Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Best For WordPress: AMD Ryzen 7700 vs 7950x3D
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Best For WordPress: AMD Ryzen 7700 vs 7950x3D

nqservicesnqservices Member
edited April 2023 in General

Hi,

Looking to buy a dedicated server from Hetzner to host around 20 WordPress websites.

I know in theory, Ryzen 9 7950x3D is faster than Ryzen 7 7700.

But 7950x3D has the new split/hybrid cores feature, with a mix of 8 3D V-Cache cores + 8 performance cores.

So in "real world" usage for PHP applications, like WordPress were single CPU thread speed important, what CPU do you think will have better performance?

Thanks

Best CPU for WordPress (fast single thread)?
  1. Best CPU for WordPress?50 votes
    1. AMD RYZEN 7 7700
      30.00%
    2. AMD RYZEN 9 7950x3D
      70.00%

Comments

  • LeviLevi Member

    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

  • nqservicesnqservices Member
    edited April 2023

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    Thanks for the advice. But not interested in using ARM based CPU and also do not need the extra features like backups.

    Just looking for the fastest dedicated server to host my WordPress websites.

  • AX52 should be enough for you, I don't think you have that huge traffic to load 7950X3D.
    Performance in single thread it's very much similar to lower model of CPU (7700).

    https://cpubenchmark.net/compare/5169vs5234/AMD-Ryzen-7-7700-vs-AMD-Ryzen-9-7950X3D

  • @nqservices said: So in "real world" usage for PHP applications, like WordPress were single CPU thread speed important, what CPU do you think will have better performance?

    split 20 Wordpress sites across 2x Ryzen 7700 :grin: But really depends on your Wordpress sites and what they're doing and it they can fully leverage static HTML caching or if they're logged in member type sites which can't leverage static HTML caching and need more PHP grunt power.

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

  • @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

    So what's the use case of CAX line? Good for Nginx or MySQL?

  • ericlsericls Member, Patron Provider

    @EthanZou said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

    So what's the use case of CAX line? Good for Nginx or MySQL?

    I'd say nginx performs better in CAX. Didn't really benchmark MySQL, but I'll try it out (I think disk is more important here perhaps?). And I'll try some simple go/node/python http stuff.

  • @ericls said: I'd say nginx performs better in CAX. Didn't really benchmark MySQL, but I'll try it out (I think disk is more important here perhaps?). And I'll try some simple go/node/python http stuff.

    Use Phoronix Test Suite :D

    Thanked by 1ericls
  • @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    nothing beats Ryzen for the price and power consumption.

    Thanked by 1BasToTheMax
  • ericlsericls Member, Patron Provider
    edited April 2023

    @cybertech said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    nothing beats Ryzen for the price and power consumption.

    I'd say M1 is better having experienced both in a laptop format.
    (Haven't had hands on experience with M2s)

    Thanked by 1ooowwww
  • ericlsericls Member, Patron Provider

    @EthanZou said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

    So what's the use case of CAX line? Good for Nginx or MySQL?

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @ericls said: I'd say nginx performs better in CAX. Didn't really benchmark MySQL, but I'll try it out (I think disk is more important here perhaps?). And I'll try some simple go/node/python http stuff.

    Use Phoronix Test Suite :D

    Did some test, ARM is a big win. for single core, it is ~1.2~1.6 times faster for most tasks and 2 times faster in some tests. For the same price (2 ARM cores vs 1 x86 core), the whole thing 2 ~ 3 times faster.

  • @ericls said:

    @EthanZou said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

    So what's the use case of CAX line? Good for Nginx or MySQL?

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @ericls said: I'd say nginx performs better in CAX. Didn't really benchmark MySQL, but I'll try it out (I think disk is more important here perhaps?). And I'll try some simple go/node/python http stuff.

    Use Phoronix Test Suite :D

    Did some test, ARM is a big win. for single core, it is ~1.2~1.6 times faster for most tasks and 2 times faster in some tests. For the same price (2 ARM cores vs 1 x86 core), the whole thing 2 ~ 3 times faster.

    Better than AMD for PHP/Nginx/MySQL? That's amazing!

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member
    edited April 2023

    @ericls said:

    @EthanZou said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    None. Go for cax line or simple vps. More scalable solution and more feature packed including snapshots and backups.

    PHP performance on CAX line is way worse than CPX line. Not sure why you recommend it, this CPU performs good just in Geekbench.

    So what's the use case of CAX line? Good for Nginx or MySQL?

    @febryanvaldo said:

    @ericls said: I'd say nginx performs better in CAX. Didn't really benchmark MySQL, but I'll try it out (I think disk is more important here perhaps?). And I'll try some simple go/node/python http stuff.

    Use Phoronix Test Suite :D

    Did some test, ARM is a big win. for single core, it is ~1.2~1.6 times faster for most tasks and 2 times faster in some tests. For the same price (2 ARM cores vs 1 x86 core), the whole thing 2 ~ 3 times faster.

    In what test did you get anywhere near "3x faster" and what instances are you even comparing?
    CPX11 PHPBench 639535 points
    CAX21 PHPBench 538642 points
    Cores in CAX are way slower, in some edge cases even 10x slower (SVT-AV1).
    Nginx is scaling well on CAX, but Redis is faster on CPX, so you'll see that ARM speed per dollar advantage on cached JSON responses, on anything else you're limited by IO. But it never reaches even 2x, so please tell me where you saw 3x.

    2x more RAM and 2x more storage for same price is the real deal here, this ARM cpu itself is worse for pretty much anything except things that can be done in parallel like batch processing (but not encoding, every important library performs bad on ARM), compilation...
    for CI/CD, websites that can be cached so CPU won't work that much its a great deal. But its not great deal in terms of computing power, I dunno where you saw 3x performance advantage, really curious.

  • febryanvaldofebryanvaldo Member
    edited April 2023

    @ericls said: Did some test, ARM is a big win. for single core, it is ~1.2~1.6 times faster for most tasks and 2 times faster in some tests. For the same price (2 ARM cores vs 1 x86 core), the whole thing 2 ~ 3 times faster.

    2 and up to 3 times better? Where do you got this data / benchmarks from...? As @AXYZE already benched, the PHPBench, AMD won there. I also have some benchmarks. You can take a look and make conclusion. Based on my little benchmarks, i don't think ARM has a BIG WINS as you said.

    Benchmark by KangServer.id
    Performed: April 18th 2023

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** Passmark's PerformanceTest *****
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Single Threaded:        1320                    |          2045
    CPU Mark       :        6224                    |          8232
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** Geekbench 5 *****
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Single Core:               803                  |           974
    Multi Core :              5909                  |          3686
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21076774   | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21076766
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** Geekbench 6 *****
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Single Core:              1034                  |          1242
    Multi Core :              5649                  |          4006
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/960880     | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/960862
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** UnixBench *****
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Single SBIS:             1288.1                 |         1850.2
    Multi SBIS :             8948.2                 |         6825.2
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS PostgreSQL (pgbench) *****
    Scaling Factor: 100 | Clients: 100 | Mode: Read-Only
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Score      :           133666 TPS               |       138406 TPS  
    Avg Latency:            0.748 ms                |        0.723 ms
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS Nginx Benchmark *****
    Connections: 1000
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Score                 21617.43 RPS              |      19791.11 TPS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS Apache HTTP Server *****
    Connections: 1000
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Score:                23250.16 RPS              |      25327.43 TPS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS PHPBench *****
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Score:                   530440                 |         650093
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS Redis *****
    Test options: SET & GET | Parallel Connections: 50
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |      8 vCPU 16GB RAM         
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    GET:                 1575098.00 RPS             |        2149429.92 RPS
    SET:                 1156443.41 RPS             |        1600233.71 RPS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***** PTS MariaDB (mysqlslap) *****
    Clients: 1024
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |      8 vCPU 16GB RAM         
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------                
    Score:                  188 QPS                 |          223 QPS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *** PTS 7-Zip Compression ***
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO      | Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO                          
                         4 vCPU 8GB RAM             |     8 vCPU 16GB RAM   
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Compression  :         35697 MIPS               |       25581 MIPS
    Decompression:         32493 MIPS               |       16605 MIPS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Hetzner CAX31 - 11.99 EURO
          4 vCPU 8GB RAM
          
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 115.29 MB/s  (28.8k) | 1.11 GB/s    (17.4k)
    Write      | 115.21 MB/s  (28.8k) | 1.15 GB/s    (17.9k)
    Total      | 230.50 MB/s  (57.6k) | 2.26 GB/s    (35.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.88 GB/s     (3.6k) | 2.29 GB/s     (2.2k)
    Write      | 2.04 GB/s     (3.9k) | 2.56 GB/s     (2.5k)
    Total      | 3.92 GB/s     (7.6k) | 4.85 GB/s     (4.7k)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Hetzner CPX31 - 13.1 EURO
          8 vCPU 16GB RAM
          
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 132.48 MB/s  (33.1k) | 1.66 GB/s    (25.9k)
    Write      | 132.83 MB/s  (33.2k) | 1.67 GB/s    (26.1k)
    Total      | 265.32 MB/s  (66.3k) | 3.33 GB/s    (52.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.39 GB/s     (4.6k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Write      | 2.52 GB/s     (4.9k) | 2.52 GB/s     (2.4k)
    Total      | 4.92 GB/s     (9.6k) | 4.88 GB/s     (4.7k)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited April 2023

    the beast!

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Apr 15 15:48:27 CEST 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 19 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4192.104 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 976.6 MiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-21-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    Net Online : IPv4 & IPv6
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HOST
    ASN        : AS203394 MDCLOUD LTD
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 561.95 MB/s (140.4k) | 4.40 GB/s    (68.8k)
    Write      | 563.43 MB/s (140.8k) | 4.42 GB/s    (69.1k)
    Total      | 1.12 GB/s   (281.3k) | 8.83 GB/s   (137.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.57 GB/s     (6.9k) | 4.07 GB/s     (3.9k)
    Write      | 3.76 GB/s     (7.3k) | 4.34 GB/s     (4.2k)
    Total      | 7.33 GB/s    (14.3k) | 8.42 GB/s     (8.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 221 Mbits/sec   | 195 Mbits/sec   | 17.6 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 219 Mbits/sec   | 194 Mbits/sec   | 17.8 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 222 Mbits/sec   | 195 Mbits/sec   | 20.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 104 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 182 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 86.0 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 205 Mbits/sec   | 142 Mbits/sec   | 124 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 202 Mbits/sec   | 100 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 220 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 17.6 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 27.8 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 192 Mbits/sec   | 19.9 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 210 Mbits/sec   | 183 Mbits/sec   | 103 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 210 Mbits/sec   | 143 Mbits/sec   | 86.2 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 210 Mbits/sec   | 182 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 205 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 150 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2314
    Multi Core      | 1961
    
  • LeviLevi Member

    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

  • 0xbkt0xbkt Member
    edited April 2023

    CAX11 (€3.29) performs on par with CPX21 (€7.05) when used as WireGuard client.

    CPX11 (€3.85) gets 900 Mbps download and 1100 Mbps upload at best. It is possible that ARM hosts are not as crowded yet as AMD ones while I see 0% steal.

    CAX11:

    root@5d21680b5512:/# ./speedtest --selection-detail -s 6554
    
       Speedtest by Ookla
    
          Server: WorldStream B.V. - Naaldwijk (id: 6554)
             ISP: WorldStream B.V.
    Idle Latency:    13.68 ms   (jitter: 0.44ms, low: 13.27ms, high: 14.29ms)
        Download:  1756.48 Mbps (data used: 1.8 GB)                                                   
                    221.96 ms   (jitter: 59.83ms, low: 15.20ms, high: 1231.43ms)
          Upload:  1462.10 Mbps (data used: 1.3 GB)                                                   
                     15.54 ms   (jitter: 2.14ms, low: 12.94ms, high: 46.17ms)
     Packet Loss:     2.8%
      Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/421abbe2-2c8b-4c8a-a748-488371d153ac
    
    

    CPX21:

    root@3f7daca6440b:/# ./speedtest --selection-detail -s 6554
    
       Speedtest by Ookla
    
          Server: WorldStream B.V. - Naaldwijk (id: 6554)
             ISP: WorldStream B.V.
    Idle Latency:    16.71 ms   (jitter: 0.07ms, low: 16.63ms, high: 16.79ms)
        Download:  1776.36 Mbps (data used: 2.7 GB)                                                   
                    158.05 ms   (jitter: 55.26ms, low: 18.67ms, high: 1078.42ms)
          Upload:  1365.71 Mbps (data used: 1.6 GB)                                                   
                     18.32 ms   (jitter: 1.44ms, low: 16.28ms, high: 26.80ms)
     Packet Loss:     0.0%
      Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/fcda9b88-04fd-417a-82ff-c643cf4bdf87
    
    
  • strange indeed. but still a beast.

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Thanked by 1hyperblast
  • LeviLevi Member

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Is thos a thing on a enterprise grade servers? Insane.

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    @LTniger said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Is thos a thing on a enterprise grade servers? Insane.

    Yes, it was a case even with 5900X that BuyVM used, his solution was to disable turbo boost.

    Now, 7950X has default PPT of 230W. Yes, default. Unless you will go watercooling there's no way to prevent throttling in 1U, possibly not even in 2U.

    With 2x 100W CPUs you have 2x more surface area so its way easier to dissipate heat.
    EPYCs are server grade, way bigger surface area and option to use two of them.

    Ryzen's are hella fast, but also hella hot, they are meant for bigass coolers that just don't fit in most server chassis and if you go 4U it isjust not cost effective with other limitation in mind (like 128GB ram limit).

  • @LTniger said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Is thos a thing on a enterprise grade servers? Insane.

    is a AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D a enterprise grade server? i guess not.

  • LeviLevi Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @LTniger said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Is thos a thing on a enterprise grade servers? Insane.

    is a AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D a enterprise grade server? i guess not.

    That's CPU. You can put desktop CPU on a chassis with decent cooling. But yea, we talking hetzner here. Budget and efficiency.

    By the way, integrated GPU brings any benefit to web hosting apps? I mean, nginx, apache, *sql ?

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    @LTniger said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @LTniger said:

    @AXYZE said:

    @LTniger said:
    Multicore score is lower than single core. Tafak is that?

    Thermal throttling

    Is thos a thing on a enterprise grade servers? Insane.

    is a AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D a enterprise grade server? i guess not.

    That's CPU. You can put desktop CPU on a chassis with decent cooling. But yea, we talking hetzner here. Budget and efficiency.

    By the way, integrated GPU brings any benefit to web hosting apps? I mean, nginx, apache, *sql ?

    Integrated GPU helps for transcoding videos and some machine learning stuff.
    Zero improvement in things you mentioned.

    Thanked by 1Levi
  • nqservicesnqservices Member
    edited April 2023

    Hi,

    Thanks all for your opinions and advice. I think I will buy a Ryzen 7700 or a 9050X. 7950x3D is out / no go.

Sign In or Register to comment.