Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Help choose betweet this two VPS RackNerd vs HostCram
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Help choose betweet this two VPS RackNerd vs HostCram

xaosxaos Member
edited September 2021 in Providers

Will be using for couple wordpress/PHP scripts
From my initial research here on LET Im between this two.
Want just bet performance for $
THX

RackNerd
RYZEN NVMe - 3 GB Ryzen KVM VPS
2x AMD Ryzen 3900X CPU Core
55 GB NVMe SSD Storage
3 GB DDR4 RAM
5000GB Monthly Premium Bandwidth (doubled to 10000GB on request)
1Gbps Public Network Port
Full Root Admin Access
1 Dedicated IPv4 Address
KVM / SolusVM Control Panel - Reboot, Reinstall, Manage rDNS, & much more
Available in MULTIPLE LOCATIONS!
JUST $48.79/Year - WOW!!

VS

HostCram
Intel® Core™ i9-11900K Processor
VPS Promo: LXC-3G
2 vCPU Core
3 GB DDR4 RAM
60 GB NVMe SSD Storage
3 TB Bandwidth
1 Dedicated IPv4
50$/year

«1

Comments

  • gianggiang Veteran

    You should consider LXC vs KVM.

    Thanked by 1webcraft
  • JasonMJasonM Member

    @xaos said: NerdRack

    What's that NerdRack??? never heard of them ever!

  • IamMadIamMad Member

    @JasonM said:

    @xaos said: NerdRack

    What's that NerdRack??? never heard of them ever!

    Purple Spammer

  • ArkasArkas Moderator

    I'd go with RackNerd. Their Ryzen VPSs perform really well.

  • dahartigandahartigan Member

    Nerdrack could be a scam

    Racknerd is awesome

  • nvmenvme Member

    The only difference I see is - LXC vs KVM and bandwidth. NerdRack offers premium bandwidth whereas Hostcram offers non-premium.

  • chocolateshirtchocolateshirt Member

    There are a lot of beast for price/performance ratio, you just need to made a due diligent before choosing the plan.

  • ShakibShakib Member, Patron Provider

    @nvme said:
    The only difference I see is - LXC vs KVM and bandwidth. NerdRack offers premium bandwidth whereas Hostcram offers non-premium.

    If you consider Internap, Level3 & HE Bandwidth non-premium, you're right.

    Performance wise we are the fastest. Specially for PHP/WordPress.

    Our PHP benchmarks can be found here > https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/173848/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-good-for-hosting/

    Thanked by 1kkrajk
  • jbuggiejbuggie Member

    KVM

    Thanked by 1xaos
  • xaosxaos Member

    Guys typo it's RackNerd fixed it

    Thanked by 1bruh21
  • cybertechcybertech Member

    kvm anyday.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    My vote is for RackNerd

  • dahartigandahartigan Member

    Hostscram sounds like host scam.

    Thanked by 1kaz050457
  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep

    racknerd in this case for sure
    more bw and kvm
    that's not to say hostcram performs poorly (their performance is probably better than ryzen 3900x), but racknerd has more bandwidth and kvm platform. plus, they have more locations for you to choose from

    Thanked by 1xaos
  • neverainneverain Member

    I don't have experience with hostcram, but racknerd is prem, super fast support and reliable servers

  • JasonMJasonM Member

    @neverain said: racknerd is prem, super fast support and reliable servers

    go with racknerd.

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    Where is that HostCram offer? I see only 2GB and 4GB LXC on their site

  • jenkkijenkki Member

    Go with dusty Dustin.

  • gianggiang Veteran

    @AXYZE said:
    Where is that HostCram offer? I see only 2GB and 4GB LXC on their site

    On another LowEnd forum:
    VPS Promo: LXC-1.5G
    1 vCPU Core
    1.5 GB DDR4 RAM
    30 GB NVMe SSD Storage
    1.5 TB Bandwidth @ 1 Gbps Port
    1 Dedicated IPv4

    Order now : $35 Year (Recurring)

    VPS Promo: LXC-3G
    2 vCPU Core
    3 GB DDR4 RAM
    60 GB NVMe SSD Storage
    3 TB Bandwidth @ 1 Gbps Port
    1 Dedicated IPv4

    Order now : $50 Year (Recurring)

    VPS Promo: LXC-6G
    3 vCPU Core
    6 GB DDR4 RAM
    90 GB NVMe SSD Storage
    6 TB Bandwidth @ 1 Gbps Port
    1 Dedicated IPv4

    Order now : $65 Year (Recurring)

    Thanked by 1Shakib
  • LurkrazyLurkrazy Member

    Just bought LXC-1G yesterday.

    here is yabs.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #


Fri Sep 17 19:07:58 UTC 2021


Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-11900K @ 3.50GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 4942.319 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.0 GiB
Swap       : 1.9 GiB
Disk       : 19.6 GiB


fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.08 GB/s   (271.7k) | 3.45 GB/s    (53.9k)
Write      | 1.08 GB/s   (272.4k) | 3.46 GB/s    (54.2k)
Total      | 2.17 GB/s   (544.1k) | 6.92 GB/s   (108.1k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 3.49 GB/s     (6.8k) | 1.27 GB/s     (1.2k)
Write      | 3.68 GB/s     (7.1k) | 1.36 GB/s     (1.3k)
Total      | 7.18 GB/s    (14.0k) | 2.63 GB/s     (2.5k)


iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 818 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec  
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 799 Mbits/sec   | 112 Mbits/sec  
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 804 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec  
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | busy            | busy           
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 835 Mbits/sec   | 504 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 825 Mbits/sec   | 749 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 831 Mbits/sec   | 534 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 421 Mbits/sec   | 138 Mbits/sec  


Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1752                          
Multi Core      | 1735                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9890550
    Thanked by 1Shakib
  • ArkasArkas Moderator

    Racknerd
    Something must be off, I'm surprised.

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2021-06-05

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Sat 18 Sep 2021 10:15:28 AM BST

    Basic System Information:

    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 3792.872 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 981.2 MiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 22.6 GiB

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 139.52 MB/s (34.8k) 1.67 GB/s (26.1k)
    Write 139.89 MB/s (34.9k) 1.68 GB/s (26.3k)
    Total 279.41 MB/s (69.8k) 3.35 GB/s (52.4k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.66 GB/s (3.2k) 1.64 GB/s (1.6k)
    Write 1.75 GB/s (3.4k) 1.75 GB/s (1.7k)
    Total 3.41 GB/s (6.6k) 3.40 GB/s (3.3k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 165 Mbits/sec | 409 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 782 Mbits/sec | 334 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 132 Mbits/sec | 334 Mbits/sec
    Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | busy | busy
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 851 Mbits/sec | 852 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 853 Mbits/sec | 854 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 815 Mbits/sec | 821 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 268 Mbits/sec | 317 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1225
    Multi Core | 1229
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9903464

    Thanked by 1Shakib
  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2021

    Why not just take 1 of each for 1 month, test both, share the results here :) and then keep the best one and have them convert it to a yearly payment?

    base specs alone tell you nothing, especially for WordPress which is heavily cached, network quality and congestion will play a big role.

    NVMe? what type, WD Blue desktop-grade or Samsung Pro? m.2 or u.2? do they use raid etc?

    Do they both offer DDOS protection so your sites don't go down when a neighbor decides to leave his VPS open to an amplification attack?

    On the surface, the Ryzen based might be the best option as it supports PCIe 4.0 while intel is probably on 3.0 which is a big iops boost.

    Ultimately they are both desktop CPU's though, I know that a LOT of hosts have issues with RYZEN CPU's overheating as the server chassis market is very limited support for them so what the specs say might not be what you really achieve.

    Lots to consider :)

    Edit: I see i9-11900k has PCIe 4.0 support now and likely has better cooling so maybe that is the better option for raw CPU performance.

    Edit 2: looking at the above benchmarks it looks like the intel outperforms the ryzen by almost 30% on single-core, so I guess that speaks for itself (excluding the network considerations)

    Thanked by 4chocolateshirt Shakib mustafamw3 drunkendog
  • xaosxaos Member

    Is that okay?

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9885928

  • chocolateshirtchocolateshirt Member

    @xaos said:
    Is that okay?

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9885928

    That is low compared to standard Ryzen 3900 single core around 1150-1300

  • xaosxaos Member

    @chocolateshirt said:

    @xaos said:
    Is that okay?

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9885928

    That is low compared to standard Ryzen 3900 single core around 1150-1300

    Why that be?

  • xaosxaos Member

    How about

    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 2.9 GiB
    Swap : 3.0 GiB
    Disk : 52.6 GiB

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 220.41 MB/s (55.1k) 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    Write 220.99 MB/s (55.2k) 1.46 GB/s (22.8k)
    Total 441.41 MB/s (110.3k) 2.92 GB/s (45.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.57 GB/s (3.0k) 1.60 GB/s (1.5k)
    Write 1.66 GB/s (3.2k) 1.70 GB/s (1.6k)
    Total 3.23 GB/s (6.3k) 3.31 GB/s (3.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 199 Mbits/sec | 187 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 172 Mbits/sec | 226 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | busy
    Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | busy | busy
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 840 Mbits/sec | 783 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 270 Mbits/sec | 420 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 621 Mbits/sec | 436 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 98.3 Mbits/sec | 117 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 916
    Multi Core | 1702
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9905426

  • xaosxaos Member

    @xaos said:
    How about

    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 2.9 GiB
    Swap : 3.0 GiB
    Disk : 52.6 GiB

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 220.41 MB/s (55.1k) 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    Write 220.99 MB/s (55.2k) 1.46 GB/s (22.8k)
    Total 441.41 MB/s (110.3k) 2.92 GB/s (45.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.57 GB/s (3.0k) 1.60 GB/s (1.5k)
    Write 1.66 GB/s (3.2k) 1.70 GB/s (1.6k)
    Total 3.23 GB/s (6.3k) 3.31 GB/s (3.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 199 Mbits/sec | 187 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 172 Mbits/sec | 226 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | busy
    Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | busy | busy
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 840 Mbits/sec | 783 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 270 Mbits/sec | 420 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 621 Mbits/sec | 436 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 98.3 Mbits/sec | 117 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 916
    Multi Core | 1702
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9905426

    Why I'm getting single core low score and why oops read 220 MB/s

    That's off isn't it?

  • ShakibShakib Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2021

    Something for you to compare. Our KVM performs better than this.

  • chocolateshirtchocolateshirt Member

    @xaos said:
    How about

    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 2 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 2.9 GiB
    Swap : 3.0 GiB
    Disk : 52.6 GiB

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 916
    Multi Core | 1702
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9905426

    your RYZEN 3900X single core result should be higher than EPYC 7302P. Btw this is my EPYC 7302P VPS.

    choco@amp:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -fi
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat 18 Sep 2021 06:21:24 PM WIB

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 256.0 MiB
Disk       : 73.8 GiB

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 940                           
Multi Core      | 1731                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9905617
  • xaosxaos Member

    @Shakib said:
    Something for you to compare. Our KVM performs better than this.

    yup I took RN for a spin test and not impressed that much, urs looks better, u got KVM deals?

    Whats the drawbacks of LXC? Ppl says prefer KVM, for me only diff is u can reinstall from panel on kvm right and LXC u ask support, anything else?

Sign In or Register to comment.