Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Looking for an Ashburn Dedicated Server w/ Unmetered Bandwidth
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Looking for an Ashburn Dedicated Server w/ Unmetered Bandwidth

OvisqOvisq Member
edited July 2023 in Help

Hello, I have come to my last resort of posting on here, don't take it as an insult though.

Requirements:
* Location must be Ashburn, VA (USA)
* Under 1 MS ping to economy.roblox.com (Most low latency Ashburn servers can achieve this)
* Unmetered Bandwidth
* Minimum of 1Gbps Port
* 6+ Core CPU
* 2+ GB RAM

Note: I have burnt through 20 providers in the last 3 months due to not performing and along the way I learned these are the specifications needed.

Comments

  • FatGrizzlyFatGrizzly Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2023

    Hetzner cloud acheives less than 1ms to rblx economy.

    Though hetz doesn't offer unmetered bandwidth.

    8c/16g at 30 euros with 20gbit uplink but not a dedi

  • conceptconcept Member
    edited July 2023

    hmm... under 1 ms ping would be hard.
    The best I can think of is buying a OVH server because not many hosting providers have unmetered bandwidth in Ashburn.

    I actually just bought a custom vps from Toxihost.com
    They are super new but server seems fast.

    ping economy.roblox.com
    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.114.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=1.82 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=1.96 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=1.74 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=1.73 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=1.78 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=1.77 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=1.77 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=8 ttl=46 time=1.92 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=9 ttl=46 time=1.75 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=10 ttl=46 time=1.81 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=11 ttl=46 time=1.77 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=12 ttl=46 time=1.82 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=13 ttl=46 time=1.80 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=14 ttl=46 time=1.78 ms
    

    Outside of that I would look at Tier.net @TierNet

  • shelfchairshelfchair Member
    edited July 2023

    Misaka.io server seems to be the lowest ping, you can try it in ping.sx (https://ping.sx/ping?t=128.116.114.4).

  • febryanvaldofebryanvaldo Member
    edited July 2023

    Maybe you could try @speedypage . It's suitable for Game Hosting / Server, as it's using high frequency CPU Ryzen 9 7950X on US (Ashburn) location.

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.114.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=0.674 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=0.643 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=0.840 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=0.817 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3044ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.643/0.743/0.840/0.090 ms
    

    Looking glass: https://ash.lg.speedypage.com

  • OvisqOvisq Member

    Interesting picks guys! I appreciate all the help so quickly, if you guys have any more I should take a look at before deciding keep on coming :)

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2023

    maybe rackdog or quickpacket @qps

    Thanked by 1qps
  • BloomVPSBloomVPS Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 2023

    We at Bloom Host have dedicated servers < 0.5 ms to economy.roblox.com

    However our bandwidth is not unmetered - do you have an idea of what your actual bandwidth usage is? We might be able to work something out. Feel free to reach out in DM or a ticket.

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.114.4) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=0.467 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=0.435 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=0.449 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=0.450 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=0.434 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=0.499 ms ^C --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.434/0.455/0.499/0.022 ms

  • PureVoltagePureVoltage Member, Patron Provider

    We would be happy to help but our Ashburn location currently is only for public sector.
    Any company with their own half decent network should be able to help you out there with good speeds some good suggestions on here already. Check out Quickpacket.

    Our latency from NY is 7.8ms which clearly wouldn't work for your usage.

  • OvisqOvisq Member
    edited July 2023

    @BloomVPS said:
    We at Bloom Host have dedicated servers < 0.5 ms to economy.roblox.com

    However our bandwidth is not unmetered - do you have an idea of what your actual bandwidth usage is? We might be able to work something out. Feel free to reach out in DM or a ticket.

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.114.4) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=0.467 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=0.435 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=0.449 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=0.450 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=0.434 ms 64 bytes from 128.116.114.4 (128.116.114.4): icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=0.499 ms ^C --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.434/0.455/0.499/0.022 ms

    Our current usage is a constant 1000 MB/s inbound and around 52 MB/s outbound 24/7. So we're going to be using terabytes of bandwidth. We're looking for long-term providers.

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2023

    QuickPacket peers with Roblox in Ashburn, so you're not getting lower latency than we have. DM me if you'd like to discuss.

    PING 128.116.102.4 (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=0.303 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.308 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=0.340 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=0.323 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=0.324 ms
    
    --- 128.116.102.4 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4072ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.303/0.319/0.340/0.023 ms
    
  • OvisqOvisq Member

    @qps said: peers with Roblox in

    @qps said:
    QuickPacket peers with Roblox in Ashburn, so you're not getting lower latency than we have. DM me if you'd like to discuss.

    Yeah we have sent you an email regarding your servers, but we have yet to get a response. If you can please check the ticket #919646. Thank you! We're checking in with the availability of unmetered bandwidth.

  • conceptconcept Member
    edited July 2023

    Depending on your budget, I would look at Psychz too.
    They currently have a 10Gbit Unmetered Dedicated Server available right now.
    These specs aren't the greatest... but 10gbit.

    E5-1650 v3 - 6 cores 12 threads
    32GB Ram
    250GB SSD
    10Gbit Unmetered
    20Gbps DDoS Protection
    Ashburn, VA
    $259

    Looking Glass: https://lg.va.psychz.net/

    Ping Test:

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.867 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.838 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.836 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.836/0.870/0.939/0.041 ms
    
  • @concept said:
    Depending on your budget, I would look at Psychz too.
    They currently have a 10Gbit Unmetered Dedicated Server available right now.
    These specs aren't the greatest... but 10gbit.

    E5-1650 v3 - 6 cores 12 threads
    32GB Ram
    250GB SSD
    10Gbit Unmetered
    20Gbps DDoS Protection
    Ashburn, VA
    $259

    Looking Glass: https://lg.va.psychz.net/

    Ping Test:

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.867 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.838 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.836 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.836/0.870/0.939/0.041 ms
    

    This may actually be the best bet here. Specs seem OK and no one is going to get cheaper than this.
    order link, I'd recommend paying an extra $5 and getting a second drive for RAID 1 since Psychz has very very slow remote hands in case of drive failure.

  • OvisqOvisq Member
    edited July 2023

    @fluffernutter said:

    @concept said:
    Depending on your budget, I would look at Psychz too.
    They currently have a 10Gbit Unmetered Dedicated Server available right now.
    These specs aren't the greatest... but 10gbit.

    E5-1650 v3 - 6 cores 12 threads
    32GB Ram
    250GB SSD
    10Gbit Unmetered
    20Gbps DDoS Protection
    Ashburn, VA
    $259

    Looking Glass: https://lg.va.psychz.net/

    Ping Test:

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.867 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.838 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.836 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.836/0.870/0.939/0.041 ms
    

    This may actually be the best bet here. Specs seem OK and no one is going to get cheaper than this.
    order link, I'd recommend paying an extra $5 and getting a second drive for RAID 1 since Psychz has very very slow remote hands in case of drive failure.

    Yeah I have been keeping hard eyes on Psychz for a few days but QuickPacket's ping I've checked with their looking glass just two days ago really caught me on.

  • @Ovisq said:

    @fluffernutter said:

    @concept said:
    Depending on your budget, I would look at Psychz too.
    They currently have a 10Gbit Unmetered Dedicated Server available right now.
    These specs aren't the greatest... but 10gbit.

    E5-1650 v3 - 6 cores 12 threads
    32GB Ram
    250GB SSD
    10Gbit Unmetered
    20Gbps DDoS Protection
    Ashburn, VA
    $259

    Looking Glass: https://lg.va.psychz.net/

    Ping Test:

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.867 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.838 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.836 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.836/0.870/0.939/0.041 ms
    

    This may actually be the best bet here. Specs seem OK and no one is going to get cheaper than this.
    order link, I'd recommend paying an extra $5 and getting a second drive for RAID 1 since Psychz has very very slow remote hands in case of drive failure.

    Yeah I have been keeping hard eyes on Psychz for a few days but QuickPacket's ping I've checked with their looking glass just two days ago really caught me on.

    Their overall network is better but you're just hitting one destination, so global performance really doesn't matter here imo. Psychz is probably good enough for what you're doing. Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

  • OvisqOvisq Member

    @fluffernutter said:

    @Ovisq said:

    @fluffernutter said:

    @concept said:
    Depending on your budget, I would look at Psychz too.
    They currently have a 10Gbit Unmetered Dedicated Server available right now.
    These specs aren't the greatest... but 10gbit.

    E5-1650 v3 - 6 cores 12 threads
    32GB Ram
    250GB SSD
    10Gbit Unmetered
    20Gbps DDoS Protection
    Ashburn, VA
    $259

    Looking Glass: https://lg.va.psychz.net/

    Ping Test:

    PING us-central-default-px.roblox.com (128.116.102.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.867 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.838 ms
    64 bytes from 128.116.102.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.836 ms
    
    --- us-central-default-px.roblox.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.836/0.870/0.939/0.041 ms
    

    This may actually be the best bet here. Specs seem OK and no one is going to get cheaper than this.
    order link, I'd recommend paying an extra $5 and getting a second drive for RAID 1 since Psychz has very very slow remote hands in case of drive failure.

    Yeah I have been keeping hard eyes on Psychz for a few days but QuickPacket's ping I've checked with their looking glass just two days ago really caught me on.

    Their overall network is better but you're just hitting one destination, so global performance really doesn't matter here imo. Psychz is probably good enough for what you're doing. Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    That's quite impressive. I'll keep this in mind.

  • @Ovisq said: Our current usage is a constant 1000 MB/s inbound.

    You really sure with this? 1000 MB/s meant you will be using exactly 8Gbps port speed. If it's just 100 MB/s then it's around 0.8 Gbps.

  • OvisqOvisq Member

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @Ovisq said: Our current usage is a constant 1000 MB/s inbound.

    You really sure with this? 1000 MB/s meant you will be using exactly 8Gbps port speed. If it's just 100 MB/s then it's around 0.8 Gbps.

    Yeah I've monitored usage, this is the ballpark of what we're at.

  • conceptconcept Member
    edited July 2023

    @fluffernutter said:
    Their overall network is better but you're just hitting one destination, so global performance really doesn't matter here imo. Psychz is probably good enough for what you're doing. Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    6PB in a month??? wtf

  • @Ovisq said: Yeah I've monitored usage, this is the ballpark of what we're at.

    You written;

    Minimum of 1Gbps Port

    To be safe it should be 10Gbps, or at least 8Gbps real unmetered requirement, and surely a dedicated server, because it will consume at least 2.5 PB per month.

  • febryanvaldofebryanvaldo Member
    edited July 2023

    @fluffernutter said: Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    Wow 6 PB?
    If it's 10Gbps unmetered, then it should be at most 3.3 PB per month right?

  • OvisqOvisq Member

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @fluffernutter said: Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    Wow 6 PB?
    If it's 10Gbps unmetered, then it should be at most 3.3 PB per month right?

    Weird, I've been using a test server from GTHost for 1 day on 2Gbps and it was running just fine on 1000mb/s

  • @Ovisq said: Weird, I've been using a test server from GTHost for 1 day on 2Gbps and it was running just fine on 1000mb/s

    Then it's not 1000 MB/s, it's 1000 Mb/s. It's big difference. 2Gbps port speed meant 2000 Mbps or 250MB/s

  • @febryanvaldo said:

    @fluffernutter said: Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    Wow 6 PB?
    If it's 10Gbps unmetered, then it should be at most 3.3 PB per month right?

    Full duplex ;)

  • @concept said:

    @fluffernutter said:
    Their overall network is better but you're just hitting one destination, so global performance really doesn't matter here imo. Psychz is probably good enough for what you're doing. Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    6PB in a month??? wtf

    I do a lot of work related to large datasets + big archives in general. Sometimes I need something to proxy my content through (backups from EU to US as an example) and I'll "reflect" it off of a server in the East Coast to send the backups to the West coast.

  • OvisqOvisq Member

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @Ovisq said: Weird, I've been using a test server from GTHost for 1 day on 2Gbps and it was running just fine on 1000mb/s

    Then it's not 1000 MB/s, it's 1000 Mb/s. It's big difference. 2Gbps port speed meant 2000 Mbps or 250MB/s

    Oh whoops, yeah that was a typo. My bad I mean Mb/s. I completely forgot to acknowledge the capitalization.

  • @fluffernutter said:

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @fluffernutter said: Also that 10g is REALLY unmetered, have used them before to dump data from one place to the other and was able to use the full 6PB of transfer with no issues or speed drops.

    Wow 6 PB?
    If it's 10Gbps unmetered, then it should be at most 3.3 PB per month right?

    Full duplex ;)

    You surely know how to burst :D

Sign In or Register to comment.