Need a vps that can host email

Gulf

@hoory said:
Profvds, they open port 25 by default, support sending and receiving emails, and the data center is located in Slovakia.

Do they have trial? May try.

Reputation is good. Owner is a russian, ok.

Neighbours are not perfect, but suitable
https://check.spamhaus.org/results?query=91.242.163.9

hoory

@Gulf said:

@hoory said:
Profvds, they open port 25 by default, support sending and receiving emails, and the data center is located in Slovakia.

Do they have trial? May try.

Reputation is good. Owner is a russian, ok.

Neighbours are not perfect, but suitable
https://check.spamhaus.org/results?query=91.242.163.9

Maybe you can submit a ticket to request a trial.

clay_p

@nazha said:
Location: US or Europe Budget: $15-25

Requires a clean IP

Requirements: Common mail ports need to be open, for example port 25

Hello @nazha
We provide VPS hosting in the US. Check out our VPS hosting plans—they may be the perfect fit for your needs!

tentor

@Gulf said:

@nazha said:
I am worried that my emails will be rejected by Microsoft or Google due to IP issues.

over 50% of providers from this forum are blocked in M$ or Google

Example, linveo is blocked in Gmail shadow ban. They even open 25 port by request...

Linveo is a good company, just an illustration, recently tried.

This could be because Gmail doesn't like egihosting or tier.net that linveo uses.
I tried other providers from tier.net and got the same results. Gmail does not like it.

I have seen that Gmail moves letters to spam for any IP address and domain pair if they don't have sufficient intelligence on it (tested with my personal domains), after some time and grow in volume the issue was gone

itsTomHarper

@CharityHost_org said:

@itsTomHarper said: I am worried that my emails will be rejected by Microsoft or Google due to IP issues.
It's not spam. I'm an e-commerce company and sometimes I need to send a lot of emails to many customers.

Ok well the problem is if your ip has already been on rbl, just rule of thumb, never use emailing lists that were not sourced by yourself with double-opt in email addresses (only send emails to addresses that signed up to you directly and confirmed the signup by email). Otherwise your source ip will always get on rbl and further your domain may end up on dnsrbl, and smtp sending services will also either cancel your service eventually, or just not send.

If you send emails to double-opt in customers/potential customers, just try smtp2go.com or something like that. You will otherwise have the same issues with a VPS regardless and it can take time to get gmail, outlook, etc to accept your emails by reputation instead of spamboxing them due to previous issues. You should use mxtoolbox.com or something like it to track your sending. I believe google requires less than 1% spam listing to be able to deliver inboxes. You see, if someone even hits spam button, you start racking in spam % plus rbl's. That's why it's best to always include a unsubscription url in your emails to customers.

Did you just quote the wrong guy with the message written by the OP.

Gulf

@tentor said:
I have seen that Gmail moves letters to spam for any IP address and domain pair if they don't have sufficient intelligence on it (tested with my personal domains), after some time and grow in volume the issue was gone

I have a domain with high reputation. This way can detect blocked providers in Gmail.

I tried to heat these ips, but no luck. Imho, if it goes to spam from the first mail, it would be hard to heat it. I drop such ips / providers.

CharityHost_org

@itsTomHarper said: Did you just quote the wrong guy with the message written by the OP

The comment is relevant regardless.

itsTomHarper

@CharityHost_org said:

@itsTomHarper said: Did you just quote the wrong guy with the message written by the OP

The comment is relevant regardless.

You quoted the wrong person with the message sent by the OP. Go check the first message you quoted, it says "itsTomHarper said: The message from OP". The quote looks like I wrote that message, when in-fact the OP wrote that.