Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


I am looking for a VDS with these features
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I am looking for a VDS with these features

sucre13sucre13 Member
edited October 12 in Requests

16GB RAM
4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
220GB NVMe RAID 10
8TB @ 10Gbps port
1 IPv4
IPv6 /112
$60/YEAR

I am looking for these features but for a single payment $60/YEAR

something similar to please

Comments

  • VDS? I don't think any provider will offer VPS at this cost.

  • something like this 8GB RAM
    4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
    200 GB NVMe

    1 IPv4
    IPv6 /112
    $60/YEAR

  • You should wait for Black Friday or New Year Sale to hit something amazing like this. No provider will have this price normally

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • For that money, you can buy a dedicated server at Hetzner dude !

  • WebProjectWebProject Host Rep, Veteran
    edited October 12

    @jure12 said:
    For that money, you can buy a dedicated server at Hetzner dude !

    I don’t think so OP be able to find Hetzner see at:

    $60/YEAR

    Thanked by 1mustafamw3
  • @jure12 said:
    For that money, you can buy a dedicated server at Hetzner dude !

    $60/YEAR i.e. $5/Month
    Dont think he will get a dedicated server at that price.
    Especially the specs that he has mentioned...

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @sucre13 said:
    16GB RAM
    4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
    220GB NVMe RAID 10
    8TB @ 10Gbps port
    1 IPv4
    IPv6 /112
    $60/YEAR

    I am looking for these features but for a single payment $60/YEAR

    something similar to please

    Good luck with your budget

    This ain't going to happen, even on BF. You need either to raise your budget or to lower the specs significantly

  • davidedavide Member
    edited October 12

    I was able to find this compromise, all the specs needed to be lowered to squash it around your budget:

    HostBrr — $75 / year
    3 Epyc Cores (shared)
    12288 MB RAM
    180 GB NVMe
    7500 GB/month bandwidth
    1.0 Gbps port speed
    IPv4 (NAT) + IPv6
    Hosted in Germany

    With higher port speed and dedicated IPv4 there is this from AllHost but unless the port speed is paramount it is less bang for the buck:

    AllHost — £75 / year
    3 Epyc Cores (shared)
    8192 MB RAM
    128 GB NVMe
    10240 GB/month bandwidth
    8.0 Gbps port speed
    IPv4 + IPv6
    Hosted in United Kingdom

    You can fiddle for more results on my affiliated LET aggregator. If you set "virtualization" to "lxc" or "any" NAT results are also returned.

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • @sucre13 said:
    16GB RAM
    4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
    220GB NVMe RAID 10
    8TB @ 10Gbps port
    1 IPv4
    IPv6 /112
    $60/YEAR

    I am looking for these features but for a single payment $60/YEAR

    something similar to please

    If you want not a VPS, but dedicated resources, then here's the closest AMD EPYC VDS you can get:

    They have larger offers like this one. All those plans can be stacked if you want something more powerful.

    However it's still "something similar", as you can get an EPYC only for a few dollars more.

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

  • @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    No no. If a host gives me these specs they will have my blessings to not go Deadpool

    /s

  • @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    Yep, blame the customers.

    These poor beggars want so much with their empty wallets...... How dare they!

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran
    edited October 12

    But on a serious note, people start with such requests, why not? To save money.

    But they then expect top notch service and support.
    They also indirectly expect the host will take backups and all. They will never care about backups until screwup happen.

    On the other hand, if all is well, they may have noisy neighbors and a yabs will be run and then start crying about the performance not matching a bare metal. Inspite of the fact they don't understand how those numbers impact their performance. Unless one is running super intensive applications only thrn the scores would typically matter. Daily tasks should not see any majir slowness.

    Or, host after their term decides to raise prices. Then it's again back to square one and host shaming starts.

    Or they choose not to read the tos and cry when they are booted off and cannot get the money back and charge backs make things bad for all

    It's always a moving goal post.

  • 80% dont need that much resources anyway.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @plumberg said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    No no. If a host gives me these specs they will have my blessings to not go Deadpool

    /s

    It opens the doors for the providers who put money before stability

    @itachikonoha said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    Yep, blame the customers.

    These poor beggars want so much with their empty wallets...... How dare they!

    Half the time it is not as you put it “empty wallet” but wanting more than is needed or compare providers who offer quality to the ones who just see the money.

    It is better to take something lower spec that will be stable and will perform as required not something high spec but having bad performance or regular outages.

  • It’s 60/mo 😂

  • @xHosts said:

    @plumberg said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    No no. If a host gives me these specs they will have my blessings to not go Deadpool

    /s

    It opens the doors for the providers who put money before stability

    @itachikonoha said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    Yep, blame the customers.

    These poor beggars want so much with their empty wallets...... How dare they!

    Half the time it is not as you put it “empty wallet” but wanting more than is needed or compare providers who offer quality to the ones who just see the money.

    It is better to take something lower spec that will be stable and will perform as required not something high spec but having bad performance or regular outages.

    Let customer decide it.

    A customer may want high performance at lower price while he may agree with unavailability from time to time.

    If there's somone who addresses this gap, then why is your objection? Why do you think everyone thinks the same way as you I. E. people always (should) put stability over price?

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @plumberg said:
    But on a serious note, people start with such requests, why not? To save money.

    No. Lately these requests have in mind to earn money, not just saving it. Essentially reselling the ressources to some compute network. May it be some crypto node stuff or AI/LLM stuff...
    If you find the above at the given price point, you might be able to earn a fivver. Then you buy 362 of those and do the math.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • @Falzo said:

    @plumberg said:
    But on a serious note, people start with such requests, why not? To save money.

    No. Lately these requests have in mind to earn money, not just saving it. Essentially reselling the ressources to some compute network. May it be some crypto node stuff or AI/LLM stuff...
    If you find the above at the given price point, you might be able to earn a fivver. Then you buy 362 of those and do the math.

    Take kyc then. Those who actually want, will provide anyway and will stop the abuse.

  • MultiMulti Member

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    To be fair the last time I bought a server too good to be true from Hostaris you got me and sold a refugee offer at similar price and specs. Still got that machine and I'm very happy with it.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @itachikonoha said:

    @xHosts said:

    @plumberg said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    No no. If a host gives me these specs they will have my blessings to not go Deadpool

    /s

    It opens the doors for the providers who put money before stability

    @itachikonoha said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    Yep, blame the customers.

    These poor beggars want so much with their empty wallets...... How dare they!

    Half the time it is not as you put it “empty wallet” but wanting more than is needed or compare providers who offer quality to the ones who just see the money.

    It is better to take something lower spec that will be stable and will perform as required not something high spec but having bad performance or regular outages.

    Let customer decide it.

    A customer may want high performance at lower price while he may agree with unavailability from time to time.

    If there's somone who addresses this gap, then why is your objection? Why do you think everyone thinks the same way as you I. E. people always (should) put stability over price?

    The same ones who press for these offers will on the first outage create a thread here complaining of the slow speeds compared to the expected, the outage, the support had no reply within a hour on a low end provider.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @Multi said:

    @xHosts said:
    This seems to be happening more and more lately, people requesting very high spec for next to nothing, some providers offer this and either

    oversell like crazy and the performance and uptime goes to the wall
    or
    they deadpool without a word of warning then people complain, these providers see a quick $60 and know within weeks or max a few months they will be gone

    It would be better to request something realistic and sustainable for both customer and provider and the end of the day

    To be fair the last time I bought a server too good to be true from Hostaris you got me and sold a refugee offer at similar price and specs. Still got that machine and I'm very happy with it.

    I earn from other avenues mostly and at times I am happy to step in when a provider deadpools to help people out when possible, no harm in helping out people who have been stung by shady providers.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 12

    @sucre13 said:
    16GB RAM
    4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
    220GB NVMe RAID 10
    8TB @ 10Gbps port
    1 IPv4
    IPv6 /112
    $60/YEAR

    I am looking for these features but for a single payment $60/YEAR

    something similar to please

    well, @hosthatch $10/month with 24GB with 2 dedicated and 4 shared vCores is the offer I can think of ... from a premium LET provider.

    24 GB 
    300 GB storage
    2 vCores dedicated
    + 4 vCores shared
    50 TB monthly bandwidth
    10 gig data port
    

    You have to wait for Black Friday or Christmas deal for that

  • @sucre13 said:
    16GB RAM
    4 EPYC cores ( 2 dedicated, 2 fair-shared cores)
    220GB NVMe RAID 10
    8TB @ 10Gbps port
    1 IPv4
    IPv6 /112
    $60/YEAR

    I am looking for these features but for a single payment $60/YEAR

    something similar to please

    You copied specifications from this thread
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/192644/64-95-m-ryzen-dedicated-server-8gb-epyc-deals-starting-60-year/p1

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    I'm closing this thread because the OP has just opened another one

    It's not clear whether the OP really and realistically knows what they want

    Thanked by 2dev_vps BasToTheMax
This discussion has been closed.