All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Oneprovider Los Angeles benchmark
satoshiscave
Member
Hello, I tested this Dedicated Server I just got provisioned in Los Angeles with Oneprovider
It seems to have extremely slow disk read and writes. The server is located in the Psychz datacenter Walnut CA. the read writes in the block test 4k is under 1 MB and low IOPS.
the plan came with HDD 1 TB but i was promised a swap for an SSD 256 GB SATA DISK
will this make the stats better than below?
I assume the current disk below is still the original plans 1 TB HDD disk!
what should I expect in terms of performance disk reads and writes?
for example the provisioning seemed to take hours for a simpler OS installation of CENTOS 8.
I am planning to run this server as a production host of several websites and use apache webserver.
Basic System Information:
Uptime : 0 days, 15 hours, 29 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v5 @ 3.40GHz
CPU cores : 8 @ 3603.178 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 15.3 GiB
Swap : 4.0 GiB
Disk : 911.9 GiB
Distro : CentOS Linux 8
Kernel : 4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
| Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS) |
|---|---|---|
| Read | 676.00 KB/s (169) | 9.55 MB/s (149) |
| Write | 708.00 KB/s (177) | 10.03 MB/s (156) |
| Total | 1.38 MB/s (346) | 19.58 MB/s (305) |
| Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS) |
| ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- |
| Read | 36.18 MB/s (70) | 45.02 MB/s (43) |
| Write | 38.42 MB/s (75) | 48.00 MB/s (46) |
| Total | 74.60 MB/s (145) | 93.02 MB/s (89) |
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
| Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 853 Mbits/sec | 338 Mbits/sec | 132 ms |
| Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 136 Mbits/sec | 140 ms |
| NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 837 Mbits/sec | 566 Mbits/sec | 143 ms |
| Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 532 Mbits/sec | 155 Mbits/sec | 232 ms |
| Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 165 Mbits/sec | 510 Mbits/sec | 56.2 ms |
| Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 929 Mbits/sec | 918 Mbits/sec | 29.1 ms |
| Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 942 Mbits/sec | 942 Mbits/sec | 0.280 ms |
Comments
To SATA SSD from HDD is a speed increase of about 4-5 times faster in my experience.
Thanks for reply. I see that some VPS stats in the same data center have massive fast stats in disk reads and writes compared to for an example 4-5 times increase to my posted stats. Do they use something else than SATA SSD in that case ?
I mean I don't want a dedicated server that have a 200 times less disk speed than a vps service. seems strange
looking at this as an example is a massive difference : from host hatch user posted stats!
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 27 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
CPU cores : 2 @ 2999.882 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 7.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 55.8 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Kernel : 4.19.0-18-amd64
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
double sadness 1. oneprovider 2. Psychz (
Why, I mean there are people using them that have great success! Its so simple. either the performance is there or it is not!
the host hatch guys have extracted some amazing performance out of their infrastructure, and I think they have been a client of theirs for many years! @hosthatch
it started out a bit strange but I assume Emil and the crew enjoy them nowadays as they are still their customers 3 years later.
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/2971533#Comment_2971533
Server configurations and user know how its not their fault!
let see I will push this service to get maximum out, if they are non performers it will show @OneProvider
@Psychz_jason
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3555908/#Comment_3555908
I am afraid these stats above (mine) are not of the state of high performance when I did the test two yrs ago. It could be much better as it is nvme hd.
auwwhh thank you. I did grab some just to compare my bad.
however my stats are fresh and it amazes me that the disk read speeds where really that low, under 1 mb/s etc.
That is so homie! kind of weird even for a 4 year old id say
look someone just posted this as stats for their host hatch nvme server slice! that is massive fast stats.
"
@satoshiscave This is for nvme in LAX
root@serv:# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Yet-Another-Bench-Script
v2022-11-28
https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Basic System Information:
Uptime : 78 days, 20 hours, 32 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
CPU cores : 3 @ 2800.000 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 15.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 63.1 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Kernel : 5.4.0-124-generic
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.40 Gbits/sec | 1.42 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.56 Gbits/sec | 800 Mbits/sec
Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 1.14 Gbits/sec | 1.31 Gbits/sec
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 726 Mbits/sec | 165 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.41 Gbits/sec | 3.18 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 593 Mbits/sec | 5.33 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 4.07 Gbits/sec | 6.64 Gbits/sec
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.17 Gbits/sec | 1.43 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.55 Gbits/sec | 1.31 Gbits/sec
Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 1.18 Gbits/sec | 1.21 Gbits/sec
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 805 Mbits/sec | 750 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.19 Gbits/sec | 3.22 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 4.75 Gbits/sec | 5.24 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 8.73 Gbits/sec | 7.28 Gbits/sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 570
Multi Core | 1535
ended up cancelling the deal! I don't need to say more.
I assume you got the $24/month server that comes with 100TB?
Used to have some of those until a few months back. The SSD ones were quite decent.
it was more like 18.99 USD black Friday special, but they could not even get it up and running, excuses after excuses and weird attitudes going on,
oneprovider customer support have a lot of attitude and very little service minded individuals that actually do something. shame shame
Whatever concerns Psychz I don't know as I have not dealt with them directly.