Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Providers with amazing network
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Providers with amazing network

What other providers have network comparable (or even better) than say Hybula?

«1

Comments

  • CloudieCloudie Member, Host Rep

    @Astro said:
    What other providers have network comparable (or even better) than say Hybula?

    quite subjecive.

    Hybula's network is great yes, buuuuut... what about to someone in South Sudan or Indonesia? not gonna be great.

    what makes it great in your eyes.. ie low latency to X, pricing, etc etc.

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Patron Provider
  • @Cloudie said:

    @Astro said:
    What other providers have network comparable (or even better) than say Hybula?

    quite subjecive.

    Hybula's network is great yes, buuuuut... what about to someone in South Sudan or Indonesia? not gonna be great.

    what makes it great in your eyes.. ie low latency to X, pricing, etc etc.

    I understand that some remote locations might not be the best places to judge network. I travel quite frequently and for my Hybula is the only that consistently saturates whatever line I'm using. So perhaps my question should be which provider has above average peering/network for most folks?

  • iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.17 Gbits/sec  | 3.08 Gbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.87 Gbits/sec  | 4.03 Gbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 10.2 Gbits/sec  | 9.96 Gbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.55 Gbits/sec  | 2.06 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.66 Gbits/sec  | 2.10 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.51 Gbits/sec  | 1.19 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.12 Gbits/sec
    

    Thats Hosthatch NL. Nice for torrenting with big RAM cache, even Nvme can't keep up :blush:

    Thanked by 3nick_ nobizzle dosai
  • AdvinAdvin Member, Patron Provider

    @Astro said:

    @Cloudie said:

    @Astro said:
    What other providers have network comparable (or even better) than say Hybula?

    quite subjecive.

    Hybula's network is great yes, buuuuut... what about to someone in South Sudan or Indonesia? not gonna be great.

    what makes it great in your eyes.. ie low latency to X, pricing, etc etc.

    I understand that some remote locations might not be the best places to judge network. I travel quite frequently and for my Hybula is the only that consistently saturates whatever line I'm using. So perhaps my question should be which provider has above average peering/network for most folks?

    Where are you generally located/what places do you generally travel to?

  • CalmDownCalmDown Member
    edited October 2022

    nforce

    Wouldn't agree that Hybula(novoserve) has "best" network :)

    Thanked by 2TrendyJack Hayashima
  • @drizbo said:
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 3.17 Gbits/sec | 3.08 Gbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 8.87 Gbits/sec | 4.03 Gbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 10.2 Gbits/sec | 9.96 Gbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 2.55 Gbits/sec | 2.06 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.66 Gbits/sec | 2.10 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 1.51 Gbits/sec | 1.19 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 1.12 Gbits/sec

    Thats Hosthatch NL. Nice for torrenting with big RAM cache, even Nvme can't keep up :blush:

    wanted to say the same.. HostHatch NL is crazy.

  • hosthatch yabs please for nl ryzen

  • @drizbo said:
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 3.17 Gbits/sec | 3.08 Gbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 8.87 Gbits/sec | 4.03 Gbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 10.2 Gbits/sec | 9.96 Gbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 2.55 Gbits/sec | 2.06 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.66 Gbits/sec | 2.10 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 1.51 Gbits/sec | 1.19 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 1.12 Gbits/sec

    Thats Hosthatch NL. Nice for torrenting with big RAM cache, even Nvme can't keep up :blush:

    HH Stockholm storage server,

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.07 Gbits/sec  | 3.37 Gbits/sec 
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 5.46 Gbits/sec  | 3.21 Gbits/sec 
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 5.27 Gbits/sec  | 4.34 Gbits/sec 
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.22 Gbits/sec  | 2.02 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 1.03 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 1.10 Gbits/sec 
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 5.67 Gbits/sec  | 2.32 Gbits/sec 
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 5.40 Gbits/sec  | 3.71 Gbits/sec 
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 6.28 Gbits/sec  | 6.99 Gbits/sec 
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.96 Gbits/sec  | 2.53 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 1.50 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | 838 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 1.07 Gbits/sec
    
  • Hosthatch!

  • terrahostterrahost Member, Patron Provider

  • @terrahost said:

    My favorite provider. Love the damn good machine I have with you.

  • @terrahost said:

    It has been out of stock for a long time. When will the new KVM plans go into stock?

  • nforce is good for torrent racing because extreme many "topsites" are hosted at nforce. every big torrentracker has 1337 sc3n3 leechaxx. some sceners who are even on rated (non colo, private lines, c-class ip..) topsites or where owner of these topsites where used to run torrent or warez sites for big cash. and when your source (or the traffic bnc) is on nforce, your seedbots for your torrent tracker will also.

    sceneaccess for example was directly affilated with nforce. these guys also pimped there bot configs, that nforce peers where better performing, cause they also sold seedboxes which where colo'd at nforce (seedvps.com)

    worldstream has an nice network too. they have orange and dtag as upstream and also ix's which are not only in nl.

  • Blazingfast_IOBlazingfast_IO Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2022

    1GB VPS Plan for 4.50€/m with coupon LET10

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Oct 28 13:20:23 UTC 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 202 days, 19 hours, 48 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 971.8 MiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 29.0 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 21.04
    Kernel     : 5.11.0-49-generic
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 280.67 MB/s  (70.1k) | 2.09 GB/s    (32.7k)
    Write      | 281.41 MB/s  (70.3k) | 2.10 GB/s    (32.8k)
    Total      | 562.08 MB/s (140.5k) | 4.19 GB/s    (65.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.42 GB/s     (8.6k) | 3.19 GB/s     (3.1k)
    Write      | 4.65 GB/s     (9.0k) | 3.40 GB/s     (3.3k)
    Total      | 9.07 GB/s    (17.7k) | 6.59 GB/s     (6.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.94 Gbits/sec  | 9.08 Gbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 4.72 Gbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 12.5 Gbits/sec  | 20.0 Gbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.12 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 2.40 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 986 Mbits/sec   | 1.54 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 831 Mbits/sec   | 1.32 Gbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1012
    Multi Core      | 1004
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18277588
    
  • @Blazingfast_IO said:
    1GB VPS Plan for 4.50€/m with coupon LET10

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2022-08-20

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Fri Oct 28 13:20:23 UTC 2022

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 202 days, 19 hours, 48 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 971.8 MiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 29.0 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 21.04
    Kernel : 5.11.0-49-generic

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 280.67 MB/s (70.1k) 2.09 GB/s (32.7k)
    Write 281.41 MB/s (70.3k) 2.10 GB/s (32.8k)
    Total 562.08 MB/s (140.5k) 4.19 GB/s (65.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 4.42 GB/s (8.6k) 3.19 GB/s (3.1k)
    Write 4.65 GB/s (9.0k) 3.40 GB/s (3.3k)
    Total 9.07 GB/s (17.7k) 6.59 GB/s (6.4k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 3.94 Gbits/sec | 9.08 Gbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 4.72 Gbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 12.5 Gbits/sec | 20.0 Gbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 2.12 Gbits/sec | 1.94 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.22 Gbits/sec | 2.40 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 986 Mbits/sec | 1.54 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 831 Mbits/sec | 1.32 Gbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1012
    Multi Core | 1004
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18277588

    .

    Thanked by 1Blazingfast_IO
  • @nobizzle said:
    wanted to say the same.. HostHatch NL is crazy.

    that probably has less to do with hosthatch and more to do with the data center. hosthatch nl is equinix am5 so you would probably get similar throughput for any provider using that data center.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran
  • TimRooTimRoo Member
    edited October 2022

    @Cloudie said:

    @Astro said:
    What other providers have network comparable (or even better) than say Hybula?

    quite subjecive.

    Hybula's network is great yes, buuuuut... what about to someone in South Sudan or Indonesia? not gonna be great.

    what makes it great in your eyes.. ie low latency to X, pricing, etc etc.

    @mosquitoguy said:

    @nobizzle said:
    wanted to say the same.. HostHatch NL is crazy.

    that probably has less to do with hosthatch and more to do with the data center. hosthatch nl is equinix am5 so you would probably get similar throughput for any provider using that data center.

    Right it seems like it's going to be location-specific more than provider-specific.

  • risharderisharde Patron Provider, Veteran

    I have a question about this - why is network so important? This might sound dumb but are we looking at the numbers or are we looking at the numbers as it relates to streaming or something like that? The reason I ask is because I most of the time do not car about the network as long as it connects. Have not, thankfully come across any provider with networks so horrible I needed to complain about. Sorry for derailing, this is not a criticism, just curious what you guys are looking for or doing where it is extremely vital. I can see dB global clustering being highly dependent on network as well, maybe gaming?

  • @risharde said:
    I have a question about this - why is network so important? This might sound dumb but are we looking at the numbers or are we looking at the numbers as it relates to streaming or something like that? The reason I ask is because I most of the time do not car about the network as long as it connects. Have not, thankfully come across any provider with networks so horrible I needed to complain about. Sorry for derailing, this is not a criticism, just curious what you guys are looking for or doing where it is extremely vital. I can see dB global clustering being highly dependent on network as well, maybe gaming?

    Yeah, gaming you want low ping count. For storage boxes you want to be able to max out bandwidth. For other uses it's likely just wanting things that tiny bit snappier, with a couple of exceptions I'm sure.

    Thanked by 1risharde
  • LiteServer NL!

  • @risharde said:
    I have a question about this - why is network so important? This might sound dumb but are we looking at the numbers or are we looking at the numbers as it relates to streaming or something like that?

    good or bad network is a symptom like a fat person doesn't clean the house otherwise he wouldn't be fat in the first place. a good network is a symptom of:

    • people who know what they're doing technical and business-wise
    • sufficient investment in infrastructure

    Those two things implies:

    • Business is run with sufficient margins to provide more stable prices
    • Increased reliability for your data/service -- they won't go down when you need them.

    Have you heard of price increases from Hybula or WorldStream? If you look at their prices, they probably have enough profit margins to eat the increased energy costs if they wanted to, unlike Hetzner or OVH. This is also reflected in their network quality.

    This trickles down to budget VM resellers. Providers who use OVH servers will end up increasing their prices as well.

  • afnafn Member
    edited October 2022

    @Astro said: tever line I'm using. So perhaps my question should be which provider has above average peering

    @Astro if we are talking about peering, I think OVH is doing fine for most parts of the world and Nforce is really great.

    @mosquitoguy said: Have you heard of price increases from Hybula or WorldStream? If you look at their prices, they probably have enough profit margins to eat the increased energy costs if they wanted to,

    Euh... you might want to check your very logical well founded theories. Does not hold... Heard from both of them. And both are increasing prices later in 2023. Don't worry sooner or later price increase will happen. Just don't speculate too much and predict their entire business model just from the lack of "hey here is a 10% price hike". It just a matter of energy contracts and renewal dates.

    tl;dr: just because you haven't heard about something, it does not mean it did not/ won't happen.

    @mosquitoguy said: a good network is a symptom of:

    people who know what they're doing technical and business-wise sufficient investment in infrastructure

    You can't say Hetzner are not invested enough or are noobs who started doing this last summer. Yet their network is a piece of shit to many parts of the world. :smile:

  • Are there any VPS providers on nforce?

  • @Astro said:
    Are there any VPS providers on nforce?

    Would be eager to know as well. They offer VPS themselves but it's not really low-end pricing: https://www.nforce.com/Cloud-Hosting/2

  • @Astro said:
    Are there any VPS providers on nforce?

    Not worth it anymore, their network is shit now. Got bought and ruined.

    Thanked by 1xx00xx
  • @afn said:
    Euh... you might want to check your very logical well founded theories. Does not hold... Heard from both of them. And both are increasing prices later in 2023. Don't worry

    I never said they wouldn't, but that given their profit margins they don't have as much pressure as those with "lowend" prices like Hetzner.

    You can't say Hetzner are not invested enough or are noobs who started doing this last summer. Yet their network is a piece of shit to many parts of the world. :smile:

    I'm not sure what your point is. Hetzner IS a piece of shit to my part of the world in the US East Coast, while WorldStream is in a class of its own. In fact my connection to WorldStream over the Atlantic is faster and stabler than several "domestic" providers on the West Coast. What does that tell you? That tells me WorldStream knows what they're doing.

  • afnafn Member
    edited October 2022

    @mosquitoguy said: I'm not sure what your point is

    My point is, you can't really tell "they invest" / "know their shit" based on that only imho.
    It is just that maybe they invest differently. Maybe Hetzner Spends X per month on network. And WS spends that same amount X. It just that Hetzner allocated that differently, for example to offer more traffic instead of less but optimized traffic. I don't have some internal numbers or some data to confirm, we are just both saying what we think, really without any real knowledge of the truth. The way you stated things made it sound like a fact...

    Simply put, connectivity to a provider like Hetzner does not mean the provider does not invest in network, or are a bunch of noobs. Cuz we both know Hetzner ain't any of these. I think it just means they don't care about your area/part of the world.

    @mosquitoguy said: t, but that given their profit margins they don't have as much pressure as those

    Or maybe they just happened to have longer contracts with the old rate, that's all. Again, Why do you say it as a fact, we don't know their profit margins? Do you happen to have an idea of their real cost? (ex employee, etc?)

Sign In or Register to comment.