Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


BuyVM is down ?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

BuyVM is down ?

Wondering if buyvm currently is down. @Francisco
Could not open the website buyvm.net.
And 1 of my service is not available...

Comments

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Vegas is down

  • CloudieCloudie Member, Host Rep

    Likely just a slip of the finger. nothin to worry about.. :)

  • My Las Vegas VM was down for few hours.

  • Looks like network speed improved after the upgrade.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Oct 15 13:11:50 IST 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 40 days, 5 hours, 26 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.6 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 653.3 GiB
    Distro     : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
    Kernel     : 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 222.71 MB/s  (55.6k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.2k)
    Write      | 223.30 MB/s  (55.8k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.3k)
    Total      | 446.01 MB/s (111.5k) | 3.36 GB/s    (52.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.88 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.61 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Write      | 1.98 GB/s     (3.8k) | 1.72 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Total      | 3.87 GB/s     (7.5k) | 3.34 GB/s     (3.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 892 Mbits/sec   | 155 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 240 Mbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 639 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 890 Mbits/sec   | 208 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 534 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 499 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 760 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 636
    Multi Core      | 1045
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17964271
    
    Thanked by 1nick_
  • Nice, it is online again. Thanks LET

  • Trust BuyVM will handle it well.

  • FatGrizzlyFatGrizzly Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2022

    @ravi said:
    Looks like network speed improved after the upgrade.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Oct 15 13:11:50 IST 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 40 days, 5 hours, 26 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.6 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 653.3 GiB
    Distro     : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
    Kernel     : 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 222.71 MB/s  (55.6k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.2k)
    Write      | 223.30 MB/s  (55.8k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.3k)
    Total      | 446.01 MB/s (111.5k) | 3.36 GB/s    (52.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.88 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.61 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Write      | 1.98 GB/s     (3.8k) | 1.72 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Total      | 3.87 GB/s     (7.5k) | 3.34 GB/s     (3.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 892 Mbits/sec   | 155 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 240 Mbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 639 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 890 Mbits/sec   | 208 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 534 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 499 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 760 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 636
    Multi Core      | 1045
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17964271
    

    nice upgrade as always.

    @Francisco 👌

  • Had an email update this morning for this issue.

    Hello
    To start, for the sake of the support staff, if your VPS is now humming along, we ask that you close any open tickets you have about this issue.

    Short version:

    Networks' been crapping itself for the past day. After 2 - 3 hard failures today we did an emergency JunOS downgrade and are cautiously optimistic that it's resolved.

    Longer/technical version:

    For the past month or so we've been suffering a weird issue where random IP addresses would stop responding. The issue is that our router would lose/expire out the ARP entry for these IP addresses and wouldn't attempt to learn them again unless forced to.

    No amount of traffic getting sent to the IP externally (pings, random connection attempts, etc) would make the router issue an ARP "who-has" message. The only fix was to either ping the IP on the LAN (through our speedtest page for instance), forcing the router to see the ARP message on the network, or to login to the router and ping from there.

    No amount of limits, tweaks, process restarts, etc, has helped with this. The only way to date has been the above methods.

    This morning we had an issue where all users on 209.141.x.x dropped offline. These subnets had been moved down to our new Cisco core switch to help resolve the issue. Our Juniper router dropped the ARP entry for the Cisco switch, killing BGP. After some time it re-learned then entry reestablished connectivity, bringing those subnets back online.

    This happened three times in the past 24 hours, each outage lasting anywhere from 5 minutes to 30 minutes.

    Las Vegas is the only location suffering this issue. The key difference between all locations being that Vegas was running JunOS 20.4, where as everywhere else is 18.2~4. In JunOS 20.x they made changes to ARP to allow policing. While we did change this policy, it didn't help us any.

    As of an hour ago we performed a downgrade to JunOS 18.4. It obviously went terribly. After some research we found the configuration entry causing issues (our 100G ports kept channelizing) and fixed it, bringing things back online.

    As of now, ARP's are resolving near instantaneously, even for new IP addresses. We took this as a good time to change the rest of our ports to 100G, giving us a 400Gbit interlink between our router and core switch.

    We're cautiously optimistic that this issue is now resolved.

    We thank you for your patience.

    BuyVM Team

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran
    edited October 2022

    Wasent a network upgrade.

    We had to do an emergency JunOS downgrade on our core router since it was losing ARP entries. I sent a fairly detailed email last night about it.

    Anyway, sorry. We’ve been fighting with this arp stuff for about a month now. We brought it up in some provider chat rooms and a few hosts messaged me confirming they saw similar things happen. I only confirmed JunOS versions with one of them. They were also running a 20.x+ release.

    The 100gb upgrade on cogent was on Thursday and has smoothed out the last of our congestion issues in LV so that’s nice. That went mostly fine minus the fact cogent yolo’d the 2nd port without telling me. If they had warned me before hand it would’ve been completely transparent.

    I don’t want to login to the router for another year. I pray to the network gods before bed every night.

    Francisco

  • emghemgh Member
    edited October 2022

    @Francisco Just because networking equipment has been brought up on here a lot lately and I have no clue how these things work in terms of what's needed for actual operations - When it comes to hardware costs - About how big of a chunk of the spend goes toward hardware never really "seen" by clients?

    As in, switches, hardware solutions to DDoS attacks etc ..

    Obviously not asking you to upload your company finances, but like, 5 %? 40 %?

  • FatGrizzlyFatGrizzly Member, Host Rep

    @Francisco said: I pray to the network gods before bed every night.

    May network gods do your will!

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @emgh said:
    @Francisco Just because networking equipment has been brought up on here a lot lately and I have no clue how these things work in terms of what's needed for actual operations - When it comes to hardware costs (mainly networking equipment and actual hardware for hypervisors, I guess) - About how big of a chunk of the spend goes toward hardware never really "seen" by clients?

    As in, switches, hardware solutions to DDoS attacks etc ..

    Obviously not asking you to upload your company finances, but like, 5 %? 40 %?

    It depends on how you setup your network and what kind of services you offer. Since we are just VPS we can sell a loooot of service in a single rack, meaning we only buy switches once in a while. Vegas used to run an mx480 that I got in 2016. We would still be running it if 100gb ports didn’t cost more than a new router all together.

    If you do dedis then you’ll likely be buying way more switches and things like that.

    But, that stuffs generally a one time cost. Juniper is trying to turn things into a subscription model though so we will see.

    As for ddos mitigation, depends if you want to do it on site or not. Sometimes you can one time pay for hardware, but I think almost everyone has moved to a subscription model now.

    Anyway. I’m going to be rolling out 10gbit burstable ports in the next day or so. It’ll be based on how aged your service is (90 days) or if you’re premier. The wait time is to prevent ddos skids from buying things and flooding people with XX gbit.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1crilla
  • emghemgh Member
    edited October 2022

    @Francisco said:

    @emgh said:
    @Francisco Just because networking equipment has been brought up on here a lot lately and I have no clue how these things work in terms of what's needed for actual operations - When it comes to hardware costs (mainly networking equipment and actual hardware for hypervisors, I guess) - About how big of a chunk of the spend goes toward hardware never really "seen" by clients?

    As in, switches, hardware solutions to DDoS attacks etc ..

    Obviously not asking you to upload your company finances, but like, 5 %? 40 %?

    It depends on how you setup your network and what kind of services you offer. Since we are just VPS we can sell a loooot of service in a single rack, meaning we only buy switches once in a while. Vegas used to run an mx480 that I got in 2016. We would still be running it if 100gb ports didn’t cost more than a new router all together.

    If you do dedis then you’ll likely be buying way more switches and things like that.

    But, that stuffs generally a one time cost. Juniper is trying to turn things into a subscription model though so we will see.

    As for ddos mitigation, depends if you want to do it on site or not. Sometimes you can one time pay for hardware, but I think almost everyone has moved to a subscription model now.

    Anyway. I’m going to be rolling out 10gbit burstable ports in the next day or so. It’ll be based on how aged your service is (90 days) or if you’re premier. The wait time is to prevent ddos skids from buying things and flooding people with XX gbit.

    Francisco

    Gotcha, thanks so much!

    Another question: Why would selling dedis result in the need for more switches?

    A noob like me would think "ah dedis, lesser amount of IP-addresses, lesser packages (I guess not always) etc.

    I mean a rack full of 30 servers being hypervisors might be like 500-4 000 instances (or more, or less lol), while a rack full of 30 servers all being sold as dedis would be, well, 30 servers?

    Nvm, someone buying a dedi can turn it into as many virtualized environments as he/she pleases, use it strictly for hardware or turning it into a file sharing server, so it might be less plannable?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @emgh said: I mean a rack full of 30 servers being hypervisors might be like 500-4 000 instances (or more, or less lol), while a rack full of 30 servers all being sold as dedis would be, well, 30 servers?

    if you're in the budget dedicated server market then you'll be turning up way more racks, than a rack full of hypervisors where you're hosting 1000's of users.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • @Francisco

    I also detected the mentioned short network outages (Las Vegas location, VPS). Thank You for the detailed and very correct email notification about the problem and the problems background!

  • afnafn Member
    edited October 2022

    @Francisco said: if you're in the budget dedicated server market then you'll be turning up way more racks, than a rack full of hypervisors where you're hosting 1000's of users.

    @Francisco said: If you do dedis then you’ll likely be buying way more switches and things like that.

    Now the question is, if you don't mind me asking, why don't you do dedis :smile: ?

    Less profit? Maybe it will bring more customers to handle-> so more headache? I am assuming right now you have better density per rack (more clients per 1 U) instead 1 client per 1U and maybe dedis won't be profitable/worth it to you?

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @titus said: @Francisco

    I also detected the mentioned short network outages (Las Vegas location, VPS). Thank You for the detailed and very correct email notification about the problem and the problems background!

    I should've sent the email before the maintenance but it wasn't on my mind. It's usually only me on Friday nights.

    @afn said: Less profit?

    Basically this.

    The dedi market is very cut throughout and i'm not sure what I can bring to that market to make us 'special'. I'd have to compete on price and that's never going to end well.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 2ralf titus
  • afnafn Member

    @Francisco said: The dedi market is very cut throughout and i'm not sure what I can bring to that market to make us 'special'. I'd have to compete on price and that's never going to end well.

    Understandable! Thanks for the answer.
    Maybe Not the US. But IMHO some people may have interest in LUX location worth paying the premium price. (not much DCs around Brussels, Lux, Switzerland compared to other places like DE, NL, FR, etc)

  • @Francisco when upgrading from 40 to 100 or 100 to 400, can you use the same fiber cable and just plug into the new transceiver or you need to run better fiber to support the better speeds?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @TimboJones said: @Francisco when upgrading from 40 to 100 or 100 to 400, can you use the same fiber cable and just plug into the new transceiver or you need to run better fiber to support the better speeds?

    >

    It isn't 400Gbit, it's 4x100Gbit in a bond :)

    But, if you used single mode fiber, then you can just in place swap. Sometimes the fiber quality isn't great which can cause issues at higher speeds, but generally you can just swap and be good.

    Some routers, like ours, require that you take the "line card" down, which is the part all the ports plug into. That has to be done to reconfigure things to support the new configuration.

    Some routers/switches will allow you to do that on the fly, but I guess Juniper decided to do this on the MX204's just to be a thorn in the ass.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1TimboJones
  • @ravi said:
    Looks like network speed improved after the upgrade.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Oct 15 13:11:50 IST 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 40 days, 5 hours, 26 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.6 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 653.3 GiB
    Distro     : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
    Kernel     : 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 222.71 MB/s  (55.6k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.2k)
    Write      | 223.30 MB/s  (55.8k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.3k)
    Total      | 446.01 MB/s (111.5k) | 3.36 GB/s    (52.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.88 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.61 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Write      | 1.98 GB/s     (3.8k) | 1.72 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Total      | 3.87 GB/s     (7.5k) | 3.34 GB/s     (3.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 892 Mbits/sec   | 155 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 240 Mbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 639 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 890 Mbits/sec   | 208 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 534 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 499 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 760 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 636
    Multi Core      | 1045
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17964271
    

    Is this taken from idle vps? Or some applications already running?

  • @Donkey said:

    @ravi said:
    Looks like network speed improved after the upgrade.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Oct 15 13:11:50 IST 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 40 days, 5 hours, 26 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.6 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 653.3 GiB
    Distro     : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
    Kernel     : 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 222.71 MB/s  (55.6k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.2k)
    Write      | 223.30 MB/s  (55.8k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.3k)
    Total      | 446.01 MB/s (111.5k) | 3.36 GB/s    (52.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.88 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.61 GB/s     (1.5k)
    Write      | 1.98 GB/s     (3.8k) | 1.72 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Total      | 3.87 GB/s     (7.5k) | 3.34 GB/s     (3.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 892 Mbits/sec   | 155 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 240 Mbits/sec
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 639 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 890 Mbits/sec   | 208 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 534 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 499 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 760 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 636
    Multi Core      | 1045
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17964271
    

    Is this taken from idle vps? Or some applications already running?

    I would like to know this too. My GB5 score is around 900+.

  • raviravi Member
    edited October 2022

    @Donkey said:

    Is this taken from idle vps? Or some applications already running?

    I have DirectAdmin installed with few low traffic websites running.
    And my node is: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Sign In or Register to comment.