New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Which one? VPS in Sweden are usually really expensive so it'd be nice to know what provider still manages these awful results.
Oderland. But it is a 23EUR yearly plan, so im not complaining.
DNS needs no diskio anyway.
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.95786 seconds, 363 MB/s
Is that your worst disk I/O? Showoff. :P
:D sorry i was think test your i/o
You didn't even write the provider, which makes the result completely useless. :P
At least write which provider and also what parameters you sent to dd.
That's strange, I never ever got under 25 MB/s here and even with that vps doesn't seems unresponsive even a bit. Maybe you should check it once again or/and contact them.
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 34.5199 s, 31.1 MB/s
ioping -c 10 /
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=1 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=2 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=3 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=4 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=5 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=6 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=7 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=8 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=9 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=10 time=0.2 ms
--- / (simfs /vz/private/591) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9002.6 ms, 6596 iops, 25.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
btw. plan cost 249.00 SEK = 28.1694 EUR/y (+ VAT, and they charge it even for non EU clients. Only VAT exception are companies with VAT number)
Even slower as before, and no - i did not pay VAT
root@ns4-se :: ~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 491.225 s, 2.2 MB/s
no comment...
@spirit - are they using virtuozzo?
Francisco
No, SolusVM.
My Home Server with 2 30GB IDE drives in RAID 1.
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 77.8624 s, 13.8 MB/s
Seems very slow =/ That drives are faster afaik. Probably the RAID is killing them.
Xen at Vooservers, UK:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 87.2373 s, 12.3 MB/s
I've been bugging them about this, but they can't seem to improve the IO. Ah well.... I'm only using it for Openserver and also VPN, so that's ok. :-/
What's node you're on? I am at Node vz10 where 30 MB/s IO wait seems constant (wit some jump up here and there) and I don't feel any delays or slow performance at all. I think that you should really contact them.
ioping -c 10 /
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=1 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=2 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=3 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=4 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=5 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=6 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=7 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=8 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=9 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from / (simfs /vz/private/591): request=10 time=0.1 ms
--- / (simfs /vz/private/591) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9002.7 ms, 6116 iops, 23.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 18.8778 s, 56.9 MB/s
~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 33.2687 s, 32.3 MB/s
Even 32.3 MB/s doesn't seem something good however it's actually very responsive vps. Packages are installed in seconds and with upgrade process I don't experience some annoying delays.
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 1246.940 MHz
Total amount of ram : 128 MB
Total amount of swap : 128 MB
System uptime : 47 days, 15:37,
Download speed : (14.7MB/s)
I/O speed : 72.7MB/s
As expected, Virpus one of the worst overall but I haven't had a chance to nail down any dd benchmarks yet (because I/O is unstable).
Here's one from today, an MD5 hash of a 14GB file:
Here's the matching ioping:
But hey, you can use all 6 cores of the Phenom X6 1055T whenever your data has a chance to get to it!