★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ $8.88/YR- 384MB ★★ $21.85/YR- 2.5GB ★ Instant ★ Japan Pre-order ★ & More

FrankZ

@kalipus said:
@VirMach still did not get my server, no answer on ticket, no answer here and i will not keep me updated for your overselling and incompetence on ticket management, this smells like scam and should be properly reported to the responding FBI department

Your joking, right?
This was a pre-order sale. You got a reduced reoccurring price for buying before the servers were even shipped. You've waited this long, now that the wait time is down to less then a week you want to get the FBI involved? You have been around here quite a while so I am kind of surprised by this comment from you.

foitin

@duckeeyuck said:

did you just write a novel generator?

cybertech

@duckeeyuck said:
No doubt, Virmach is the type of person who can look you right in the eye and, with an expression of the utmost sincerity, tell you any kind of whopper that suits his purpose. But the pen is a powerful tool. Why don’t we use that tool to champion the force of goodness against the greed of reckless, foul-mouthed polemicists? I’m sorry if I’ve gotten a little off track here, but Virmach has no shame. Never had it, never will. Virmach has been petitioning lawmakers to criminalize statements made about him that are excessively truthful. You might think I’m telling you this because I like to beat up on Virmach. Really, that isn’t my principal reason. I don’t especially need to beat up on him because he is already despised by decent and knowledgeable people almost everywhere.

This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact. Now, I don’t want to overwork the story about how Virmach plans to construct the specter of a terrible armed threat, so let’s just say that on the issue of interpretivism, he is wrong again. Sure, unless we hold Virmach to account for promoting brassbound ideologies such as materialism, no real changes will ever occur. But every gain demands a sacrifice. In this case, we stand to gain the ability to present a different paradigm from the typical paradigm of the policy marketplace. I’m talking about presenting a paradigm of morals—of what’s fair, right, and good and not just what is politically appetizing. This new paradigm will require us to spread the word about how Virmach’s "I’m right and you’re wrong" attitude is quixotic because it leaves no room for compromise.

Virmach’s retinue provides ignominious, perfidious money-worshippers group membership and some safety, but it also limits their capacity to understand that an impressive segment of the population shares my anxieties about Virmach’s rebarbative, nocent statements yet remains ostensibly tranquil. To these patient but determined individuals I say that there is a war being fought in the unseen realm between the forces of good and evil, and the battlefield is your mind. The only way for us to win this war is to extend the compass of democracy to abusive, litigious quacksalvers. One might argue that it would be better instead to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals, but bear in mind that one of Virmach’s favorite dirty tricks is to forge letters from his censurers. These forgeries are laced with scandalous "revelations" about everyone Virmach hates. Such trickery deflects attention from the fact that if you’ll allow me a minor dysphemism, by popularizing a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge heartless buffoons to manipulate the public’s emotions and opinions on every issue of importance, Virmach has unmistakably earned his reputation as a prideful, macabre malingerer. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, I don’t want to build castles in the air. I don’t want to plan things that I can’t yet implement. But I do want to cast a gimlet eye on Virmach’s expositions because doing so clearly demonstrates how a frightening number of people accept his argument that the best way to serve one’s country is to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. In contrast, I prefer to follow, in Robert Frost’s words, "the road not taken" and criticize Virmach’s pontifications publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. As Frost’s poem concludes, "and that has made all the difference." In fact, that "difference" is why I can stand before you and proclaim that I can’t possibly believe Virmach’s claim that rules and regulations are for other people, never for him. If someone can convince me otherwise, I’ll eat my hat. Heck, I’ll eat a whole closetful of hats. That’s a pretty safe bet because an important piece of information that was leaked from official sources is that Virmach plans on belittling all fine social standards in the coming days. As soon as news of this choleric plan spread, Virmach announced that his approach would be "reworked". Unfortunately, it wasn’t long before it was again full-steam ahead for toppling society, which proves that Virmach’s confidants have tried repeatedly to assure me that Virmach will eventually tire of his plan to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools and will then step aside and let us break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between "don’t hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs". Let me conclude by saying that we who want to act honorably will not rest until we do.

Surely no argument is necessary to prove that Virmach respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond himself. That may sound unbelievable, but it’s the truth. Another unbelievable but true statement is that I don’t blame Virmach’s self-righteous, obstreperous vaporings as much as I blame the generations of unapologetically passive-aggressive dunderheads who internalized such loopy things into their personalities. Maybe it’s not their fault, though. Maybe it’s because Virmach sometimes puts himself in charge of giving an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgments. At other times, one of his swampers is deputed for the job. In either case, I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that Virmach sometimes uses the word "honorificabilitudinitatibus" when describing his revenge fantasies. Beware! This is a buzzword designed for emotional response.

you tryna replace the resident content writer/strategist here?

AlwaysSkint

@cybertech said: you try..

Did you really have to go and quote all again?

cqjerry

I guess all the 2560 plan has not been actived.

lemoncube

@VirMach SJCZ003 is down again?

Peach

just wait.

Rising123Sun

Hello, I have been buying for nearly two weeks, when will I be able to turn it on? My invoice is 1415674

xmd5

@Rising123Sun said:
Hello, I have been buying for nearly two weeks, when will I be able to turn it on? My invoice is 1415674

It hasn't been activated for 45 days, wait for it.

cybertech

@AlwaysSkint said:

absolutely not, but i want to

VirMach

@lemoncube said:
@VirMach SJCZ003 is down again?

Yes, already posted the network status update on our website. Running a firmware update right now and trying to find a fix for both SJCZ007 and SJCZ003 at this point as it seems like they're both facing the same issue just as different times.

@cqjerry said:
I guess all the 2560 plan has not been actived.

No, a good amount did activate. That's why I'm confused on what happened and still figuring it out with our developer. It's not a huge deal though we can definitely manually activate these once we have more space. They're not a large quantity left over.

VirMach

@VirMach said:

@cnencc said:
Node:037
Hello!
It's almost impossible to use, there's no Internet... Ping 90% of packets in the world are lost.

I've made some improvements.

Can anyone confirm TYOC037 has been improved for them?

@hapa said:
The TYOC034 node network looks so crazy, need me to open a ticket?

I'm trying to fix this as well, similar to TYOC037.

cqjerry

No, a good amount did activate. That's why I'm confused on what happened and still figuring it out with our developer. It's not a huge deal though we can definitely manually activate these once we have more space. They're not a large quantity left over.

@VirMach So, what do you consider how to compensate these people should be activated but have not been activated?

nightcat

@VirMach said:

@lemoncube said:
@VirMach SJCZ003 is down again?

Yes, already posted the network status update on our website. Running a firmware update right now and trying to find a fix for both SJCZ007 and SJCZ003 at this point as it seems like they're both facing the same issue just as different times.

@cqjerry said:
I guess all the 2560 plan has not been actived.

No, a good amount did activate. That's why I'm confused on what happened and still figuring it out with our developer. It's not a huge deal though we can definitely manually activate these once we have more space. They're not a large quantity left over.

Create my vps to SJC instead Ticket #922765
and active others. feel quite upset at TYK040.

VirMach

@ArcReactor said:

@hapa said:
The TYOC034 node network looks crazy, need me to open a ticket?

NODE 35 SAME

Not really the same at all in any way, graphs looks completely different and I see no huge ping spikes on 35.

xpreboun

@cqjerry said: So, what do you consider how to compensate these people should be activated but have not been activated?

Like modifying your service due date, then activate you when more capacity become available? It's "supposed" not "should"...

vhhjkgl

@VirMach said:

@ArcReactor said:

@hapa said:
The TYOC034 node network looks crazy, need me to open a ticket?

NODE 35 SAME

Not really the same at all in any way, graphs looks completely different and I see no huge ping spikes on 35.

I think it's time to migrate some of the people away, no matter which node the network will boom once more people

cnencc

@VirMach TYK037 has been improved temporarily, occasionally pinging 500-700ms, generally stable.

klarns

I'm still in that 3% too.

zhuyijun

@cqjerry said:

No, a good amount did activate. That's why I'm confused on what happened and still figuring it out with our developer. It's not a huge deal though we can definitely manually activate these once we have more space. They're not a large quantity left over.

@VirMach So, what do you consider how to compensate these people should be activated but have not been activated?

update Tokyo is still being activated. Approximately 97% of services have been activated.
but as @virmach said before, he activate the server depend on RAM not order paid time,so he can sell more vps which is small RAM

storm

@kalipus said:
@VirMach still did not get my server, no answer on ticket, no answer here and i will not keep me updated for your overselling and incompetence on ticket management, this smells like scam and should be properly reported to the responding FBI department

You need to brush up on the American government. The FBI is not the appropriate agency to investigate trade disputes.

zhuyijun

@klarns said:
I'm still in that 3% too.

most 2560 plan buyers are in that 3%

cybertech

@zhuyijun said:

@klarns said:
I'm still in that 3% too.

most 2560 plan buyers are in that 3%

already got mine 2560 for about a week plus

risturiz

Last deployment should be better... Only few people :-)

skorous

@zhuyijun said: but as @virmach said before, he activate the server depend on RAM not order paid time,so he can sell more vps which is small RAM

Come again?

zhuyijun

@cybertech said:

@zhuyijun said:

@klarns said:
I'm still in that 3% too.

most 2560 plan buyers are in that 3%

already got mine 2560 for about a week plus

well, your are very few which 2560 activated, but many others still pending

zhuyijun

@skorous said:

@zhuyijun said: but as @virmach said before, he activate the server depend on RAM not order paid time,so he can sell more vps which is small RAM

Come again?

sure, or not the fact？

skorous

@zhuyijun said:

sure, or not the fact？

I don't remember that. I remember a discussion about pricing and stock being affected by size but not activation but I'm not here every day.

Mirage

@cybertech said:

@zhuyijun said:

@klarns said:
I'm still in that 3% too.

most 2560 plan buyers are in that 3%

already got mine 2560 for about a week plus

Your situation is not representative of everyone, my 2560 two-year payment was not deployed, and the order was placed on March 12.

cybertech

@Mirage said:

@cybertech said:

@zhuyijun said:

@klarns said:
I'm still in that 3% too.

most 2560 plan buyers are in that 3%

already got mine 2560 for about a week plus

Your situation is not representative of everyone, my 2560 two-year payment was not deployed, and the order was placed on March 12.

Your situation is not representative of everyone, my 2560 one-year payment was deployed, and the order was placed on March 12.