Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


IPv6?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

IPv6?

Citizens of LET,

A simple poll:

  • if you have already implemented IPv6 for most of your services, or You consider yourself able and willing to do it, within a 72 hours time frame answer with "Yay!"

  • if not, answer with "Nay!"

Best Regards,

Jovan

IPv6?
  1. IPv6?57 votes
    1. Yay!
      77.19%
    2. Nay!
      22.81%

Comments

  • jmginerjmginer Member, Patron Provider

    In our case,

    Madrid: IPv6 Ready!

    Barcelona: No IPv6

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • edited December 2013

    Yay!

    Full native IPv6 on all VPS services for almost 2 years now.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • Available in our EU VPS location, not yet in EU shared or US VPS.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    All our locations runs IPv6

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • @i83 said:
    Available in our EU VPS location, not yet in EU shared or US VPS.

    If you have the cPanel server in the EU you could just update cPanel to the latest 21st Century edition to get IPv6 support

    http://releases.cpanel.net/

  • Our software already supports it.

    Waiting on a allocation from the DC to the web nodes before we can make the switch.

  • @i83 said:
    Waiting on a allocation from the DC to the web nodes before we can make the switch.

    Great.

  • Dual Stack running on all services, IPv6 being the default choice, reverting to IPv4 when no AAAA records available.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • i83i83 Member
    edited December 2013

    @rmlhhd said:
    Great.

    EU Shared - <1month

    EU VPS - IPv6/v4 NAT

    US VPS - Coming Soon™

  • Running native IPv6 in all of the locations. Almost zero interest in IPv6.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • jmginerjmginer Member, Patron Provider

    Just now! activated IPv6 on all our shared hosting accounts.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • @jmginer said:
    Just now! activated IPv6 on all our shared hosting accounts.

    are you sure? C'mon, it's April's fools day in Spain!.

    /kidding.

  • We've got native IPv6 in Dallas and Los Angeles for quite a while. Some older Dallas services still need to be migrated over.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • Nick_ANick_A Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    Native in our 3 locations.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • jmginerjmginer Member, Patron Provider
    edited December 2013

    @john_k said: are you sure? C'mon, it's April's fools day in Spain!.

    Yes :)

    The main thing was adding the IPv6 range in the SolusVM, as now, it's not possible to add a range, I have do doing a direct SQL query to add a /118 (1024 IPv6).

    I created a new IPv6 block: http://goo.gl/bov2Pp

    And by hand, I do the SQL query: http://goo.gl/p8aynQ

    then, I can add the range in cPanel: http://goo.gl/RnxlDu

    and enable for all accounts: http://goo.gl/1jtXDr

    Useful tools:

    Regards!

  • SpeedBusSpeedBus Member, Host Rep

    Only 2 locations left with no v6 :) http://wiki.crowncloud.net/doku.php/ipv6_status

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • JanevskiJanevski Member
    edited December 2013

    It's good to hear that there are IPv6 ready people and hosting service providers. It's bad that ISPs, at least where i come from seem uninterested in IPv6, they have some blocks assigned, however there is no native deployment for customers.

    We are going to have to expand the addressing space, the needs of the humanity are growing, IPv4 is limited to 2^32 addresses, the demand is increasing, the supply is running low, thus the prices per IPv4 are rising. This may kill or at least severely injure the "low end" market. I am saying it in quote marks because it is a very efficient and significant market, it's absolutely not low at all. IPv4 brokers emerge, which means the efficiency in the IPv4 market is getting low. If possible cutting the middleman is essential for achieving greater efficiency, everywhere.

    What's next?

    Adding additional communication layers of abstraction?
    Multiplexing services using only one IPv4 and creating bottlenecks?
    NAT-ing whole customer subnets?
    It seems pretty bad to me.

    Let's consider another aspect - tracking behind NATs and multiplexers, service proxies, if You will, is getting harder.

    Also, i am not satisfied with the fact that i just cannot buy additional IPs from my ISP for example. Can't buy with money. I am not asking it for free.

    So we have to expand.

    The IPv4 bubble is growing and we have to burst it, the sooner the better, else it will cost us a lot.

    Anyhow this is a bit of an incoherent rant from my side, but sadly it's true.

Sign In or Register to comment.