i want telegram bot hosting

PRISRI

i am making file to direct link bot suggest me best hosting for this bot

high traffic and high bandwidth

direct file downloading bot

davide

If the bot only shares the links to those files, it's not going to consume much bandwidth, unless you intend to host the bot and the files on the same server. Is that the intent?

Gulf

They are using Equinix in Amsterdam, Miami and Singapore.

I saw some providers in the offer section, like Roayl Host / Royal Hosting, and their resellers. I recently saw a reseller.

dev_vps

@PRISRI said:
i am making file to direct link bot suggest me best hosting for this bot

high traffic and high bandwidth

direct file downloading bot

@oplink $5/month plan has 50TB monthly bandwidth

https://my.oplink.net/store/amd-ryzen-3900x-vps/2gb

PS — make sure you follow telegram api guidelines

DataIdeas-Josh

@PRISRI said:
i am making file to direct link bot suggest me best hosting for this bot

high traffic and high bandwidth

direct file downloading bot

Check out our High storage VPS's
https://my2.dataideas.com/store/intel-xeon-storage-vps-shared-cpu
https://my2.dataideas.com/store/intel-xeon-storage-vps-dedicated-cpu

or even our AMD Ryzen 7 dedi starting at $39.99/m
https://my2.dataideas.com/store/dedicated

We don't meter bandwidth traffic.

itachikonoha

for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Void

@itachikonoha said:
for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Not for a public bot with many users

itachikonoha

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:
for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Not for a public bot with many users

Define "many" . What's the range?

Void

@itachikonoha said:

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:
for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Not for a public bot with many users

Define "many" . What's the range?

This is one such bot I guess.

itachikonoha

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:
for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Not for a public bot with many users

Define "many" . What's the range?

This is one such bot I guess.

I asked because the predecessor of Rose bot; "Marie" used to run on this same configuration IIRC (except a bit higher storage). The limit it faced was with regards to the database because in case of marie bot or rose bot, it's not only file links but different groups saves thousands of quoted message IDs each day.

The bottleneck was indexing the database due to which, queries were getting slow and the bot was re-written later. This occured when it had around million users.

If your bot is bogged down, then issue will probably be in the architecture of your app and your database design. Even a cheap node server can handle thousands of request concurrently without much stress.

Void

@itachikonoha said:

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:

@Void said:

@itachikonoha said:
for direct link bot, even a 512 mb, 5gb, 1 core server with even 1 TB/month will be more than enough.

I would say $11-$12 per year cheap vps will do the job.

Not for a public bot with many users

Define "many" . What's the range?

This is one such bot I guess.

I asked because the predecessor of Rose bot; "Marie" used to run on this same configuration IIRC (except a bit higher storage). The limit it faced was with regards to the database because in case of marie bot or rose bot, it's not only file links but different groups saves thousands of quoted message IDs each day.

The bottleneck was indexing the database due to which, queries were getting slow and the bot was re-written later. This occured when it had around million users.

If your bot is bogged down, then issue will probably be in the architecture of your app and your database design. Even a cheap node server can handle thousands of request concurrently without much stress.

If it's for a simple filtering bot (usually Marie clone for indexing stuff and responding with it), then yes, a server with a cheap configuration can handle it. But from the OP's requirements (high traffic/bandwidth), it seems the bot will also use the server to download files, generate links, and serve the files. A cheap server can't handle that for a few hundred users, let alone thousands.

xHosts

We offer bot hosting using WISP