Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hosthatch's CPU is used heavily by neighbours,my VM speed is very slow

124»

Comments

  • edited June 2024

    @khnielsen said:
    app is used for 3D Secure

    So basically i couldn't use it at all since i don't own a smartphone.

    it quite literally is a 3 second thing done in an official government controlled validation app

    and letting my government basically control my payment authorization is something i'd feel extremely bad about in general.

    • Now, I am not saying everything is perfect, but fraud online is an ever increasing thing and 2FA helps you, whether it is passwords or cards, I think we can agree that you are more protected from having your card abused than not having it?

    Well, kind of, yes. As long as potential damages are not my problem there is very little difference though. It basically means i need to check my bill more closely. As for passwords i prefer to decide myself if i feel 2FA is necessary. Especially since a lot of solutions want to force people into some kind of app and even if not there's always a chance for the system to fail meaning i'm locked out of my account. Not to mention that for some stuff i simply don't attach enough importance to justify jumping through any extra hoops.

    As someone who's worked with this for over a decade I don't really share your view on the risk being put on the user - You are just as well protected, infact even more protected by having a card that supports 3DS (as an example) and actively using it, there's no scenarios, atleast not here that have changed due to 3D Secure, you can dispute, chargeback and get your money back on the same exact terms as you've always been able to.

    Well, i don't claim to be an expert on this but i've looked into it when 2FA on CCs became a thing and what i came up with was that there's basically a shift of the burden of proof. Without 3D secure it's up to the issuer to prove that the charge i'm disputing was in fact not fraudulent but with 3D Secure it's up to the user, so if the issuer doesn't feel like taking the loss you can always be hit with "Please provide proof that you really didn't order any Hosthatch VPS". If that happens all i can say is: Good luck.

  • MakiMaki Member

    @Oscar_Inc said:

    @Greyhound said:

    @Oscar_Inc said:

    @lirrr said:
    show cpu steal

    unable to show,the VM is shutted down by hosthatch and i don't know why they refuse to give a refund:abuse credit card payments

    Simply because you're using a stolen credit card for the payment.

    Why this is not allowed? @hosthatch
    Money is just money,it don't necessarily belongs to which card is responsible for holding the money in,the money in my card is equivalent the money in my friend's card
    Why you must label the money belongs to that card??? @hosthatch

    Ah you are saying "Why is stealing is not allowed?"

    If you say, Money is just money, then just rob your chinese bank there

    You also said: "If you use other people's money and they don't notice anything unusual, then that's acceptable!", Use your mother wallet, thats OK for you

  • khnielsenkhnielsen Member
    edited June 2024

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @khnielsen said:
    app is used for 3D Secure

    So basically i couldn't use it at all since i don't own a smartphone.

    it quite literally is a 3 second thing done in an official government controlled validation app

    and letting my government basically control my payment authorization is something i'd feel extremely bad about in general.

    • Now, I am not saying everything is perfect, but fraud online is an ever increasing thing and 2FA helps you, whether it is passwords or cards, I think we can agree that you are more protected from having your card abused than not having it?

    Well, kind of, yes. As long as potential damages are not my problem there is very little difference though. It basically means i need to check my bill more closely. As for passwords i prefer to decide myself if i feel 2FA is necessary. Especially since a lot of solutions want to force people into some kind of app and even if not there's always a chance for the system to fail meaning i'm locked out of my account. Not to mention that for some stuff i simply don't attach enough importance to justify jumping through any extra hoops.

    As someone who's worked with this for over a decade I don't really share your view on the risk being put on the user - You are just as well protected, infact even more protected by having a card that supports 3DS (as an example) and actively using it, there's no scenarios, atleast not here that have changed due to 3D Secure, you can dispute, chargeback and get your money back on the same exact terms as you've always been able to.

    Well, i don't claim to be an expert on this but i've looked into it when 2FA on CCs became a thing and what i came up with was that there's basically a shift of the burden of proof. Without 3D secure it's up to the issuer to prove that the charge i'm disputing was in fact not fraudulent but with 3D Secure it's up to the user, so if the issuer doesn't feel like taking the loss you can always be hit with "Please provide proof that you really didn't order any Hosthatch VPS". If that happens all i can say is: Good luck.

    Point 1 - If you don't have a smartphone you get a text, if you don't have access to a phone at all you get a piece of paper in the mail with 100 random digits that are then used.

    Point 2 - Again, thats personal preference, the system we use here are government funded but are not driven by the government, they own the system and use it for a wide range of things like you personal tax items etc, not trusting the app for your payments would also mean you wouldn't trust it with your taxes, you'd then have to go do that manually at a local help point and hope they can help, nothings perfect but it protects you.

    Point 3 - I actually have first hand knowledge of a scenario like this - Abt 10 years ago my cousin got arrested by the police, put in jail and was charged with terrorism, reason? His card had funded purchases related to it online, his card was scimmed in a local store.
    Or another scenario, you get a payment from hosthatch that you don't know, you go to your bank and issue a chargeback, you do get your money back, but hosthatch also gets a €50 fine from their gateway in dispute fee, is that fair? You could have taken a simple step to protect you, your card and vendors online but chose not to.

    Point 4 - Easy, provide email logs that you never got an email from hosthatch, evidence provided and any serious bank would run a chargeback - It really isn't as "bad" as you put it out to be.

    Lastly @totally_not_banned - Appreciate your conduct here, I always find it interesting to see/read other viewpoint on matters like this, thanks for keeping it civil thus far!

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad
    edited June 2024

    @khnielsen said: email logs that you never got an email from hosthatch

    You having access to the logs often means that you can also manipulate them/delete something. And generally that's a bit difficult - would you want to simply send nothing as when no email is sent/received, there won't be any log entries about that.
    Or do you have log entries like:

    Jul 19 05:06:57 relay postfix/smtpd[5462]: No email received from billing@hosthatch. Waiting...
    Jul 19 05:07:57 relay postfix/smtpd[5462]: No email received from billing@hosthatch. Waiting...
    Jul 19 05:08:05 relay postfix/smtpd[5462]: connect from x.x.x.x
    Jul 19 05:08:57 relay postfix/smtpd[5462]: No email received from billing@hosthatch. Waiting...
    

    Edit: and a transaction can also legitimately happen without prior emails...

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Cybr said:
    That's why I keep my collection of chopped off fingers in the freezer.

    Frozen fingers are incompatible with Apple Pay.

    @Levi said:
    Chopped off fingers will be fine with all those eye balls in a stew!

    Fingers don't taste good, unless it's a chicken finger served in school cafeteria.

    @khnielsen said:
    3D Secure or any kind of 2FA build directly into the card will protect you no matter what scenario you are in (Virtually all).

    Most US cards have 2FA that kicks in only during high risk transactions.
    I would get a text message, to which I must respond Y to approve the transaction.

    I've seen such messages 4 times in the past 12 years.
    3 out of 4 times, it was a fraud case that resulted in card replacement.

  • MJJ from China got banned.
    lmao

  • khnielsenkhnielsen Member
    edited June 2024

    @lukast__ said:

    @khnielsen said: email logs that you never got an email from hosthatch

    You having access to the logs often means that you can also manipulate them/delete something. And generally that's a bit difficult - would you want to simply send nothing as when no email is sent/received, there won't be any log entries about that.

    It was perhaps a bit short, but if you have a search record, atleast here most people can get that from their email provider stating whether or not there's been any emails from a certain domain, that is enough validation in case you don't know the transaction.

    I do agree that it poses a problem, but its a trust based system afterall - It was more meant in the way tht if you dispute something where you claim you do not know it, there's multiple avenues where you can look to, to prove that you do not know it.

    That said though, with 3D Secure you are under higher pressure to provide proof that you do not know a vendor if you've also approved it in your 2FA app, but that doesn't stop you from going towards a chargeback in case the service wasn't provided or the vendor scammed you.

    If you use gmail fx you can get transcripts of whats come in/out of your inbox - And I do know that you can transact without an email but today the norm is to provide payment confirmations, invoices etc via email - If you can prove you never got any of that, you can also (in my eyes) prove to your bank that you do not know the vendor

    @yoursunny - That is the same it is here, but its just mandated now that any payment above €100 (I believe) needs to be 3D Secure verified, anything below that is up to the individual vendor.

    All I am saying is that, there are ways to protect you from having your card abused online and I think there should be more focus on preventing, rather than "Oh well, lets just chargeback", but I am also tainted as a vendor that are on the other end and are at risk of chargeback fees - 3DS like systems don't remove chargeback from the internet, but it will cut back dramatically on payments being processed that the card owner doesn't outright know.

  • edited June 2024

    @khnielsen said:

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @khnielsen said:
    app is used for 3D Secure

    So basically i couldn't use it at all since i don't own a smartphone.

    it quite literally is a 3 second thing done in an official government controlled validation app

    and letting my government basically control my payment authorization is something i'd feel extremely bad about in general.

    • Now, I am not saying everything is perfect, but fraud online is an ever increasing thing and 2FA helps you, whether it is passwords or cards, I think we can agree that you are more protected from having your card abused than not having it?

    Well, kind of, yes. As long as potential damages are not my problem there is very little difference though. It basically means i need to check my bill more closely. As for passwords i prefer to decide myself if i feel 2FA is necessary. Especially since a lot of solutions want to force people into some kind of app and even if not there's always a chance for the system to fail meaning i'm locked out of my account. Not to mention that for some stuff i simply don't attach enough importance to justify jumping through any extra hoops.

    As someone who's worked with this for over a decade I don't really share your view on the risk being put on the user - You are just as well protected, infact even more protected by having a card that supports 3DS (as an example) and actively using it, there's no scenarios, atleast not here that have changed due to 3D Secure, you can dispute, chargeback and get your money back on the same exact terms as you've always been able to.

    Well, i don't claim to be an expert on this but i've looked into it when 2FA on CCs became a thing and what i came up with was that there's basically a shift of the burden of proof. Without 3D secure it's up to the issuer to prove that the charge i'm disputing was in fact not fraudulent but with 3D Secure it's up to the user, so if the issuer doesn't feel like taking the loss you can always be hit with "Please provide proof that you really didn't order any Hosthatch VPS". If that happens all i can say is: Good luck.

    Point 1 - If you don't have a smartphone you get a text, if you don't have access to a phone at all you get a piece of paper in the mail with 100 random digits that are then used.

    That's something at least. While text message is actually somewhat convenient and in my opinion usually good enough it's also not exactly that hard to break for a determined attacker and sadly gets very, very error prone in an international context, so while this might work OK for a local CC it's not really always ideal for random passwords.

    Point 2 - Again, thats personal preference, the system we use here are government funded but are not driven by the government, they own the system and use it for a wide range of things like you personal tax items etc, not trusting the app for your payments would also mean you wouldn't trust it with your taxes, you'd then have to go do that manually at a local help point and hope they can help, nothings perfect but it protects you.

    Well, in regards to taxes i have to deal with the authorities. I'd just rather not deal with them regarding my personal life. I'm dutifully fulfilling my legal obligations but beyond that the further the government is away from me the better. They are already invading people's private lives more than enough with all their regulations and paternalism. I seriously don't see a need to hand them a killswitch for my payments on top of that even if they are still two steps away from being able to actually press it.

    Funny anecdote on the side: The year digital tax filings became mandatory around here i hired a tax consultant to do my paperwork and i get reminded pretty regularly how good of an idea that was by the frustration of the people around me that choose to put up with my government's crappy technology.

    Point 3 - I actually have first hand knowledge of a scenario like this - Abt 10 years ago my cousin got arrested by the police, put in jail and was charged with terrorism, reason? His card had funded purchases related to it online, his card was scimmed in a local store.

    Well, sure something like this might happen but i figure chances aren't that high. It'll probably rather involve a bunch of Amazon flat screens delivered to some drop. Personally i wouldn't loose sleep over it. Just as i (usually) don't lose sleep over text messages being intercepted, SIM cards being cloned, numbers being fraudulently transferred or TAN sheets (which are sadly practically non-existent around here these days - i kind of liked those) being stolen from the mailbox.

    Or another scenario, you get a payment from hosthatch that you don't know, you go to your bank and issue a chargeback, you do get your money back, but hosthatch also gets a €50 fine from their gateway in dispute fee, is that fair? You could have taken a simple step to protect you, your card and vendors online but chose not to.

    Fair? No. From a mere consumer standpoint i'm not responsible for agreements entered by third parties though. I can understand if businesses reject such terms just as i hope businesses understand that i don't like jumping through extra hoops which gain me no noticeable advantage (outside the slim chance that someone is trying to abuse my card for terrorist financing but gets stuck on 2FA).

    Point 4 - Easy, provide email logs that you never got an email from hosthatch, evidence provided and any serious bank would run a chargeback - It really isn't as "bad" as you put it out to be.

    Where would i get such logs? Personally i wouldn't know and email being 100% unreliable i also wouldn't see what those are proving. Yeah, there's probably some spy on everyone indiscriminately law around here that requires email providers to keep logs but i doubt i'll get access to those and even if i'd get it the mail might just have been lost who-knows-where or i could have simply used another email address. In a legal context email is usually pretty bad news. There's a reason why registered snail mail is still the default when things get serious (and even there it's notoriously hard to prove delivery and reception of a specific document).

    Lastly @totally_not_banned - Appreciate your conduct here, I always find it interesting to see/read other viewpoint on matters like this, thanks for keeping it civil thus far!

    Sure thing. This is just my personal take on things anyways. Personal meaning me. For other people personal would mean them so they might come to different conclusions or apply different weighting and there's (usually) nothing wrong with that but i think i know quite well what you mean. People these days somewhat tend to take different opinions as a threat... I seriously have no clue what's up with that but it's annoying for sure.

  • Because of retards like these, we can't have nice things such as being able to pay for a service without emailing an ID.

    Thanked by 1totally_not_banned
  • edited June 2024

    @siemens said:
    Because of retards like these, we can't have nice things such as being able to pay for a service without emailing an ID.

    Or put up with annoying 2FA stuff. As much as i don't like it i feel like it's kinda realistic to assume that the risk put onto businesses will likely force more and more of them to require it (compared to sending IDs i'd actually even see it as the lesser evil).

  • @Oscar_Inc said:

    @danblaze said:
    Just wanted a quick explanation for those who don't know the truth:

    OP is a repeat credit card theft offender, a pathetic child flaunting his transgressions.

    The only real victim here is HH.

    Once again money is just money,it does nothing more or less than itself
    Money only works for only one use case:equal exchange of things

    Once again: using a stolen credit card is fraud. Fraud is criminal. Using it while you know it's fraud/criminal is even worse. You admitted it. @Hosthatch apparantly knows your real bank account. All ingredients to let officials take it from here.

    Hope that @Hosthatch will persue this. You are a disgrace to the LET community.

    Thanked by 1YassGames
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    Imagine not having BankID

  • @Oscar_Inc said: Simply because you're using a stolen credit card for the payment.

    Why this is not allowed? @ hosthatch

    I've been away from this forum for a while, and one of the first things I read after coming back is someone asking why using a stolen credit card isn't allowed? lol

  • @yoursunny said:

    @kait said:

    @yoursunny said: You need fingerprint to authorize payment.

    That is cringe.

    Before MJJs come stealing our finger -
    Apple Pay is incompatible with chopped off fingers.
    At best, you can knock us unconscious and use the still attached finger to buy a chicken.
    Once the finger is cut, it expires in about 5 minutes, after which Apple Pay will no longer work.

    have you tried it yet?

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
Sign In or Register to comment.