Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


⭐ Black Friday's little brother is right here | 1GB RAM VM at only 1 €/month ⭐
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

⭐ Black Friday's little brother is right here | 1GB RAM VM at only 1 €/month ⭐

FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

Hello, dear ones!

After selling over 100 Black Friday packages that only allowed annual payments, it was time to stock up and add monthly recurrence.

We do not want to influence your purchase decision, but unfortunately even this time the stock is limited.

Let the fun begin!

[LXC] VPS SSD (Configurable, starting at 1 eur/mo)
1 vCPU 3.50Ghz (fair usage)
1GB DDR4 ECC RAM
10GB Pure SSD Storage (RAID1)
10GBps Connection
5TB Monthly Transfer (then 100MBps unlimited)
Private IPv4 at only 0.50€/month (optional)
IPv6/64 Subnet Included

Buy it 🌐 here

[LXC] VPS Storage (Configurable, starting at 1.5 eur/mo)
1 vCPU 3.50Ghz (fair usage)
1GB DDR4 ECC
100GB SAS Storage (RAID10)
10GBps Connection
5TB Monthly Transfer (then 100MBps unlimited)
Private IPv4 at only 0.50€/month (optional)
IPv6/64 Subnet Included

Buy it 🌐 here

Looking Glass: https://proof.hazi.ro/
Terms & Conditions: https://hazi.ro/termeni-si-conditii

Acceptable usage policy: https://hazi.ro/utilizarea-acceptabila

Accepted payment methods: Stripe (Card International & SEPA), MobilPay (European Card), Paysafecard, Coinbase (Bitcoin, Ethereum, USD Coin, Dogecoin, Litecoin, Dai, Bitcoin Cash), Bank Transfer.

Best regards, Florin.

Thanked by 1Shinozaki_714
«1

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    You have IPv6 now.
    Please add IPv6 to looking glass.

  • Any yabs ?

    Interesting port speed 10GBps (Giga Byte per second)

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @blackeye said:
    Any yabs ?

    Interesting port speed 10GBps (Giga Byte per second)

    [root@lxc ~]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Dec 11 06:28:31 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1199.950 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    bash: line 422: bc: command not found
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 6.93 MB/s     (1.7k) | 60.71 MB/s     (948)
    Write      | 6.95 MB/s     (1.7k) | 61.20 MB/s     (956)
    Total      | 13.89 MB/s    (3.4k) | 121.91 MB/s   (1.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 73.98 MB/s     (144) | 81.82 MB/s      (79)
    Write      | 77.91 MB/s     (152) | 87.27 MB/s      (85)
    Total      | 151.90 MB/s    (296) | 169.09 MB/s    (164)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 594 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 2.02 Gbits/sec  | 806 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | busy
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (1G)            | busy            | busy
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 555 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 346 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 888 Mbits/sec   | 505 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 300 Mbits/sec   | 475 Mbits/sec
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 583 Mbits/sec   | 590 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 523 Mbits/sec   | 37.7 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 497 Mbits/sec   | 561 Mbits/sec
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (1G)            | 127 Mbits/sec   | busy
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 466 Mbits/sec   | 327 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 402 Mbits/sec   | 246 Mbits/sec
    
    
  • tomletomle Member, LIR

    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @tomle said:
    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

    Yes, you are completely right.
    This phrase is achieved by fact it's a copy of our BF offer which is well known on this community.
    Best regards, Florin.

  • @FlorinMarian said:

    @tomle said:
    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

    Yes, you are completely right.
    This phrase is achieved by fact it's a copy of our BF offer which is well known on this community.
    Best regards, Florin.

    So you're expecting only customers that got your BF offer to get this one?
    If not - you should have made it clear that its a NAT offer. Otherwise - get yourself prepared to deal with people that expected to get an ipv4, yet didn't get one. Chargebacks and all that.

  • Very good offer, problem is with the title. Stars used in title is bad, because it creates confusion with bookmarked threads (star on the right). I have the feeling as I have bookmarked this thread and it's important.

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • waiting for the elder brother deal

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @NobodyInteresting said:

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @tomle said:
    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

    Yes, you are completely right.
    This phrase is achieved by fact it's a copy of our BF offer which is well known on this community.
    Best regards, Florin.

    So you're expecting only customers that got your BF offer to get this one?
    If not - you should have made it clear that its a NAT offer. Otherwise - get yourself prepared to deal with people that expected to get an ipv4, yet didn't get one. Chargebacks and all that.

    I hope it is clear enough for any customer to see it.

  • Do KVM and PayPal and you will be back into the horse.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    UDP unavailable lol.
    HTTP/3 and WireGuard will not work.

    "Private IPv4" generally means an RFC1918 address, like this: 192.168.5.1 .
    You should write "Dedicated IPv4".

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • @yoursunny said: UDP unavailable lol.

    This lol is gold.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @yoursunny said:
    UDP unavailable lol.
    HTTP/3 and WireGuard will not work.

    "Private IPv4" generally means an RFC1918 address, like this: 192.168.5.1 .
    You should write "Dedicated IPv4".

    Correct answer is like "UDP unavailable if you are not resident in an EU country".
    And yeah, private wasn't best choice to express my intention.
    Best regards, Florin.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @yoursunny said:
    UDP unavailable lol.
    HTTP/3 and WireGuard will not work.

    Correct answer is like "UDP unavailable if you are not resident in an EU country".

    When I had a container, UDP was unavailable even if the remote peer is in an EU Country.
    I tested from OVH Roubaix.

    Best regards, push-up specialist

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep
    edited December 2021

    Few minutes ago we had another reboot on colocated node to improve server's performance.
    We had lot of CPU steal caused by KSM & some abusers.
    I find non-sense for the customer who has 2 LXC containers with us, getting first VM suspended for CPU steal (100% over 8 hours) then few days later to do same thing on second VPS.
    Welcome to paradise! :smile:

    Best regards, Florin.

  • _MS__MS_ Member
    edited December 2021

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Few minutes ago we had another reboot on colocated node to improve server's performance.
    We had lot of CPU steal caused by KSM & some abusers.
    I find non-sense for the customer who has 2 LXC containers with us, getting first VM suspended for CPU steal (100% over 8 hours) then few days later to do same thing on second VPS.
    Welcome to paradise! :smile:

    Best regards, Florin.

    The (BF NAT LXC) Server is severely restricted after the update, did you just dealt with the customer or changed/decreased resource allocations of other clients, too? See the YABS before this update and after.

    Before:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-10-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Nov 30 08:16:54 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3112.425 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 134.95 MB/s  (33.7k) | 335.73 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Write      | 135.31 MB/s  (33.8k) | 337.50 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Total      | 270.26 MB/s  (67.5k) | 673.24 MB/s  (10.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.15 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.87 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.22 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.99 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 2.37 GB/s     (4.6k) | 3.86 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 762
    Multi Core      | 769
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11330591
    

    After:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 13 11:34:57 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1200.040 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.19 MB/s     (1.2k) | 43.28 MB/s     (676)
    Write      | 5.21 MB/s     (1.3k) | 43.47 MB/s     (679)
    Total      | 10.40 MB/s    (2.5k) | 86.75 MB/s    (1.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 63.73 MB/s     (124) | 60.17 MB/s      (58)
    Write      | 66.92 MB/s     (130) | 64.40 MB/s      (62)
    Total      | 130.66 MB/s    (254) | 124.57 MB/s    (120)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 146
    Multi Core      | 156
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11581306
    

    I/O and IOPS is 1/20th of the original bench, and CPU score is 1/5th.
    What say, time for the refund?

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    MS said:

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Welcome to paradise! :smile:

    The (BF NAT LXC) Server is severely restricted after the update, did you just dealt with the customer or changed/decreased resource allocations of other clients, too? See the YABS before this update and after.

    I/O and IOPS is 1/20th of the original bench, and CPU score is 1/5th.
    What say, time for the refund?

    You should be thankful that you can now use the ⅕ CPU at 100% without triggering suspension.
    This is how the paradise looks like.

    The alternative is that the provider tells you it's strictly fair usage and suspends you into the hell whenever they feel you are using too much.

    Best regards, push-up specialist

    Thanked by 1_MS_
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @yoursunny said:

    MS said:

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Welcome to paradise! :smile:

    The (BF NAT LXC) Server is severely restricted after the update, did you just dealt with the customer or changed/decreased resource allocations of other clients, too? See the YABS before this update and after.

    I/O and IOPS is 1/20th of the original bench, and CPU score is 1/5th.
    What say, time for the refund?

    You should be thankful that you can now use the ⅕ CPU at 100% without triggering suspension.
    This is how the paradise looks like.

    The alternative is that the provider tells you it's strictly fair usage and suspends you into the hell whenever they feel you are using too much.

    Best regards, push-up specialist

    Suspension doesn't mean service cancellation, means that you have to contact us and take care about what we'll expect from you to keep your service running.
    And yeah, we're also aware of CPU steal.
    We'll solve this situation by identifying abusers (if they still exists) or we'll have an hardware upgrade.
    Best regards, Florin.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    MS said:

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Few minutes ago we had another reboot on colocated node to improve server's performance.
    We had lot of CPU steal caused by KSM & some abusers.
    I find non-sense for the customer who has 2 LXC containers with us, getting first VM suspended for CPU steal (100% over 8 hours) then few days later to do same thing on second VPS.
    Welcome to paradise! :smile:

    Best regards, Florin.

    The (BF NAT LXC) Server is severely restricted after the update, did you just dealt with the customer or changed/decreased resource allocations of other clients, too? See the YABS before this update and after.

    Before:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-10-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Nov 30 08:16:54 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3112.425 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 134.95 MB/s  (33.7k) | 335.73 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Write      | 135.31 MB/s  (33.8k) | 337.50 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Total      | 270.26 MB/s  (67.5k) | 673.24 MB/s  (10.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.15 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.87 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.22 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.99 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 2.37 GB/s     (4.6k) | 3.86 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 762
    Multi Core      | 769
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11330591
    

    After:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 13 11:34:57 UTC 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1200.040 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.19 MB/s     (1.2k) | 43.28 MB/s     (676)
    Write      | 5.21 MB/s     (1.3k) | 43.47 MB/s     (679)
    Total      | 10.40 MB/s    (2.5k) | 86.75 MB/s    (1.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 63.73 MB/s     (124) | 60.17 MB/s      (58)
    Write      | 66.92 MB/s     (130) | 64.40 MB/s      (62)
    Total      | 130.66 MB/s    (254) | 124.57 MB/s    (120)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 146
    Multi Core      | 156
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11581306
    

    I/O and IOPS is 1/20th of the original bench, and CPU score is 1/5th.
    What say, time for the refund?

    I've figured out something, after RAM & Storage upgrade ZFS cache has been disabled.
    Now I play with it and seems to be better (load avg 3.5 from 10, CPU usage 12-17%).

    Thank you for your feedback!

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 108.09 MB/s  (27.0k) | 2.08 GB/s    (32.6k)
    Write      | 108.38 MB/s  (27.0k) | 2.10 GB/s    (32.8k)
    Total      | 216.47 MB/s  (54.1k) | 4.19 GB/s    (65.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.88 GB/s     (5.6k) | 91.96 MB/s      (89)
    Write      | 3.03 GB/s     (5.9k) | 98.08 MB/s      (95)
    Total      | 5.91 GB/s    (11.5k) | 190.05 MB/s    (184)
    
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    Yup, we can confirm resolution of performance issues on romanian node.

  • no paypal ? thats to bad ! couldnt order..

  • tomletomle Member, LIR

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @NobodyInteresting said:

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @tomle said:
    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

    Yes, you are completely right.
    This phrase is achieved by fact it's a copy of our BF offer which is well known on this community.
    Best regards, Florin.

    So you're expecting only customers that got your BF offer to get this one?
    If not - you should have made it clear that its a NAT offer. Otherwise - get yourself prepared to deal with people that expected to get an ipv4, yet didn't get one. Chargebacks and all that.

    I hope it is clear enough for any customer to see it.

    No it's not clear. A private IP by definition (RFC1918) is an IP in the 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 or 192.168.0.0/16 range. Is that what you are selling and why would I want to pay for that?
    Just write public IP instead as I suggested above (if that is what you are selling).

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @tomle said:

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @NobodyInteresting said:

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @tomle said:
    Maybe you should rephrase your ad. These come without public IPv4, only NAT and IPv6. As far as I can see, a public IPv4 address can be added for €1/month.

    Yes, you are completely right.
    This phrase is achieved by fact it's a copy of our BF offer which is well known on this community.
    Best regards, Florin.

    So you're expecting only customers that got your BF offer to get this one?
    If not - you should have made it clear that its a NAT offer. Otherwise - get yourself prepared to deal with people that expected to get an ipv4, yet didn't get one. Chargebacks and all that.

    I hope it is clear enough for any customer to see it.

    No it's not clear. A private IP by definition (RFC1918) is an IP in the 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 or 192.168.0.0/16 range. Is that what you are selling and why would I want to pay for that?
    Just write public IP instead as I suggested above (if that is what you are selling).

    Hello!
    Just updated it, now it is "shared/owned" which is clear enough, I hope.
    Best regards, Florin.

  • brueggusbrueggus Member, IPv6 Advocate

    "Dedicated" would be more appropriate, but either should work - except for picky people :)

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • Decent deal.

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep
    root@sv2:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed 15 Dec 2021 08:08:39 AM EET
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 16 @ 3322.739 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       :
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 212.99 MB/s  (53.2k) | 2.88 GB/s    (45.0k)
    Write      | 213.55 MB/s  (53.3k) | 2.90 GB/s    (45.3k)
    Total      | 426.55 MB/s (106.6k) | 5.78 GB/s    (90.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.41 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.73 GB/s     (2.6k)
    Write      | 2.54 GB/s     (4.9k) | 2.91 GB/s     (2.8k)
    Total      | 4.95 GB/s     (9.6k) | 5.64 GB/s     (5.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.26 Gbits/sec  | 374 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 4.03 Gbits/sec  | 429 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 4.35 Gbits/sec  | 334 Mbits/sec
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (1G)            | busy            | busy
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.33 Gbits/sec  | 635 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 678 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 664 Mbits/sec   | 718 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 649 Mbits/sec
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 445 Mbits/sec   | 442 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 465 Mbits/sec   | 359 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 431 Mbits/sec   | 459 Mbits/sec
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (1G)            | busy            | busy
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 456 Mbits/sec   | 347 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 331 Mbits/sec   | 260 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 858
    Multi Core      | 5277
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/11616787
    

    I guess we did some push-ups and now things seems to be over expectations regarding network speed and storage cache.
    In the mean time we're preparing new Storage setups which will include double storage space, separated on different physical drives and ISO images to give to the client right co choose between RAID1, RAID0 or Non-RAID, following his needs (not everybody need a backup of backup and also not everybody uses our services as backup space).
    Best regards, Florin.

    Thanked by 2_MS_ yoursunny
  • @FlorinMarian said: I guess we did some push-ups and now things seems to be over expectations regarding network speed and storage cache.

    No offense, I think you should be careful of posting yabs benchmarks like that. Eventually your node will get filled up and you will get whiners complaining about bad i/o when it's perfectly reasonable. Recently people have gotten very entitled and feel they NEED high i/o benchmarks even if they don't need the i/o at all.

    Also, admittedly, I am not in the hosting business but are you perhaps on some kind of "unmetered" shared 10 Gbps deal? Keep in mind that "unmetered" probably means 100+ TB is the max you can go per month and your datacenter may soon request you to upgrade/pay for bandwidth. Occasionally you get these sweet unmetered deals but it's usually only offered for 1-2u colocation, for good reason. I really hope things work out well for you, but if your clientele is 100% LET it is hard to make it work.

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @smallbibi said:

    @FlorinMarian said: I guess we did some push-ups and now things seems to be over expectations regarding network speed and storage cache.

    No offense, I think you should be careful of posting yabs benchmarks like that. Eventually your node will get filled up and you will get whiners complaining about bad i/o when it's perfectly reasonable. Recently people have gotten very entitled and feel they NEED high i/o benchmarks even if they don't need the i/o at all.

    Also, admittedly, I am not in the hosting business but are you perhaps on some kind of "unmetered" shared 10 Gbps deal? Keep in mind that "unmetered" probably means 100+ TB is the max you can go per month and your datacenter may soon request you to upgrade/pay for bandwidth. Occasionally you get these sweet unmetered deals but it's usually only offered for 1-2u colocation, for good reason. I really hope things work out well for you, but if your clientele is 100% LET it is hard to make it work.

    Thank you for your feedback!
    I'm happy to say that no, LET community is not our single customer range.
    Newer packages on our website starts at 9 eur per month because we know that we're very responsive on client's requests and this costs money. :smile:
    As a refference, this is how pricing table will look like, having smalles pieces like this:smile:

    As a plan B, if this will not produce enough income, we'll pay few hundreds euros more for 32-48 threads per CPU and then we'll be able to sell dedicated resources with simmilar packages as Kimsufi does :smile:

    Best regards, Florin.

  • _MS__MS_ Member
    edited December 2021

    @FlorinMarian said: As a plan B, if this will not produce enough income, we'll pay few hundreds euros more for 32-48 threads per CPU and then we'll be able to sell dedicated resources with simmilar packages as Kimsufi does :smile:

    Don't forget and discontinue the "FUCKPURPLEDADDY" clients, IYKWIM :wink:
    You'll be stripped of your "Legend" tag, then :D

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    MS said:

    @FlorinMarian said: As a plan B, if this will not produce enough income, we'll pay few hundreds euros more for 32-48 threads per CPU and then we'll be able to sell dedicated resources with simmilar packages as Kimsufi does :smile:

    Don't forget and discontinue the FUCKPURPLEDADDY clients, IYKWIM :wink:

    No reason to do it as long people follow rules.
    We terminated only one single VM until now because BitNinja reported Child Porn hosted there and for this we have 0 tolerance.
    For CPU abusers we had just suspensions which were solved after talking with them.
    Best regards, Florin.

    Thanked by 1_MS_
Sign In or Register to comment.