The ones that don't respond to abuse reports and/or allow spoofing (those are particularly hard to identify out of IX). And then those in more expensive regions that do either of those.
But sorry, I'm not providing that in a list for potential attackers.
Many providers does not utilize proactive measures for abuse. If you lease server with GigE pipe and are within that limit - why they should care? If care, than we are in a lot of trouble with privacy, because DPI is not good for business...
Comments
That certainly is news to me

OVH uses for DDOS??? NO WAY
FYP
No surprise about ovh 🤣
yeah what about it is surprising
everyone knows that OVH and Hetzner is shit at abuse and everyone DDoS' the whole internet with them.
Strange that they don't have outgoing hardware to keep an eye on potential abuses.
They keep an eye on potential abuses. But they block more legitimate traffic than abuse.
Hetzner suprises me, they have always been quick to whack senders I've reported (with GMT timestamps, ips and usually pcaps / flows).
OVH on the other hand I've never heard back from.... and allow spoofing in certain locations.
Which ASNs are the most problematic for you?
The ones that don't respond to abuse reports and/or allow spoofing (those are particularly hard to identify out of IX). And then those in more expensive regions that do either of those.
But sorry, I'm not providing that in a list for potential attackers.
[deleted]
I understand OVH to be one of the major origins of spam, ddos, abuse etc. Nothing new in that. everyone knows it.
but Hetzner?
Many providers does not utilize proactive measures for abuse. If you lease server with GigE pipe and are within that limit - why they should care? If care, than we are in a lot of trouble with privacy, because DPI is not good for business...