New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
As much as I can kick out Mormons from our property for trying to "have some friendly conversation" on a weekend, or carolers for trying to "spread joy" during dinnertime, or smelly people, rude people, loud people, personal enemies, etc., private companies can kick out users that are spreading shady speech on their servers.
Yes, but they cannot refuse to allow people in during the open hours for as long as they do not do anything forbidden, even if they wear the yarmulke, the veil or a turban. They can ask politely those people to leave, but cannot really ban them from coming.
Of course, if your mother is into making cakes, she can refuse to make it for anyone. If she has a business, then the business itself has the right to remove any ads for other cake makers inside their premises, but cannot stop people to order something with their own writing for as long as she offers this customization to the PUBLIC and the customization is legal.
And how do you separate those? I have my own company, I'm the only employee, everything the company does, I do. And vice versa.
Can I as a person refuse something, but I as a company can not? Then whats the point, in reality my rights as a person are the same as the rights of the company.
Pretty easy, they call your listed company phone or email with the order, it is company, it is a friend asking over a glass of scotch, it is personal.
Management, well, all employees of companies, have an obligation to act in the best interests of their companies and owners/stockholders. If cancerous tumors are sighted operating on their platforms, they would be right to cut the tumors off. I don't agree with banning all Russians, but the noisy ones? Sure, no problem. It's not even a hard decision.
That is the idea, make a point, you are not going to use my premises for murderous propaganda. I wouldn't though, unless they are annoying other customers or are getting violent which is not about free speech.
OK. But understand that all these dictates about what someone else can/can't do in regulating access to properties built and paid for by someone else's toil and resources amount to coercion.
You were never promised that right to obligate others by
Hence why you get nowhere.
There is a simple solution to that, here, in Romania, neo-protestant cults adopted that one. They don't register as a church, just a house, people come and are allowed in only if they are members, a kind of private club if you would like.
That being said, there are some requisites to register as an accepted cult, if you don't want that, fine, register as a non-profit, there are tax breaks but no subventions, a registered cult has much more benefits. I personally think the private club idea is best, this is how religion should be, not public, not subsidized, not political, not militant and not bellicose. They should not impose anything on me, I should not impose anything on them, I don't want taxes from them, but they should not receive anything from me either.
The most important part, though, whatever their imaginary friend(s) tell(s) them, it is between themselves, not for the laws, not for political parties, not for schools, hospitals or the army. Keep out of my lawn and I would stay out of yours.
No, but they put warnings and symbols on the box. It's more the attitude, "go ahead and sell your warez, we'll sue your ass into oblivion if we're harmed and you didn't tell us not to".
Fucking religion. Again, the lower courts ruled it was against the law, just didn't do it cleanly and was overturned. I call that a technicality, unless I missed an invalidation of the law as a result.
Fucking hell. So glad a) I'm not a woman, b) live in the US with so many fucking religious fuckheads.
I'm not sure what you're saying, you just described now and it would be 1000x worse in "allow everything" world.
When it comes the life and health, the person takes priority as my initial thought (I'm not a lawyer). In a sole proprietorship case (are you technically an employee in self-employed company? If given multiple choice between owner and employee, you'd select owner), there's not much difference. Your liability as a sole proprietor is not the same as a corporation or limited liability company. Corporations get away with doing way more damage than you could on your own but would face much higher penalties than the fuckwits at fortune 500 companies.
I imagine that comes down to the circumstances. If you're at your kid's school, that's nothing business related. But something comes in on your work email, that's likely company area.
I'm not a fan of religion, but I'd be annoyed if corporations had the same religious freedom as you as a person. Otherwise, they'd just Flying Spaghetti Monster the shit out of it to bend whatever laws in their favour.
+1000
Nope. Say I am a Q-Anon nutjob, a jihadi or citizen of Trumpistan.
Would you rather have me "publishing" my theories in the open, talk about how "we" need to blow up pedophile pizza houses, a church or a synagogue, how to "citizen arrest" some governor for asking "us" to wear a mask or would you rather have me communicating untraceably online? Would you rather have me "explain" why we should kill "woke" niggers for forcing "critical race theory" on "our" kids or LGBTQ "propaganda"? Or X and Y senator/representative/governor for "conspiring" with "crisis actors" to take away our only means to resist "wokeism" and tyranny?
If I am in the open, people would be able to challenge me, make me say what I "think", my "theories" would be proven to be what they are as well as the way of thinking which generates them, I would quote my "sources" and slowly we can reach the Putlerism behind them.
If I am conspiring in the deep web you won't be able to find me so easily, challenge me and have a laugh. Ridendo castigat mores but not if you don't know where to find me and my "sources". In the open you can see how many we are, where and how we "tick", there won't be any more harm and much more fun. The number of idiotic and crazy people is limited, they WOULD manage to find their "soulmates" whether we "cancel" them or not.
I dont think you understand how schools work
sure bud
Someone please change its title, whatever it is , its not compromised companies. Everytime I see this topic, I get curious that even whole company get compromised (like compromised server) then again, author is talking everything but this topic is not about company being compromised.
Author can talk about anything and it won't change the fact that its the tinyweasel talk.
Bro you signed up Dec 2021 and from the beginning you only talk about tinyweasel. Pretty suspicious, wouldn't you say.
also literally have weasel in your avatar
I'd agree with you before the Internet, but not now. Before, the nutjob impact radius was limited to local region or word of mouth. Today, you have a single tweet get jihadists in other countries overnight.
Oh boy. The difference here is you think they can be reasoned with and convinced they are wrong. That's what education system is for and when they're adults and nutjobs, the chance that rational discussion does sweet fuck all are small.
What you're talking about comes down to convenience and intelligence. Nothing changed wrt getting an informant on the inside, but now you're dealing with shit at scale, not some small group.
I don't think you've heard of US school systems and their bonkers governors.
Things are getting meta if two weasel alts are arguing over who are weasel alts.
At this point I'm going to ask @Mods to close this thread, things are spiralling out of control and obviously you haven't matured enough to discuss the topic yet.
Hang on, I thought you were against cancel culture. Why are you cancelling yourself?
https://animeai.com/forum/member.php?u=162 have fun with this last gift of PII... anyway, goodbye
Nope, not at all, what I mean is that they need to be in the open for the OTHER people to see. Say a trumpistani comes to explain the choir how their guy is the warrior of light godsent to quash the pedophile woke pizza sellers and reinstate the reign of the superior race and while most others there would agree, some people would probably reconsider.
At this time many trumpistanis think they need those useful idiots madmen in order to get a "conservative" majority to put their ppl in the supreme court as well as all other courts, the army, the congress, DA offices, hospitals, schools, policing and whatnot. When they would see who else is part of that "majority" they might start to think for a change. I am not sure EVERYONE would think it is worth losing everything for the sake of getting the ban on abortions and LGBTQ people as well as a new segregation or at least removing the vote from most minority people. Hitler was a vegetarian, anti-alcoholic, anti-tobacco, animal lover, he made Germany great again but it was not really worth it giving up everything for that. Some people might see that.
And you think there won't be any without a tweet... Remember crusades? They didn't even have the printing press at the time. What about the first caliphates and the jihads? Those were illiterate people too albeit less so than those in Europe. The scale has nothing to do with the medium, but having a medium to mediate is likely to bring more people to the middle. At least in theory.
Of course, people try to ban encryption and Tor because it is more convenient to associate people with IPs than infiltrate the group as it used to be done, but you are advocating to push underground people who WANT to be in the open. So either encryption is bad because allows child molesters, drug dealers, woke niggers and whatnot to hide and continue their dastardly deeds against the hard working white superior race OR it is good because it allows "our" guys to hide from the oppression of common sense. If they wish to spread their lies and "organize" their coups in the open, fine, I say let them! There won't be an excuse not to act then, no more need for subpoenas, special committees, stuff like that... Everything would be online for everyone to see.
There clearly is some terrorist activity going on in this thread and the usual rule doesn't apply.
What's wrong with that?
Agree to disagree. That was the thinking before Trump. It's only reinforced that the religious fucks don't care and will deal with the devil to get abortion and other stupid shit like shitty education.
Those were local to the region, not getting cunts from Canada, US and UK to join in.
You're sounding naive that they'll publish the nefarious plans in the open to make it worth while, that's crazy. You're also happy to react after the fact after the horses left the barn, rather than prevent or reduce effects beforehand.
At the time, Europe was in no way local to the middle east and America has not been discovered yet. The jihad went on from Central asia to africa and south-west europe, at that time those areas were literally at the ends of the world.
Those people ARE crazy, of course they are bragging about their plans and they believe not only that they are doing right, but also that their rights would be infringed upon if anyone would attempt to intervene.