Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


EasyVM - lots of network connectivity issues - support was non-responsive
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

EasyVM - lots of network connectivity issues - support was non-responsive

Ended up leaving EasyVM because my host had persistent network issues (NJ data center) which support was unable to diagnose and resolve. Frankly, it would take support days to reply to me and usually with a Question I had already answered in my last note. It got so frustrating I ended up doing a migration off to a different provider. No longer can I recommend them despite them being quite inexpensive. (you get what you pay for???)

Thanked by 1komdragon

Comments

  • RubbenRubben Member
    edited January 2

    Hello dear valued customar,

    Tank you for sharing your experiences with us or whatever

    As for me, I am not an EasyVM customar because their VMs don't have at least 70% cpu steal! This is very dealbreaker for me ok.

    kind reguards,
    rubben

    Thanked by 1beanman109
  • DrNutellaDrNutella Member
    edited January 3

    Respectfully, I consider this fake spam without pictures. We all do. No one will give this thread or post any credibility without proof.

    Provide pictures for proof, all pictures, all proof. Do not hide anything from us. You may block name and personal information, not communication details.

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    Hello,

    We have only received reports of issues in our Dallas location but they were resolved with the help of some customers. If you could direct message me your ticket ID I'd be happy to take a look.

    Thanked by 1admax
  • bugisbugis Member

    Hi @aqua
    What about Ticket #177907 regarding adding an SSD to the server? The invoice has been paid starting Saturday 14 December 2024. However, until today there is no clarity.

  • I have a high priority ticket on EasyVM that I have not received a reply on since last Thursday.

    Are you all getting replies after posting here?

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited February 3

    @Clept0 said:
    I have a high priority ticket on EasyVM that I have not received a reply on since last Thursday.

    Are you all getting replies after posting here?

    Same thing. Getting ignored pretty much. Texas network has been shitting itself for weeks.

    Thanked by 1ethanblake87
  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad
    edited February 3

    @zGato said:

    @Clept0 said:
    I have a high priority ticket on EasyVM that I have not received a reply on since last Thursday.

    Are you all getting replies after posting here?

    Same thing. Getting ignored pretty much. Texas network has been shitting itself for weeks.

    The VPS network at EASYVM's Dallas location also has some issues, but I’ve set it idle now until it gets fixed! The ticket responses are a bit slow, but I haven’t rushed them. o:)

    Thanked by 1truemagic
  • ss93ss93 Member

    I also have a Dallas vps. I thought my server got hacked somehow since in 3 days it used almost 500Gb of bandwidth... I set it up freshly yesterday and only setup docker + my own discord bot which is pretty much idle and the traffic keeps going up. No clue why I'm getting "taxed" for this bandwidth that's not even used by my own vps.

    Seems like they won't reply by checking the posts above. At least it's only $6/year...

  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    We've been investigating this internally regarding the abysmal performance of our Dallas network. With the mix of the complexity of this occurrence + our head network engineer's tight schedule (active military), it has been rough. If you are near your bandwidth limit, PLEASE open a ticket, we will uncap your limit with no issues.

    We are not attempting to inflate your bandwidth usage to penny-pinch you into spending more money with us. We will happily uncap this with no problem.

    If you have a ticket open with us, please don't hesitate to PM me the ticket ID and I will provide an update.

    Thanked by 2ss93 tototo
  • ss93ss93 Member

    Appreciate it. It's not something urgent as I barely use this server but will DM and appreciate the fast response :) Hope you guys manage to figure it out eventually!

  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    @ss93 said:
    I also have a Dallas vps. I thought my server got hacked somehow since in 3 days it used almost 500Gb of bandwidth... I set it up freshly yesterday and only setup docker + my own discord bot which is pretty much idle and the traffic keeps going up. No clue why I'm getting "taxed" for this bandwidth that's not even used by my own vps.

    Seems like they won't reply by checking the posts above. At least it's only $6/year...

    If you use the iftop command to check, you may know the cause of some abnormal bandwidth consumption, but you don't know how it was generated.

  • @aqua I have a dedi with easyvm at the Virginia datacenter. It's a 1gbit line to the dedi server.

    however, my transfer speeds to the server have been restricted to 1mb/sec (whereas they should be 125mb/sec based on 1gbit). I am very far below the BW allotment.

    I sent in a high priority ticket last week and no one has replied to help explain what's going on.

    Can you please help with ticket #076504 ?

  • @aqua haven't heard from you and I added an update to my ticket. Please help to fix ASAP.

    Iperf3 logs--
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_4paralleltransfers_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_LosAngeles_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_serverLOG_from_VPS_Buffalo_NY_client.txt
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt

    There is SERIOUS throttling going on at the Ashburn VA server. I shared my results from running iperf3 tests.

    Here in L.A., I'm only getting 10Mbit/sec transfers to EasyVM Ashburn, VA whether I use multi-threaded transfers or single transfers, compared to +400mbit/sec (avg) to my Buffalo NY VPS.

    When I use my VPS (Buffalo, NY) to EasyVM (Ashburn, VA) -- both at datacenters and much closer in distance -- it's also only getting 10.1 Mbit/sec as shown in the logs that I attached to the ticket-

    [SUM] 0.00-20.05 sec 24.0 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec receiver

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @Clept0 said:
    @aqua haven't heard from you and I added an update to my ticket. Please help to fix ASAP.

    Iperf3 logs--
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_4paralleltransfers_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_LosAngeles_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_serverLOG_from_VPS_Buffalo_NY_client.txt
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt

    There is SERIOUS throttling going on at the Ashburn VA server. I shared my results from running iperf3 tests.

    Here in L.A., I'm only getting 10Mbit/sec transfers to EasyVM Ashburn, VA whether I use multi-threaded transfers or single transfers, compared to +400mbit/sec (avg) to my Buffalo NY VPS.

    When I use my VPS (Buffalo, NY) to EasyVM (Ashburn, VA) -- both at datacenters and much closer in distance -- it's also only getting 10.1 Mbit/sec as shown in the logs that I attached to the ticket-

    [SUM] 0.00-20.05 sec 24.0 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec receiver

    The network is gigacooked my man, i've seen people with servers at other EasyVM locations (texas,etc) have the exact same issue.

    My dedi in VA is also affected, opened a support ticket last Monday and so far have had one response back 5 days later asking if I'm still seeing the issue, responded to that 4 hours later and now it's been nothing again for another 3-4 days

    Speedtest.net (Region: NORTH AMERICA)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      
    
     ISP: PARALLAX 
    
     Nearest          0.50 ms     0.0%    936.60 Mbps    926.97 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Ashburn, VA 
    
     Vancouver, BC    58.50 ms    N/A     4.49 Mbps      197.99 Mbps    TELUS - Vancouver, BC 
     Calgary, AB      60.18 ms    N/A     10.28 Mbps     394.74 Mbps    Shaw Communications - Calgary, AB 
     Winnipeg, MB     36.13 ms    0.0%    2.24 Mbps      921.87 Mbps    Voyageur Internet - Winnipeg, MB 
     Toronto, ON      25.82 ms    0.0%    9.74 Mbps      454.68 Mbps    Bell Canada - Toronto, ON 
     Montreal, QC     18.90 ms    0.0%    923.58 Mbps    919.15 Mbps    Rogers Wireless - Montréal, QC 
    
     New York, NY     6.55 ms     0.0%    9.69 Mbps      106.18 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY 
     Ashburn, VA      0.61 ms     0.0%    923.19 Mbps    917.53 Mbps    Rackdog - Ashburn, VA 
     Durham, NC       7.15 ms     N/A     924.42 Mbps    918.97 Mbps    Spectrum - Durham, NC 
     Atlanta, GA      15.45 ms    0.0%    9.90 Mbps      200.27 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Atlanta, GA 
     Miami, FL        27.68 ms    0.0%    19.78 Mbps     430.22 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL 
     Dallas, TX       34.39 ms    0.0%    9.75 Mbps      206.81 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
     Houston, TX      33.21 ms    N/A     9.79 Mbps      475.30 Mbps    Comcast - Houston, TX 
     Kansas, MO       40.19 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      203.68 Mbps    Nocix - Kansas City, MO 
     Minneapolis, MN  25.79 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      415.76 Mbps    US Internet - Minneapolis, MN 
     Chicago, IL      17.15 ms    0.0%    10.05 Mbps     359.89 Mbps    Hivelocity - Chicago, IL 
     Cleveland, OH    18.57 ms    0.0%    921.73 Mbps    916.50 Mbps    Cleveland Broadband - Cleveland, OH 
     Albuquerque, NM  50.65 ms    N/A     9.92 Mbps      400.19 Mbps    Comcast - Albuquerque, NM 
     Denver, CO       40.69 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      289.23 Mbps    T-Mobile Fiber | Intrepid - Denver, CO 
     Portland, OR     65.19 ms    N/A     9.84 Mbps      398.77 Mbps    CenturyLink - Portland, OR 
     Las Vegas, NV    61.17 ms    N/A     10.22 Mbps     317.42 Mbps    Boost Mobile - Las Vegas, NV 
     Salt Lake, UT    62.05 ms            10.12 Mbps     FAILED         Novva Data Centers - Salt Lake City, UT 
     Phoenix, AZ      49.98 ms    0.0%    9.98 Mbps      286.71 Mbps    Xiber LLC - Phoenix, AZ 
     Los Angeles, CA  54.73 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      253.79 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
     San Jose, CA     66.46 ms    0.0%    9.87 Mbps      246.83 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA 
     Spokane, WA      64.05 ms    0.0%    10.03 Mbps     185.52 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA 
    
    Thanked by 2Clept0 admax
  • Clept0Clept0 Member
    edited February 10

    @beanman109 said:

    @Clept0 said:
    @aqua haven't heard from you and I added an update to my ticket. Please help to fix ASAP.

    Iperf3 logs--
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_4paralleltransfers_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_LosAngeles_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_serverLOG_from_VPS_Buffalo_NY_client.txt
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt

    There is SERIOUS throttling going on at the Ashburn VA server. I shared my results from running iperf3 tests.

    Here in L.A., I'm only getting 10Mbit/sec transfers to EasyVM Ashburn, VA whether I use multi-threaded transfers or single transfers, compared to +400mbit/sec (avg) to my Buffalo NY VPS.

    When I use my VPS (Buffalo, NY) to EasyVM (Ashburn, VA) -- both at datacenters and much closer in distance -- it's also only getting 10.1 Mbit/sec as shown in the logs that I attached to the ticket-

    [SUM] 0.00-20.05 sec 24.0 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec receiver

    The network is gigacooked my man, i've seen people with servers at other EasyVM locations (texas,etc) have the exact same issue.

    My dedi in VA is also affected, opened a support ticket last Monday and so far have had one response back 5 days later asking if I'm still seeing the issue, responded to that 4 hours later and now it's been nothing again for another 3-4 days

    Speedtest.net (Region: NORTH AMERICA)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      
    
     ISP: PARALLAX 
    
     Nearest          0.50 ms     0.0%    936.60 Mbps    926.97 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Ashburn, VA 
    
     Vancouver, BC    58.50 ms    N/A     4.49 Mbps      197.99 Mbps    TELUS - Vancouver, BC 
     Calgary, AB      60.18 ms    N/A     10.28 Mbps     394.74 Mbps    Shaw Communications - Calgary, AB 
     Winnipeg, MB     36.13 ms    0.0%    2.24 Mbps      921.87 Mbps    Voyageur Internet - Winnipeg, MB 
     Toronto, ON      25.82 ms    0.0%    9.74 Mbps      454.68 Mbps    Bell Canada - Toronto, ON 
     Montreal, QC     18.90 ms    0.0%    923.58 Mbps    919.15 Mbps    Rogers Wireless - Montréal, QC 
    
     New York, NY     6.55 ms     0.0%    9.69 Mbps      106.18 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY 
     Ashburn, VA      0.61 ms     0.0%    923.19 Mbps    917.53 Mbps    Rackdog - Ashburn, VA 
     Durham, NC       7.15 ms     N/A     924.42 Mbps    918.97 Mbps    Spectrum - Durham, NC 
     Atlanta, GA      15.45 ms    0.0%    9.90 Mbps      200.27 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Atlanta, GA 
     Miami, FL        27.68 ms    0.0%    19.78 Mbps     430.22 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL 
     Dallas, TX       34.39 ms    0.0%    9.75 Mbps      206.81 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
     Houston, TX      33.21 ms    N/A     9.79 Mbps      475.30 Mbps    Comcast - Houston, TX 
     Kansas, MO       40.19 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      203.68 Mbps    Nocix - Kansas City, MO 
     Minneapolis, MN  25.79 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      415.76 Mbps    US Internet - Minneapolis, MN 
     Chicago, IL      17.15 ms    0.0%    10.05 Mbps     359.89 Mbps    Hivelocity - Chicago, IL 
     Cleveland, OH    18.57 ms    0.0%    921.73 Mbps    916.50 Mbps    Cleveland Broadband - Cleveland, OH 
     Albuquerque, NM  50.65 ms    N/A     9.92 Mbps      400.19 Mbps    Comcast - Albuquerque, NM 
     Denver, CO       40.69 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      289.23 Mbps    T-Mobile Fiber | Intrepid - Denver, CO 
     Portland, OR     65.19 ms    N/A     9.84 Mbps      398.77 Mbps    CenturyLink - Portland, OR 
     Las Vegas, NV    61.17 ms    N/A     10.22 Mbps     317.42 Mbps    Boost Mobile - Las Vegas, NV 
     Salt Lake, UT    62.05 ms            10.12 Mbps     FAILED         Novva Data Centers - Salt Lake City, UT 
     Phoenix, AZ      49.98 ms    0.0%    9.98 Mbps      286.71 Mbps    Xiber LLC - Phoenix, AZ 
     Los Angeles, CA  54.73 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      253.79 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
     San Jose, CA     66.46 ms    0.0%    9.87 Mbps      246.83 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA 
     Spokane, WA      64.05 ms    0.0%    10.03 Mbps     185.52 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA 
    

    SMH this is horrible. Thanks for sharing your experience as well. I'm evaluating my options at this point. 10Mbps on a "1gigabit" line...

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @Clept0 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @Clept0 said:
    @aqua haven't heard from you and I added an update to my ticket. Please help to fix ASAP.

    Iperf3 logs--
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_4paralleltransfers_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_LosAngeles_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_serverLOG_from_VPS_Buffalo_NY_client.txt
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt

    There is SERIOUS throttling going on at the Ashburn VA server. I shared my results from running iperf3 tests.

    Here in L.A., I'm only getting 10Mbit/sec transfers to EasyVM Ashburn, VA whether I use multi-threaded transfers or single transfers, compared to +400mbit/sec (avg) to my Buffalo NY VPS.

    When I use my VPS (Buffalo, NY) to EasyVM (Ashburn, VA) -- both at datacenters and much closer in distance -- it's also only getting 10.1 Mbit/sec as shown in the logs that I attached to the ticket-

    [SUM] 0.00-20.05 sec 24.0 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec receiver

    The network is gigacooked my man, i've seen people with servers at other EasyVM locations (texas,etc) have the exact same issue.

    My dedi in VA is also affected, opened a support ticket last Monday and so far have had one response back 5 days later asking if I'm still seeing the issue, responded to that 4 hours later and now it's been nothing again for another 3-4 days

    Speedtest.net (Region: NORTH AMERICA)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      
    
     ISP: PARALLAX 
    
     Nearest          0.50 ms     0.0%    936.60 Mbps    926.97 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Ashburn, VA 
    
     Vancouver, BC    58.50 ms    N/A     4.49 Mbps      197.99 Mbps    TELUS - Vancouver, BC 
     Calgary, AB      60.18 ms    N/A     10.28 Mbps     394.74 Mbps    Shaw Communications - Calgary, AB 
     Winnipeg, MB     36.13 ms    0.0%    2.24 Mbps      921.87 Mbps    Voyageur Internet - Winnipeg, MB 
     Toronto, ON      25.82 ms    0.0%    9.74 Mbps      454.68 Mbps    Bell Canada - Toronto, ON 
     Montreal, QC     18.90 ms    0.0%    923.58 Mbps    919.15 Mbps    Rogers Wireless - Montréal, QC 
    
     New York, NY     6.55 ms     0.0%    9.69 Mbps      106.18 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY 
     Ashburn, VA      0.61 ms     0.0%    923.19 Mbps    917.53 Mbps    Rackdog - Ashburn, VA 
     Durham, NC       7.15 ms     N/A     924.42 Mbps    918.97 Mbps    Spectrum - Durham, NC 
     Atlanta, GA      15.45 ms    0.0%    9.90 Mbps      200.27 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Atlanta, GA 
     Miami, FL        27.68 ms    0.0%    19.78 Mbps     430.22 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL 
     Dallas, TX       34.39 ms    0.0%    9.75 Mbps      206.81 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
     Houston, TX      33.21 ms    N/A     9.79 Mbps      475.30 Mbps    Comcast - Houston, TX 
     Kansas, MO       40.19 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      203.68 Mbps    Nocix - Kansas City, MO 
     Minneapolis, MN  25.79 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      415.76 Mbps    US Internet - Minneapolis, MN 
     Chicago, IL      17.15 ms    0.0%    10.05 Mbps     359.89 Mbps    Hivelocity - Chicago, IL 
     Cleveland, OH    18.57 ms    0.0%    921.73 Mbps    916.50 Mbps    Cleveland Broadband - Cleveland, OH 
     Albuquerque, NM  50.65 ms    N/A     9.92 Mbps      400.19 Mbps    Comcast - Albuquerque, NM 
     Denver, CO       40.69 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      289.23 Mbps    T-Mobile Fiber | Intrepid - Denver, CO 
     Portland, OR     65.19 ms    N/A     9.84 Mbps      398.77 Mbps    CenturyLink - Portland, OR 
     Las Vegas, NV    61.17 ms    N/A     10.22 Mbps     317.42 Mbps    Boost Mobile - Las Vegas, NV 
     Salt Lake, UT    62.05 ms            10.12 Mbps     FAILED         Novva Data Centers - Salt Lake City, UT 
     Phoenix, AZ      49.98 ms    0.0%    9.98 Mbps      286.71 Mbps    Xiber LLC - Phoenix, AZ 
     Los Angeles, CA  54.73 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      253.79 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
     San Jose, CA     66.46 ms    0.0%    9.87 Mbps      246.83 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA 
     Spokane, WA      64.05 ms    0.0%    10.03 Mbps     185.52 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA 
    

    SMH this is horrible. Thanks for sharing your experience as well. I'm evaluating my options at this point. 10Mbps on a "1gigabit" line...

    Yeah I've pretty much given up, jumped ship and got a new dedi from a different provider and will be recommending most steer clear of EasyVM for a while.
    Network issues on this scale is one thing but then the lack of communication and support is the nail in the coffin

    Thanked by 2plumberg admax
  • @beanman109 said:

    @Clept0 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @Clept0 said:
    @aqua haven't heard from you and I added an update to my ticket. Please help to fix ASAP.

    Iperf3 logs--
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_4paralleltransfers_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_LosAngeles_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt
    iperf3_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_serverLOG_from_VPS_Buffalo_NY_client.txt
    iperf3_VPS_Buffalo_NY_clientLOG_to_EasyVM_Ashburn_VA_server.txt

    There is SERIOUS throttling going on at the Ashburn VA server. I shared my results from running iperf3 tests.

    Here in L.A., I'm only getting 10Mbit/sec transfers to EasyVM Ashburn, VA whether I use multi-threaded transfers or single transfers, compared to +400mbit/sec (avg) to my Buffalo NY VPS.

    When I use my VPS (Buffalo, NY) to EasyVM (Ashburn, VA) -- both at datacenters and much closer in distance -- it's also only getting 10.1 Mbit/sec as shown in the logs that I attached to the ticket-

    [SUM] 0.00-20.05 sec 24.0 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec receiver

    The network is gigacooked my man, i've seen people with servers at other EasyVM locations (texas,etc) have the exact same issue.

    My dedi in VA is also affected, opened a support ticket last Monday and so far have had one response back 5 days later asking if I'm still seeing the issue, responded to that 4 hours later and now it's been nothing again for another 3-4 days

    Speedtest.net (Region: NORTH AMERICA)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      
    
     ISP: PARALLAX 
    
     Nearest          0.50 ms     0.0%    936.60 Mbps    926.97 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Ashburn, VA 
    
     Vancouver, BC    58.50 ms    N/A     4.49 Mbps      197.99 Mbps    TELUS - Vancouver, BC 
     Calgary, AB      60.18 ms    N/A     10.28 Mbps     394.74 Mbps    Shaw Communications - Calgary, AB 
     Winnipeg, MB     36.13 ms    0.0%    2.24 Mbps      921.87 Mbps    Voyageur Internet - Winnipeg, MB 
     Toronto, ON      25.82 ms    0.0%    9.74 Mbps      454.68 Mbps    Bell Canada - Toronto, ON 
     Montreal, QC     18.90 ms    0.0%    923.58 Mbps    919.15 Mbps    Rogers Wireless - Montréal, QC 
    
     New York, NY     6.55 ms     0.0%    9.69 Mbps      106.18 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY 
     Ashburn, VA      0.61 ms     0.0%    923.19 Mbps    917.53 Mbps    Rackdog - Ashburn, VA 
     Durham, NC       7.15 ms     N/A     924.42 Mbps    918.97 Mbps    Spectrum - Durham, NC 
     Atlanta, GA      15.45 ms    0.0%    9.90 Mbps      200.27 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Atlanta, GA 
     Miami, FL        27.68 ms    0.0%    19.78 Mbps     430.22 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL 
     Dallas, TX       34.39 ms    0.0%    9.75 Mbps      206.81 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
     Houston, TX      33.21 ms    N/A     9.79 Mbps      475.30 Mbps    Comcast - Houston, TX 
     Kansas, MO       40.19 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      203.68 Mbps    Nocix - Kansas City, MO 
     Minneapolis, MN  25.79 ms    0.0%    9.85 Mbps      415.76 Mbps    US Internet - Minneapolis, MN 
     Chicago, IL      17.15 ms    0.0%    10.05 Mbps     359.89 Mbps    Hivelocity - Chicago, IL 
     Cleveland, OH    18.57 ms    0.0%    921.73 Mbps    916.50 Mbps    Cleveland Broadband - Cleveland, OH 
     Albuquerque, NM  50.65 ms    N/A     9.92 Mbps      400.19 Mbps    Comcast - Albuquerque, NM 
     Denver, CO       40.69 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      289.23 Mbps    T-Mobile Fiber | Intrepid - Denver, CO 
     Portland, OR     65.19 ms    N/A     9.84 Mbps      398.77 Mbps    CenturyLink - Portland, OR 
     Las Vegas, NV    61.17 ms    N/A     10.22 Mbps     317.42 Mbps    Boost Mobile - Las Vegas, NV 
     Salt Lake, UT    62.05 ms            10.12 Mbps     FAILED         Novva Data Centers - Salt Lake City, UT 
     Phoenix, AZ      49.98 ms    0.0%    9.98 Mbps      286.71 Mbps    Xiber LLC - Phoenix, AZ 
     Los Angeles, CA  54.73 ms    0.0%    9.94 Mbps      253.79 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
     San Jose, CA     66.46 ms    0.0%    9.87 Mbps      246.83 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA 
     Spokane, WA      64.05 ms    0.0%    10.03 Mbps     185.52 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA 
    

    SMH this is horrible. Thanks for sharing your experience as well. I'm evaluating my options at this point. 10Mbps on a "1gigabit" line...

    Yeah I've pretty much given up, jumped ship and got a new dedi from a different provider and will be recommending most steer clear of EasyVM for a while.
    Network issues on this scale is one thing but then the lack of communication and support is the nail in the coffin

    100% agree!

  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    Hi all,

    We are still working on resolving these issues, and I sincerely apologize for the current status of EasyVM. To be blunt, we have simply been taking on too much onto our plate with not only EasyVM, but with Parallax aswell. The network problems have been entirely our fault, and not doing preventative planning and maintenance. The current setup can handle just the load of EasyVM, but not both.

    I have been out on holiday for the past 3 weeks for my best friends wedding and haven't been able to have full focus on this.

    I will be back tomorrow and will be on full force resolving all of current issues, and putting in measures to resolve these issues permanently.

    We will be bringing on more team members to help with the significant increase of load we are experiencing.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @aqua said:
    Hi all,

    We are still working on resolving these issues, and I sincerely apologize for the current status of EasyVM. To be blunt, we have simply been taking on too much onto our plate with not only EasyVM, but with Parallax aswell. The network problems have been entirely our fault, and not doing preventative planning and maintenance. The current setup can handle just the load of EasyVM, but not both.

    I have been out on holiday for the past 3 weeks for my best friends wedding and haven't been able to have full focus on this.

    I will be back tomorrow and will be on full force resolving all of current issues, and putting in measures to resolve these issues permanently.

    We will be bringing on more team members to help with the significant increase of load we are experiencing.

    Will there be a refund / partial refund option for those who have lost faith in the current state of EasyVM and no longer wish to be a customer due to this?

  • @beanman109 said:

    @aqua said:
    Hi all,

    We are still working on resolving these issues, and I sincerely apologize for the current status of EasyVM. To be blunt, we have simply been taking on too much onto our plate with not only EasyVM, but with Parallax aswell. The network problems have been entirely our fault, and not doing preventative planning and maintenance. The current setup can handle just the load of EasyVM, but not both.

    I have been out on holiday for the past 3 weeks for my best friends wedding and haven't been able to have full focus on this.

    I will be back tomorrow and will be on full force resolving all of current issues, and putting in measures to resolve these issues permanently.

    We will be bringing on more team members to help with the significant increase of load we are experiencing.

    Will there be a refund / partial refund option for those who have lost faith in the current state of EasyVM and no longer wish to be a customer due to this?

    This has fallen on deaf ears at EasyVM. It's clear that they do not value their customers.

    In fact, I've seen the quickest response from them when I contacted PayPal to get a refund. They closed my account in less than six hours.

    As I have experienced and others mentioned, it usually takes over a week to get a reply to a service ticket ¯(ツ)/¯. @FAT32 heads up on EasyVM

    Thanked by 1srch07
  • Yup, there has been too many issues with almost no resolution in past 2-3 months.

    • Support ticket responses are minimum 7 days delayed. They used to be within 36 hours 3 months before.
    • Ashburn location is unusable due to network. Quite literally, even almost nil traffic Wordpress websites hosted on VPS's in Ashburn keep going offline randomly for a few minutes everyday. I am not even going to say anything about network throttle in that location.
    • Dallas is having network burst issue, with mis calculation in bandwidth usage.

    I strongly feel they are into a downward spiral with slim chance of getting everything together, considering how long this has dragged on.

    Thanked by 1Clept0
  • yup had a ticket with them for over a month, and if they do reply it's typically unhelpful and frustrating.

    Thanked by 1Clept0
  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    We have seemed to find the fix for the issues, please let us know if you are still encountering them via ticket.

  • @aqua said:
    We have seemed to find the fix for the issues, please let us know if you are still encountering them via ticket.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Feb 22 10:19:51 PM EST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 2 days, 23 hours, 16 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2395.500 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-31-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Aquatic Tech LLC
    ASN        : AS26930 Parallax
    Host       : Parallax
    Location   : Secaucus, New Jersey (NJ)
    Country    : United States
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 570 Mbits/sec   | 10.2 Mbits/sec  | 72.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 752 Mbits/sec   | 19.9 Mbits/sec  | 76.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 19.2 Mbits/sec  | 171 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 462 Mbits/sec   | 19.6 Mbits/sec  | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 473 Mbits/sec   | 10.1 Mbits/sec  | 58.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 519 Mbits/sec   | 10.2 Mbits/sec  | 6.87 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 721 Mbits/sec   | 17.7 Mbits/sec  | 114 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 491 Mbits/sec   | 72.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 863 Mbits/sec   | 76.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 844 Mbits/sec   | 437 Mbits/sec   | 171 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 566 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 870 Mbits/sec   | 58.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 917 Mbits/sec   | 7.01 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 996 Mbits/sec   | 105 Mbits/sec   | 114 ms
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 24 sec
    
    Thanked by 1Clept0
  • Still seeing a large amount of traffic on my Dallas VM (with bandwidth mis-calculation) but to their credit, I opened a support case and the bandwidth was uncapped in under ~3 hours (on a weekend).

    In an effort to debug whether it was my VM I've run tcptrack on the VM and see a large amount of connections being made.

  • seems the portal has an invalid captcha key now, making it impossible to login.

    Thanked by 2skippy Decicus
  • Just wanted to note I am having network issues in NY. I can connect to the virtualizer but it won't restart the VPS. I haven't had that many issues in the past

    Thanked by 1funky_cake
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @paroxsitic said:
    Just wanted to note I am having network issues in NY. I can connect to the virtualizer but it won't restart the VPS. I haven't had that many issues in the past

    Probably something to do with your service being sold to LevelOneServers without notice.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/203263/easyvm-sold-to-leveloneservers#latest

  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @aqua said:
    Hi all,

    We are still working on resolving these issues, and I sincerely apologize for the current status of EasyVM. To be blunt, we have simply been taking on too much onto our plate with not only EasyVM, but with Parallax aswell. The network problems have been entirely our fault, and not doing preventative planning and maintenance. The current setup can handle just the load of EasyVM, but not both.

    I have been out on holiday for the past 3 weeks for my best friends wedding and haven't been able to have full focus on this.

    I will be back tomorrow and will be on full force resolving all of current issues, and putting in measures to resolve these issues permanently.

    We will be bringing on more team members to help with the significant increase of load we are experiencing.

    It seems like you solved all of the issues right?

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/203263/easyvm-sold-to-leveloneservers#latest

Sign In or Register to comment.