Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Debian strange port behavior.

I have a problem with a Debian7 openVZ server. The server runs a couple of VM’s, and I want to control it with Openvz-web-panel. However, I can’t use any services that open ports to the outer world. The main problem here is port 3000 that should work for OWP, but anything like Neorouter( port 32k) doesn’t work either. Netstat shows it as listening, but an Nmap scan shows a ridiculous amount of open ports, that are not shown as open in netstat:
Nmap scan:
http://pastebin.com/PC9c8Tqh

netstat:
http://pastebin.com/QBb26X0L

Does anyone have a clue why this is happening? Thanks in advance :)

PS: the error neorouter gave was: "Transport endpoint is not connected."

Comments

  • What I forgot to add: services like apache and openssh run fine. I even tried setting owp to port 21, since I don't use ftp, but that didn't work too.

  • When I have tried setup like this I had same problem, after some time I gave up and installed CentOS on host with openvz. Other way would be to use CLI for openvz since I assume everything else is working except OWP.

  • May this be an issue with fail2ban for some unimaginable reason? I see fail2ban in a list of socks.

Sign In or Register to comment.