @zGato said:

    @advinservers said:

    @zGato said:
    Hosted under Hetzner and tunneled to Frankfurt, ...

    Be aware, latency is way worse than getting directly from a Hetzner reseller or a Frankfurt provider.

    We colocate with Hetzner in Nuremberg and have a fiber connection to Interxion Frankfurt. In addition, we also have Cogent locally in Nuremberg.

    We do not use Hetzner transit at all, nor do we resell their servers. We own all of our hardware.

    My point is not whether you own all hardware and bla bla bla, but about your network being tunneled to Frankfurt, which of course, adds quite a bit of latency (roughly 5-7ms) to everywhere, and is not optimal for some scenarios.

    I understand, I'm just making that clear :)

    We should be at around a 2-3ms flat increase, but that could differ if it is sent through Cogent and not our primary upstream (Dataforest/Avoro).

    Hetzner often also goes through Frankfurt, adding a similar amount of latency, so I would not go as far to say that our network is way worse than Hetzner. At least, if you have suboptimal latency in comparison to Hetzner, it's probably not caused by our Frankfurt <-> Nuremberg link itself and it might be something that we could optimize.

    I just wanted to make it clear that we don't use any GRE tunnels or similar technology (which usually have increased latency and instability compared to just having a direct fiber connection as we do, since we eliminate the overhead of going through Hetzner transit first). In addition, we have Cogent in our blend, which is directly in Nuremberg and not through Frankfurt.

    Eventually, we will have a location directly in Frankfurt with options to migrate there for existing customers (hopefully with a 40G/100G link). We are currently working out the details with a few datacenters in the area, and we hope to launch that option sometime within the next few months!

  • Kindly Close this Thread as server has been transferred to our fellow member

Sign In or Register to comment.