Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › OWN.TN | Over 55% OFF | KVM Servers in Uruguay (Latin America) and Kazakhstan (Central Asia)
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

OWN.TN | Over 55% OFF | KVM Servers in Uruguay (Latin America) and Kazakhstan (Central Asia)

OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
edited November 2023 in Offers

We are excited to release a discount exclusive to the LowEnd community. This gives you more than 55% off our standard pricing and is only available for a limited time. Our special locations give you something you may wish to 'own' and keep for a long time, with premium performance and reliability.

We strive for an experience a developer may dream of:

  • Integrated control panel in billing system
  • Use your favourite console: HTML5 VNC Console, xterm.js Serial or SPICE.
  • Power Management (shutdown, reboot, reset)
  • Automated OS installation and network configuration (via cloud-init images)
  • Virtual firewall (configure rules and policies)
  • Network interface and assigned IP viewer: access handy information
  • Performance monitor (track CPU, memory, disk IO and network usage)
  • Easily store, upload and install your custom ISO
  • Residential user type IPs, direct from local ISP
  • Router VRRP and 802.3ad LACP NIC Bonding for redundancy
  • Powered by Dell Enterprise Hardware and Kingston Datacenter SSD drives
  • Hardware RAID 10 on hypervisor with up to 8x SSD drives for performance and redundancy


Location: Pando, Canelones in Uruguay (Latin America)
Your server is also powered by renewable energy!

UY-VM 3G
CPU: 1x Intel Xeon
RAM: 3GB DDR4
SSD Storage: 20GB Hardware RAID 10
Data Transfer: 500GB
Connectivity: Up to 600Mbps*
Port: 1Gbps
Virtualisation: KVM
Original Price: $24/month
Discounted price: $10/month with coupon HB5OWDK19
ORDER NOW (enter promo code during order)

Location: Pavlodar in Northeastern Kazakhstan (Central Asia)

KZ-VM 3G
CPU: 1x AMD EPYC
RAM: 3GB DDR4
SSD Storage: 20GB Hardware RAID 10
Data Transfer: 3TB
Connectivity: 1Gbps
Virtualisation: KVM
Original Price: $22/month
Discounted price: $10/month with coupon DAM1CMLET
ORDER NOW (enter promo code during order)

Network

Uruguay: ANTEL TIER III Data Center
Test IPv4: 190.64.201.9

  • We have direct connectivity to Europe via EllaLink submarine cable with latency as low as 135 ms to Spain.
  • Terrestrial routes for optimized latency within Latin America to Chile, Brazil and Argentina.
  • Direct submarine cable routes to Ashburn and Miami USA.
  • Optimised routes to Central America via Telecom Italia and Telefonica transit

Kazakhstan: Kazakhtelecom Pavlodar TIER III Data Center
Test IPv4: 178.89.141.8

  • Optimised routes to CIS region (Central Asia, Russia etc).
  • Direct route to Hong Kong via PCCW and Level 3.

*Terms: https://own.tn/portal/index.php/page/terms/
Note: IPv6 is not yet available from the ISPs.

Accepted Payment Methods: Stripe (Credit/Debit Cards) and PayPal

Please let us know if you have any questions!

Thanked by 3ngktbot OhJohn JerryHou
«1

Comments

  • zippstormzippstorm Member
    edited November 2023

    Wow, that's rare...
    Are you considering offering LXC containers in the future?

  • easteast Member

    Interesting location:)

  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @zippstorm said:
    Are you considering offering LXC containers in the future?

    Unfortunately we have no plans to offer LXC virtualisation. However we have nested virtualisation enabled for our KVM virtual machines, so you may install custom apps on top of a container based VM (within the KVM) such as Docker etc.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Test IPv6 ?

  • LeviLevi Member

    Ultra rare locations, but the price does not qualify...

  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @yoursunny said: Test IPv6 ?

    We are unable to contract for IPv6 connectivity with our ISPs yet. Road map may be Q4 next year until it is supported.
    With Kazakhtelecom, IPv6 for datacenter services is undergoing testing by the ISP and not available for production use/end users.
    With ANTEL, some of the ISP owned infrastructure in this specific DC region is not configured for IPv6 yet and hence not available.

  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @LTniger said: Ultra rare locations, but the price does not qualify...

    Hi LTniger,

    Thanks for the feedback. I believe our pricing is competitive compared to market pricing in these locations and for the desirable features we offer. The goal is not to sacrifice performance, but actually optimise it for which the pricing allows it to be sustainable in the long term. We are here for the long haul!

    From my own experience, some providers at a lower price may provide the bare minimum with limited server control management, no automation, CPU usage caps or memory over-commitment. We provide dedicated resources for memory and storage, and the ability to use up to 100% of the assigned CPU core at any one point in time (we don't impose hard limits). In addition, we have specialty features that are targeted to an engineer such as nested virtualisation, virtual firewall that sits on the network interface, resource usage visualisation and on demand direct ISO upload via the portal.

    With regards to the network, it is multi homed and not single homed. In other words, we have committed to the highest tier (enterprise) datacenter connectivity package that provides access to all transit providers/peers from the ISP, with no additional route restrictions.

    Thank you and hope to see you one day try our services.

  • MarkoVCRMarkoVCR Member

    Very naice. High five.

  • miguelzabalamiguelzabala Member

    Why the bandwidth so expensive?

  • shruubshruub Member

    @miguelzabala said:
    Why the bandwidth so expensive?

    They are offering servers in non US/EU central regions, which automatically means more expensive bandwidth (almost). I can only assume that is some sorta limit set by their upstreams or something.

    Basically, no one hosts porn sites there, so there isn't a bandwidth lobby ;^)

    Thanked by 1OwnTN
  • zGatozGato Member

    Got a server from each location, so obviously YABS is obligatory:

    YABS for Uruguay 🇺🇾

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2023-09-06                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Nov 18 03:27:47 UTC 2023

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 11 hours, 48 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2399.996 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 2.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 19.6 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-12-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones
ASN        : AS6057 Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones
Host       : Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones
Location   : Montevideo, Montevideo Department (MO)
Country    : Uruguay

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 172.44 MB/s  (43.1k) | 931.69 MB/s  (14.5k)
Write      | 172.90 MB/s  (43.2k) | 936.59 MB/s  (14.6k)
Total      | 345.35 MB/s  (86.3k) | 1.86 GB/s    (29.1k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.08 GB/s     (2.1k) | 1.14 GB/s     (1.1k)
Write      | 1.13 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.21 GB/s     (1.1k)
Total      | 2.21 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 281 Mbits/sec   | 31.7 Mbits/sec  | 214 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 89.2 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 175 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 327 Mbits/sec   | 27.5 Mbits/sec  | 195 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 84.4 Mbits/sec  | 15.0 Mbits/sec  | 289 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 215 Mbits/sec   | 7.89 Mbits/sec  | 161 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | busy            | 18.1 Mbits/sec  | 278 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 304 Mbits/sec   | 25.5 Mbits/sec  | 194 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1166
Multi Core      | 1160
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3597206

YABS completed in 15 min 27 sec

    YABS for Kazakhstan 🇰🇿

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2023-09-06                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Nov 18 03:41:21 UTC 2023

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 12 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2994.372 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 2.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 19.6 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-12-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : JSC Kazakhtelecom
ASN        : AS9198 JSC Kazakhtelecom
Host       : IP Internet Company
Location   : Almaty, Almaty (75)
Country    : Kazakhstan

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 68.54 MB/s   (17.1k) | 541.03 MB/s   (8.4k)
Write      | 68.75 MB/s   (17.1k) | 543.88 MB/s   (8.4k)
Total      | 137.29 MB/s  (34.3k) | 1.08 GB/s    (16.9k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 729.07 MB/s   (1.4k) | 477.32 MB/s    (466)
Write      | 767.81 MB/s   (1.4k) | 509.11 MB/s    (497)
Total      | 1.49 GB/s     (2.9k) | 986.43 MB/s    (963)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 4.41 Mbits/sec  | 109 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 846 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 96.8 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 835 Mbits/sec   | 310 Mbits/sec   | 106 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 890 Mbits/sec   | 139 Mbits/sec   | 31.7 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 715 Mbits/sec   | 111 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | busy            | busy            | 351 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 591 Mbits/sec   | 70.7 Mbits/sec  | 241 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1818
Multi Core      | 1822
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3597337

YABS completed in 14 min 10 sec

    You may or may not agree with the pricing, but truly residential IPs are quite difficult (to not say impossible) in such locations, that's why I got these 2 basically.

    Thanked by 1OwnTN
  • conceptconcept Member

    Honestly the specs of the Kazakhstan VPS is not too bad considering the location... Epyc Processor, 1gbit and decent amount of bandwidth.

    Thanked by 1OwnTN
  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @miguelzabala said:
    Why the bandwidth so expensive?

    The price of datacenter internet connectivity is in the two digit ($XX) per Mbit range for Uruguay. The cost is being driven by the access to specific low latency submarine cables which we requested, a small country, and a state-owned enterprise dominated market. We try our best to optimise performance and absorb costs for the benefit of the LowEnd community, so you can at least get a server in this special location!

    There are likely lower cost options in the market such as a single homed GBLX going to Miami before going to Europe or back to South America, but that's not ideal for a global scale + network performance : ) Thankfully we try our best to make sure you have a premium experience with the shortest routes possible from the region, and multi path redundancy.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    No IPv6 hall of shame

    • GitHub, Globalping
    • Outlook
    • SparkPost, MessageBird
    • ColonCrossing - VirMach, RackNerd, CloudServer, HostNamaste (Dallas), cheapwindowsvps
    • XetHost
    • SoftShellWeb (San Jose only)
    • KhanWebHost (Turkey etc), BatuCloud, BalHost
    • Wishosting
    • Reprise Hosting
    • HostWebis
    • Oplink
    • Leapswitch Networks (except Mumbai), Advin Servers (only Mumbai)
    • DedicatServer gardens, iHostART, CloudForest
    • HostTiger HostTigger
    • ForwardWeb
    • SKB Enterprise
    • HostHatch (some locations)
    • Watta Server, ONeil Online
    • HostMayo
    • GardenCloud gardens
    • CoreHosting
    • Hye Cloud
    • VirmAche, Gullo New York
    • HostVDS
    • FireVPS
    • Rabisu
    • MyHBD
    • RackEdge
    • PulsedMedia
    • HOST-C
    • DEPLOYD
    • iNetCloud
    • ADTAQ
    • IONOS
    • OpenVZ7: EthernetServers, WebHorizon
    • Ginernet
    • TerraNode
    • OwnTN

    Include IPv6 for no extra cost on every plan in every location to get delisted.

    Thanked by 2JohnFilch123 Carlin0
  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    We have had a few questions on the typical latency from Uruguay to a couple different locations. Here it is for your reference:

    Buenos Aires, Argentina: 15ms
    Santiago, Chile: 40ms
    Asunción, Paraguay: 30ms
    Sao Paulo, Brazil: 28ms
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 30ms
    Porto Alegre, Brazil: 30ms
    Cochabamba, Bolivia: 67ms
    Lima, Peru: 69ms
    Madrid, Spain: 143ms
    Amsterdam, Netherlands: 167ms
    Frankfurt, Germany: 170ms
    Ashburn, USA: 134ms
    Miami, USA: 128ms

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • benchbench Member

    @OwnTN said:
    We have had a few questions on the typical latency from Uruguay to a couple different locations. Here it is for your reference:

    Buenos Aires, Argentina: 15ms
    Santiago, Chile: 40ms
    Asunción, Paraguay: 30ms
    Sao Paulo, Brazil: 28ms
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 30ms
    Porto Alegre, Brazil: 30ms
    Cochabamba, Bolivia: 67ms
    Lima, Peru: 69ms
    Madrid, Spain: 143ms
    Amsterdam, Netherlands: 167ms
    Frankfurt, Germany: 170ms
    Ashburn, USA: 134ms
    Miami, USA: 128ms

    Has anyone already asked a question about pocket loss in Kazakhstan?

    https://tools.bunny.net/latency-test?query=178.89.141.8

  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @bench said: Has anyone already asked a question about pocket loss in Kazakhstan?

    The IP 178.89.141.8 belongs to a RIPE probe in the Pavlodar DC region, and appears to be unstable today.

    Please use the below IP from which our routers are located on:

    https://tools.bunny.net/latency-test?query=92.47.150.90

    Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
    Packets Pings
    Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 2.X.X.X.megaline.telecom.kz 0.0% 13 1.2 0.5 0.4 1.2 0.2
    2. 92.47.150.90 0.0% 13 0.9 1.7 0.9 7.5 1.9

    Thanked by 2bench fer_garcia
  • lawrencelawrence Member

    $10 per month is not a big deal... Show some anual plan for $30 top.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @lawrence said:
    $10 per month is not a big deal... Show some anual plan for $30 top.

    Yes, and I would cancel VirmAche Miami $8.88 and switch to this.

  • tsofttsoft Member
    edited November 2023

    Good locations, but for Kazakhstan could be a bit cheaper. You can buy cheaper directly from local providers.

    In KZ the bandwidth is mostly unlimited.

  • JohnFilch123JohnFilch123 Member

    @yoursunny said:

    @lawrence said:
    $10 per month is not a big deal... Show some anual plan for $30 top.

    Yes, and I would cancel VirmAche Miami $8.88 and switch to this.

    Only after the introduction of ipv6.

  • tsofttsoft Member

    Also, Pavlodar is very close to russia.

    I'd better see like Almaty. In almaty there is a cloudflare DC.

  • OwnTNOwnTN Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2023

    @tsoft said: In KZ the bandwidth is mostly unlimited.

    From my tests at some places, it's a shared 100Mbit/s or 200Mbit/s across multiple hypervisor nodes, the switch or VMs. So sometimes you might able to use less than half of it due to other end users.

    Also we're in the Tier III Kazakhtelecom Data Center with VRRP redundant links and 1Gbps committed. If we went with a Tier II DC with Kazakhtelecom in a different city, then the quality may be poorer with a higher chance of congested links. At least I am told, the network traffic to/from the Tier III DC is prioritised...

    Kazakhtelecom is not perfect as it is a little complex to deal with and paperwork but for us it works reliably at this time. DPI is a long standing issue which can affect single threaded connections in the entire Kazakhtelecom network...

  • harrisonharrison Member
    edited November 2023

    I have tested their KZ location since about a month ago in their call-to-test (and won 1 month extension) . I can vouch for it. The network speeds were good and VM itself is snappy.

    One question from community:
    What's the special value in "rare" locations for a VPS?

    Thanked by 1OwnTN
  • tsofttsoft Member
    edited November 2023

    Kazakhtelecom (KT) is not perfect, agree, but monopolist.

    Do they route via russia ofcourse?
    Try to open rutracker.org
    It is not blocked in Kazakhstan, but blocked in Russia. And you cannot open this site in Kazakhstan :D

    ISP traffic from KT is routed via russia and there undergo censorship.

  • tsofttsoft Member
    edited November 2023

    @harrison said:
    One question from community:
    What's the special value in "rare" locations for a VPS?

    The KZ location is now hot for RU people who move to KZ. They have to open visa/mastercard in KZ banks. Then they go back and need a proxy / remote desktop to open Paypal, ebay, payoneer and similar sites that are blocked in Russia. If you open them from Russian IP, you will get a permanent ban soon.

    So this location is very hot now.

    The location of TS is great for russian people, because it is just nearby the border and pings are low.

    Thanked by 1harrison
  • tsofttsoft Member

    I need rare locations for proxies to bypass country restrictions in scraping.

    I have a dedicated server in Almaty, also in Kazakhtelecom. Pings to cloudflare 1-2 ms (the same city). As I understand, the server is even in the same building as cloudflare :D

    Pinged TS from Almaty:
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=23.048 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=23.973 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=36.741 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=22.840 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=21.962 ms

    From dedi in Russia (Piter)
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=75.6 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=74.6 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=75.2 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=74.8 ms
    64 bytes from 178.89.141.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=74.9 ms

    Thanked by 1harrison
  • tsofttsoft Member
    edited November 2023

    Also, forgot. KT uses the same net for hosting and resident internet.

    So all IPs will be residents for different services. This is good for VPN or proxies.

    Test IP of TS is marked as resident and even has an rDNS 178.89.141.8.megaline.telecom.kz

    Megaline is an internet-provider in Kazakhstan :D This way people can bypass Paypal protection (it is violation of their terms to use VPN or proxy, but they cannot detect RU people from IP who use vps in KT).

  • tsofttsoft Member
    edited November 2023

    This one is interesting, tried to ping from Novosibirsk, and got the same pings as from Piter. Novosibirsk is in Russia, about 400km to Pavlodar. But traffic anyway goes to Moscow then returns back...

  • gbzret4dgbzret4d Member

    @tsoft said:
    This one is interesting, tried to ping from Novosibirsk, and got the same pings as from Piter. Novosibirsk is in Russia, about 400km to Pavlodar. But traffic anyway goes to Moscow then returns back...

    FSB needs to sniff on our traffic

Sign In or Register to comment.