Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › SEA – 4 GB, 50 GB SSD, 5 TB @ $6/mo. Up to 30% off! FREE SERVER GIVEAWAY!! - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

SEA – 4 GB, 50 GB SSD, 5 TB @ $6/mo. Up to 30% off! FREE SERVER GIVEAWAY!!

1234689

Comments

  • DvoDvo Veteran

    @Hayashima said:
    Note: I purchased 10G port for 2 extra dollars. But it does not look good from the speedtests(especially the upload speed).

    To be fair, I really don’t put a lot of value in benchmark scripts such as YABS. One of the reasons why is because 100% of it’s US iperf servers are with one provider (which I’ll assume is donating the bandwidth). Now I’m not saying anything bad about the provider because I’ve never personally used them, however there isn’t any transparency (from what I can see) on what the servers port utilization is. The more popular the benchmark scripts become, the more traffic the servers will see and of course the slower it’ll become.

    At the same time, the illusion for the consumer is that the script sets a standard. However, without knowing how saturated the remote end is, how much value would the results be? If the 10g port on the remote end is 50% saturated (due to the scripts popularity) and the results show less than 10g, is that a problem on the providers network or the remote network?

    On the other hand, when YABS was created, how popular were 10g ports? It’s almost like it’s designed to benchmark 1G ports vs 10G ports. 1G to 10G works, 1G to 1G kinda works, well... 10G to 10G kinda works too. :/ But 10G to 40/100G works better.

    The reason why I say that is because when I iperf OVH’s Vint Hill location, I’m seeing almost 5 Gbps, but then the OVH server isn't being hammered on since it's not listed within YABS.

    [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 506 MBytes 4.24 Gbits/sec 1096
    [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 516 MBytes 4.32 Gbits/sec 140
    [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 536 MBytes 4.50 Gbits/sec 169
    [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 529 MBytes 4.44 Gbits/sec 439
    [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 553 MBytes 4.64 Gbits/sec 238
    [SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 551 MBytes 4.62 Gbits/sec 156
    [SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 554 MBytes 4.64 Gbits/sec 124
    [SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 605 MBytes 5.08 Gbits/sec 162
    [SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 635 MBytes 5.32 Gbits/sec 169
    [SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 630 MBytes 5.29 Gbits/sec 211
    [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.48 GBytes 4.71 Gbits/sec 2904 sender
    [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.46 GBytes 4.69 Gbits/sec receiver

    Thanked by 1Hayashima
  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • HayashimaHayashima Member

    @Dvo said:

    @Hayashima said:
    Note: I purchased 10G port for 2 extra dollars. But it does not look good from the speedtests(especially the upload speed).

    To be fair, I really don’t put a lot of value in benchmark scripts such as YABS. One of the reasons why is because 100% of it’s US iperf servers are with one provider (which I’ll assume is donating the bandwidth). Now I’m not saying anything bad about the provider because I’ve never personally used them, however there isn’t any transparency (from what I can see) on what the servers port utilization is. The more popular the benchmark scripts become, the more traffic the servers will see and of course the slower it’ll become.

    At the same time, the illusion for the consumer is that the script sets a standard. However, without knowing how saturated the remote end is, how much value would the results be? If the 10g port on the remote end is 50% saturated (due to the scripts popularity) and the results show less than 10g, is that a problem on the providers network or the remote network?

    On the other hand, when YABS was created, how popular were 10g ports? It’s almost like it’s designed to benchmark 1G ports vs 10G ports. 1G to 10G works, 1G to 1G kinda works, well... 10G to 10G kinda works too. :/ But 10G to 40/100G works better.

    The reason why I say that is because when I iperf OVH’s Vint Hill location, I’m seeing almost 5 Gbps, but then the OVH server isn't being hammered on since it's not listed within YABS.

    [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 506 MBytes 4.24 Gbits/sec 1096
    [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 516 MBytes 4.32 Gbits/sec 140
    [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 536 MBytes 4.50 Gbits/sec 169
    [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 529 MBytes 4.44 Gbits/sec 439
    [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 553 MBytes 4.64 Gbits/sec 238
    [SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 551 MBytes 4.62 Gbits/sec 156
    [SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 554 MBytes 4.64 Gbits/sec 124
    [SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 605 MBytes 5.08 Gbits/sec 162
    [SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 635 MBytes 5.32 Gbits/sec 169
    [SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 630 MBytes 5.29 Gbits/sec 211
    [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.48 GBytes 4.71 Gbits/sec 2904 sender
    [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.46 GBytes 4.69 Gbits/sec receiver

    Thank you for replying me. I am not saying the server is not good. I think it is a good deal. And I understand YABS speedtests are not very accurate. From my speedtests (normal speedtests using speettest.net cli version) I can see it has great connections to Canada, especially around 3Gbps to Bell Toronto. But the speedtests within the US are generally slower than the speed to Canada.

    Speedtests with servers from Webnx/AT&T, etc... performed similar to the speedtests I did to Canada (around 2-3 Gbps).

    But to my server located in Michigan(With dedicated 1Gbps network), it has around 500mbps upload/download speed.

    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  40.9 MBytes   343 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  58.8 MBytes   493 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  60.0 MBytes   503 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  60.0 MBytes   503 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  58.8 MBytes   493 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  58.8 MBytes   493 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  60.0 MBytes   503 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  60.0 MBytes   503 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  58.8 MBytes   493 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  60.0 MBytes   503 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  5]  10.00-10.05  sec  2.50 MBytes   438 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes

    But I understand you are not a huge provider, so your speed to many small providers cant compare with, lets say vultr. I understand that, your server's performance is great within the price range you are on.

  • MMzFMMzF Member

  • FlavourFlavour Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • MMzFMMzF Member

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • shelfchairshelfchair Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • DvoDvo Veteran

    ** The winner for today is **

    @MMzF

    Congrats!

    To claim your prize, please register on the billing site https://billing.limewave.net and PM me your email address. Your prize will be added to your account!

    Thanked by 1MMzF
  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • happymanhappyman Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • XrmaddnessXrmaddness Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • winerwiner Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

    Quote

  • jwg29859jwg29859 Member

    Hi @happyman that is not the way it works. @angstrom @Arkas

  • shelfchairshelfchair Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • sh97sh97 Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • greenteagreentea Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • u104b230u104b230 Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • ArkasArkas Moderator
    edited October 2022

    @happyman said: GIMME A FREE SERVER!

    Do NOT do that again & Warning issued.

  • dawangdawang Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

  • shelfchairshelfchair Member

    GIMME A FREE SERVER!

Sign In or Register to comment.