Boomer.host's final offer for the year. ONLY $0.5 first year. Recurring $19.95 per year!

sayem314

wen deadpool

DataIdeas-Josh

@sayem314 said:
wen deadpool

No, but I have done messaged them so they know what to do when they get up.

jenkki

@ezeth said: Uhh. I'm sorry china but I need to rate limit you guys on making a new order for a while. I want some diversification in the clientbase

Chinese become you billionaire.. If every Chinese pay you 50 Cents. After few days you arrive to Hawaii and forget about business.

default

@jenkki said:

@ezeth said: Uhh. I'm sorry china but I need to rate limit you guys on making a new order for a while. I want some diversification in the clientbase

Chinese become you billionaire.. If every Chinese pay you 50 Cents. After few days you arrive to Hawaii and forget about business.

You forgot about GFW blocking the whole IPv4 class, or even ASN, making customers request refund because VPN does not work. Sadly, they are being watched and monitored, so the offer will not work for them if it's too popular.

jenkki

@default said: You forgot about GFW blocking the whole IPv4 class, or even ASN, making customers request refund because VPN does not work. Sadly, they are being watched and monitored, so the offer will not work for them if it's too popular.

If you order product doesn't works for your purposes you take your own risk. That not a provider fault.

Also need to be rude for open $0,50 Credit Card chargeback

ezeth

Okay. The reason for the shitty IO performance is virtualizor panel. Here's an IO when I disabled the front end virtualizor panel. I need to find an alternative that's less shitty. it puts more stress on the machine than all other VMs combined. Why? it's dragging everything down by running: prlctl list all > lists all VMs, and status, ip etc when you only need to edit one VM, or show the dashboard of one VM.

It's really just really. really badly optimized code by virtualizor team

Temporary fix is just to set this to have low priority

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	31.42 MB/s (7.8k)	42.14 MB/s (658)
Write	31.46 MB/s (7.8k)	42.32 MB/s (661)
Total	62.89 MB/s (15.7k)	84.46 MB/s (1.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	47.54 MB/s (92)	201.52 MB/s (196)
Write	50.20 MB/s (98)	214.94 MB/s (209)
Total	97.75 MB/s (190)	416.47 MB/s (405)

AXYZE

@ezeth said:
Okay. The reason for the shitty IO performance is virtualizor panel. Here's an IO when I disabled the front end virtualizor panel. I need to find an alternative that's less shitty. it puts more stress on the machine than all other VMs combined. Why? it's dragging everything down by running: prlctl list all > lists all VMs, and status, ip etc when you only need to edit one VM, or show the dashboard of one VM.

It's really just really. really badly optimized code by virtualizor team

Temporary fix is just to set this to have low priority

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	31.42 MB/s (7.8k)	42.14 MB/s (658)
Write	31.46 MB/s (7.8k)	42.32 MB/s (661)
Total	62.89 MB/s (15.7k)	84.46 MB/s (1.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	47.54 MB/s (92)	201.52 MB/s (196)
Write	50.20 MB/s (98)	214.94 MB/s (209)
Total	97.75 MB/s (190)	416.47 MB/s (405)

Quick Google Search tells me that they were supposed to fix that years ago

"Bug-Fix] On OpenVZ 7 nodes the prlctl high load issue has been fixed."
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/126299/virtualizor-2-9-4-released/p1

Try to ask their support, maybe its not that common or theres some error

ezeth

@AXYZE said:

@ezeth said:
Okay. The reason for the shitty IO performance is virtualizor panel. Here's an IO when I disabled the front end virtualizor panel. I need to find an alternative that's less shitty. it puts more stress on the machine than all other VMs combined. Why? it's dragging everything down by running: prlctl list all > lists all VMs, and status, ip etc when you only need to edit one VM, or show the dashboard of one VM.

It's really just really. really badly optimized code by virtualizor team

Temporary fix is just to set this to have low priority

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	31.42 MB/s (7.8k)	42.14 MB/s (658)
Write	31.46 MB/s (7.8k)	42.32 MB/s (661)
Total	62.89 MB/s (15.7k)	84.46 MB/s (1.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	47.54 MB/s (92)	201.52 MB/s (196)
Write	50.20 MB/s (98)	214.94 MB/s (209)
Total	97.75 MB/s (190)	416.47 MB/s (405)

Quick Google Search tells me that they were supposed to fix that years ago

"Bug-Fix] On OpenVZ 7 nodes the prlctl high load issue has been fixed."
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/126299/virtualizor-2-9-4-released/p1

Try to ask their support, maybe its not that common or theres some error

I tried asking their support weeks ago and they haven't gotten back to me. I'm running latest versions

default

@ezeth said:

It's really just really. really badly optimized code by virtualizor team

AmirGT

@Ganonk said:

@ezeth said:

what name apk do you use?

Hello. This screenshot is mine, I posted it on LET Discord last night. I use Tremius because I have a subscription there, it saves time re-entering all the server's info again on PC then on phone.

ezeth

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

skorupion

@ezeth said:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

someone's slowly unlocking their vps lolz

ezeth

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

someone's slowly unlocking their vps lolz

Lol yeah, I did put this one unlocked but lower io priority than the others. Nodewatch anti abuse also had a feature where it would suspend io abuse so I'm not worried about it anymore

skorupion

@ezeth said:

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

someone's slowly unlocking their vps lolz

Lol yeah, I did put this one unlocked but lowwer io priority than the others

still maxed out the io, so ur server doesn't use that much io at all

ezeth

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

someone's slowly unlocking their vps lolz

Lol yeah, I did put this one unlocked but lowwer io priority than the others

still maxed out the io, so ur server doesn't use that much io at all

No. Not at all. There's plenty of resources left. IO usage, is fine, and this is the current CPU usage

Node CPU
17.92%

skorupion

@ezeth said:

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

@skorupion said:

@ezeth said:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	40.96 MB/s (10.2k)	73.65 MB/s (1.1k)
Write	41.04 MB/s (10.2k)	74.03 MB/s (1.1k)
Total	82.01 MB/s (20.5k)	147.69 MB/s (2.3k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	170.53 MB/s (333)	202.75 MB/s (198)
Write	179.59 MB/s (350)	216.25 MB/s (211)
Total	350.13 MB/s (683)	419.01 MB/s (409)

I guess for now you're just going to have to live with a little slower virtualizor front end panel but a faster VM until their support can fix it. Thankfully you don't need to manage your vps that often

someone's slowly unlocking their vps lolz

Lol yeah, I did put this one unlocked but lowwer io priority than the others

still maxed out the io, so ur server doesn't use that much io at all

No. Not at all. There's plenty of resources left. IO usage, is fine, and this is the current CPU usage

Node CPU
17.92%

care to ssh onto the main server and show top, but the interface with graphs on every core?

default

@ezeth

How many orders activated?

How many got suspended for abusing the CPU with mining?

ezeth

@default said:
@ezeth

How many orders activated?

How many got suspended for abusing the CPU with mining?

24 orders didn't pass my manual validation because their card name, location etc is different from what they entered in client area. ALL of them chineese. Sorry because of this I will need to automatically reject new orders from china. There's likely a bot if you saw above image making mass orders 70% of the orders from china were fraudulent. I will still however accept you if you're a member with post history here on LET manually

100+ orders activated. 100-150.

2 suspended due to DOS. 1-2 suspected miners (they renamed xmrig to something else but it doesn't matter since nodewatch will catch it anyway )

And I also fixed the lagging server. Sorry about that guys it won't happen again!

And.. RESTOCKED!

default

@ezeth said:

@default said:
@ezeth

How many orders activated?

How many got suspended for abusing the CPU with mining?

24 orders didn't pass my manual validation because their card name, location etc is different from what they entered in client area. ALL of them chineese. Sorry because of this I will need to automatically reject new orders from china. There's likely a bot if you saw above image making mass orders 70% of the orders from china were fraudulent. I will still however accept you if you're a member with post history here on LET manually

100+ orders activated. 100-150.

2 suspended due to DOS. 1-2 suspected miners (they renamed xmrig to something else but it doesn't matter since nodewatch will catch it anyway )

And I also fixed the lagging server. Sorry about that guys it won't happen again!

And.. RESTOCKED!

MagicApple

@h2o said:

@ezeth said:
Not yet. I just need to process the damn orders so you don't end up waiting too long. I didn't think it would sell this fast!

@farsighter said:
Looks like stock is over.. is everything gone?

@Edmond said:

Edit: darn it.. just realized the disk space wouldn't even be enough for me...

Give it to me then haha

For those who still wants to order a VM, PM me and I'll send you a notification & link when it's back

Also I'm sorry if your VPS is a bit slow (cpu spikes) because it's launching all new VMs

So hard... Stripe declines all my cards

I thought this was just me. Why did it decline all my cards too?

ezeth

@Sebster27 said:

@h2o said:

@ezeth said:
Not yet. I just need to process the damn orders so you don't end up waiting too long. I didn't think it would sell this fast!

@farsighter said:
Looks like stock is over.. is everything gone?

@Edmond said:

Edit: darn it.. just realized the disk space wouldn't even be enough for me...

Give it to me then haha

For those who still wants to order a VM, PM me and I'll send you a notification & link when it's back

Also I'm sorry if your VPS is a bit slow (cpu spikes) because it's launching all new VMs

So hard... Stripe declines all my cards

I thought this was just me. Why did it decline all my cards too?

It's either that you used prepaid cards, used anonymous network, location is china (needs to be manually approved for now because of 70% fraud rate/bot orders) or simply your bank rejected the payment

add_iT

I have ordered one

Hope it can be activated

AXYZE

Yabs.sh results now. I/O is much better than yesterday.

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Aug 13 18:39:13 CEST 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.926 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1000.0 MiB
Swap       : 1000.0 MiB
Disk       : 14.6 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 11.05 MB/s    (2.7k) | 14.51 MB/s     (226)
Write      | 11.07 MB/s    (2.7k) | 15.13 MB/s     (236)
Total      | 22.12 MB/s    (5.5k) | 29.65 MB/s     (462)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 22.42 MB/s      (43) | 27.18 MB/s      (26)
Write      | 24.13 MB/s      (47) | 29.62 MB/s      (28)
Total      | 46.56 MB/s      (90) | 56.81 MB/s      (54)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 191 Mbits/sec   | 207 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 180 Mbits/sec   | 209 Mbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | busy            | busy
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 127 Mbits/sec   | 75.1 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 215 Mbits/sec   | 215 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 214 Mbits/sec   | 217 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 210 Mbits/sec   | 211 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 158 Mbits/sec   | 185 Mbits/sec

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 134 Mbits/sec   | 8.86 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 148 Mbits/sec   | 24.2 Mbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | busy            | busy
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 141 Mbits/sec   | 19.8 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 166 Mbits/sec   | 21.3 Mbits/sec

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 412
Multi Core      | 461
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9305137

tannietan

I get the error "your overall risk is too high" i used my phone's ip, home ip but that didn't work too.

Proxecure

@tannietan said:
I get the error "your overall risk is too high" i used my phone's ip, home ip but that didn't work too.

Risk. Yes there is a risk that you may not renew next year .😄

tototo

They wanna watch YouTube via this network...?
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/0bebc177-cd19-4c63-bbc0-577e78b3bf0a.png (Boomer.host)
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/0d55d968-2064-485a-bec2-2367b081b8cb.png (Racknerd)

jenkki

@tannietan said: I get the error "your overall risk is too high" i used my phone's ip, home ip but that didn't work too.

If you born in China there already risk for US National banking system

ezeth

@tototo said:
They wanna watch YouTube via this network...?
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/0bebc177-cd19-4c63-bbc0-577e78b3bf0a.png (Boomer.host)
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/0d55d968-2064-485a-bec2-2367b081b8cb.png (Racknerd)

Kek wtf. How did you get upload of 0.32 Mbps

tannietan

@jenkki said:

@tannietan said: I get the error "your overall risk is too high" i used my phone's ip, home ip but that didn't work too.

If you born in China there already risk for US National banking system

but i'm not from china. I'm from india...

ezeth

@tannietan said:

@jenkki said:

@tannietan said: I get the error "your overall risk is too high" i used my phone's ip, home ip but that didn't work too.

If you born in China there already risk for US National banking system

but i'm not from china. I'm from india...

Approved