Low latency to China

lzy0

CPU 1H
memory 2G
Hd 20g
120 ms delay
Price: $5-10
Will there be such VPS?

KermEd

Monthly or yearly? .

joshcorn

I think you can try Tencent Cloud or Alibaba Cloud. They are local cloud service providers in China and provide Hong Kong servers. Usually has a low latency to China.

yoursunny

Oracle Cloud Tokyo
4 cores
24GB RAM
200GB SSD
500Mbps network
84ms RTT to most of China
$0/month if it's your home region

---

@joshcorn said:
I think you can try Tencent Cloud or Alibaba Cloud. They are local cloud service providers in China and provide Hong Kong servers. Usually has a low latency to China.

Aliyun Hong Kong has 80ms average RTT.
It's not my server so I don't know how much it costs.

lzy0

@KermEd said:
Monthly or yearly? .

Every month

lzy0

@yoursunny said:

Oracle Cloud Tokyo
4 cores
24GB RAM
200GB SSD
500Mbps network
84ms RTT to most of China
$0/month if it's your home region

---

@joshcorn said:
I think you can try Tencent Cloud or Alibaba Cloud. They are local cloud service providers in China and provide Hong Kong servers. Usually has a low latency to China.

Aliyun Hong Kong has 80ms average RTT.
It's not my server so I don't know how much it costs.

The price of traffic in China is relatively expensive. If the traffic price is similar to other countries. I will choose Alibaba Cloud or Tencent Cloud

lzy0

@joshcorn said:
I think you can try Tencent Cloud or Alibaba Cloud. They are local cloud service providers in China and provide Hong Kong servers. Usually has a low latency to China.

The price of traffic in China is relatively expensive. If the traffic price is similar to other countries. I will choose Alibaba Cloud or Tencent Cloud

jenkki

@lzy0 said: Will there be such VPS?

Try Vietnam location VPS. They have nice potential and low ping to China.

lzy0

@jenkki said:

@lzy0 said: Will there be such VPS?

Try Vietnam location VPS. They have nice potential and low ping to China.

Is there a cheap VPS in Vietnam?

jenkki

@lzy0 said: Is there a cheap VPS in Vietnam?

Try vhost.vn or vietnix.vn

spectre145

@lzy0 said:
CPU 1H
memory 2G
Hd 20g
120 ms delay
Price: $5-10
Will there be such VPS?

you should try Hawkhost (HK server)

jenkki

G-Core Labs provide Khabarovsk location, only 100 km to China border. Ping around 76-90ms. To Beijing even 51ms. But everything depends destination city and local carrier routing.

bsh

@jenkki said:

@lzy0 said: Will there be such VPS?

Try Vietnam location VPS. They have nice potential and low ping to China.

I used to use this LG to check latency to Viet Nam, hope it useful to the OP
https://lg-vn1.vhost.vn/

Vitaly

Hello, please check our datacenters here:
https://lg.justhost.ru/
Adman, TTK, Dataline better.

dahartigan

China

winer

need bgp sessions vps

BAKA

@Vitaly said:
Hello, please check our datacenters here:
https://lg.justhost.ru/
Adman, TTK, Dataline better.

I am in Shanghai, ISP China Telecom. Below is your result:

The current time is: 19:24:24.71

//DataLine (Tier-3, Moscow)
Ping statistics for 46.17.40.85:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 9, Lost = 1 (10% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 193ms, Maximum = 199ms, Average = 194ms

//IQ Data (Tier-3, St. Petersburg)
Ping statistics for 194.87.68.192:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 8, Lost = 2 (20% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 258ms, Maximum = 260ms, Average = 259ms

//Fiord (Moscow)
Ping statistics for 212.60.5.88:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 242ms, Maximum = 246ms, Average = 243ms

//Rostelecom (Kazan)
Ping statistics for 176.32.32.133:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 9, Lost = 1 (10% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 335ms, Maximum = 337ms, Average = 336ms

//Rostelecom (ex Adman, Novosibirsk)
Ping statistics for 46.29.162.89:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 141ms, Maximum = 154ms, Average = 148ms

//TTK (Novosibirsk)
Ping statistics for 193.38.50.142:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 7, Lost = 3 (30% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 137ms, Maximum = 145ms, Average = 139ms

BAKA

@bsh said:

@jenkki said:

@lzy0 said: Will there be such VPS?

Try Vietnam location VPS. They have nice potential and low ping to China.

I used to use this LG to check latency to Viet Nam, hope it useful to the OP
https://lg-vn1.vhost.vn/

Test result from Shanghai Telecom:

//VNPT HCM
Ping statistics for 103.232.123.53:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 18, Lost = 2 (10% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 360ms, Maximum = 412ms, Average = 387ms

//FPT HCM
Ping statistics for 103.143.142.4:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 3, Lost = 17 (85% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 84ms, Maximum = 87ms, Average = 85ms

//Viettel HCM
Ping statistics for 103.92.28.208:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 19, Lost = 1 (5% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 320ms, Maximum = 373ms, Average = 351ms

//Viettel HN
Ping statistics for 103.143.208.221:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 19, Lost = 1 (5% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 426ms, Maximum = 555ms, Average = 480ms

//Singapore
Ping statistics for 103.231.189.38:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 17, Lost = 3 (15% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 312ms, Maximum = 317ms, Average = 313ms

The current time is: 19:31:56.67

BAKA

@jenkki said:
G-Core Labs provide Khabarovsk location, only 100 km to China border. Ping around 76-90ms. To Beijing even 51ms. But everything depends destination city and local carrier routing.

No hope.

Khabarovsk/ipv4: ping 101.87.1.1

PING 101.87.1.1 (101.87.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 101.87.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=229 ms
64 bytes from 101.87.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=224 ms
64 bytes from 101.87.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 101.87.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=245 time=225 ms

--- 101.87.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 4 received, 20% packet loss, time 4003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 216.347/223.952/229.344/4.735 ms

bsh

I think you'd be filtered by 秦始皇's The Great Wall

jenkki

@BAKA said: No hope.

That depends local routing. I get 350ms and 51ms on test with different routes in China.

jenkki

http://ping.pe/92.223.80.1

BAKA

OP should specify what you mean by saying China. In terms of International connectivity to China, it varies much by region and ISP.
And OP should clarify your expected bandwidth & traffic cost. As you already know, routing and traffic to China is expensive.

• If you only mean Hong Kong, China, then most Asia is good enough.
• If you mean China Mobile in southern China, then Singapore VPS (preferrably optimized routing) will do.
• If you mean China Mobile or China Unicom in east China, then you may find a handful of VPS in Japan, with some packet loss in the evening.
• If you mean northern China, then a handful of east Russia VPS may do, with some packet loss in the evening.

But if you need low latency & low packet loss to most areas in China, then either you should buy a VPS within China, or buy a VPS with China Telecom CN2-GIA or China Unicom AS9929 routing, or buy IPLC transfer service.
But none is within LET range except some non-recurring promotion or starter's package from Tencent Cloud or Alibaba Cloud.

Btw, always test connectivity to China in the evening (Beijing time). Most overseas VPS have seemingly wonderful performance during daytime, but 10%-50% packet loss in the evening, which approximates broken.

BAKA

@jenkki said:
http://ping.pe/92.223.80.1

But look at the packet loss

I'd rather choose 200ms+0% loss than 50ms+10% packet loss.

jenkki

@BAKA said: I'd rather choose 200ms+0% loss than 50ms+10% packet loss.

That your way. But you cannot find ideal location with low ping and no packet loss for China.

jenkki

@BAKA said: But look at the packet loss

http://ping.pe/114.234.139.6

Local Chinese host also have huge packet loss even inside country.

Durs

@lzy0 said:

@jenkki said:

@lzy0 said: Will there be such VPS?

Try Vietnam location VPS. They have nice potential and low ping to China.

Is there a cheap VPS in Vietnam?

@jenkki said:

@lzy0 said: Is there a cheap VPS in Vietnam?

Try vhost.vn or vietnix.vn

I want rent one VPS at vietnix.vn. Unfortunately vhost.vn dont offer any VPS in Gia Re.

vietnix.vn:
I have not found any Information about Connection speed & Bandwidth.

Can somebody post maybe a bench Script would be great.

xiaoyang

Yes, Tencent Cloud often holds preferential activities. The prices of the servers in these activities are very low

BAKA

@jenkki said:

@BAKA said: But look at the packet loss

http://ping.pe/114.234.139.6

Local Chinese host also have huge packet loss even inside country.

Why do you post an IP that is not responding to ping at all?
Look, the IP in the same /24 doesn't have any packet loss at all within Mainland China:

Note: Taiwan, Hong Kong and Mainland China are not the same thing when speaking of the Internet.

jenkki

@BAKA said: Why do you post an IP that is not responding to ping at all?

At the time when I reply IP was responding. Try near IP instead.

China show same packet loss in four locations when I check.