Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


HAZI.ro | Because of the heat, the resources expanded and ended up being doubled! - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HAZI.ro | Because of the heat, the resources expanded and ended up being doubled!

2»

Comments

  • When can paypal payment be supported, I will support you

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @xiaomai said:
    When can paypal payment be supported, I will support you

    Hey!
    We are just about to give up on Stripe, there is no question of adding PayPal again, giving up on the same reasoning.
    Specifically, a LET member ordered 4 VPS servers that amounted to about 60 EUR, one per day.
    After about a week, we receive a cascade of complaints from Stripe that the transactions are disputed on the grounds that "the cardholder has no idea what's going on with them".
    Since I had no way to prove that the cardholder is behind the whmcs account, I agreed to give a refund for all transactions, but what will you see.
    It cost 60 euros to return all the money and another 82 in stripe fees (each lost dispute costs 20.5 euros), regardless of the value of the transaction.

  • YABS run on "2vCPU - 4GB RAM - 60GB SSD + 100GB SAS 7.2K" (5,50€/m):

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Aug 18 20:14:09 UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 155.9 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-79-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Bucharest, Bucharest (B)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.61 MB/s      (652) | 38.76 MB/s     (605)
    Write      | 2.63 MB/s      (657) | 39.06 MB/s     (610)
    Total      | 5.24 MB/s     (1.3k) | 77.83 MB/s    (1.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 63.76 MB/s     (124) | 66.95 MB/s      (65)
    Write      | 66.60 MB/s     (130) | 71.48 MB/s      (69)
    Total      | 130.36 MB/s    (254) | 138.44 MB/s    (134)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 54.4 Mbits/sec  | 149 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 116 Mbits/sec   | 400 Mbits/sec   | 58.6 ms        
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | busy            | --             
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 400 Mbits/sec   | 267 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 370 Mbits/sec   | 33.6 Mbits/sec  | --             
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 98.1 Mbits/sec  | 123 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.4 Mbits/sec  | busy            | --             
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 215                           
    Multi Core      | 375                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2311252
    
    YABS completed in 39 min 22 sec
    

    Few things so far:

    • noVNC was initially broken in the control panel, @FlorinMarian was very fast to fix it though! :)
    • Server lost IPv6 connectivity over night. Thought it fixed itself after a re-install of the VM, but doesn't look like it.
    • The pre-configuration of the images (tried Debian 11 and Ubuntu 22.04) feels somewhat strange, especially in the network area - have to give it a closer look first.
    • Advertised as 2 cores of a E5-2680 v4, but deployed on a E5-2698 v3 - should however be rather similar in performance: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/2368vs2779/Intel-Xeon-E5-2698-v3-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-2680-v4
    • I could be mistaken, but playing around with it, the performance was not very consistent. Don't get me wrong, we know how the setup looks like and I acknowledge that and don't expect much, but at least i.e. some level of consistency in the connectivity. Also the CPU performance seems to fluctuate quite a bit.

    Really wanted to support the whole endeavor and like the idea of the setup very much, also the openess of @FlorinMarian about his way to this point - keep it up! :)
    However, I can't really justify keeping it around in my collection for the provided price-performance ratio so far. :/

  • coldcold Member

    is double uptime also an option?

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    is double price also an option?

  • fluffernutterfluffernutter Member
    edited August 2023

    @Bochi said:
    Single Core | 215

    holy shit 215 singlecore? It's not 2009 anymore.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2023

    @Bochi said:
    YABS run on "2vCPU - 4GB RAM - 60GB SSD + 100GB SAS 7.2K" (5,50€/m):

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Aug 18 20:14:09 UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 155.9 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-79-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Bucharest, Bucharest (B)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.61 MB/s      (652) | 38.76 MB/s     (605)
    Write      | 2.63 MB/s      (657) | 39.06 MB/s     (610)
    Total      | 5.24 MB/s     (1.3k) | 77.83 MB/s    (1.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 63.76 MB/s     (124) | 66.95 MB/s      (65)
    Write      | 66.60 MB/s     (130) | 71.48 MB/s      (69)
    Total      | 130.36 MB/s    (254) | 138.44 MB/s    (134)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 54.4 Mbits/sec  | 149 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 116 Mbits/sec   | 400 Mbits/sec   | 58.6 ms        
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | busy            | --             
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 400 Mbits/sec   | 267 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 370 Mbits/sec   | 33.6 Mbits/sec  | --             
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 98.1 Mbits/sec  | 123 Mbits/sec   | --             
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.4 Mbits/sec  | busy            | --             
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 215                           
    Multi Core      | 375                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2311252
    
    YABS completed in 39 min 22 sec
    

    Hey!
    First of all, thanks for the feedback!

    Few things so far:

    • noVNC was initially broken in the control panel, @FlorinMarian was very fast to fix it though! :)

    This was caused by the fact that previously the main node was another and that node had been closed for a few hours to replace all 6 SSDs from Intel 1.2TB to Samsung PM893 1.92TB. My mistake for not making sure that the necessary files for the NoVNC console from whmcs are not missing.

    • Server lost IPv6 connectivity over night. Thought it fixed itself after a re-install of the VM, but doesn't look like it.

    I also noticed this on one of our VMs, but I didn't have time to debug. There are high chances that it is a problem because of the new Firewall rules added after 2 or 3 days ago we went through a series of DDoS attacks.

    • The pre-configuration of the images (tried Debian 11 and Ubuntu 22.04) feels somewhat strange, especially in the network area - have to give it a closer look first.

    The images are from the repos of the respective vendors, they are not customized in any way.

    This is something that escaped me more or less by accident.
    Specifically, I wanted to leave the deployment on the "any" node so that if one of the nodes disappears overnight (errors or simply taken out of use) any future reinstallation or the activation of a new order will not crack, on the principle that only the CPU can be different (all nodes also have RAID10 SSDs + DDR4 RAM) and the client, having direct access to the CPU name, can request live migration of the VM to a node with the promised CPU.

    • I could be mistaken, but playing around with it, the performance was not very consistent. Don't get me wrong, we know how the setup looks like and I acknowledge that and don't expect much, but at least i.e. some level of consistency in the connectivity. Also the CPU performance seems to fluctuate quite a bit.

    You know why? Even in the results of your benchmark, you don't see anything wow because the storage node (hp1) on which your VM is currently running is permanently running the 'powersave' mode and not because of being stingy with regard to resource consumption, but because the 14 fans stay at 12k rpm in this consumption mode and at over 20k rpm in 'performance' mode.

    Really wanted to support the whole endeavor and like the idea of the setup very much, also the openess of @FlorinMarian about his way to this point - keep it up! :)
    However, I can't really justify keeping it around in my collection for the provided price-performance ratio so far. :/

    In conclusion, thank you for drawing my attention to these things, I will look for a method to solve them as best I can.

    P.S. I know that people trust me when it comes to honesty, but I still leave a proof that the problem with the benchmark is not overselling but the 'reduced consumption' mode, as I specified.

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    I can confirm the fact that the assumption related to the much too low performance due to the energy saving mode was true.
    I leave below a benchmark of a node running in "performance" mode.
    I think the results speak for themselves.
    Thank you once again @Bochi for your honest and helpful feedback.
    P.S. If you want to keep your service and move it to another node where you won't have those problems, let me know. I will also offer you a free month to reward your time.

    root@node04:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Aug 19 09:57:27 AM EEST 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 2 days, 3 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 56 @ 2895.201 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 188.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.2.16-6-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Sabaoani, Neamt (NT)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 31.39 MB/s    (7.8k) | 500.27 MB/s   (7.8k)
    Write      | 31.45 MB/s    (7.8k) | 502.90 MB/s   (7.8k)
    Total      | 62.84 MB/s   (15.7k) | 1.00 GB/s    (15.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.21 GB/s     (4.3k) | 1.86 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 2.33 GB/s     (4.5k) | 1.98 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 4.54 GB/s     (8.8k) | 3.85 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 75.2 Mbits/sec  | 164 Mbits/sec   | 60.5 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 374 Mbits/sec   | 409 Mbits/sec   | 50.7 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 164 Mbits/sec   | 56.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 367 Mbits/sec   | 329 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 171 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 354 Mbits/sec   | 143 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.7 Mbits/sec  | 27.3 Mbits/sec  | 191 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 116 Mbits/sec   | 60.6 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 897 Mbits/sec   | --
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 897 Mbits/sec   | 862 Mbits/sec   | --
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 847 Mbits/sec   | 639 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | 130 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 664 Mbits/sec   | 399 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 19.8 Mbits/sec  | 29.7 Mbits/sec  | 194 ms
    
    Running GB6 benchmark test... *cue elevator music*
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 936
    Multi Core      | 8169
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2315103
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 59 sec
    
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    A benchmark of the node with issues, after changing the power mode settings:

    root@hp1:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Aug 19 11:30:12 AM EEST 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 64 @ 1887.178 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.2.16-8-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Sabaoani, Neamt (NT)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 124.05 MB/s  (31.0k) | 2.15 GB/s    (33.6k)
    Write      | 124.38 MB/s  (31.0k) | 2.16 GB/s    (33.8k)
    Total      | 248.43 MB/s  (62.1k) | 4.31 GB/s    (67.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 848.72 MB/s   (1.6k) | 1.50 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Write      | 893.81 MB/s   (1.7k) | 1.60 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Total      | 1.74 GB/s     (3.4k) | 3.11 GB/s     (3.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 71.5 Mbits/sec  | 127 Mbits/sec   | 56.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 239 Mbits/sec   | 51.3 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | busy            | 60.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 157 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | 135 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 316 Mbits/sec   | 86.7 Mbits/sec  | 169 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.7 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 192 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 68.8 Mbits/sec  | 103 Mbits/sec   | 55.2 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 691 Mbits/sec   | 892 Mbits/sec   | 55.7 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 862 Mbits/sec   | 60.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 753 Mbits/sec   | 549 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 713 Mbits/sec   | 243 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 770 Mbits/sec   | 525 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 19.6 Mbits/sec  | 31.9 Mbits/sec  | 190 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 776
    Multi Core      | 8234
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2315790
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 57 sec
    
    Thanked by 2Bochi fluffernutter
  • First of all, thanks for the feedback @FlorinMarian - appreciate that.

    @FlorinMarian said: I can confirm the fact that the assumption related to the much too low performance due to the energy saving mode was true.
    I leave below a benchmark of a node running in "performance" mode.
    I think the results speak for themselves.

    Gave it another go, looks way better (and "feels" better as well):

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Aug 19 19:00:59 UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 2 hours, 49 minutes
    Processor  : Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX)
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 155.9 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-79-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Bucharest, Bucharest (B)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 59.75 MB/s   (14.9k) | 137.75 MB/s   (2.1k)
    Write      | 59.88 MB/s   (14.9k) | 138.47 MB/s   (2.1k)
    Total      | 119.63 MB/s  (29.9k) | 276.23 MB/s   (4.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 144.84 MB/s    (282) | 804.42 MB/s    (785)
    Write      | 152.53 MB/s    (297) | 858.00 MB/s    (837)
    Total      | 297.38 MB/s    (579) | 1.66 GB/s     (1.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 47.1 Mbits/sec  | 127 Mbits/sec   | 59.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 46.8 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | busy            | 51.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 403 Mbits/sec   | 313 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 383 Mbits/sec   | 40.0 Mbits/sec  | 124 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 327 Mbits/sec   | 131 Mbits/sec   | 158 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.7 Mbits/sec  | 31.5 Mbits/sec  | 185 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 614
    Multi Core      | 1073
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2321425
    
    YABS completed in 19 min 56 sec
    

    Side notes:

    • Processor no longer reports as the real model.
    • Nested virtualization seems to be disabled now, wanted to play around with it.

    @FlorinMarian said Thank you once again @Bochi for your honest and helpful feedback.
    P.S. If you want to keep your service and move it to another node where you won't have those problems, let me know. I will also offer you a free month to reward your time.

    Thanks you very much for the offer, no need for a free month though - may not have time to play that much unfortunately... :(
    Can you bring back nested virtualization though? Willing to use those 8GB of RAM to tinker with Proxmox a bit.

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • @FlorinMarian you still havent paid me back from when you shut down all these cheap vps'es (nat ones i think)

  • KrisKris Member

    This title did not age well

  • Are multi user vpn server setup allowed?

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @DadKisser said:
    Are multi user vpn server setup allowed?

    It is not against rules but you are responsable to prevent any abuse

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    Hey!
    A new benchmark of the hybrid package (SSD + HDD) at 5.50 EUR after we optimized the infrastructure organization again.

    [root@www ~]# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-04-23                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Aug 21 01:22:38 AM EDT 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX)
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2394.652 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 157.8 GiB
    Distro     : CentOS Stream 9
    Kernel     : 5.14.0-331.el9.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HFM S.R.L
    ASN        : AS57403 HFM S.R.L
    Host       : HFM S.R.L
    Location   : Sabaoani, Neamt (NT)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 136.63 MB/s  (34.1k) | 777.27 MB/s  (12.1k)
    Write      | 136.99 MB/s  (34.2k) | 781.36 MB/s  (12.2k)
    Total      | 273.63 MB/s  (68.4k) | 1.55 GB/s    (24.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.18 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.19 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Write      | 1.24 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.27 GB/s     (1.2k)
    Total      | 2.43 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.47 GB/s     (2.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 78.9 Mbits/sec  | 185 Mbits/sec   | 52.3 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 428 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 54.4 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 426 Mbits/sec   | 162 Mbits/sec   | 48.9 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 337 Mbits/sec   | 345 Mbits/sec   | 118 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 392 Mbits/sec   | 250 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 216 Mbits/sec   | 142 Mbits/sec   | 159 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 35.7 Mbits/sec  | 180 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 81.8 Mbits/sec  | 154 Mbits/sec   | 52.7 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 387 Mbits/sec   | 840 Mbits/sec   | 52.2 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 791 Mbits/sec   | 49.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 368 Mbits/sec   | 541 Mbits/sec   | 118 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 370 Mbits/sec   | 719 Mbits/sec   | 126 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 254 Mbits/sec   | 496 Mbits/sec   | 160 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 20.8 Mbits/sec  | 31.0 Mbits/sec  | 180 ms
    
    Running GB6 benchmark test... *cue elevator music*
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 960
    Multi Core      | 1714
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2336158
    
    YABS completed in 18 min 3 sec
    

    Buy it now

    We would like to inform you that there is an upgrade on the IPv4 network where we currently have 650Mbps guaranteed and 2Gbps best effort, but we are waiting for the quote from both providers to know which of the two lines will be increased.(2 weeks have already passed since we requested their feasibility study but we still have no results)

    Thanked by 2Bochi maverick
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    Hello!
    Having a lot of free time during this period, I started migrating our switch configurations from RAW commands to an ansible role written from scratch to include all the changes so far, with a much easier subsequent management (you can't even imagine how much the architecture gets complicated from one day to the next when bottlenecks and things that can be substantially improved keep appearing).

    I'm very intrigued by the idea of offering either managed VPS or webhost to broaden our horizons :)

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • FlorinMarian said:
    Hello!
    Having a lot of free time during this period, I started migrating our switch configurations from RAW commands to an ansible role written from scratch...

    let me translate it for these few hipothetical customers left:

    ANOTHER OUTAGE IS COMMING

    codename for this nth disaster episode will be a revelation:

    "declarative! this is the way!"

    perseverance is a virtue... romanian reverse style of doing things: sell, run, test, configure, think

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Andrews said:
    perseverance is a virtue... romanian reverse style of doing things: sell, run, test, configure, think

    Don't worry, bro has a bachelor in IT management.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @Andrews said:

    FlorinMarian said:
    Hello!
    Having a lot of free time during this period, I started migrating our switch configurations from RAW commands to an ansible role written from scratch...

    let me translate it for these few hipothetical customers left:

    ANOTHER OUTAGE IS COMMING

    codename for this nth disaster episode will be a revelation:

    "declarative! this is the way!"

    perseverance is a virtue... romanian reverse style of doing things: sell, run, test, configure, think

    I would really appreciate your mentality if it wasn't as chaotic to work on a product, looking for hiccups and errors by yourself to solve before the release and then become a millionaire without doing anything.
    We both know very well why there are several releases for the same product which obviously comes not only with new features but also with bugfixes and improvements.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @Andrews said:
    perseverance is a virtue... romanian reverse style of doing things: sell, run, test, configure, think

    Don't worry, bro has a bachelor in IT management.

    you meant proven track of neverending clueless actions :D

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @Andrews said:

    @yoursunny said:

    @Andrews said:
    perseverance is a virtue... romanian reverse style of doing things: sell, run, test, configure, think

    Don't worry, bro has a bachelor in IT management.

    you meant proven track of neverending clueless actions :D

    It seems that you read a recent reply of mine from right to left.

    I said and I repeat: if everything had gone well the first time, I would not have learned anything.

    How ignorant I am, I don't think you are in a position to tell me considering that you only know what I have exposed here :)

  • LeviLevi Member

    Ou Florin Florin... Please print this and hang on your wall near to "hang in there!" poster:

    "declarative! this is the way!"

    Read this: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/reference_appendices/glossary.html#term-Declarative

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @LTniger said:
    Ou Florin Florin... Please print this and hang on your wall near to "hang in there!" poster:

    "declarative! this is the way!"

    Read this: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/reference_appendices/glossary.html#term-Declarative

    Hey!
    With Ansible I still have a choice, the declaration seems much more pressing when I use Terraform (only at work at the moment, at HAZI.ro I haven't found a meaning yet).

  • @FlorinMarian said:

    I said and I repeat: if everything had gone well the first time, I would not have learned anything.

    Very good that you learn new stuff but is not a good idea to learn on customers money.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @SirNeo said:

    @FlorinMarian said:

    I said and I repeat: if everything had gone well the first time, I would not have learned anything.

    Very good that you learn new stuff but is not a good idea to learn on customers money.

    Hey!
    Again, it sounds good until we come back down to earth and realize that all the people who develop software and provide services do the same.

    Customers have the obligation to make their own backups regardless of the provider they have.

    I even lost access to Oracle Cloud through their faulty anti-fraud mechanisms but I had nothing better to do than to have a plan B to get me out of trouble

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    Hey!
    For the sake of transparency and so that customers can more easily report abuses if you identify them, we made public the dashboard where you can see the statistics at the level of active nodes (only 3 of the 7 nodes are present because one has a different OS, another is in a separate cluster and the other 2 are stopped until the resources for the present ones are exhausted).

    https://metrics.hazi.ro

    Thanked by 1Bochi
Sign In or Register to comment.